Jump to content

Senate Rejects Bill to Ban Transgender Athletes from Female Sports Teams


Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, Sir Dude said:

Complete morons... looks like the hub of stupidness on this. Why aren't you protecting women and their space? I guess because you don't care

Trans is a "the king has no clothes" moment for liberals. It's obviously farcical nonsense so how much you can believe the lie proves how loyal you are the to the king. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I have said this before!

Why keep bringing up the past.  Please discuss how you are going to fix todays and the problems of the future.

History is not there to be raked over in order to blame others, but for lessons to be learnt from it!

If you are going to wrongly requote someone's post it might help if you did not lie by including  "I have said this before!" when you have NOT made that post before, especially wrt the rest of THEIR (my) post.

 

Now that you have agreed with me in your last post regarding not reposting about past failures maybe you could concentrate, as I said in my post and you re-quoted, please discuss in future how you are going to fix todays and the problems of the future.

Posted
1 minute ago, rough diamond said:

If you are going to wrongly requote someone's post it might help if you did not lie by including  "I have said this before!" when you have NOT made that post before, especially wrt the rest of THEIR (my) post.

 

Now that you have agreed with me in your last post regarding not reposting about past failures maybe you could concentrate, as I said in my post and you re-quoted, please discuss in future how you are going to fix todays and the problems of the future.

Why are you bringing up the past yet again? The topic is not Stormy Danials or how big you think Trump's balls are. Please let it go and move one.

 

The topic is: "Senate Rejects Bill to Ban Transgender Athletes from Female Sports Teams"

 

Why not take a position on the topic, and we can have a discussion. 

 

Posted
36 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Why not take a position on the topic, and we can have a discussion. 

There is absolutely no point in attempting ANY so called discussion on ANY subject with such a narrow minded and blinkered person as you.

Goodbye.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, rough diamond said:

There is absolutely no point in attempting ANY so called discussion on ANY subject with such a narrow minded and blinkered person as you.

Goodbye.

Go with God brother.

  • Agree 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, johng said:

 

Sounds like a threat to me ?hope the NSA,CIA and FBI  take note 😋

 

no , not a threat.     but i am allowed to dream...

 

sorry.  we are getting off topic here

 

Posted
14 hours ago, proton said:

There are no transgender men, they are men full stop, with a fantasy.

Actually - they are men, with penises, who dress as women and expect to be able to win medals and trophies which they can't win when competing against other men. They can win them by "competing against the weaker sex!"  That's what a lot of this is about.

It's sick.  And those who advocate for it are equally sick.  And it's a danger to biological woman. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, G Rex said:

3rd time lucky?   One can only hope

 

 

28 minutes ago, johng said:

 

Sounds like a threat to me ?hope the NSA,CIA and FBI  take note 😋

 

"One can only hope."  So you advocate for the assassination of the US President?  Interesting?  🤔

Posted
11 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Darts! Swimming! Snooker! Chess! Conkers! Poker!

 

Some sports allow men to compete with woman. No place for men in women's strength and endurance sports.

Women are generally not able to compete at the highest levels of swimming, snooker, chess or poker. 

 

Conkers? 

  • Like 1
Posted
46 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Women are generally not able to compete at the highest levels of swimming, snooker, chess or poker. 

 

Conkers? 

Woman are particularly good at poker. So hard to read them. Never know if they are bluffing or telling true.

 

When I was in Germany, the local conker champion was a woman.

Posted
Just now, Stiddle Mump said:

Woman are particularly good at poker. So hard to read them. Never know if they are bluffing or telling true.

 

When I was in Germany, the local conker champion was a woman.

As far as I know, there has never been a female world poker champion. 

 

That's not to say that if the percentage of women that played poker was similar to the percentage of men playing, they would not. 

 

Never heard of Conker.

 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

As far as I know, there has never been a female world poker champion. 

 

That's not to say that if the percentage of women that played poker was similar to the percentage of men playing, they would not. 

 

Never heard of Conker.

At the highest level, men and women can compete in swimming's mixed relays. Two men, two women each team.

 

Yes Conkers! We used to play in the UK when I was younger. Big in Germany. Have to watch out for cheating though. Rules differ. We had the call 'strings'. Don't know if they have that everywhere.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

At the highest level, men and women can compete in swimming's mixed relays. Two men, two women each team.

Yes, but that is not women competing against men. 

 

That's more like mixed doubles tennis. 

 

2 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

 

Yes Conkers! We used to play in the UK when I was younger. Big in Germany. Have to watch out for cheating though. Rules differ. We had the call 'strings'. Don't know if they have that everywhere.

Indeed 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
On 3/5/2025 at 9:18 PM, connda said:

Actually - they are men, with penises, who dress as women and expect to be able to win medals and trophies which they can't win when competing against other men. They can win them by "competing against the weaker sex!"  That's what a lot of this is about.

It's sick.  And those who advocate for it are equally sick.  And it's a danger to biological woman. 

There is an easy way to stop many (not all) of them claiming to be women. Stop them taking female hormones. See how they measure up then.

  • Agree 1
Posted

The left wing Democrats are delusional in thinking that drugs, surgery and a little makeup can change the biological sex of an individual. Its as though they do not want to accept the scientific, biological creation and development of man. And their perverted, debauched ideology concerning a biological man is causing much damage and degradation to women and their sports. 

Posted
On 3/5/2025 at 5:41 PM, JulesMad said:

Does it really matter? Each of the transgenders have more balls than the orange criminal tRump 😎🙏

A classic example of a non sequitur.

Posted
On 3/5/2025 at 1:02 PM, Social Media said:

But bills like these send the message that transgender kids don’t deserve the same opportunities to thrive as their peers simply because of who they are.”

They can get the same opportunities if they stop pretending to be a different gender and compete in their appropriate gender teams.

If they are missing out, it's their own ( or their parents ) fault.

  • Like 1
Posted

I would have thought the President would be more favorably disposed to trans people, as he is married to a trans, isn't he?  (Without DNA evidence of a Y chromosome, I can't be sure, but certainly she looks the part to me.)

 

I'm willing to bet she wouldn't even have to prove her katoey-ness, if she applied for a dancer job at one of Nana's ladyboy agogos. "She" is certainly not a woman in my book, and no amount of Viagra on Earth could get straight men to rise for the occasion. MAGAs, maybe, could, but since most of them are Incels anyway, that would not be proof of femininity or cross gender appeal. No, leave that beast for MAGAs and their messiah.

Posted

I think this is an example of even a broken clock telling the correct time twice a day.

 

In my opinion, the greater harm accrues to the biological women who have to compete against biological men in sports where men hold a proven biological advantage. 

 

There are other endeavors where the trans community deserves protection from discrimination. This isn't one of them. Dems should let this one go and focus on something more worthy.

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...