Jump to content

Convicted Paris Synagogue Bomber Lives Freely in Canada Amid Growing Outrage


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

Hassan Diab, the man convicted in absentia for the 1980 bombing of a Paris synagogue, remains free in Canada, sparking outrage among Jewish advocacy groups and political leaders. Despite an international arrest warrant and a life sentence handed down by a French court, Diab continues to live in the suburbs of Ottawa, where he has been seen walking and biking in recent weeks.

 

The government of former prime minister Justin Trudeau refused to extradite the convicted 1980 Paris synagogue bomber Hassan Diab to France, which has sparked outrage among Jewish advocacy groups

 

Jewish organizations are condemning the Canadian government’s refusal to extradite Diab. “That Hassan Diab remains free in Canada is unacceptable,” said Richard Marceau, Vice President, External Affairs and General Counsel at the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA), in a statement to DailyMail.com. Critics argue that his continued presence in the country is a failure of justice, made worse by the fact that he was convicted of carrying out a deadly anti-Semitic attack.

 

B'nai B'rith Canada, an international Jewish service organization, blasted Carleton University in a statement it shared on social media

 

On the evening of October 3, 1980, a powerful explosive device, hidden on a motorcycle, detonated outside the Rue Copernic synagogue in Paris, killing four people. French authorities identified Diab as a suspect years later, but he has always maintained his innocence, claiming he was taking university exams in Beirut at the time of the bombing.

 

 

Diab was arrested in Canada in 2008 but was granted bail while awaiting an extradition decision. In 2014, he was sent to France, where he spent three years in pretrial detention. In 2018, French prosecutors dropped the charges due to a lack of evidence, allowing him to return to Canada. However, the case took a dramatic turn when the Paris Court of Appeal reversed that decision in January 2021, ordering Diab to stand trial. He refused to return to France, and on April 21, 2023, he was convicted in absentia of terrorism charges and sentenced to life in prison.

 

Canada has so far refused to send him back to France, a decision made by the government of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. With a Canadian federal election expected this spring, political pressure is mounting for Diab’s extradition. Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre has criticized the government’s inaction, writing on social media last November: “Why hasn’t he been extradited to France to face justice?”

 

Diab himself has acknowledged the uncertainty of his situation, telling a Canadaland podcast, “I just have to be careful. It’s like you are living in constant fear. It’s not easy, it’s like waiting for a ghost to appear from somewhere.”

 

Last year, Diab taught a course titled Social Justice in Action at Ottawa's Carleton University, using his extradition case in the class. B'nai B'rith Canada was one of the many Jewish groups that blasted Carleton University, in a statement posted on social media. 'We cannot stand by while a convicted terrorist, affiliated with a listed terrorist group, teaches on our campuses!

 

Jewish organizations and victims’ advocates insist that allowing a convicted terrorist to remain in Canada undermines the justice system. Marceau emphasized that Diab’s trial in France was fair, stating, “He was afforded every protection under French and European law and was found guilty by an independent court of law.” He further argued that failing to extradite him is “an abuse of process” and added,  'Justice must be upheld. At a time of rising anti-Semitism, allowing a convicted perpetrator of a deadly anti-Semitic attack to remain in Canada is indefensible. 

 

Based on a report by Daily Mail  2025-03-24

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

image.png

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 hour ago, CanadaSam said:

First of all, we DID extradite him once to face trial, where he was proven innocent by the courts, then he returned to Canada.

 

 

 

   That isn't true . 

He wasn't proven innocent in Court 

  • Agree 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Purdey said:

This decision means he didn't do it and he was freed.

 

   Until you read the very next sentence 

 

"However, the case took a dramatic turn when the Paris Court of Appeal reversed that decision in January 2021, ordering Diab to stand trial." 

 

  • Agree 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Where does Israel fit into the topic ?

They are the ones complaining about it. A bit rich if you ask me considering the current situation.

 

9 hours ago, Social Media said:

Jewish organizations are condemning the Canadian government’

 

  • Thanks 2
Posted
10 hours ago, Social Media said:

Diab was arrested in Canada in 2008 but was granted bail while awaiting an extradition decision. In 2014, he was sent to France, where he spent three years in pretrial detention. In 2018, French prosecutors dropped the charges due to a lack of evidence, allowing him to return to Canada. However, the case took a dramatic turn when the Paris Court of Appeal reversed that decision in January 2021, ordering Diab to stand trial. He refused to return to France, and on April 21, 2023, he was convicted in absentia of terrorism charges and sentenced to life in prison.

Looks like a legit reason to extradite him, even if it is for a 2nd time for the same offence.  What must the victim's families be thinking; the person proven to have committed the crime walking free?   

Posted

From what I read, his passport was found with entry/exit stamps in Spain around the time of the attack (the terrorists allegedly came from Spain). Diab claims he had lost it and that someone else used it. He also claims he was passing exams in Lebanon at that time.

Posted
5 hours ago, Purdey said:

This decision means he didn't do it and he was freed.

The decision didn't mean he didn't do it it just meant there was a lack of evidence that could be found, obviously a clever criminal.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
16 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

Liberals aiding terror

Translation to facts he was extricated stood trial and was acquitted period all stop.just because you don’t like the outcome doesn’t mean anyone is aiding terror quire the opposite in fact the law was upheld he was tryed and acquitted no more no less.stop blubbering 

Posted
51 minutes ago, Tug said:

Translation to facts he was extricated stood trial and was acquitted period all stop.just because you don’t like the outcome doesn’t mean anyone is aiding terror quire the opposite in fact the law was upheld he was tryed and acquitted no more no less.stop blubbering 

 

  He wasnt though , He didn't stand trial 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...