Jump to content

Thailand at Risk of More Unpredictable Earthquakes, Experts Warn


Recommended Posts

Posted

460198.JPG

File photo for reference only

 

At a recent seminar, academics highlighted Thailand's ongoing vulnerability to earthquakes, emphasising the unpredictability of when and where they might occur. This discussion took place during the 32nd "Chula the Impact" seminar at Chulalongkorn University.

 

Santi Pailoplee, a noted geology professor, explained that while scientists can identify areas at risk, predicting exact times and places remains impossible, dismissing any premature warnings as fake news. Aftershocks typically decrease in strength, but their occurrence is directly linked to the magnitude of the initial quake, he noted. An example cited was Indonesia's devastating earthquake, which resulted in approximately 500 aftershocks.

 

Notably, aftershocks from last Friday's quake no longer threaten Thailand, Santi reassured. However, Panya Jarusiri, another geology expert, pointed to the active Sagaing Fault and Thailand's 16 active fault lines as ongoing concerns. Risks from undetected faults like those in Phitsanulok and Kanchanaburi warrant caution, he added.

 

 

 

On building safety, civil engineering lecturer Chatpan Chintanapakdee recognised improvements in construction standards post-2007 but called for stringent inspections to ensure new buildings are designed to be earthquake-resistant. Furthermore, Angkanawadee Pinkaeo, a law academic, stressed reviewing insurance policies to ensure comprehensive coverage and address liability issues, particularly in light of the new State Audit Office building collapse.

 

With these discussions, experts aim to better prepare Thailand for future seismic events, combining research insights with construction safety measures, reported Bangkok Post.

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

-- 2025-04-02

 

image.png

 

image.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
21 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

At a recent seminar, academics highlighted Thailand's ongoing vulnerability to earthquakes, emphasising the unpredictability of when and where they might occur.

That is about the stupidest statement I have ever heard.  "Expert?"  The essence of earthquakes IS their unpredictability. 

:angry: "Earthquakes are unpredictable.  I'm an expert.  I know!"
🙅‍♂️ "I'm a 4 year old and mummy has told me the earthquakes are unpredictable."

I'm Captain Obvious and I'm here to tell you that Earthquakes Are Unpredictable! See - I'm an "expert" too! 

"Experts."  <gag> 

  • Haha 2
Posted
21 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

On building safety, civil engineering lecturer Chatpan Chintanapakdee recognised improvements in construction standards post-2007

Construction standards are only as good as the corruption which bypasses the standards.

Posted

Knowing everything, what can anyone do to solve the problem? Fill in the fault lines with concrete? Even upgrading the construction of high rises is pointless if engineers take bribes to "help" rich owners escape stringent tests.

Posted

I only read the headline, then thought, why read the rest, I'm not an expert, but I do know, no-one can predict earthquakes

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Purdey said:

Knowing everything, what can anyone do to solve the problem? Fill in the fault lines with concrete? Even upgrading the construction of high rises is pointless if engineers take bribes to "help" rich owners escape stringent tests.

Do you know what a fault line is...555

  • Haha 1
Posted

Earthquakes relieve stress along fault lines. 

 

After stress is relieved, it takes decades to build up again.

 

Anyone saying there is going to be another earthquake soon, is not an expert, he is an idiot.

  • Agree 1
Posted

There could be a strong earthquake that levels most of BKK tomorrow with it being built on jelly. Or it could be in 300 years. No one knows.

Posted
2 hours ago, klauskunkel said:
Quote

Thailand at Risk of More Unpredictable Earthquakes, Experts Warn

The expertise in this warning is paramount.


The headline is completely misleading & alarmists.

 

The article itself, accurate & factual and paints a very different picture than the headline implies. 
 

Facts: Minor aftershocks & tremors will occur & typically decrease in strength.

 

Other faults exist but are not major on plate boundaries & present low intensity ‘seismic risk’.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, CanadaSam said:

Earthquakes relieve stress along fault lines. 

 

After stress is relieved, it takes decades to build up again.

 

Anyone saying there is going to be another earthquake soon, is not an expert, he is an idiot.


Correct, however the article also says that.  It’s just the headline that’s somewhat alarmist. 

Posted
58 minutes ago, Rolo89 said:

There could be a strong earthquake that levels most of BKK tomorrow with it being built on jelly. Or it could be in 300 years. No one knows.


No there cannot.

 

This is about as strong as the Local magnitude (ML) in Bangkok could get as it sits too far away from any major plate boundary. 
 

Soft sediment / basin amplification was a major factor in the Magnitude experienced in Bkk, nevertheless this was as high as it gets (reasons explained in other threads I can link to later) 
 

The Sagaing fault hit hits highest ever magnitude - previous to that was in 1912 when 7.9 Mw was recorded. 
 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...