Jump to content

US Greenlights $50 Million in Military Aid to Ukraine Following Landmark Minerals Agreement


Recommended Posts

Posted
21 hours ago, jippytum said:

This is the best deal under the cicumstances. Ukraine should reiburse the countries who have spent billions To curtail the Russian advance. 

American presence will deter future Russian invasion.. 

Well done Trump. 

As per 'Well done Trump" NY Times 30 APR 2025 said:

 

The concept of giving the United States a stake in Ukraine’s minerals was first proposed to Mr. Trump by Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, during a meeting at Trump Tower last September.

  • Agree 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Pouatchee said:
On 5/3/2025 at 9:21 AM, WDSmart said:

We should be providing the aid without any conditions.

 

Really? and why is that? If Ukraine has something to barter they should barter. BTW, how many hard working american and european tax dollars have been skimmed off the top by ukrainian officials?

We should provide the aid without any conditions because that is the right thing to do. It shows our empathy (wokeness). If Ukraine has been misusing the aid we give, that is another story, but even in that case, we should not stop the aid—unless we think it is okay that Russia uses its military force to take over a sovereign country.

  • Thumbs Up 3
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Trump got outsmarted by Zelensky. He got immediate military aid while the rare earth is a questionable possibility that may or may not be fulfilled in an unknown future. 

Sure. Outsmarted by Zelensky. Outsmarted by Putin. What you fail to admit is Trump can pull the plug on Zelensky. This is also just the 1st installment of money for defence related equipment through DCS. Zelensky buy these systems commercially through the US with rare earth mineral guarantees as part of the deal. Can you explain how Zelensky has "outsmarted" Trump with this.

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

Trump got outsmarted by Zelensky. He got immediate military aid while the rare earth is a questionable possibility that may or may not be fulfilled in an unknown future. 

The payoff is a very long way off in the future.  Only time will tell if it even gets to that, anyways.

  • Like 1
Posted

50 million? An infamous Deutsche Bank CEO once called this sum "peanuts".

Less than one F18 jet falling from a carrier.

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, KhunBENQ said:

50 million? An infamous Deutsche Bank CEO once called this sum "peanuts".

Less than one F18 jet falling from a carrier.

Agreed.

It's very small relative to what's needed, but at this point given how much of a Putin licker Trump has been, it can be seen as a symbolic baby step in the right direction.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
5 hours ago, sharot724 said:

The payoff is a very long way off in the future.  Only time will tell if it even gets to that, anyways.

Zelensky got the security guarantee. No payoff if Russia occupy Ukraine. Trump has got the agreement to gloat and nothing else nor bother. 

Posted
On 5/3/2025 at 11:32 AM, dinsdale said:

Jets are not needed (AWACS being an exception). Artillery pieces, shells and air defence systems are way more useful. This deal also means there will be a US presence in Ukraine.

In a way the US presence is needed simply because Russia has added a N. Korean and Chinese presence (albeit undercover)

Posted
1 minute ago, thesetat said:

In a way the US presence is needed simply because Russia has added a N. Korean and Chinese presence (albeit undercover)

Chinese? North Koreans yes but mainly they'd be with their artillery systems. 

Posted
On 5/3/2025 at 11:24 AM, Thingamabob said:

Utter drivel. The USA has, over many years, including during this Presidency and Trump's previous term of office, supported Ukraine with non-stop aid notwithstanding a high amount of corruption within the Ukrainian govt system. Ukraine is now massively in debt to the USA, and many other countries. In this context the new minerals agreement with the USA  makes sense as it adds weight to the USA's ongoing  commitment to the well-being of Ukraine. You really need to know what you're talking about before going into print.

Maybe the Russian money that is frozen in overseas banks ,they use

that to compensate Ukraine for all the damage the Russians have done

as the aggressor to Ukraine

 

regards worgeordie

Posted
10 hours ago, WDSmart said:

We should provide the aid without any conditions because that is the right thing to do.

 

OK... I need a million dollars for my wife's buffalo that just died. Money grows on trees and no one is accountable right?  You woke much?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...