-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
49
Trump wants his own parade - literally
And Trump has been living rent free in your head for how long now. -
49
-
15
Politics Supreme Court to Probe Enforcement of Thaksin’s Prison Sentence
Best summary ever...."....above the law everyone knows that." -
32
New Chinese form of psychological torture rolled out in Thailand
I meant Villa won't deliver to me here. Too far for them. -
4,091
-
230
White House Defends Abrego Garcia Deportation, Calling Return "Out of the Question"
I respectively disagree. Aside from the one sentence that stevenl pointed out (which I had to explain a bit), the statements are ambiguous. (This is where one of the NYT does a disservice by not reproducing part the original exchange and paraphrasing instead.) Yes. This is also a reasonable interpretation. In fact, I like this version because it means that the courts can indeed order the administration to bring Garcia back home. What's important here is, though, is it the only one? That's kind of the point though. Some of the articles are pointing out that since the president said this, the administration won't be able to argue in court that they can't actually get Garcia back. The question I suppose is less if my interpretation is reasonable, but would the Supreme Court buy it (or something like it)? If SCOTUS buys it then they'll say, "he didn't admit that he could bring Garcia back, and the diplomatic note is enough to show that they tried to facilitate it, and we accept that the government has done all that it can to correct the mistake."
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
-
.thumb.jpeg.d2d19a66404642fd9ff62d6262fd153e.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now