2 hours ago, RuamRudy said:

 

He's not the messiah; he's a very naughty boy (mortgage fraud, beating up women and police etc...) 

Not to mention two previous cases of contempt of court in 2017 and 2019. One suspended sentence and one jail term. 

Tommy Robinson charged with harassment

Far-right activist Tommy Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, has been charged with harassment causing fear of violence against two men in August last year, the Crown Prosecution Service has said.

"We have authorised the Metropolitan Police to charge Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, 42, with harassment causing fear of violence against two men," a CPS spokesperson said.

 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdr557ngn4ro

Apparently this latest court action was prompted after he was doxed by 2 Daily Mail reporters putting his safety at risk, so he turned the tables, returning the gesture.
More here:

 

"Yaxley-Lennon was jailed last October because he ignored an order not to repeat false allegations about a Syrian refugee who successfully sued him for libel. "

 

I watched the film he made.  It's actually a documentary and the videos and documents produced in that film confirm that he did not make false accusations against the Syrian 'bullying yob'.  His accusations are true but don't really fit the pro-Islam narrative of many politicians in the UK nowadays.....

Just now, simon43 said:

"Yaxley-Lennon was jailed last October because he ignored an order not to repeat false allegations about a Syrian refugee who successfully sued him for libel. "

 

I watched the film he made.  It's actually a documentary and the videos and documents produced in that film confirm that he did not make false accusations against the Syrian 'bullying yob'.  His accusations are true but don't really fit the pro-Islam narrative of many politicians in the UK nowadays.....

Contempt of Court is illegal.  The content is immaterial.

 

Looks like he might be returning to jail soon 🤔

On 5/20/2025 at 9:03 PM, Baht Simpson said:

Contempt of Court is a crime in most countries including the U.S. 

 

When the court order is wrong, it's a civic duty.

 

20 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Contempt of Court is illegal.  The content is immaterial.

 

Looks like he might be returning to jail soon 🤔

Since the content was not illegal, it follows that the decision by the Court of libel was incorrect....

15 minutes ago, simon43 said:

Since the content was not illegal, it follows that the decision by the Court of libel was incorrect....

You don't get to judge what's legal or illegal. That's why we have the judiciary. Apparently he repeated claims that were proven in court to be libelous. If you have evidence to the contrary rather than just an opinion I'm sure they'd be happy review it. He himself pleaded guilty to the charge and I believe him. 

 

 

 

24 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

When the court order is wrong, it's a civic duty.

 

Civic duty is defined in part as obeying the law and that which is legally mandated.  If you disagree with the law you campaign to get it changed, you can't just disobey it without consequence. 

The CPS is stuffed full of Muslims,wAs 85% few years ago

51 minutes ago, Baht Simpson said:

Civic duty is defined in part as obeying the law and that which is legally mandated.  If you disagree with the law you campaign to get it changed, you can't just disobey it without consequence. 

 

Rosa Parks would have disagreed. 

Just now, impulse said:

 

Rosa Parks would have disagreed. 

That was civil disobedience not civic duty. You're confusing the two.

1 minute ago, Baht Simpson said:

That was civil disobedience not civic duty. You're confusing the two.

No I'm not.  Same thing.

 

He's no problem, its the Nazi loving, baby boomer hater fascist James Goddard you should be worried about...peddling his hate on just about everyone from his little Na Jomtien condo.

 

11 minutes ago, impulse said:

No I'm not.  Same thing.

 

Your civil duty is to obey the law, pay taxes, refrain from violence and generally do all that is required in a polite, civil society to live together.  Civil disobedience usually, but not always, involves breaking the law. They're broadly opposites.  

 

Civil disobedience sometimes has its place but it must be done in the correct way. That's where Robinson had failed.

 

 

38 minutes ago, jori123 said:

The CPS is stuffed full of Muslims,wAs 85% few years ago

 

I rate the chances of there being a link to support that claim at virtually zero.

 

If only I could find a bookie where I could lay that bet.

1 hour ago, jori123 said:

The CPS is stuffed full of Muslims,wAs 85% few years ago

85% of the CPS were Muslims. And now it is still "stuffed full" of them.

Where is your link or evidence to support this nonsense claim? Please share or else admit you just made it up.

Baroness,HoL  Hindu woman flather made statements years ago about the then  head prosecutor,Muslim ,for NW England failed to prosecute 2 Muslim men over killing of white girl in blackpool,she went on about % of Muslims on benefits.was up for less than a week,87%

5 minutes ago, jori123 said:

Baroness,HoL  Hindu woman flather made statements years ago about the then  head prosecutor,Muslim ,for NW England failed to prosecute 2 Muslim men over killing of white girl in blackpool,she went on about % of Muslims on benefits.was up for less than a week,87%

Can anyone translate?

And you ignored my earlier request for a link or proof that 85% of the CPS were Muslims and now it is still "stuffed with them". Still waiting. It is, obviously, nonsense.

3 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Can anyone translate?

And you ignored my earlier request for a link or proof that 85% of the CPS were Muslims and now it is still "stuffed with them". Still waiting. It is, obviously, nonsense.

Link 

.CPS does publish diversity ,75% did respond declaring religion,did not exact numbers of Muslims,baroness Flather did that

9 minutes ago, jori123 said:

Link 

.CPS does publish diversity ,75% did respond declaring religion,did not exact numbers of Muslims,baroness Flather did that

Maybe you don't know what a link is. It usually contains the web address (on the internet) of a credible source for a claim. It is not just writing the word "link" then repeating your garbled nonsense.

Try again?

1 hour ago, Baht Simpson said:

Your civil duty is to obey the law, pay taxes, refrain from violence and generally do all that is required in a polite, civil society to live together.  Civil disobedience usually, but not always, involves breaking the law. They're broadly opposites.  

 

Civil disobedience sometimes has its place but it must be done in the correct way. That's where Robinson had failed.

 

Rosa Parks seemed to disagree.  Civil disobedience is just one component of civic duty.  I doubt her objective was to sit in the nice seats regardless of the consequences she knew she'd incur for breaking an unjust law.  She knew she was powerless to change the law using legal means, so she took it on herself to fight the law by violating it.  She took that as her civic duty.

 

Change the name from Parks to Robinson, and change the circumstances a little, and the stories are the same story.  They both violated what they saw as unjust laws.

 

12 minutes ago, jori123 said:

Link 

.CPS does publish diversity ,75% did respond declaring religion,did not exact numbers of Muslims,baroness Flather did that

Civil service Muslim network organisation may respond

4 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

Rosa Parks seemed to disagree.  Civil disobedience is just one component of civic duty.  I doubt her objective was to sit in the nice seats regardless of the consequences she knew she'd incur for breaking an unjust law.  She knew she was powerless to change the law using legal means, so she took it on herself to fight the law by violating it.  She took that as her civic duty.

 

Change the name from Parks to Robinson, and change the circumstances a little, and the stories are the same story.  They both violated what they saw as unjust laws.

 

 

Jeez, someone actually just compared Rosa Parks with Yaxley-Lennon. Now I have seen and heard everything.

You must be a very very gullible person indeed. I hope you remember to click and donate!

 

3 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Contempt of Court is illegal.  The content is immaterial.

 

Looks like he might be returning to jail soon 🤔

 

The truth is inconvenient you mean.  I don't think you understand how dangerous it is to continuously lock people up for saying things that the state doesn't like relying on a corrupt judiciary to help them do so.  History is littered with fascist states doing exactly this and sadly it is also filled with useful idiots cheering from the sidelines when it happens to someone they don't like.   I doubt historically those useful idiots were cheering in the end.  

 

The next thing he is being charged with is for allegedly doxxing 2 journalists in response to them doxxing him.   It's beyond ridiculous now.   He needs to claim asylum in the USA as it is abundantly clear he is being persecuted for having political views the state does not like.   It's shameful what the UK has become and the UK is no longer in a position to criticize other fascistic states when they persecute their own citizens.  

1 hour ago, jori123 said:

Civil service Muslim network organisation may respond

 

Assuming such an organisation exists, what makes you think that they are reading these posts?

 

There is no evidence to support your claims.

1 hour ago, jori123 said:

Civil service Muslim network organisation may respond

So you have absolutely zero evidence, you just make stuff up and then get outraged at it.

 

1 hour ago, impulse said:

 She knew she was powerless to change the law using legal means, so she took it on herself to fight the law by violating it.  She took that as her civic duty.

 

 

 

By that measure terrorists are just doing their civic duty. 

 

Maybe she had a moral duty which led to civil disobedience but that's not what civil duty means. 

 

Civil disobedience must be morally justified. Rosa Parkes had that by taking a stand against racism. Robinson doesn't have that by defying a judge and repeating proven libelous remarks.

 

 

25 minutes ago, RayC said:

 

Assuming such an organisation exists, what makes you think that they are reading these posts?

 

There is no evidence to support your claims.

Certainly does exist,pity A1 does not allow copy and paste

 

25 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

So you have absolutely zero evidence, you just make stuff up and then get outraged at it.

 

Outraged...only one here is you.this has done more to enhance Robinson's crusade against Muslims,this and reform will most definitely bring the govt down. The latest charges are  absurd,next rally in London is something to look forward to ill be there hopefully

On 5/20/2025 at 3:03 PM, merck said:

In his own words:

 

 

Watch the section were a Muslim girl from Rotherham defends the Muslim groomers, she mentions that her father is a taxi driver but forgot to say that the majority of the groomers in Rotherham were in fact Muslim and taxi drivers.

I would like to suggest to all those people who disagree with him.

just watch the full video with an open mind the same as those Oxford university students. Many of whom opposed his views.