Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

Think Tank Accuses Muslim Council of Undermining Press Freedom

 

A new report has accused the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) of acting in “bad faith” by attempting to stifle legitimate reporting on Islamist terrorism, claiming such efforts risk curbing press freedom in the UK.

 

The report, published by the think tank and educational charity Policy Exchange, focuses on the activities of the Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM), an arm of the MCB. It alleges that the CfMM has pressured journalists and media producers to adopt a one-sided portrayal of Islam while misrepresenting the nature of factual coverage.

 

Despite claiming to address misreporting, the CfMM has reportedly uncovered only “a tiny number” of genuinely false and harmful stories since its inception seven years ago, according to the 94-page study. The report suggests that much of the CfMM’s work is rooted in ideology rather than journalistic standards.

 

While the CfMM has not issued a formal rebuttal to the report, it has expressed concern over its findings. A representative stated that the organisation “engages constructively” with media companies and regulatory bodies. It also confirmed it had shared its internal style guide with the BBC and participated in discussions with the Independent Press Standards Organisation (Ipso), including calls for stricter guidelines on the reporting of Muslims.

 

However, the report challenges the CfMM’s influence on media practices. Journalist and Times Radio presenter Andrew Neil endorsed the report’s conclusions, arguing that the CfMM mischaracterises the British media. “This Policy Exchange report forensically demonstrates that CfMM, its evidence and its conclusions are badly flawed,” Neil said. “It shows how CfMM has a purpose far wider than the correction of supposed factual errors. It seeks to enforce a tendentious view of Islam and sometimes seeking to suppress truthful, factual reporting which happens to contradict that view.

 

The increasing role played by self-appointed, unrepresentative and often rather small activist groups in shaping public debate has been examined too little.”

 

Andrew Gilligan and Damon Perry, authors of the Policy Exchange report, criticised the CfMM for what they see as overstating the scale of bias in the media. The CfMM has claimed that nearly 10 per cent of the 55,000 articles it monitored misrepresented Muslims and that around 60 per cent of stories about Islam are negative. But the authors argue these claims distort the reality of media coverage and conflate critical reporting with prejudice.

 

The report cites instances where media outlets were attacked for referring to individuals such as Mohammed Emwazi, better known as Jihadi John, as a “terrorist,” or Khalid Masood, the Westminster attacker, as an “Islamic extremist.” According to Gilligan and Perry, such pressure frames accurate descriptions of terrorism as Islamophobic.

 

The report also questioned the CfMM’s lobbying efforts around fictional media portrayals. It described efforts to influence drama content that features Muslim characters who are gay or reject traditional dress like the hijab, suggesting this signals a wider intent to police cultural narratives.

“This report provides all who need it with the evidence that the Centre for Media Monitoring is a bad-faith actor. It should not be engaged with or taken at face value by journalists, regulators or anyone else,” Gilligan and Perry concluded.

 

The MCB has long been viewed with suspicion by UK authorities. In 2009, the Labour Party suspended formal ties with the group after one of its leaders was alleged to have supported violence against Israel, an accusation the MCB denied. More recently, a 2023 review of the government’s Prevent counterextremism programme by Sir William Shawcross reaffirmed the official policy of non-engagement with the MCB, citing “unresolved extremism concerns.”

 

The CfMM has been contacted for comment.

 

image.png  Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Times  2025-07-09

 

 

newsletter-banner-1.png

  • Love It 1
Posted

"..Khalid Masood, the Westminster attacker, as an “Islamic extremist.” According to Gilligan and Perry, such pressure frames accurate descriptions of terrorism as Islamophobic."

He is not an "Islamic extremist"; better would be to classify as "Islamic fundamentalist", getting his authority to attack directly from the Koran. Read it some time. I have.

Also, a phobia is an irrational fear. Maybe anxiety would be a better fit, but the fact does remain that the attacks, the terror, are based on religious teachings enslave or kill infidels. 
 

  • Like 2
Posted
19 minutes ago, mogandave said:

They are just doing the jobs lazy Brits refuse to do. 

 

 

yes like grooming  school children and assaulting our policewoman

 

22 minutes ago, mogandave said:

They are just doing the jobs lazy Brits refuse to do. 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, proton said:

 

Chomper beginning to see the light 😆 Where Islam takes over there is NO freedom, it's Allah's and the sick Prophets way only.

I wasn’t referring to any one particular religious group.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 4
  • Haha 3
Posted
2 hours ago, mogandave said:

They are just doing the jobs lazy Brits refuse to do. 

 

 

who are 

Posted
29 minutes ago, steve187 said:

who are 

Immigrants. And it’s a well known fact that Muslim immigrants commit far fewer crimes than white Brits. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 3
  • Haha 2
Posted
2 hours ago, mogandave said:

Immigrants. And it’s a well known fact that Muslim immigrants commit far fewer crimes than white Brits. 

 

Really? the prisons are full of muslims

  • Like 2
Posted
20 minutes ago, retayl said:

A fact only known in your Brit bashing brain. Muslims represent 6.5% of the population yet 18.1% of the prison population. 

Do the figures breakdown to show how many of the Muslims were 1st/2nd generation UK born or 1st gen Immigrants?

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
1 minute ago, DezLez said:

Do the figures breakdown to show how many of the Muslims were 1st/2nd generation UK born or 1st gen Immigrants?

 

Irrelevant they are Muslims first born in the UK or not

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted

Isn't that something that pretty much every mainstream media outlet has done in recent years? And as for this specific topic, that's what you get when you let tumors grow.

Posted
3 hours ago, mogandave said:

Immigrants. And it’s a well known fact that Muslim immigrants commit far fewer crimes than white Brits. 

 

50 minutes ago, proton said:

 

Irrelevant they are Muslims first born in the UK or not

I believe that it is relevant as @mogandave has made reference to the difference without facts/links!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...