2 hours ago, angryguy said:

Seems like allowing illegals into the country is against the constitution. Did you care about the constitution then?

Excuse me, but I am genuinely interested in this comment. Where in the Constitution does it mention illegal migrants?

2 hours ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

You went from people wanting them out to wanting them dead. How did you go from A to B. Something went amiss there. 

No, nothing amiss, it tells you about his politics quite clearly.

1 minute ago, Purdey said:

Excuse me, but I am genuinely interested in this comment. Where in the Constitution does it mention illegal migrants?

Certain people seem to forget that they are the descendents of immigrants who stole the land from the first peoples of the north American continent.  If you get rid of people who are descendents of immigrants, then you only have the descendents of the First People that lived there.

6 minutes ago, MarkBR said:

Certain people seem to forget that they are the descendents of immigrants who stole the land from the first peoples of the north American continent.  If you get rid of people who are descendents of immigrants, then you only have the descendents of the First People that lived there.

Thanks. I wondered whether people had forgotten that point. Anyway, I cannot find a clause banning illegal immigrants in the Constitution... but then my eyesight isn't great.

4 hours ago, Cameroni said:

The real miracle is a why are people watching Rachel Maddow, who goes home to do cunnilingus on her 67 year old wife, at all? It's obvious she's a hysterical deviant. Yet people watch her. 

Was your Mummy mean to you, buddy? Is that the reason for your pathological misogyny?

2 hours ago, BritManToo said:

Actually sex outside marriage is illegal under Sharia law.

You're either married and can have sex with your partner whenever you like (consent given by marriage ceremony), or you're single and abstain from sex.

If you do indulge please use protection.👍

1 hour ago, Cameroni said:

 

They're a lesbian couple! What do you think they get up to in the evening, play monopoly? 

 

Let me tell you, my perverted imagination is A LOT better than Rachel Maddow and her 67 year old muffin. 

 

Oh yeah, you watch an ice hockey player jawed lesbian who gets it on with a 67 year old blonde woman and I'm the weird one, ok. 

I don't watch her. The few times I have see her though  I noted she was incredibly well researched and had interesting things to say. Biased against Trump - yes she focuses on anti Trump stories but some see that as worth covering due to the often important broader issues involved e.g. I think an episode I saw covered in some detail the way Trump and family are benefiting from the presidency. Shocking. Her personal life is her personal life. 

1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

Sadly platforms like AN only seem to use what they classify as trusted news sources hence the bias you talk about seen on here. Time for an upgrade of policy IMHO as these "trusted sources" have shown themselves to be anything but and are simply an extension of the Democratic Party anti-Trump/woke progressive agenda. Of course trust in the legacy media was lost during Covid when they were simply an arm of Big Pharma's propaganda machine.

Brilliantly exposed !

I was told many years ago if you don't like policy go somewhere else.

This is they/thems world. Propaganda machine on the left of me  and jokers on the right,here I am stuck in the middle with you.

2 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

Highest rating news 

They/them hate the fact of facts.

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Why does it bother you?

 

 

 

Well, apart from the visual horror of Maddow going down on her 67 year old lesbian wife, the real issue is much more serious.

 

 

 Do you think that the fact that Rachel Maddow is a raving lesbian deviant who prays at the altar of Sappho every night with her 67 year old "wife" does not have an influence on her reporting the news, and on Trump in particular? This will not colour and pervade her view of things? Obviously it does.

 

Like I said, I watched a few minutes and Maddow came across as a zealot on an almost religious level, she was literally almost crying as she talked about Washington being occupied. Pausing for dramatic effect she spouted speculation after speculation, none of it corroborated with facts. Even wheeling out a 100 year old woman protester. She tried to appeal on the most base emotional level. Her sole aim was to agitate against Trump.

 

This was not news. This was histrionic agitation dressed up as news.

 

43 minutes ago, JAG said:

However I do suggest that Rachel Madow does produce incisive, accurate and well researched commentary which clashes with whatever echo chamber you favour.

 

Lol, I SAW Maddow. The last thing she offers is "incisive, accurate and well researched" news. What she actually offers is histrionic, hysteric, speculation totally devoid of facts, that services the echo chamber YOU favour.

 

If Maddow is "incisive" "accurate and "well researched" then Joe Biden was a great president, lol.

 

Indeed Maddow is watched by many people, that's true, which is the perplexing thing. Perhaps not though, as she services the most base, hysteric and preposterous instincts of the large mass of losers who lost the last election.

37 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

If Maddow is "incisive" "accurate and "well researched" then Joe Biden was a great president, lol.

And not a kiddy fiddler that showered with his daughter and sniffed any 12yo girl within his reach.

Also amazing that they love Bill who thought it was OK to coerce his interns into accepting his privates in their mouth.

 

Yet Trump, who paid for a hooker is the king of evil.

Despite almost every poster on this forum doing similar stuff.

5 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

And not a kiddy fiddler that showered with his daughter and sniffed any 12yo girl within his reach.

Also amazing that they love Bill who thought it was OK to coerce his interns into accepting his privates in their mouth.

 

Yet Trump, who paid for a hooker is the king of evil.

Despite almost every poster on this forum doing similar stuff.

 

I'm not even anti-Trump and even I got scared as Rachel Maddow was describing the utter evil that is Donald Trump. It was like watching Goebbels, if Goebbels were a lesbian going down on 67 year olds.

1 hour ago, JAG said:

I don't know, don't care and it's none of my business. I leave it to your rabid imagination.

 

However I do suggest that Rachel Madow does produce incisive, accurate and well researched commentary which clashes with whatever echo chamber you favour. It is watched and noticed by many people - perhaps it is that rather than your imagined image of her domestic life which "gets on your wick"?

 

Her Russian collusion frezied coverage was incredible. Didnt she send goons to Moscow to ferret through bins?😅 yep, a really credible source.

3 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

Highest rating news 

Which demonstrates the dumbing down of the human race.

38 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

And not a kiddy fiddler that showered with his daughter and sniffed any 12yo girl within his reach.

Also amazing that they love Bill who thought it was OK to coerce his interns into accepting his privates in their mouth.

 

Yet Trump, who paid for a hooker is the king of evil.

Despite almost every poster on this forum doing similar stuff.

You seem to be missing out on Trump inciting insurrection, dudding contractors, disrespecting fallen soldiers, stealing from charities, forcibly fingering a woman, pilfering top secret documents, and convicted of cooking the books.

 

Quite amazing how the worshippers omit these facts from their narrative.

6 hours ago, angryguy said:

The leftist bias apparent in 90% of articles becomes apparent to more people as trump keeps on getting things done that previous administrations wouldnt be able to even with the media on their side. The truth is clear to many and it cannot be found without a distrust of “facts” and “figures” that were fabricated to make trump look bad. He still has a long time to go in office. I dont think these media outlets in their current form can sustain themselves much longer as there wont be anyone left to fool

Suuure! It's not Trump and MAGA lying (starting with the Big Lie that Trump regularly recalls in his speeches), it's the facts and statistics lying (when they don't support Trump's lies)! 🤣

What a load of B.S.!

 

Anyway, it's a good thread for frustrated Trumpers to let steam off! 😆

11 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

You seem to be missing out on Trump inciting insurrection, dudding contractors, disrespecting fallen soldiers, stealing from charities, forcibly fingering a woman, pilfering top secret documents, and convicted of cooking the books.

 

Quite amazing how the worshippers omit these facts from their narrative.

So you're OK with kiddy fiddlers then?

Just now, BritManToo said:

So you're OK with kiddy fiddlers then?

Of course I am not, and it's a blatant deflection.

 

The point I am making is Trump is a grub across a wide spectrum of activities. I did not even come close to a full list.

 

OTOH, you seem to be OK with underage sex, dressing it up with weasel words about different ages in different jurisdictions.

 

No wonder you like sharia law, it permits sex at puberty.

52 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

So you're OK with kiddy fiddlers then?

It does seem to have become a favoured tactic doesn't it; if someone offers an opinion which differs from or counters yours, to immediately accuse them of agreeing with, supporting or at times even indulging in something equally or more reprehensible.

 

A particularly bankrupt debating tactic!

2 hours ago, Cameroni said:

Like I said, I watched a few minutes and Maddow came across as a zealot on an almost religious level, she was literally almost crying as she talked about Washington being occupied. Pausing for dramatic effect she spouted speculation after speculation, none of it corroborated with facts. Even wheeling out a 100 year old woman protester. She tried to appeal on the most base emotional level. Her sole aim was to agitate against Trump.

I too watched the clip which you describe. She raised a number of points, particularly with regard to the constitutional provisions on the Federal Government deploying or rather not deploying troops to act against it's own citizens on the streets of the United States, and highlighted the widespread opposition to that, of which the 104 year old lady was a notable part.

 

You seem to be the one having the hysterical reaction, particularly when you insist in somehow coupling it with your imagined sexual fantasies about her private life!

12 minutes ago, JAG said:

It does seem to have become a favoured tactic doesn't it; if someone offers an opinion which differs from or counters yours, to immediately accuse them of agreeing with, supporting or at times even indulging in something equally or more reprehensible.

 

A particularly bankrupt debating tactic!

I just repeated Chomper,

So lefties doing it is ok, but anyone else doing it is reprehensible.

58 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Of course I am not, and it's a blatant deflection.

 

The point I am making is Trump is a grub across a wide spectrum of activities. I did not even come close to a full list.

 

OTOH, you seem to be OK with underage sex, dressing it up with weasel words about different ages in different jurisdictions.

 

No wonder you like sharia law, it permits sex at puberty.

Trump is a grub.

Biden and Clinton not grubs?

39 minutes ago, JAG said:

I too watched the clip which you describe. She raised a number of points, particularly with regard to the constitutional provisions on the Federal Government deploying or rather not deploying troops to act against it's own citizens on the streets of the United States, and highlighted the widespread opposition to that, of which the 104 year old lady was a notable part.

 

Maybe that was at the end then? I closed it after some time, as I found her dishonest, manipulative and overly dramatic. What the point of pointing out the 100 year old protester was, I have no idea, apart from obviously agitating against Trump.. As I recall the sweet 100 year old lady was arguing for scientific funding ("Girls just want to have fun-ding for scientific research" harhar").

 

Anyway, that clip was a dog's breakfast and convinced me that watching the Rachel Maddow show is a colossal waste of time, won't be tuning in again. Worthless.

 

She's basically a parasite living off of  Trump. Like those tiny fish who attach to sharks. Or like those Youtubers who posted about the Depp-Heard trial, only her trial is all year round. She must make a fortune from being a guppy fish.

2 hours ago, BritManToo said:

Trump is a grub.

Biden and Clinton not grubs?

You seem to be afflicted with a severe case of what-aboutism. I recommend a rest from posting until it gets better.

 

Were you behind the door when they were handing out a sense of proportion?

3 hours ago, BritManToo said:

3 hours ago, Lacessit said:

You seem to be missing out on Trump inciting insurrection, dudding contractors, disrespecting fallen soldiers, stealing from charities, forcibly fingering a woman, pilfering top secret documents, and convicted of cooking the books.

 

Quite amazing how the worshippers omit these facts from their narrative.

So you're OK with kiddy fiddlers then?

 

Yes he forgot to add kiddy fiddlers to the list of Trump's crimes, but that doesn't mean he's OK with it

19 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

 

Yes he forgot to add kiddy fiddlers to the list of Trump's crimes, but that doesn't mean he's OK with it

Kiddy fiddlers are defined as pre-pubescent, under-age is post-puberty.

 

I don't think anyone is accusing Trump of being a kiddy fiddler. Under-age, where there is smoke there is fire. Plenty of smoke around the Epstein files.

 

I've known several parents who showered with their kids. Going from that to being called a kiddy fiddler is the product of a diseased mind.

9 hours ago, BritManToo said:

9 hours ago, Tug said:

Did you flunk civics in school?you do understand that everything trump is getting (done) is outside the bounds of our constitution and laws that in a nutshell is why folks are dead set against him.hes not a president,more like a wannabe dictator.

Expand  

AHH yes,

Everyone against him, just like the election predictions

 

Must be why dems support is at its all time low.....

23 hours ago, Cameroni said:

I was actually watching a few minutes of Rachel Maddow. ...

 

Why? Does masochism float your boat, as well as painting graphic images of carpet-munching?

13 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

Why? Does masochism float your boat, as well as painting graphic images of carpet-munching?

 

Nah, it was just her clickbait. She got me good. She claimed she knew the "real reasons" why Trump was sending military to Washington. Of course when I started the video it started with an endless diatribe about Trump, how he's not hard on crime. I was totally shocked. This was not what I was promised! This was not hard news! Just cheap anti-Trump agit-pod.

 

I fast-forwarded...surely...at some point...she'll talk about the real reasons she put in the video title...some actual information....but no....There was nothing....Just more speculation, insinuation and hysterical hand-wringing.. 

 

But it was a bit like being slappled with the stick of stupid, you're not wrong. I never should have clicked on it. You live and learn.

 

 

On 8/13/2025 at 10:14 AM, BritManToo said:

You think the news reflects the wishes of the people?

As far as I can see most people in the west want immigrants out or dead, with no due process or delays, and clearly the news doesn't reflect that.

If you could see farther you'd notice the 5+ million people in the streets around the USA protesting against ICE.  The rest of the west may be more bigoted like you. 
Due process is in the constitution, not a "leftist" idea.
 
Check Trump's approval/disapproval ratings for what most people want.  Of course, for you that's fake news, deep state, blah blah.