Remember the incident on the Tube when " Stephen yaxley Lennon's " name was splashed all over the MSM with headlines like Man assaulted and seriously hurt in an unprovoked attack and running away from justice, Police waiting for him to return to face questioning. Another set up the victim miraculously recovered within 24 hours and walked out of the Hospital and all charges were dropped against him.  As one poster seems to mention Tommy's use of a Bentley maybe he can tell us why lags let out early are picked up in Lambo's outside Prison.

19 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

If Sir Keir Starmer wanted to sound a bit more "street" and said from now on he wanted to be known as Barry Smith, would you oblige? I am sure you would respect his wishes, right? Good old Bazza.

 

"Barry Smith is a W@nk$r ' hasn't got the same ring to it.........

20 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

So why was he charged with contempt of court then?

Try and keep up, he was not charged with contempt of court  that was a previous hearing.   He was charged this time with 

"frustrating" counter-terrorism powers by refusing to give access to the phone   

His defence is that the police stop under the terrorism act  was illegal

 

The police are arguing it was justified to use terrorism charges because he was "vague"

 

"The court heard Robinson was stopped in his silver Bentley SUV because he gave "short, vague replies" about what he was doing and "made no eye contact".

 

Total farce, they knew exactly who he was and having seen his phone they were desperate to obtain it , no doubt under instruction from  above. I don't think in this case the police on the ground can be blamed , this will have come from the top

 

7 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Let’s have your evidence to back your claim that Yaxley Lennon has been ‘Debanked’.

 

Feel free to search for any evidence against any of the numerous names he has used.

from AI on google

 

"HSBC, Lloyds, and NatWest have all closed accounts for Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (aka Tommy Robinson). While the specific reasons for each closure are not detailed, he had his accounts with these banks closed down and stated in 2022 that he was using an online bank he did not name. 

7 hours ago, JAG said:

Certainly that would make life very difficult! I can't imagine it was in any way linked to his views, or activism in any way, I mean, that would be an abuse of the banking process, and I cannot imagine the government standing for that- much less being complicit in it!

 

Ironic though - one of the reasons for questioning him was that he was carrying a lot of cash - yet he is denied access to banking!

I like your sarcasm.           

9 hours ago, NanLaew said:

 

Why do 👎🏻 bother you at all?

It kills time during Chemotherapy , and on days that I feel fatigued,  and at night when I can't sleep,     Is that ok with you ?

 There is nothing like the behaviour and musings of idiots to make one feel better about ones own problems

1 hour ago, Bday Prang said:

Try and keep up, he was not charged with contempt of court  that was a previous hearing.   He was charged this time with 

"frustrating" counter-terrorism powers by refusing to give access to the phone   

His defence is that the police stop under the terrorism act  was illegal

 

The police are arguing it was justified to use terrorism charges because he was "vague"

 

"The court heard Robinson was stopped in his silver Bentley SUV because he gave "short, vague replies" about what he was doing and "made no eye contact".

 

Total farce, they knew exactly who he was and having seen his phone they were desperate to obtain it , no doubt under instruction from  above. I don't think in this case the police on the ground can be blamed , this will have come from the top

 

Try and keep up, we were talking about his charge of contempt of court for live streaming outside a trial.

"I was watching this livestream as it happened. He did not almost collapse the case at hand, do you ever stop to think matters through yourself?🤣"

Please, do keep up. 

8 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

Remember the incident on the Tube when " Stephen yaxley Lennon's " name was splashed all over the MSM with headlines like Man assaulted and seriously hurt in an unprovoked attack and running away from justice, Police waiting for him to return to face questioning. Another set up the victim miraculously recovered within 24 hours and walked out of the Hospital and all charges were dropped against him.  As one poster seems to mention Tommy's use of a Bentley maybe he can tell us why lags let out early are picked up in Lambo's outside Prison.

Please share a link to "the MSM" calling it an unprovoked attack. I'll wait here.

So "miraculously" recovering in 24 hours from being knocked unconscious is unusual? If he walked out of the hospital that's ok?  Do you deny that he was punched unconscious? You call it a "set up". How was it set up exactly? I don't understand your thought process here. He clearly knocked a man unconscious, you seem to be the only one denying this. We don't know whether he was provoked or how he might have been provoked or whether or not his response was justified.

Charges were dropped due to a lack of evidence, not because he was found innocent.

Cue BarraMarra having a flounce and calling me a disrupter. 

6 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Charges were dropped due to a lack of evidence, not because he was found innocent.

Doesn't the absence of evidence suggest innocence?

4 minutes ago, Fact said:

Doesn't the absence of evidence suggest innocence?

Not necessarily. The "victim" did not want to give a statement, and the CCTV was inconclusive. It suggests the evidence as it was was not reliable enough to convince the public prosector that a jury would be convinced beyond reasonable doubt.

It is completely different to being innocent.

34 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Please share a link to "the MSM" calling it an unprovoked attack. I'll wait here.

So "miraculously" recovering in 24 hours from being knocked unconscious is unusual? If he walked out of the hospital that's ok?  Do you deny that he was punched unconscious? You call it a "set up". How was it set up exactly? I don't understand your thought process here. He clearly knocked a man unconscious, you seem to be the only one denying this. We don't know whether he was provoked or how he might have been provoked or whether or not his response was justified.

Charges were dropped due to a lack of evidence, not because he was found innocent.

Cue BarraMarra having a flounce and calling me a disrupter. 

I'll answer you joebloggs do your own work instead of waiting for others Google it.

2 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

from AI on google

 

"HSBC, Lloyds, and NatWest have all closed accounts for Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (aka Tommy Robinson). While the specific reasons for each closure are not detailed, he had his accounts with these banks closed down and stated in 2022 that he was using an online bank he did not name. 

Please provide a link to verifiable reports.

 

Not AI summaries to unsubstantiated statements made by Yaxley Lennon.

On 10/14/2025 at 2:27 AM, josephbloggs said:

He had "journalistic material" on the phone. So did he get arrested for stealing the phone then? Which journalist did he nick it from?

Nice though that he was off to Spain carrying some of his donation money that all the saps happily throw at him for doing nothing more than spouting hatred and nonsense.

Haha damn never seen a leftist get so many thumbs down. For me it means im posting truth, for you not so much

31 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

I'll answer you joebloggs do your own work instead of waiting for others Google it.

I did. I found nothing. Hence asking you.

Your claim, you back it up. That's how it works.

1 hour ago, josephbloggs said:

Try and keep up, we were talking about his charge of contempt of court for live streaming outside a trial.

"I was watching this livestream as it happened. He did not almost collapse the case at hand, do you ever stop to think matters through yourself?🤣"

Please, do keep up. 

 you are getting confused, time for your milky tea and an early night

3 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Your claim, you back it up. That's how it works.

Or what ?

31 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Please provide a link to verifiable reports.

 

Not AI summaries to unsubstantiated statements made by Yaxley Lennon.

can't find anything , maybe I'm mistaken, but I don't think so cant be bothered looking now , life's to short  still its hardly indicative of terrorism to be carrying cash

On 10/14/2025 at 5:35 AM, SunnyinBangrak said:

Incredible the journalist 100% responsible for saving thousands of BRITISH kids from sex slavery at the hands of barbarians would trigger lefties so much?!

Some people need a reality check, and fast 

 

Mr. lennon is not a journalist. He is a convicted violent rabble rouser who is trying to use patriotism to shield him from the consequences of his seeking to foment civil unrest. You are the one who needs a reality check. Alling oneself a journalist does not make one a journalist.  And no he did not save thousands  from sex slavery. There were many people who had worked tirelessly to expose the grooming gangs. Lennon has attempted to claim credit for their hard and difficult work.

 

47 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

<nonsensical disinformation snipped>There were many people who had worked tirelessly to expose the grooming gangs. Lennon has attempted to claim credit for their hard and difficult work.

 

Many people like Naz Shah and the rest of the loony left? The enslaved girls should shut their mouths for the sake of diversity isn't exactly "working tirelessly to expose the grooming gangs", is it? Nor is calling brave journalist Mr Robinson a racist for daring to expose them.😆

 

For the record in case anyone hasnt followed this story over the many years. Tommy Robinson exposed the industrial scale rape of young vulnerable white girls by muslim males of predominently Pakistani heritage, and the ENTIRE LEFT banged on about it being a) false b) racist rhetoric and c)even if it was happening we should stfu for the sake of the lefts disastrous multiculti experiment. Dont let them rewrite history after such evil behavior.

21 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Many people like Naz Shah and the rest of the loony left? The enslaved girls should shut their mouths for the sake of diversity isn't exactly "working tirelessly to expose the grooming gangs", is it? 

 

You are either being deliberately dense or you are parroting sensationalism without checking for yourself. Don't worry it is common in your world.

She did not make that as a literal comment. She didn't even make the comment herself. It was a tweet from a parody account that she liked and retweeted. When she realised that morons were (probably deliberately) taking it literally she took it down, a whole 8 minutes after it went up. But people like you still bang on about it and deliberately twist it.

The knuckleheads at "Leave EU" had to pay her damages after calling her a "grooming gangs apologist" based on a parody that was up for eight minutes. Especially bad considering she has worked for more than 20 years on child abuse, violence against women, and grooming, and it is all on record. So, you know, she actually does stuff to protect victims of grooming gangs, unlike people like Yaxley-Lennon who do nothing but jump on bandwagons to whip up the masses for donations. That makes comments like yours even more distasteful and repugnant as she has done more against grooming gangs than all of your heroes put together.

They publicly apologised and accepted Ms Shah was a "vociferous campaigner for victims of grooming gangs", and said their post was “ill-judged and untrue”. Maybe you can do the same? Or if not will you admit you have been mislead and genuinely believed what you were told to believe without checking for yourself? Either one of the two would be acceptable.

 

Quote

 Nor is calling brave journalist Mr Robinson a racist for daring to expose them.😆

 

A brave journalist. Oh my, you actually really said that. Now maybe I am sure you are a wind up account. 🤣

  🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   🤣   A brave journalist. Oh, please, make it stop.

 

Quote

For the record in case anyone hasnt followed this story over the many years. Tommy Robinson exposed the industrial scale rape of young vulnerable white girls by muslim males of predominently Pakistani heritage, and the ENTIRE LEFT banged on about it being a) false b) racist rhetoric and c)even if it was happening we should stfu for the sake of the lefts disastrous multiculti experiment. Dont let them rewrite history after such evil behavior.
 

For the record in case anyone hasn't followed this story over the year, he didn't expose ANYTHING. He just jumped on a bandwagon when he saw the public outrage - a great opportunity to get the donations in. 

Sammy Woodhouse actually played a major role in exposing the Muslim grooming gangs. She was groomed by these gangs, abused, and actually helped bring it to light. She did actual brave stuff. You would think she would praise anyone who helped as she was abused herself and suffered immensely and did all she could to help bring them down, but funnily enough she said Yaxley-Lennon was jumping on the bandwagon and "taking credit for things he hadn't done." She said "he didn't expose it" and was being "disrespectful."

They were exposed in the mainstream media years before Yaxley-Lennon had ever heard of them.

https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/society/2025/01/tommy-robinson-elon-musk-grooming-scandal
 

34 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Many people like Naz Shah and the rest of the loony left? The enslaved girls should shut their mouths for the sake of diversity isn't exactly "working tirelessly to expose the grooming gangs", is it? Nor is calling brave journalist Mr Robinson a racist for daring to expose them.😆

 

For the record in case anyone hasnt followed this story over the many years. Tommy Robinson exposed the industrial scale rape of young vulnerable white girls by muslim males of predominently Pakistani heritage, and the ENTIRE LEFT banged on about it being a) false b) racist rhetoric and c)even if it was happening we should stfu for the sake of the lefts disastrous multiculti experiment. Dont let them rewrite history after such evil behavior.

No. This is your politically motivated  misrepresentation of events. You are giving credit to a criminal who has misappropriated the work of others.Robinson exposed nothing. He in effect has taken the work of others and claimed that he did it all. Lennon was busy as a football hooligan and petty criminal when actual journalists were dealing with this issue.

In 2004, the UK Channel 4 News department presented a documentary on the  alleged sexual abuse. Multiple charges and trials occurred in 2010. This then led to Operation Bullfinch and  multiple convictions were secured  between 2013-2017 as trials and appeals proceeded.  It was the late Andrew Norfolk of the Times  who in 2011 exposed the Rotherham grooming gang scandal. His fearless and extensive reporting that led to the inquiry into child sexual exploitation. He was the journalist who detailed the events, not Lennon.

 

Robinson/Lennon only showed up at a court proceeding in 2017 to try and disrupt a trial.  And yet here you come to push an opportunistic petty criminal as a national hero.

All i will say is Tommy Robinson brought over 250 thousand people to protest in London about kiddie fiddlers and Illegal migration into the UK. We are not right wing thugs only people like you Patong and your mate class us as right wing hooligans.

5 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

Mr. lennon is not a journalist. He is a convicted violent rabble rouser who is trying to use patriotism to shield him from the consequences of his seeking to foment civil unrest. You are the one who needs a reality check. Alling oneself a journalist does not make one a journalist.  And no he did not save thousands  from sex slavery. There were many people who had worked tirelessly to expose the grooming gangs. Lennon has attempted to claim credit for their hard and difficult work.

 

he was not exposing the gangs , so much as exposing the refusal of the authorities to deal with the problem.   Who else was doing this?  "working tirelessly "  lol  very few if anybody, was even talking about it,   they are now though, years later thanks mainly to Robinson.  , but for some reason are still reluctant to crack on properly 

Evidence collected by Tommy Robinson of the police, Town Councilors, and care home bosses who were implicated in the grooming has been Acknowledge. We know of at least two police officers who were implicated and were named by Yorkshire Police, so the Police know full well it has and possibly still going on. This is why they are demanding what Robinson has on his phone so they can delete it and begin a campaighn on him to try and make it look like its Tommy Robinson is deliberatly causing racial tensions. The two scumbag reporters from the daily Mail who travelled to Turkey to make up stories about him seems to have gone quiet. Another false claim of assault by one of them against Tommy.

8 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

can't find anything , maybe I'm mistaken, but I don't think so cant be bothered looking now , life's to short  still its hardly indicative of terrorism to be carrying cash

Yaxley Lennon was kicked off PayPal and his ability to raise funds via YouTube videos was removed by those two private companies for breaking the company’s terms of use.

 

He was also subject to the normal credit restrictions of a bankrupt.

 

He has never been ‘Debanked’.

 

He’s a grifting fraudster, don’t send him any of your money.

8 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Many people like Naz Shah and the rest of the loony left? The enslaved girls should shut their mouths for the sake of diversity isn't exactly "working tirelessly to expose the grooming gangs", is it? Nor is calling brave journalist Mr Robinson a racist for daring to expose them.😆

 

For the record in case anyone hasnt followed this story over the many years. Tommy Robinson exposed the industrial scale rape of young vulnerable white girls by muslim males of predominently Pakistani heritage, and the ENTIRE LEFT banged on about it being a) false b) racist rhetoric and c)even if it was happening we should stfu for the sake of the lefts disastrous multiculti experiment. Dont let them rewrite history after such evil behavior.

You clearly haven’t got a clue what you are talking about.

 

Yaxley Lennon’s only part in any of this was to put the trial of sex offenders at risk of collapse, to engage in hate mongering and to grift money on the back of it all.

 

Yaxley Lennon exposed Jack!

He’s a grifting fraudster, don’t send him any of your money.

3 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

he was not exposing the gangs , so much as exposing the refusal of the authorities to deal with the problem.   Who else was doing this?  "working tirelessly "  lol  very few if anybody, was even talking about it,   they are now though, years later thanks mainly to Robinson.  , but for some reason are still reluctant to crack on properly 

“He was exposing the gangs”

 

By grandstanding outside a courthouse in which a rape gang were on trial and in doing so putting that trial of risk of collapse.

 

He played absolutely no part in preventing any rape, absolutely no part in exposing rape gangs, absolutely no part in bringing any rapist to Justice.

 

He’s a grifting fraudster, don’t send him any of your money.

11 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

“He was exposing the gangs”

 

By grandstanding outside a courthouse in which a rape gang were on trial and in doing so putting that trial of risk of collapse.

 

He played absolutely no part in preventing any rape, absolutely no part in exposing rape gangs, absolutely no part in bringing any rapist to Justice.

 

He’s a grifting fraudster, don’t send him any of your money.

Why would I send any of my money to him or anybody else,  That would be rather stupid. 

"a grifting fraudster" who else has that allegation  or rather insult been aimed at?   Ah yes Farage and Trump another two with no redeeming features whatsoever , its standard lefty entry level stuff

How would you describe Sir Kier Starmer?  would it be "w4nker" like everybody else?   or are you a fan?   (is that even possible)

3 minutes ago, Bday Prang said:

Why would I send any of my money to him or anybody else,  That would be rather stupid. 

"a grifting fraudster" who else has that allegation  or rather insult been aimed at?   Ah yes Farage and Trump , its standard lefty entry level stuff

I wouldn’t call you stupid,  without any help from others you’ve correctly identify Yaxley Lennon’s ilk.

 

 

 

 

 

 

23 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You clearly haven’t got a clue what you are talking about.

 

Yaxley Lennon’s only part in any of this was to put the trial of sex offenders at risk of collapse, to engage in hate mongering and to grift money on the back of it all.

 

Yaxley Lennon exposed Jack!

He’s a grifting fraudster, don’t send him any of your money.

But the trial did not collapse did it ?     Just made up rubbish then?