https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/israel-committed-47-violations-of-gaza-ceasefire-since-oct-10-says-media-office/3720614

 

 

Israel are itching to get back to genocide.

 

According to the office, these violations have led to the killing of 38 Palestinians, the injury of 143 others, and the arrest of several civilians, noting that the breaches included shelling, deliberate targeting, and direct gunfire at citizens.

The statement described the violations as “a blatant breach of the ceasefire decision and of the principles of international humanitarian law.”

 

Gaza media office says these violations led to killing of 38 Palestinians, injury of 143 others, and arrest of several civilians, as breaches included shelling, deliberate targeting, and direct gunfire at citizens

The six problems a Gaza ceasefire has brought Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/six-problems-gaza-ceasefire-brought-164149758.html

11 minutes ago, JimCM said:

https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/israel-committed-47-violations-of-gaza-ceasefire-since-oct-10-says-media-office/3720614

 

 

Israel are itching to get back to genocide.

 

 

According to the office, these violations have led to the killing of 38 Palestinians, the injury of 143 others, and the arrest of several civilians, noting that the breaches included shelling, deliberate targeting, and direct gunfire at citizens.

The statement described the violations as “a blatant breach of the ceasefire decision and of the principles of international humanitarian law.”

 

Gaza media office says these violations led to killing of 38 Palestinians, injury of 143 others, and arrest of several civilians, as breaches included shelling, deliberate targeting, and direct gunfire at citizens

How many Palestinians has Hamas murdered since the ceasefire began?

1 hour ago, Trippy said:

How many Palestinians has Hamas murdered since the ceasefire began?

 

Remind us all how many Palestinian men, women, children and babies, have been murdered by the IDF and Israeli government in just over 2 years. none of whom ever went to a trial. 

 

Was it 64.xxx or 65,xxx, NOT including a family of 11 murdered in the last day or 2 by the IDF, or don't those matter to you?

36 minutes ago, billd766 said:

 

Remind us all how many Palestinian men, women, children and babies, have been murdered by the IDF and Israeli government in just over 2 years. none of whom ever went to a trial. 

 

Was it 64.xxx or 65,xxx, NOT including a family of 11 murdered in the last day or 2 by the IDF, or don't those matter to you?

I am going to have to buy a bigger trash bin for all these red thumbs down. Either that or get them made into a sash that I can wear as a badge of MY honour.

39 minutes ago, billd766 said:

 

Remind us all how many Palestinian men, women, children and babies, have been murdered by the IDF and Israeli government in just over 2 years. none of whom ever went to a trial. 

 

Was it 64.xxx or 65,xxx, NOT including a family of 11 murdered in the last day or 2 by the IDF, or don't those matter to you?

That's war, and people including civilians die in war, it's not murder. Killing your fellow countrymen is murder, big difference.

1 minute ago, Trippy said:

That's war, and people including civilians die in war, it's not murder. Killing your fellow countrymen is murder, big difference.

Killing unarmed civilians is NOT murder?

 

And how many weapons have the IDF managed to recover so far?

 

Were those 11 people killed in the bus ALL armed to the teeth? Were all the journalists and the people killed in the hospitals armed and fighting the IDF.

 

Were all the  64.xxx or 65,xxx people including the men, women, children and babies ALL armed to the teeth, and fighting the IDF?

 

Were the emergency crews in the 2 ambulances armed to the teeth, and fighting the IDF?

 

MURDER is MURDER, no matter which way YOU want to twist it. That is of course if your definition of murder is different frpm the rest of the world's.

 

 

Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
mur·der
/ˈmərdər/

 

what is the definition of murder

AI Mode

murder
Overview
Usage examples
Similar and opposite words
Pronunciation
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
mur·der
/ˈmərdər/
noun
1.
the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another.
"the stabbing murder of an off-Broadway producer"

 

4 minutes ago, billd766 said:

Killing unarmed civilians is NOT murder?

 

And how many weapons have the IDF managed to recover so far?

 

Were those 11 people killed in the bus ALL armed to the teeth? Were all the journalists and the people killed in the hospitals armed and fighting the IDF.

 

Were all the  64.xxx or 65,xxx people including the men, women, children and babies ALL armed to the teeth, and fighting the IDF?

 

Were the emergency crews in the 2 ambulances armed to the teeth, and fighting the IDF?

 

MURDER is MURDER, no matter which way YOU want to twist it. That is of course if your definition of murder is different frpm the rest of the world's.

 

 

Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
mur·der
/ˈmərdər/

 

what is the definition of murder

AI Mode

murder
Overview
Usage examples
Similar and opposite words
Pronunciation
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
mur·der
/ˈmərdər/
noun
1.
the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another.
"the stabbing murder of an off-Broadway producer"

 

I guess you don't understand that in every war civilians die. That's the nature of war. If Israel wanted to kill all the civilians they could have used an air assault to kill everyone in gaza, then the only ones left would have been Hamas hiding in the tunnels, easy pickins. But instead they go to great lengths to avoid killing civilians. The problem is Hamas uses civilians as human shields, and cares much less about Palestinians lives than the Israelis' do.

But I'm guessing you disagree with the truth. 

1 hour ago, billd766 said:

 

Remind us all how many Palestinian men, women, children and babies, have been murdered by the IDF and Israeli government in just over 2 years. none of whom ever went to a trial. 

 

Was it 64.xxx or 65,xxx, NOT including a family of 11 murdered in the last day or 2 by the IDF, or don't those matter to you?

Including 18,000+ children, and the injured children, highest amputation figures in the world, including wars. Just wear their shoes.

36 minutes ago, Trippy said:

That's war, and people including civilians die in war, it's not murder. Killing your fellow countrymen is murder, big difference.

Plenty of murder in war.

 

Targeting civilians being an example.

38 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Plenty of murder in war.

 

Targeting civilians being an example.

Tell that to LBJ, he killed 3.8 million Vietnamese.

1 hour ago, Trippy said:

Tell that to LBJ, he killed 3.8 million Vietnamese.

The USA are as guilty as Israel in the genocide.

Remember Iraq?

How many violations has Hamas committed od the Gaza ceasefire?

Wait a minute. Didn't all those pro Israel fellows here again and again repeat, give back the hostages and the war will end immediately.

 

And yet despite the last living hostage beeing returned Israel keeps firing rockets into Gaza and the settlers keep stealing land and killing Palestinians in the West Bank.

 

Is there a chance that you guys might have been wrong at a point or two?

 

That Israel's main goal was maybe not returning all the hostages?

 

I mean there were barely noticeable hints like the IDF destroying every building where the hostages might have been kept in.

 

Or shooting at everything and everybody even when they were screaming for help in Hebrew like those three hostages who somehow escaped Hamas and where gunned down by the IDF.

 

<removed>

45 minutes ago, Somjot said:

Wait a minute. Didn't all those pro Israel fellows here again and again repeat, give back the hostages and the war will end immediately.

No, no one said that. 

45 minutes ago, Somjot said:

And yet despite the last living hostage beeing returned Israel keeps firing rockets into Gaza and the settlers keep stealing land and killing Palestinians in the West Bank.

Great news. 

45 minutes ago, Somjot said:

Is there a chance that you guys might have been wrong at a point or two?

No

45 minutes ago, Somjot said:

That Israel's main goal was maybe not returning all the hostages?

That was never the main goal. 

45 minutes ago, Somjot said:

I mean there were barely noticeable hints like the IDF destroying every building where the hostages might have been kept in.

After warning the Palestinians to evacuate. 

45 minutes ago, Somjot said:

Or shooting at everything and everybody even when they were screaming for help in Hebrew like those three hostages who somehow escaped Hamas and where gunned down by the IDF.

 

<removed>

You must have loved that

6 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

No, no one said that. 

Many said that.

8 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

No, no one said that. 

Great news. 

No

That was never the main goal. 

After warning the Palestinians to evacuate. 

You must have loved that

 

Look, I made the mistake of reacting to your posts and at some point I reached a level where instead of posting my opinion based on facts, I started, same as you did and now do again, use wrong facts, empty allegations and hateful statements.

 

Which had consequences. I acknowledged my misbehavior, which, should I repeat it, would make me look like an idiot or at least like someone with low self-control.

 

So, for the last time:

Many wrote “If Hamas gives back the hostages, the war would be over immediately”, even Israeli politicians said that and recently Trump.

 

Same goes for many Israeli politicians repeatedly stating that the main goal was getting back the hostages.

 

You just completely deny that. Maybe you just didn't get it. I have better things to do than find sources to prove you wrong or to read through countless posts from the past.

 

Maybe you really believe what you're writing as you somehow overread all those posts, or maybe you are just trying to provoke again. It doesn't matter at all.

 

And if you really think that the Palestinians were warned in time before their buildings were flattened, I wonder why anybody died in Gaza at all.

 

However, your only reaction to my post “despite the last living hostage being returned Israel keeps firing rockets into Gaza and settlers keep stealing land and killing Palestinians in the West Bank”  being “Great news.”, clearly shows that you and I live in different worlds.

 

And your assumption after I wrote “the IDF was shooting at everything and everybody even when they were screaming for help in Hebrew like those three hostages who somehow escaped Hamas and where gunned down.” that I “must have loved that”, is not only completely wrong it also proves that you somehow mistakenly think we have the same moral compass.

 

I would never "love" the death of innocent people, no matter from which side.

 

I tried to imagine how they must have felt after witnessing the horrors of October 7, the atrocities, then being kidnapped, being brutalized but somehow 3 managed to escape. Maybe Hamas was searching for them or shooting at them already.

 

And then without supplies or water they finally found soldiers from their own home country. Hope replaced the fear of death, hope to see their loved ones again, something which seemed to be near impossible just a few hours ago.

 

What must have been their last thoughts when they felt the bullets of their own people hitting the bodies? That must have been beyond desperation. What a horrible way to go.

 

As you can see, I feel compassion for both sides, especially for those who had no say in the decisions of the past, who played no role in the mistakes of their politicians, who were just born in the wrong place and time and now must pay the price for the failures of others.

 

 Your support of continued violence commenting them as great news clearly shows me that our mindsets are so different that any discussion between us wouldn`t make any sense.

 

We simply do not speak the same language, we do not share the same compassion, we do not have the same view on the value of human life.

 

Every human life.

 

Don't waste your time commenting on my posts as you simply cannot understand them same as I will never be able to understand your mindset.

 

It would be best for both of us and the peace in the forum  just to ignore each other and hopefully we are mature enough to do it without using the button.

 

All the best to you.

 

Peace!

 

 

On 10/19/2025 at 12:08 AM, Trippy said:

How many Palestinians has Hamas murdered since the ceasefire began?

Shhhh...don't talk about this. 

58 minutes ago, Somjot said:

Don't waste your time commenting on my posts as you simply cannot understand them same as I will never be able to understand your mindset.

Why not comment on a post from a Hamas sympathizer? 

4 hours ago, Mike_Hunt said:

Why not comment on a post from a Hamas sympathizer? 

That’s an unfounded allegation. You don’t have to be a HAMAS supporter to sympathize with the Palestinian people and deplore the genocide being committed by Israel’s IDF.

 

And absolutely, many pro-Israel posters here said give back the hostages and war will end immediately.

1 minute ago, JBChiangRai said:

That’s an unfounded allegation. You don’t have to be a HAMAS supporter to sympathize with the Palestinian people and deplore the genocide being committed by Israel’s IDF.

 

And absolutely, many pro-Israel posters here said give back the hostages and war will end immediately.

There is no genocide being committed.  Next. 

5 hours ago, Somjot said:

 

Look, I made the mistake of reacting to your posts and at some point I reached a level where instead of posting my opinion based on facts, I started, same as you did and now do again, use wrong facts, empty allegations and hateful statements.

 

Which had consequences. I acknowledged my misbehavior, which, should I repeat it, would make me look like an idiot or at least like someone with low self-control.

 

So, for the last time:

Many wrote “If Hamas gives back the hostages, the war would be over immediately”, even Israeli politicians said that and recently Trump.

 

Same goes for many Israeli politicians repeatedly stating that the main goal was getting back the hostages.

 

You just completely deny that. Maybe you just didn't get it. I have better things to do than find sources to prove you wrong or to read through countless posts from the past.

 

Maybe you really believe what you're writing as you somehow overread all those posts, or maybe you are just trying to provoke again. It doesn't matter at all.

 

And if you really think that the Palestinians were warned in time before their buildings were flattened, I wonder why anybody died in Gaza at all.

 

However, your only reaction to my post “despite the last living hostage being returned Israel keeps firing rockets into Gaza and settlers keep stealing land and killing Palestinians in the West Bank”  being “Great news.”, clearly shows that you and I live in different worlds.

 

And your assumption after I wrote “the IDF was shooting at everything and everybody even when they were screaming for help in Hebrew like those three hostages who somehow escaped Hamas and where gunned down.” that I “must have loved that”, is not only completely wrong it also proves that you somehow mistakenly think we have the same moral compass.

 

I would never "love" the death of innocent people, no matter from which side.

 

I tried to imagine how they must have felt after witnessing the horrors of October 7, the atrocities, then being kidnapped, being brutalized but somehow 3 managed to escape. Maybe Hamas was searching for them or shooting at them already.

 

And then without supplies or water they finally found soldiers from their own home country. Hope replaced the fear of death, hope to see their loved ones again, something which seemed to be near impossible just a few hours ago.

 

What must have been their last thoughts when they felt the bullets of their own people hitting the bodies? That must have been beyond desperation. What a horrible way to go.

 

As you can see, I feel compassion for both sides, especially for those who had no say in the decisions of the past, who played no role in the mistakes of their politicians, who were just born in the wrong place and time and now must pay the price for the failures of others.

 

 Your support of continued violence commenting them as great news clearly shows me that our mindsets are so different that any discussion between us wouldn`t make any sense.

 

We simply do not speak the same language, we do not share the same compassion, we do not have the same view on the value of human life.

 

Every human life.

 

Don't waste your time commenting on my posts as you simply cannot understand them same as I will never be able to understand your mindset.

 

It would be best for both of us and the peace in the forum  just to ignore each other and hopefully we are mature enough to do it without using the button.

 

All the best to you.

 

Peace!

 

 

Again, I could be wrong, but I do believe anyone has said: “If Hamas gives back the hostages, the war would be over immediately”, I certainly have not. 

 

IYou are not an honest broker. 

7 hours ago, Mike_Hunt said:

Why not comment on a post from a Hamas sympathizer? 

 

Well, the part of my post you quoted already included the answer to your question:

 

Because he "simply cannot understand them same as I will never be able to understand (his) mindset."

 

Or in other words, in his world there is only black and white when it comes to Israel.

Israel is the good side, and he will support practically anything Israel and the IDF do unconditionally same as he will always condemn anything the Palestinians or Hamas do as evil.

 

Same as you. The minute anybody criticizes Israel he must be Hamas. There is no other explanation in your mindset.

 

Despite I have many times shown my disgust for Hamas and how much I despise what they have done on October 7, that doesn't count for you, as soon as I mentioned anything critical about Israel, I am judged as the Hamas sympathizer by you.

 

And that is why I wrote comments on each other's posts is completely useless and a waste of time.

 

You will probably ask yourself, how stupid can a person from the western world be, that he supports terrorists like Hamas who would probably introduce Sharia law in his country if they could.

 

And I am asking myself, why some people in here are so biased that they repeatedly condemn the atrocities of October 7 with almost 1200 people dead but support the killing of 10s of thousands 2/3 of them being women and children. How can they support a country that has been stealing land from other people or neighboring countries and keep doing so. How can they just ignore the atrocities committed by the IDF like target practice on children or shooting starving people who came for food, executing the 15 aid workers, executing 5-year-old Hind Rajab, and so on. How can they repeatedly condemn Hamas for raping hostages while the IDF is doing the same with their … err … prisoners, some of them even children.

 

And somehow, I'm sure that when you just read these last sentences I wrote, all you understood was: “I love Hamas, Hamas forever, Hamas is great, I want to be ruled by Hamas.”

 

Same mindset, that made you think I am a Hamas supporter, and which makes me think you are a terror apartheid state supporter.

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Again, I could be wrong, but I do believe anyone has said: “If Hamas gives back the hostages, the war would be over immediately”, I certainly have not. 

 

On 5/6/2025 at 12:00 PM, Eloquent pilgrim said:

Free the hostages and disarm and it will end;   

 

 

On 10/1/2025 at 11:40 AM, Patong2021 said:

 Israel will withdraw once the hostages are released 

 

 

On 9/12/2025 at 4:46 PM, Nick Carter icp said:

 release the hostages , that would stop the Palestinian civilians suffering 

 

Proof enough?

 

 

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

 

IYou are not an honest broker. 

 

And you keep on trolling. Why do you say I am not an honest broker?

 

Because I wrote that some members have said if Hamas would free the hostages, the war would be over?

 

You even concede, that you could be wrong. Meaning you are not sure. 

 

But interestingly you are sure that I am a liar despite not being sure if what I wrote was the truth.

 

Not even implying that I could be wrong about members making that statement same as you admit you could be wrong about members not saying such a thing, which in both cases would be a mistake but not an intentional lie.

 

All you are trying is to insult and cause some kind of reaction.

 

Because you feel threatened by me and by what I wrote, otherwise you wouldn`t bother wasting your time commenting my posts.

 

Maybe there is no other way than to put you on ignore.

4 hours ago, Mike_Hunt said:

There is no genocide being committed.  Next. 

 

I don`t know if you have noticed, but practically EVERY Human Rights organization concluded, that Israel is committing genocide.

 

Two leading human rights organizations based in Israel, B’Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights, say Israel is committing genocide.

 

The world's leading association of genocide scholars the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS)  has declared that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.

 

I guess I will have to write letters to all of them telling them our leading expert, his excellency Mike Hunt, has concluded they are all wrong.

 

And Hamas sympathizers.  🤣

2 minutes ago, Somjot said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proof enough?

 

 

 

And you keep on trolling. Why do you say I am not an honest broker?

 

Because I wrote that some members have said if Hamas would free the hostages, the war would be over?

 

You even concede, that you could be wrong. Meaning you are not sure. 

 

But interestingly you are sure that I am a liar despite not being sure if what I wrote was the truth.

 

Not even implying that I could be wrong about members making that statement same as you admit you could be wrong about members not saying such a thing, which in both cases would be a mistake but not an intentional lie.

 

All you are trying is to insult and cause some kind of reaction.

 

Because you feel threatened by me and by what I wrote, otherwise you wouldn`t bother wasting your time commenting my posts.

 

Maybe there is no other way than to put you on ignore.

No proof at all. Again, one said: “If Hamas gives back the hostages, the war would be over immediately”.

 

Example 1: "Free the hostages and disarm and it will end;". Nothing about the war being over immediately.

 

Example 2:  "Israel will withdraw once the hostages are released". Nothing about the war being over immediately.

Example 3:  "release the hostages , that would stop the Palestinian civilians suffering". Nothing about the war being over immediately.

 

None of your "quotes" are even complete sentences. You cut a few words of a someone's post and pretend they have said something that have not. 

 

I said I could be wrong, because I do not know what everyone has said, but I am surer now than I was. 

 

 

You must be used to talking with children or fools. I say you are not an honest broker, because you are not an honest broker. And I am not threatened by liars; the truth will out. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18 minutes ago, Somjot said:

 

I don`t know if you have noticed, but practically EVERY Human Rights organization concluded, that Israel is committing genocide.

 

Two leading human rights organizations based in Israel, B’Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights, say Israel is committing genocide.

 

The world's leading association of genocide scholars the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS)  has declared that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.

 

I guess I will have to write letters to all of them telling them our leading expert, his excellency Mike Hunt, has concluded they are all wrong.

 

And Hamas sympathizers.  🤣

What is the definition of genocide that all these human rights organizations use? 

5 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

No proof at all. Again, one said: “If Hamas gives back the hostages, the war would be over immediately”.

 

OMG! Are you serious?

 

You accuse me of being a liar and not an honest broker because I wrote the sentence above and despite these quotes

 

5 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Example 1: "Free the hostages and disarm and it will end;". Nothing about the war being over immediately.

 

Aha, and what do you think was meant by "it"? Global warming? 

 

5 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Example 2:  "Israel will withdraw once the hostages are released". Nothing about the war being over immediately.

 

Oh, and how exactly do you continue a war, if you have withdrawn already?

 

5 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Example 3:  "release the hostages , that would stop the Palestinian civilians suffering". Nothing about the war being over immediately.

 

Well, maybe you haven`t noticed but in the recent 2 years Palestinians were mostly if not exclusively suffering from the effects of the war, which was partially justified by the ongoing detainment of the hostages, so I am quite sure he was talking about the war that will stop, when he wrote "civilians suffering".

 

But who knows, maybe he meant some horrific Arab TV shows.

 

However, my initial post that made you call me a not honest broker, was ... 

 

(By the way, I am no broker, never was. I am a medic)

 

On 10/24/2025 at 4:59 PM, Somjot said:

Wait a minute. Didn't all those pro Israel fellows here again and again repeat, give back the hostages and the war will end immediately.

 

That was no quote. I was just giving the general sense of many posts, I had read in the last months, which should have been plausible for you, as

1. I did not use " ", which are applied when quoting someone

2. I was referring to "pro Israel fellows", meaning Plural, and basic common sense should have told you that it is rather unlikely that all of them used exactly the same words.

 

But why stick to profanities when there is a chance to brand some opponent as a liar, right?

 

And you have no problem expressing insinuations like the one that I "must have loved that", when I mentioned the Israeli hostages who had been shot by their own people.

 

You even applaud the resumption of the Israeli bombing of Gaza and the genocide.

 

Yet in your world I am the bad guy.

 

5 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

You must be used to talking with children or fools.

 

Children not so much but the latter, well, see above.

 

5 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

I say you are not an honest broker, because you are not an honest broker.

 

You do understand that an insinuation cannot be proved by repeating the same insinuation, don`t you?

 

5 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

the truth will out. 

 

Just accept it, YOUR truth is completely out. And so are you.

 

You must be really desperate, when you have to come up with such extremely far-fetched allegations to oppose me.

 

Understandable, you are defending mass murder, starvation and land theft.

6 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

What is the definition of genocide that all these human rights organizations use? 

 

Throwing out the next bait?

 

If you really wanted to know, you would have googled that already.

 

But instead you ask me about the definition of genocide used by those HR organizations.

 

Why? Because you respect me as a source of knowledge and wisdom? 

 

All you want is me quoting that and just changing the words a little bit without corrupting the definition or even just forgetting a "," and once again you have a "proof" of me being a liar, which makes all I said a lie, and all my critique towards Israel wrong.

 

You`re becoming predictable.

 

But to quote Jamie Lannister: "Not much to be gained from discussing with you though, is there?"

13 minutes ago, Somjot said:

 

OMG! Are you serious?

 

You accuse me of being a liar and not an honest broker because I wrote the sentence above and despite these quotes

 

 

Aha, and what do you think was meant by "it"? Global warming? 

Did you miss the part about disarming? 

13 minutes ago, Somjot said:

Oh, and how exactly do you continue a war, if you have withdrawn already?

Withdrawing only means a pause. 

13 minutes ago, Somjot said:

Well, maybe you haven`t noticed but in the recent 2 years Palestinians were mostly if not exclusively suffering from the effects of the war, which was partially justified by the ongoing detainment of the hostages, so I am quite sure he was talking about the war that will stop, when he wrote "civilians suffering".

 

But who knows, maybe he meant some horrific Arab TV shows.

The dead hostages are still being held, even though the Palestinians promised to return the bodies. 

13 minutes ago, Somjot said:

 

However, my initial post that made you call me a not honest broker, was ... 

 

(By the way, I am no broker, never was. I am a medic)

 

 

That was no quote. I was just giving the general sense of many posts, I had read in the last months, which should have been plausible for you, as

1. I did not use " ", which are applied when quoting someone

2. I was referring to "pro Israel fellows", meaning Plural, and basic common sense should have told you that it is rather unlikely that all of them used exactly the same words.

 

But why stick to profanities when there is a chance to brand some opponent as a liar, right?

 

And you have no problem expressing insinuations like the one that I "must have loved that", when I mentioned the Israeli hostages who had been shot by their own people.

 

You even applaud the resumption of the Israeli bombing of Gaza and the genocide.

 

Yet in your world I am the bad guy.

 

 

Children not so much but the latter, well, see above.

 

 

You do understand that an insinuation cannot be proved by repeating the same insinuation, don`t you?

 

 

Just accept it, YOUR truth is completely out. And so are you.

 

You must be really desperate, when you have to come up with such extremely far-fetched allegations to oppose me.

 

Understandable, you are defending mass murder, starvation and land theft.

You claimed people were making claims they had not made, and then you say you weren't quoting them, so you can pretend they said anything they like. 

 

Again, you are not honest.