A typical adult has an estimated 8.7 quadrillion atoms of aluminium in their brain.

1 minute ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Sir! We had a gentleman's agreement. You wouldn't mention JWs, and I wouldn't say you spent most of your day on the rowing machine.

I don't have a rowing machine, but you have a dodgy agenda, chap...........😬

Another example of a scary atoms........

 

Mercury crosses the blood-brain barrier and disrupts neuronal membranes, neurotransmitters, and mitochondrial function. Linked to tremors, memory loss, and cognitive decline.

•  Typical levels: In non-exposed individuals, brain mercury is often <0.01 µg/g.

•  Atom count: For 0.01 µg/g in a 1,300 g brain:

 

That’s 39 quadrillion atoms—even at “low” levels.

22 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

You might want to get your misinformation straight:

 

"No, asbestos is not intentionally added to talc; however, because talc and asbestos are natural minerals that can form together in the earth, talc deposits are often contaminated with asbestos."

 

--AI assisted

 

Did I say "intentionally added?" No I did not. Please don't misquote me to suit your own narrative.

AI Overview

No, most major baby powder brands no longer contain asbestos because 

Johnson & Johnson stopped selling talc-based powder globally in 2023, replacing it with a cornstarch formula. While talc-based powders from the past have been found to be contaminated with asbestos, most new products are now asbestos-free due to the switch from talc to cornstarch and to avoid legal issues and lawsuits. 

It'll be microchips next 

28 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

I can't see any problem with challenging and investigating what is considered the norm.

I agree.... but just a suspicion about something shouldn't be given much attention until some actual research is conducted.

 

Pretty much the world of science does listen but all too often the suspicions are raised by those with no real experience or education in the subject under consideration.

3 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

I agree.... but just a suspicion about something shouldn't be given much attention until some actual research is conducted.

 

Pretty much the world of science does listen but all too often the suspicions are raised by those with no real experience or education in the subject under consideration.

Like the OP...................😒

•  Cookware (annual exposure): 6.7 × 10¹⁹ atoms

•  Vaccines (lifetime exposure): 2.8 × 10¹⁶ atoms

 

So cookware delivers roughly 2,400 times more aluminium atoms annually than all vaccine injections combined over a lifetime.

1 hour ago, transam said:

 

Are you by any chance a single chap....?  🥴

You can find more than you ever want to know here:

https://aseannow.com/topic/1134505-diary-of-a-farang-in-isaan/

 

1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

•  Cookware (annual exposure): 6.7 × 10¹⁹ atoms

•  Vaccines (lifetime exposure): 2.8 × 10¹⁶ atoms

 

So cookware delivers roughly 2,400 times more aluminium atoms annually than all vaccine injections combined over a lifetime.

What do you think we have skin and a digestive system for Will Sir?

 

Best not to get them confused. Or you might be injecting hamburgers and swallowing soap-suds.

2 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

Your responses to ANY topic that challenges the MSM and medical establishment 'accepted narrative' on Vaccine related topics is so predictable. 

First you 'shoot the messenger' by making the author or the source suspect, preferably by making use of bought so-called 'fact-checker' sources. 

Then you flood the threat with posts from what you consider 'trusted sources' like the CDC, FDA or WHO, all of whom are deeply invested in keeping the Vaccine myth alive on behalf of their Big Pharma bosses, funding and having infiltrated those vile institutions. 

 

The intent of doing the above is clear > de-railing the threat from the very start.  

It is partly succesful because it sure scares away the occasional visitors to the threat which are not inclined to delve into that tsunami of semi-science pro-vaxxer nonsense and are giving the whole threat a miss. 

Luckily the more diligent AN-members are aware of your approach and simply skip your posts. 

As @Stiddle Mump correctly remarked > you erroneously seem to think that starting a 'cut-and-past competition' is equivalent to an open-minded discussion or debate about the controversial Vaccine topic.  

Well said!!

44 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

I agree.... but just a suspicion about something shouldn't be given much attention until some actual research is conducted.

Do you think mRNA Covid-19 vaccine harms are "just a suspicion" or something that needs rigorous independent scientific examination?

1 minute ago, Stiddle Mump said:

What do you think we have skin and a digestive system for Will Sir?

 

Best not to get them confused. Or you might be injecting hamburgers and swallowing soap-suds.

 

 

What a truly pathetic statement to make.

 

One of many you make, but this is well in the lead.

18 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

What do you think we have skin and a digestive system for Will Sir?

is your alimentary canal not allowing the bloodstream to absorb anything?

 

If I had a pet duck, it would say....quack, quack... lol

3 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

is your alimentary canal not allowing the bloodstream to absorb anything?  quack, quack... lol

 

Thank you.

 

I do try to resist posting on these particular threads.....but I'm weak.

Several off-topic posts exchanging personal comments about forum members have been removed, pursuant to the forum's rules.

 

The Aluminum intake from anti-perspirant and Aluminum foil is higher. The whole OP is dangerous nonsense.

50 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Do you think mRNA Covid-19 vaccine harms are "just a suspicion" or something that needs rigorous independent scientific examination?

They have been studied the  risk/benefit analysis lands squarely on the side of vaccination.

1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

Do you think mRNA Covid-19 vaccine harms are "just a suspicion" or something that needs rigorous independent scientific examination?

The noisy crew on AN posting the suspicions of mRNA (or all) vaccines are uneducated and without significant experience in actual science work.  They have heard/read misinformation and swallowed it whole which has fostered strange obsessions.  Up to you to choose who's reliable.

16 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

They have been studied the  risk/benefit analysis lands squarely on the side of vaccination.

That would be the studies done and or paid for by big pharma. I said indepenendent scientific studies.

12 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

misinformation

Misinformation like safe and effective and if you get jabbed you can't spread it? 

8 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

That would be the studies done and or paid for by big pharma. I said indepenendent scientific studies.

Why? You ignore all studies in favor of Qanonsense innuendo.

15 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

That would be the studies done and or paid for by big pharma. I said indepenendent scientific studies.

Says the bloke who's had covid 8 times...........😂

 

So who does the independent studies, you and the OP.......😬............🤣

Just now, transam said:

Says the bloke who's had covid 8 times...........😂

 

So who does the independent studies, you and the OP.......😬............🤣

The set up a special lab in Moms basement.

4 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

The set up a special lab in Moms basement.

following instructions from the world famous University of YouTube.

 

Certainly there's no financial influence on YouTube's content, right?

Clickbait is just some leftist denial fabricated nonsense. Wink, wink!

3 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

The set up a special lab in Moms basement.

They would burn the place down....😬

39 minutes ago, transam said:

Says the bloke who's had covid 8 times...........😂

 

So who does the independent studies, you and the OP.......😬............🤣

Surprise Surprise. Your only comments so far have not addressed the topic but have been your usual snide remarks complete with emojis of course. Boring.

The topic has been addressed, both in the total NON-credibility of the misinformation peddling, non-medical source in the OP, and what decades of research has shown:

 

From the U.S. CDC:

Fact

"Adjuvants have been used safely in vaccines for decades. [emphasis added]

 

Aluminum salts, such as aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, and aluminum potassium sulfate have been used safely in vaccines for more than 70 years. Aluminum salts were initially used in the 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s with diphtheria and tetanus vaccines after it was found they strengthened the body's immune response to these vaccines. [emphasis added]

 

In all cases, vaccines containing adjuvants are tested for safety and effectiveness in clinical trials before they are licensed for use in the United States, and these vaccines are continuously monitored by CDC and FDA once they are approved."

 

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/about/adjuvants.html

48 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Surprise Surprise. Your only comments so far have not addressed the topic but have been your usual snide remarks complete with emojis of course. Boring.

YOU went off onto COVID..................😂

2 minutes ago, transam said:

YOU went off onto COVID..................😂

In the context of vaccines and scientific investigation into the problems therein. No snide comment and no personal attack. You should try this approach sometime.