12 hours ago, NickyLouie said:

She's won't be missed , hopefully the others will take note

Are you absolutely certain that her family, her wife, her relatives and her three children will not miss her? Do you know that for a fact?

Or are you just playing the role of a nasty, hostile, highly partisan grumpy old man?

On 1/9/2026 at 5:59 PM, Yellowtail said:

 

 

The left want open borders and mass migration, and they'll do whatever it takes, including stoking violence.

Elementary Philosophy of Revolution from Lenin, Stalin: death advances the cause.

As per their other hero, National Socialist Leader Adolf Hitler, who is here quoted by Wikpedia in the article about Horst Wessel:

"[those} who live for that task and who die for it ... [they would] later be not only the martyrs of their struggle but also the seed from which the subsequent harvest [would come]"

Wonder how long it will be before they erect a statue of her. Maybe take down Washington, he owned slaves.

26 minutes ago, Tug said:

Naa he’s more akin to vidkum quesling definitely hates free speech democracy and is definitely into authoritarian regimes.anyway the trigger happy idiots cam was interesting on video you see her turning her steering wheel hard right attempting to flee….right or wrong that shouldn’t be a death sentence and the idiot ice thug shouldent be so stupid as to stand in front of someone’s car as they attempt to flee…..that’s a bad shooting no doubt about it,definitely uncalled for and a gross over reaction.

Id respond, but I dont read incoherence well.

16 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

As yes, Jen Psaki, that noted journalist and unbiased reporter of facts.

While it is interesting that the agents left, it has zero to do with the circumstances of the shooting. Now, new video has come to light that shows Renee Good sitting in the middle of the road for 3 minutes, blasting her horn, dancing in her car, and apparently having a great old time doing so. All while federal agents were attempting to perform their legal duties.

Again, this shows her intent was to confront ICE, disrupt their operations, which is a crime. So she couldn't have been surprised when ICE agents approached her and legally ordered her out of the car. Instead, she added to her crimes by attempting to flee arrest by driving away. Which led to the tragic shooting.

"Tragic shooting" implies it was sort of an accident. It wasn't. He shot her in the head through the side window, and that's murder.

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Elementary Philosophy of Revolution from Lenin, Stalin: death advances the cause.

As per their other hero, National Socialist Leader Adolf Hitler, who is here quoted by Wikpedia in the article about Horst Wessel:

"[those} who live for that task and who die for it ... [they would] later be not only the martyrs of their struggle but also the seed from which the subsequent harvest [would come]"

Wonder how long it will be before they erect a statue of her. Maybe take down Washington, he owned slaves.

You're sick.........😒

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Elementary Philosophy of Revolution from Lenin, Stalin: death advances the cause.

As per their other hero, National Socialist Leader Adolf Hitler, who is here quoted by Wikpedia in the article about Horst Wessel:

"[those} who live for that task and who die for it ... [they would] later be not only the martyrs of their struggle but also the seed from which the subsequent harvest [would come]"

Wonder how long it will be before they erect a statue of her. Maybe take down Washington, he owned slaves.

You’re quoting Hitler as a basis for your argument.

Get a grip man.

12 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You’re quoting Hitler as a basis for your argument.

Get a grip man.

I'm quoting socialist Hitler as an example of the philosophy that you promote and support

14 minutes ago, transam said:

You're sick.........😒

Maybe, but I do not support child sex predators, nor do I interfere with their arrest. Do you think that illegal alien child sex Predators should be removed from communities?

19 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

I'm quoting socialist Hitler as an example of the philosophy that you promote and support

No you’re not.

You are gaslighting your hogwash assertion of who regards Hitler as a hero, then you quote Hitler as the basis of your own arguments.

Get a grip man.

33 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

No you’re not.

You are gaslighting your hogwash assertion of who regards Hitler as a hero, then you quote Hitler as the basis of your own arguments.

Get a grip man.

From a guy bragging about how this poor woman's death would help the left in the midterms.

Always classy the left.

10 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

From a guy bragging about how this poor woman's death would help the left in the midterms.

Always classy the left.

Making stuff up again.

16 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Again the DHS is caught out with their bald-faced lies, in defense of agents who have committed murder. They seem to be exhibiting the same level of moral bankruptcy as the president. According to them truth is not truth. Not a good look.

DHS and the administration have repeatedly said that agents were fanning out across the country to detain immigrants who’d committed crimes. (Vice President JD Vance made this claim on Thursday, in fact.) As 2025 unfolded, though, we learned that immigrants with no criminal record made up more ICE arrests than immigrants with criminal convictions. The number of detainees arrested by ICE without convictions or pending criminal charges rose from 842 on Dec. 1, 2024, to 21,892 on Nov. 30, 2025 — an astounding 2,500% increase.

U.S. District Court Judge Sara Ellis summarized the credibility of Noem and DHS in a 233-page ruling issued in late November. After articulating several claims that DHS had presented in a lawsuit alleging the use of excessive force in Chicago, Ellis anticipated how the government would respond.

“While Defendants may argue that the Court identifies only minor inconsistencies,” Ellis wrote, “every minor inconsistency adds up, and at some point, it becomes difficult, if not impossible, to believe almost anything that Defendants represent.”

The government accused two people, Marimar Martinez and Anthony Ruiz, of attempting to ambush federal agents. DHS claimed that Martinez was armed and that she was struck by “defensive fire” from officers. Both were described by the agency as “domestic terrorists” — as was Renee Good.

The Justice Department eventually dropped the charges against Martinez and Ruiz. A permitted firearm holder, Martinez never took her gun out of her purse. Her attorney said that he’d seen footage indicating that DHS agents rammed her car, rather than her striking them. The DHS official who relayed this story to the press? Tricia McLaughlin.

One might wonder why agents of the federal government would consistently misrepresent the actions of their agency and its employees. Some of it might be explained by their desire to show allegiance to their workforce. Some might be ascribed to errors or incomplete information. But we cannot assume that this is the sole motivation when the government agency at issue is part of the Trump administration.

The president has repeatedly demonstrated a willingness in the past decade to make false claims that impugn his opponents or celebrate his allies — or both. This approach has permeated the government, carried into individual agencies by the loyal allies he’s installed as their leaders.

What this means, though, is that the skepticism one ought to bring to any pronouncement of Trump should similarly be applied to those who work for and defend him. Particularly when — as in the case of the Department of Homeland Security — those officials have repeatedly been caught in fabrications of their own.

Kristi Noem and DHS do not deserve the benefit of the doubt.

https://share.google/x4gCOznmUnx0wwxRq

It would seem as if the thumbs down emojis are represented by people who are either living in complete denial, or just simply prefer to remain deluded by the official version or should I say the fake version of the events and the incredibly lame attempts at a total cover-up, which has been discredited even at the judicial level.

Trump and Noem are both lowlifes, pathological liars, and truth, sincerity and reality mean nothing to them. It's all about the look for them and it's never about the substance.

4 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

You are very poorly misinformed

Thank you for confirming that, if I'm "very poorly misinformed" [sic], I must, then, be very well informed.

1 hour ago, BLMFem said:

"Tragic shooting" implies it was sort of an accident. It wasn't. He shot her in the head through the side window, and that's murder.

No, the shot was through the drivers side windscreen after she tried to kill him with her lethal weapon, her accelerating car, as the bullet hole clearly shows.

6 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No, the shot was through the drivers side windscreen after she tried to kill him with her lethal weapon

How you know she tried to kill him? Have you not considered she might have been trying to do something else that did not require an instant assassination?

6 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No, the shot was through the drivers side windscreen after she tried to kill him with her lethal weapon, her accelerating car, as the bullet hole clearly shows.

He stepped aside and fired twice more to make sure she was dead.

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Maybe, but I do not support child sex predators, nor do I interfere with their arrest. Do you think that illegal alien child sex Predators should be removed from communities?

😒.......Oh dear, I think you are lost................🤔

10 minutes ago, Palatus said:

How you know she tried to kill him? Have you not considered she might have been trying to do something else that did not require an instant assassination?

Legally, it does not matter what she intended, she is not on trial. It only matters whether or not it was reasonable for the officer to believe she was endangering his life.

14 minutes ago, Real Name Hidden said:

22 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No, the shot was through the drivers side windscreen after she tried to kill him with her lethal weapon, her accelerating car, as the bullet hole clearly shows.

He stepped aside and fired twice more to make sure she was dead.

Perhaps he stepped aside and fired twice more to stop her as the vehicle continued to attempt to leave.

2 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Perhaps he stepped aside and fired twice more to stop her as the vehicle continued to attempt to leave.

Or he was frightened and thought she was going to continue running people down.

Only he knows what was going through his head.

18 minutes ago, Palatus said:

25 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No, the shot was through the drivers side windscreen after she tried to kill him with her lethal weapon

How you know she tried to kill him?

She drove her SUV at him...and hit him. Maybe you're right, though, perhaps she accelerated into him with the intention of using her SUV to knock him out of the way and only slightly injure him?

38 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

Trump and Noem are both lowlifes, pathological liars, and truth, sincerity and reality mean nothing to them. It's all about the look for them and it's never about the substance.

The truth shall set you free.

This is a prior incident involving the same ICE agent.

He pulls over a "wanted man" ie criminal. Officer has his hand in the car and the guy drives off, dragging the officer.

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

Legally, it does not matter what she intended, she is not on trial. It only matters whether or not it was reasonable for the officer to believe she was endangering his life.

3 shot execution............😒

37 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No, the shot was through the drivers side windscreen after she tried to kill him with her lethal weapon, her accelerating car, as the bullet hole clearly shows.

She didn't try to kill him..............🙄

Notice how all the Trump obsessed lefties claim to know what everyone is thinking.

14 minutes ago, transam said:

52 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

No, the shot was through the drivers side windscreen after she tried to kill him with her lethal weapon, her accelerating car, as the bullet hole clearly shows.

She didn't try to kill him..............🙄

How do you know?

17 minutes ago, transam said:

29 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Legally, it does not matter what she intended, she is not on trial. It only matters whether or not it was reasonable for the officer to believe she was endangering his life.

3 shot execution............😒

Three shot attemp to stop an escaping person who had just driven at, and hit, a law enforcement officer.

2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Notice how all the Trump obsessed lefties claim to know what everyone is thinking.

The only one that is obsessed is you, protecting an executioner.......🤫

Also, you're obsessed with "lefties", when I reckon tyhose who voted Trump will vote for the left side of politics to get Trump out to graze, to get the USA back to some sort of normality..

Isn't it funny that those supporting Trump and the shooter, live in Thailand.....😁

Just now, Liverpool Lou said:

Three shot attemp to stop an escaping person who had just driven at and hit a law enforcemen officer.

No she never, besides, your man was an ICE agent.......🤫

3 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

How do you know?

The car tyres were pointing the wrong way........🤗

The car was covered by many agents with guns, I doubt very much she wanted to get wasted, just laugh and move on, she was joking with the shooter................🤭

The execution was by a loose cannon, we all watched it, a bunch of cowboys...😒