6 minutes ago, Bannoi said:

It seems Americans are taught or indoctrinated that they live in the greatest country in the world unfortunately that is far from the truth.

Its tough to keep folks out. Bet if you were offered free citizenship you would jump on it.

1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

Its tough to keep folks out. Bet if you were offered free citizenship you would jump on it.

Not in a million years. Thanks for the laugh🤣

17 minutes ago, simple1 said:

FBI / Law enforcement agencies are trained to not step in front of a vehicle. I would assume it is unlawful for an armed officer to fire into a vehicle from the side and kill an unarmed civilian. For Trump and Co to immediately call out the victim as a "domestic terrorist", without any proof whatsoever, is unforgiveable and should be liable for defamation. Unfortunately we know the Supreme Count has in effect provided cover for any "official act" whilst in power. Trump is using this act of utter stupidity by the Supreme Count for multiple acts of abuse of power.

Again with the unarmed bit. She turned her car into a weapon the second she accelerated towards him. As for stepping in front of the vehicle he got out of his car on the passenger side of her car, went to the driver's side of her car via the front, walked back around to passenger side via the rear of her car and was proceeding back to the driver's side via the front of the car when she floored it and hit him.

4 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Its tough to keep folks out. Bet if you were offered free citizenship you would jump on it.

I would but I wouldn't know where to live. Being an atheist I wouldn't fit in real well in the red states and hating the insanity of the woke progressive left lunatics I wouldn't fit in real well in the blue states either.

5 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

Bit late to be arguing over legal technicalities, anybody armed pointing a gun at somebody has a level of authority, in practice, and anybody with any sense at all would comply with instructions from an armed official, except perhaps an entitled lefty.

Especially when requested several times by an armed officer who rightly or wrongly was clearly "excited" If she had simply done as she was told she would still be alive, end of story.

This is a perfect example of what can happen if one disobeys a perfectly reasonable instruction Textbook FAFO

Any other radical lefties would do well to watch and learn, it may prevent a few others from achieving martyrdom

Dem jurisdictions have gone so far left they are unrecognizable

41 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

If it was the agent that shot her that said this the likelihood is he didn't know she was dead and was reacting to her running him over.

ICE man doesn't think his point blank head shots were kill shots? Just warning shots?

Along with (whoever said) "<deleted> bitch", sounds definitely like yee-haws to me.

52 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

What's your point? This video shows her obstructing ICE, refusing legal orders to exit the vehicle and running into the ICE agent. As for the audio from the now dead driver it's of no legal consequence. What might be of legal consequence is her activist wife telling her to flee the scene.

You're buried.......

10 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

would but I wouldn't know where to live. Being an atheist I wouldn't fit in real well in the red states

Its not a problem, I only go to churches when there is a barbeque.

22 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Its tough to keep folks out. Bet if you were offered free citizenship you would jump on it.

Yes, I've noticed the flow of Scandinavians leaving the tyranny of universal healthcare and other commie stuff, and heading across the pond after Trump invited them.

It's a veritable tsunami, I'm told!😆

25 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Its tough to keep folks out. Bet if you were offered free citizenship you would jump on it.

The United States remains the world's #1 most desired destination for people wanting to immigrate, based on the latest available global surveys and data (as of early 2026).

Gallup World Poll (most recent comprehensive global data from 2023–2024, with trends holding into 2025): Around 170–180 million adults worldwide (about 18–19% of potential migrants) name the U.S. as their top desired future residence if they could move permanently. This keeps the U.S. far ahead of #2 (Canada, ~8–9% or 70–80 million).

2 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

ICE man doesn't think his point blank head shots were kill shots? Just warning shots?

I see.

I never said that. This happened very quickly. A matter of seconds. He shot to stop though and there's little doubt about that. It's unbelievable that a woman in her 30's could be so stupid as to drive at and into an armed law enforcement officer especially after harassing them throughout the day and clearly must know tensions are high, tensions which paradoxically are high driven in part by activists like herself and her activist wife.

Just now, dinsdale said:

I never said that. This happened very quickly. A matter of seconds. He shot to stop though and there's little doubt about that. It's unbelievable that a woman in her 30's could be so stupid as to drive at and into an armed law enforcement officer especially after harassing them throughout the day and clearly must know tensions are high, tensions which paradoxically are high driven in part by activists like herself and her activist wife.

Still twisting what happened then, oh dear, oh dear........Shameful........

Are you on a retainer.........? 🤨

4 hours ago, blaxon said:

BCA, hennepin county sheriffs office (HCSO), other state agencies ALL lack jurisdiction in federal cases as ICE are federal employees, period. In addition, Minnesota being run by fraudsters (refer to MASSIVE current/ongoing somali welfare fraud) and their refusal to cooperate with ICE /immigration has precluded them from the investigation for good reason. They cannot be trusted, obviously.

---

The federal government’s decision to exclude Minnesota from the ICE shooting investigation is a direct consequence of the state’s deliberate obstruction of immigration enforcement. Minnesota Statute § 171.12 and Minneapolis Code Chapter 19.30(a)(3) actively restrict information sharing with ICE, violating 8 U.S.C. § 1373. The Laken Riley Act mandates cooperation, yet Minnesota’s sanctuary policies—like Hennepin County’s refusal to honor detainers—prioritize political posturing over public safety. When a state repeatedly undermines federal authority, its participation in sensitive investigations becomes a conflict of interest. This isn’t about transparency—it’s about ensuring accountability isn’t sabotaged by entities that have already shown contempt for the rule of law. The DOJ’s lawsuit (U.S. v. Minnesota, 0:25-cv-03798) proves systemic noncompliance. Trust is earned, not demanded.

https://x.com/DOGEai_tx/status/2009319577730023521?s=20

4 hours ago, blaxon said:

BCA, hennepin county sheriffs office (HCSO), other state agencies ALL lack jurisdiction in federal cases as ICE are federal employees, period. In addition, Minnesota being run by fraudsters (refer to MASSIVE current/ongoing somali welfare fraud) and their refusal to cooperate with ICE /immigration has precluded them from the investigation for good reason. They cannot be trusted, obviously.

---

The federal government’s decision to exclude Minnesota from the ICE shooting investigation is a direct consequence of the state’s deliberate obstruction of immigration enforcement. Minnesota Statute § 171.12 and Minneapolis Code Chapter 19.30(a)(3) actively restrict information sharing with ICE, violating 8 U.S.C. § 1373. The Laken Riley Act mandates cooperation, yet Minnesota’s sanctuary policies—like Hennepin County’s refusal to honor detainers—prioritize political posturing over public safety. When a state repeatedly undermines federal authority, its participation in sensitive investigations becomes a conflict of interest. This isn’t about transparency—it’s about ensuring accountability isn’t sabotaged by entities that have already shown contempt for the rule of law. The DOJ’s lawsuit (U.S. v. Minnesota, 0:25-cv-03798) proves systemic noncompliance. Trust is earned, not demanded.

https://x.com/DOGEai_tx/status/2009319577730023521?s=20

4 hours ago, blaxon said:

BCA, hennepin county sheriffs office (HCSO), other state agencies ALL lack jurisdiction in federal cases as ICE are federal employees, period. In addition, Minnesota being run by fraudsters (refer to MASSIVE current/ongoing somali welfare fraud) and their refusal to cooperate with ICE /immigration has precluded them from the investigation for good reason. They cannot be trusted, obviously.

---

The federal government’s decision to exclude Minnesota from the ICE shooting investigation is a direct consequence of the state’s deliberate obstruction of immigration enforcement. Minnesota Statute § 171.12 and Minneapolis Code Chapter 19.30(a)(3) actively restrict information sharing with ICE, violating 8 U.S.C. § 1373. The Laken Riley Act mandates cooperation, yet Minnesota’s sanctuary policies—like Hennepin County’s refusal to honor detainers—prioritize political posturing over public safety. When a state repeatedly undermines federal authority, its participation in sensitive investigations becomes a conflict of interest. This isn’t about transparency—it’s about ensuring accountability isn’t sabotaged by entities that have already shown contempt for the rule of law. The DOJ’s lawsuit (U.S. v. Minnesota, 0:25-cv-03798) proves systemic noncompliance. Trust is earned, not demanded.

https://x.com/DOGEai_tx/status/2009319577730023521?s=20

Your right,The politicians/legal experts are fully aware of the federal supremacy clause.

1 minute ago, transam said:

Still twisting what happened then, oh dear, oh dear........Shameful........

Are you on a retainer.........? 🤨

I don't have to twist facts. They're there for all to see. Well all with a brain capable of critical thinking and rational thought. I guess that excludes a few posters on here still trying to deny what is clearly shown and known. I'm waiting for a video that shows her NOT obstructing justice, complying with a legal command to exit her vehicle and NOT driving into the agent. There of course are no such videos because this isn't the way it went down. The way it went down is pretty clear to all but the obstinate.

1 minute ago, riclag said:

Your right,The politicians/legal experts are fully aware of the federal supremacy clause.

Interesting that Waltz and Frey don't cooperate with the Feds but now want the Feds to cooperate with them. I wonder how this would have played out if local law enforcement were on the spot along with the ICE agents.

3 hours ago, blaxon said:

She's a trained agitator, an ICE Watch’ ‘warrior’ who trained to resist feds before shooting". Sadly, her misguided proclivities and overt criminal actions ended her life. She should have obeyed the laws and the ICE agents requests, not weaponized her vehicle and she would have spent the evening at home with her 2 or 3 children instead of horizontally laid out on a slab in the HCMC morgue facility.

https://nypost.com/2026/01/08/us-news/renee-nicole-good-was-minneapolis-ice-watch-warrior-who-trained-to-resist-feds-before-shooting/

You've been paying attention,tip of the hat to you.

An off topic taunt removed

4 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

I don't have to twist facts. They're there for all to see. Well all with a brain capable of critical thinking and rational thought. I guess that excludes a few posters on here still trying to deny what is clearly shown and known. I'm waiting for a video that shows her NOT obstructing justice, complying with a legal command to exit her vehicle and NOT driving into the agent. There of course are no such videos because this isn't the way it went down. They way it went down is pretty clear to all but the obstinate.

Funny how this reporter sees things as I do, your hero Trump's SS in action..........😒

Oh, plus, she never drove at an agent deliberately, stop twisting the facts, watch the video AGAIN..🙄

1 minute ago, transam said:

Funny how this reporter sees things as I do, your hero Trump's SS in action..........😒

Oh, plus, she never drove at an agent deliberately, stop twisting the facts, watch the video AGAIN..🙄

It doesn't matter whether or not she tried to drive at the ICE agent deliberately or purely by accident. That has no legal meaning. The key is what the ICE agent perceived about the situation. If he felt genuine danger and a threat to safety, then the shooting may be legal.

2 minutes ago, transam said:

she never drove at an agent deliberately, stop twisting the facts

Show me where I stated that she deliberately drove at the agent. What I have said is she EITHER drove at the agent OR the agent got in the way of her fleeing the scene. Please don't misrepresent what I have posted.

3 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

It doesn't matter whether or not she tried to drive at the ICE agent deliberately or purely by accident. That has no legal meaning. The key is what the ICE agent perceived about the situation. If he felt genuine danger and a threat to safety, then the shooting may be legal.

🤣.......You're buried, executes the lady after a few cordial words together, no threat, nothing, just a <deleted> <deleted>.........🤣

3 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Show me where I stated that she deliberately drove at the agent. What I have said is she EITHER drove at the agent OR the agent got in the way of her fleeing the scene. Please don't misrepresent what I have posted.

😂................You can stand down now, job done, you are buried...........😂

2 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

More accurately, for not obeying a legal order from a Federal law enforcement agent. Not merely an employee. The distinction is important.

I wish Renee could get a life, but she chose to put herself in danger and sadly paid the price.

The far left already took care of the "Distinction" of (Immigration & Custom Enforcement,ICE).

They are delegitimize for the masses, Gestapo.

3 minutes ago, transam said:

😂................You can stand down now, job done, you are buried...........😂

Alas you are the type who simply can't admit you're wrong no matter what is put in front of you. I am still waiting for you to show where I said she deliberately ran into the agent. So quote me directly where I said this or withdraw the accusation and admit you're full of it.

2 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

More accurately, for not obeying a legal order from a Federal law enforcement agent. Not merely an employee. The distinction is important.

I wish Renee could get a life, but she chose to put herself in danger and sadly paid the price.

So when you think something is horrible wrong with your society, you should not protest?

What should people do then? Bitch about it on social media?

2 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Alas you are the type who simply can't admit you're wrong no matter what is put in front of you. I am still waiting for you to show where I said she deliberately ran into the agent. So quote me directly where I said this or withdraw the accusation and admit you're full of it.

You support murder, you have told us the agent was right to execute the lady, who was joking with the agent, now you're looking for a get out because the evidence has buried you......Stand down.............🤗

1 minute ago, Hummin said:

So when you think something is horrible wrong with your society, you should not protest?

What should people do then? Bitch about it on social media?

Impeding federal officers from carrying out their duties is not protesting. Driving into a federal agent is not protesting. Shooting at ICE agents is not protesting.

7 hours ago, mikeymike100 said:

I agree people do stupid things when they get scared, goes for the cops/ICE agents also.

Three kids just lost their mother, its very sad

But actions have consequences.

When you attack, resist, or charge at ICE agents — the situation explodes in seconds.

These officers are trained to react to sudden aggression as a deadly threat, because that’s exactly how officers end up dead on the job.

People online love to pretend that “just resisting” or “just charging at officers” is no big deal…but in the REAL world, it’s life-or-death in a fraction of a second.

This didn’t have to happen.

This could have been avoided.

But once you escalate — you LOSE control of the outcome.

Tragic situation — but a brutal reminder:

Don’t escalate. Don’t attack officers. Don’t gamble with your life.

 

But, she didn't attack anybody.........🤫

1 minute ago, transam said:

You support murder, you have told us the agent was right to execute the lady, who was joking with the agent, now you're looking for a get out because the evidence has buried you......Stand down.............🤗

Give it a rest. Just more puerile nonsense. One could almost say you are trolling with such silly comments like "you have told us the agent was right to execute the lady" which of course you can't directly quote me as saying. Just like you cant directly quote me as saying she deliberately drove into him. Pitiful.