7 hours ago, Effective altruism said:

Is any of this actionable in a court of law?

Once the Dems get back in control and release the full Epstein files they can. And civil courts will extract billions from the Trump grift family.

6 hours ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Epstein was working an extortion racket with Putin. Hence Trumps compliance with all things Russian.

Russiagate never dies.

Virtually everyone in the Epstein is Jewish. He's 100% working with Israel and the greater Jewish diaspora. This was basically the Jewish version of the UK grooming gangs.

7 minutes ago, NorthernRyland said:

Russiagate never dies.

Virtually everyone in the Epstein is Jewish. He's 100% working with Israel and the greater Jewish diaspora. This was basically the Jewish version of the UK grooming gangs.

There is a reason Russiagate never dies. Trump is a traitor.

What total nonsense.

Why is someone claiming Trump reported Epstein? Why now?

It's a total fabrication.

2 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

What total nonsense.

Why is someone claiming Trump reported Epstein? Why n

It's a total fabrication.

It has appeared in police records from the time. But if true, why did Trump lie about it in 2019 when he stated he had "no idea" what Epstein was up to.

There is no evidence that Trump made this report.

There’s lots of evidence of Trump’s continuing friendship and association with Epstein long after Epstein’s conviction.

Yes Trump knew about Epstein’s crimes.

No Trump did nothing about it.

Yes Trump continued his friendship and association with Epstein long after this alleged report and long after Epstein’s conviction.

28 minutes ago, NorthernRyland said:

Russiagate never dies.

Virtually everyone in the Epstein is Jewish. He's 100% working with Israel and the greater Jewish diaspora. This was basically the Jewish version of the UK grooming gangs.

It’s certainly odd that the press have not jumped to a fix an ethnic label to this particular ‘rape gang’.

12 hours ago, Yagoda said:

So it makes one wonder how he could be guilty of anything if he was the one complaining about it.

Does the concept of gaslighting not come to mind?

23 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Trump is not going to war with Russia, he is turning over the country to Russia.

Oh Lord, your mind is in complete disarray. Lay off the statins.

13. Low-Value Posts - Posts that add no written contribution are not allowed.

This includes emoji-only replies, very short comments, memes, GIFs, screenshots, or embedded social media posts without explanation or opinion.

A post has been removed.

9 hours ago, Effective altruism said:

Is any of this actionable in a court of law?

Well it was, it would have been and it would have every headline in the MSM?

14 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Looks like he was the first one to do so. So it makes one wonder how he could be guilty of anything if he was the one complaining about it. Of course, the people who are driven absolutely crazy by Trump will complain and spin.

https://www.salon.com/2026/02/10/everyone-has-known-trump-told-police-that-epsteins-conduct-was-open-secret/

https://www.hollywoodintoto.com/how-will-jimmy-kimmel-spin-this-trump-epstein-revelation/

"It may not be a smoking gun-level reveal, but it’s darn near close. Why would then-citizen Trump blow the whistle on Epstein if he had any real association with him?"

The problem with the anti Trump fanatics is that they obsessively blame every ill in the world on him, and use libel, slander, innuendo, outright lies and made up conspiracy theories to attack him. That does a disservice to everybody, because it makes even legitimate criticism look like a bunch of crazy BS. Screaming the sky is falling like deranged lunatics insures that nobody looks up when this guy actually does fall.

Spin away kiddies I noticed that this subject hasn't been raised yet. Meanwhile Bill Clinton was getting his fake charity pots sweetened by Epstein and his enablers.

And yes Lutnick should resign and Andrew prosecuted.

If you have listened to any of the Congressional Committee interrogating Trump's justice Secretary, you would have heard comments and questions to her by committee that has reviewed those unredacted files and would have heard them say that Trump should be indicted as he also took part in the child abuse! Just saying, the hearings are open to the public and are taking place almost daily now. Just saying, these Committee members also indicate that while he may have been referenced in the files already put out to the public some 38 thousand times, in the unredacted files he is mentioned "millions" of times by the committee members. If any further indictments do come out IMHO, Trump's DOJ will try to avoid serving him so it will be up to the American citizens whether they want he to remain in office or not unless he can cancel the fall elections for Congress.

17 minutes ago, Presnock said:

If you have listened to any of the Congressional Committee interrogating Trump's justice Secretary, you would have heard comments and questions to her by committee that has reviewed those unredacted files and would have heard them say that Trump should be indicted as he also took part in the child abuse! Just saying, the hearings are open to the public and are taking place almost daily now. Just saying, these Committee members also indicate that while he may have been referenced in the files already put out to the public some 38 thousand times, in the unredacted files he is mentioned "millions" of times by the committee members. If any further indictments do come out IMHO, Trump's DOJ will try to avoid serving him so it will be up to the American citizens whether they want he to remain in office or not unless he can cancel the fall elections for Congress.

You assume those congresscritters have access to all 3 million plus pages of documents.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Department of Justice will allow members of Congress to review unredacted files on the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein starting on Monday, according to a letter that was sent to lawmakers.

The letter obtained by The Associated Press says that lawmakers will be able to review unredacted versions of the more than 3 million files that the Justice Department has released to comply with a law passed by Congress last year.

https://apnews.com/article/epstein-files-congress-unredacted-justice-department-5219f89459e80a141b84e1aa2551b0d2

We promises on the precious, we does!

28 minutes ago, Presnock said:

If you have listened to any of the Congressional Committee interrogating Trump's justice Secretary, you would have heard comments and questions to her by committee that has reviewed those unredacted files and would have heard them say that Trump should be indicted as he also took part in the child abuse! Just saying, the hearings are open to the public and are taking place almost daily now. Just saying, these Committee members also indicate that while he may have been referenced in the files already put out to the public some 38 thousand times, in the unredacted files he is mentioned "millions" of times by the committee members. If any further indictments do come out IMHO, Trump's DOJ will try to avoid serving him so it will be up to the American citizens whether they want he to remain in office or not unless he can cancel the fall elections for Congress.

Who cares what those lunatic and insane democratic Representatives in the house say Except for folks utterly consumed by trump hate .

3 hours ago, JBChiangRai said:

What total nonsense.

Why is someone claiming Trump reported Epstein? Why now?

It's a total fabrication.

Because MAGA gets desperate, delusional actually, when even his own GOP starts turning against him.

1 hour ago, Presnock said:

If you have listened to any of the Congressional Committee interrogating Trump's justice Secretary, you would have heard comments and questions to her by committee that has reviewed those unredacted files and would have heard them say that Trump should be indicted as he also took part in the child abuse! Just saying, the hearings are open to the public and are taking place almost daily now. Just saying, these Committee members also indicate that while he may have been referenced in the files already put out to the public some 38 thousand times, in the unredacted files he is mentioned "millions" of times by the committee members. If any further indictments do come out IMHO, Trump's DOJ will try to avoid serving him so it will be up to the American citizens whether they want he to remain in office or not unless he can cancel the fall elections for Congress.

Pam Bondi only protects Trump and lies under oath:

Bondi lies to Congress, tells them Maxwell was not transferred to a 'lower-level facility'

Did Pam Bondi Just Lie Under Oath About Trump and Epstein? | The New Republic

15 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Looks like he was the first one to do so. So it makes one wonder how he could be guilty of anything if he was the one complaining about it. Of course, the people who are driven absolutely crazy by Trump will complain and spin.

https://www.salon.com/2026/02/10/everyone-has-known-trump-told-police-that-epsteins-conduct-was-open-secret/

https://www.hollywoodintoto.com/how-will-jimmy-kimmel-spin-this-trump-epstein-revelation/

"It may not be a smoking gun-level reveal, but it’s darn near close. Why would then-citizen Trump blow the whistle on Epstein if he had any real association with him?"

The problem with the anti Trump fanatics is that they obsessively blame every ill in the world on him, and use libel, slander, innuendo, outright lies and made up conspiracy theories to attack him. That does a disservice to everybody, because it makes even legitimate criticism look like a bunch of crazy BS. Screaming the sky is falling like deranged lunatics insures that nobody looks up when this guy actually does fall.

Spin away kiddies I noticed that this subject hasn't been raised yet. Meanwhile Bill Clinton was getting his fake charity pots sweetened by Epstein and his enablers.

And yes Lutnick should resign and Andrew prosecuted.

Answer me this...since Trump called the New York Post, informing them of what happened in connection with Mar a Lago in 2000, why did it take seven years to 'ban' Epstein?

He also knew that the girl was younger than eighteen, as she was his employee, recruited at sixteen as her father worked at Mar a Lago.

Maxwell hooked onto her at around seventeen years of age. Trump knew her exact age, so when he called into the NYP, he said "around eighteen". It's all documented. Then claimed to ban Epstein seven years later. Doesn't add up, does it?

So why is he lying?

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00037155.pdf

Sex Case Victims Lining Up. The New York Post -- Page Six 15 October 2007 Fi Mon, 15 Oct 2007 at 15:27 * October 15, 2007 -- LAWYERS for Manhattan billionaire investor Jeffrey Epstein - who's agreed to plead guilty to soliciting underage hookers - are bracing for a slew of lawsuits from as many as 40 young women who came to his Palm Beach mansion for massage sessions, Page Six has learned. During the probe that led to Epstein's plea deal, which will put him behind bars for 18 months, underage girls told cops they claimed to be 18 or over and gave the financier massages for hundreds of dollars per session. One g "purple vibrator" on her while she partially stripped. Cops say Epstein's assistant, court documents as just 14, said Epstein used a helped arrange the massages. "The lawyers have identified up to 40 women who could come forward, even though some of them didn't even see Epstein - they just accompanied their friends and stayed in the kitchen and had lunch," the source said. Epstein's legal team is also fighting to get some portions of the police report chronicling the sleazy activities changed. "For example, the state police reported finding in Mr. Epstein's garbage a 'sex toy.' Meanwhile, the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach last night confirmed a Web site report that Epstein has been banned there. "He would use the spa to try to procure girls. But one of them, a masseuse about 18 years old, he tried to get her to do things," a source told us. "Her father found out about it and went absolutely ape-[bleep]. Epstein's not allowed back." Epstein denies he is banned from Mar-a-Lago and says, in fact, he was recently invited to an event there.

5 hours ago, gargamon said:

Once the Dems get back in control and release the full Epstein files they can. And civil courts will extract billions from the Trump grift family.

Funny how that hasn't happened yet though. Could it be that there is no there there and that you have nothing but you're own obsession.

How convenient that you forget that the Democrats were in charge and didn't release the files then.

4 minutes ago, IsmeUno said:

Answer me this...since Trump called the New York Post, informing them of what happened in connection with Mar a Lago in 2000, why did it take seven years to 'ban' Epstein?

He also knew that the girl was younger than eighteen, as she was his employee, recruited at sixteen as her father worked at Mar a Lago.

Maxwell hooked onto her at around seventeen years of age. Trump knew her exact age, so when he called into the NYP, he said "around eighteen". It's all documented. Then claimed to ban Epstein seven years later. Doesn't add up, does it?

So why is he lying?

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00037155.pdf

Sex Case Victims Lining Up. The New York Post -- Page Six 15 October 2007 Fi Mon, 15 Oct 2007 at 15:27 * October 15, 2007 -- LAWYERS for Manhattan billionaire investor Jeffrey Epstein - who's agreed to plead guilty to soliciting underage hookers - are bracing for a slew of lawsuits from as many as 40 young women who came to his Palm Beach mansion for massage sessions, Page Six has learned. During the probe that led to Epstein's plea deal, which will put him behind bars for 18 months, underage girls told cops they claimed to be 18 or over and gave the financier massages for hundreds of dollars per session. One g "purple vibrator" on her while she partially stripped. Cops say Epstein's assistant, court documents as just 14, said Epstein used a helped arrange the massages. "The lawyers have identified up to 40 women who could come forward, even though some of them didn't even see Epstein - they just accompanied their friends and stayed in the kitchen and had lunch," the source said. Epstein's legal team is also fighting to get some portions of the police report chronicling the sleazy activities changed. "For example, the state police reported finding in Mr. Epstein's garbage a 'sex toy.' Meanwhile, the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach last night confirmed a Web site report that Epstein has been banned there. "He would use the spa to try to procure girls. But one of them, a masseuse about 18 years old, he tried to get her to do things," a source told us. "Her father found out about it and went absolutely ape-[bleep]. Epstein's not allowed back." Epstein denies he is banned from Mar-a-Lago and says, in fact, he was recently invited to an event there.

Wow according to the New York Post, I'm impressed. I thought it was a lying rag like Fox News. Regardless, when you quote from a source you shouldn't edit it. Carry on.

16 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Looks like he was the first one to do so. So it makes one wonder how he could be guilty of anything if he was the one complaining about it. Of course, the people who are driven absolutely crazy by Trump will complain and spin.

https://www.salon.com/2026/02/10/everyone-has-known-trump-told-police-that-epsteins-conduct-was-open-secret/

https://www.hollywoodintoto.com/how-will-jimmy-kimmel-spin-this-trump-epstein-revelation/

"It may not be a smoking gun-level reveal, but it’s darn near close. Why would then-citizen Trump blow the whistle on Epstein if he had any real association with him?"

The problem with the anti Trump fanatics is that they obsessively blame every ill in the world on him, and use libel, slander, innuendo, outright lies and made up conspiracy theories to attack him. That does a disservice to everybody, because it makes even legitimate criticism look like a bunch of crazy BS. Screaming the sky is falling like deranged lunatics insures that nobody looks up when this guy actually does fall.

Spin away kiddies I noticed that this subject hasn't been raised yet. Meanwhile Bill Clinton was getting his fake charity pots sweetened by Epstein and his enablers.

And yes Lutnick should resign and Andrew prosecuted.

And yet despite all this diversionary drivel the fact remains that Trump is mentioned more times in the Epstein files that god is mentioned in the Bible, or Harry Potter is mentioned in the book series....about Harry Potter!

But move along, nothing to see here.😂

Or, in the words of Pam Bondi, why are we talking about pedophiles and sex traffickers when the stock market is doing so well!

4 hours ago, JBChiangRai said:

What total nonsense.

Why is someone claiming Trump reported Epstein? Why now?

It's a total fabrication.

It's an interview of the local police chief by the FBI. It also confirms that Trump knew that Epstein was with teenagers and that Maxwell was involved. And reported it only after Epstein was arrested

The current DOJ did not corroborate it, as they would also corroborate what Trump knew and did not report before Epstein was arrested! 😀

9 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

And yet despite all this diversionary drivel the fact remains that Trump is mentioned more times in the Epstein files that god is mentioned in the Bible, or Harry Potter is mentioned in the book series....about Harry Potter!

Are you claiming someone who mentions Trump a lot must love him and support him?

16 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

And yet despite all this diversionary drivel the fact remains that Trump is mentioned more times in the Epstein files that god is mentioned in the Bible, or Harry Potter is mentioned in the book series....about Harry Potter!

But move along, nothing to see here.😂

You'll be telling us he was mentioned in Ashleys diary next😅

The only crime Trump has comitted is a convoluted book-keeping error long past the statute of expirations.

When you're one of the "everybody knew" what Epstein was doing (as Trump claimed when he congratulated the police Chief), you're no hero for keeping it to yourself until Epstein got arrested.

If Trump was one of the "everybodys", how many young girls were abused from the time Trump "found out" until Trump saw Epstein was arrested and tried to virtue signal?

22 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

But move along, nothing to see here.😂

Why would Trump drop a dime on him if he was involved? Too tough for you to answer?

Why if Trump is culpable didnt Bidens DOJ indict him? Another one thats too hard for you?

19 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Are you claiming someone who mentions Trump a lot must love him and support him?

No, I'm claiming that the constant use of strawman arguments by the Trump protectors is proof that defending the indefensible is impossibly hard work that makes those who attempt to do so look like......

10 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Wow according to the New York Post, I'm impressed. I thought it was a lying rag like Fox News. Regardless, when you quote from a source you shouldn't edit it. Carry on.

Where have I edited anything? You aren't really interested in the truth of the matter, are you?

I have provided the link to the DOJ website. In addition here is the original Page Six web page from 2007: https://pagesix.com/2007/10/15/sex-case-victims-lining-up/

So you cannot suggest that this has anything to do with his presidential run. He called in under his pseudonym, John Barron.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/04/2016-donald-trump-tabloids-new-york-post-daily-news-media-213842/

It seems more likely that they fell out in 2004 over the property auction with Trump using Virginia Guiffre to dob him in.

Doing so, also affected a lot of other people, including himself, so he's pretending that he had nothing to do with it.

He definitely knew what was going on and the level of his involvement should be openly investigated.

15 hours ago, Alan Zweibel said:

This is hilarious. For starters, he clearly was not the first person to blow the whistle. And we know this because former Chief of Palm Beach Police Michael Reiter said that Epstein had already been arrested for soliciting prostitution. It's a lot more likely that Trump was trying to spin the story away from himself. There's no indication that he offered any useful evidence to the investigation. What's more, later on Trump denied that he had any knowledge that Epstein was a pedophile.

Former Chief Reiter Michael Reiter says Trump also told him that Maxwell was Epstein's "operative". Also that she was "evil". This is the same person that Trump later said he just wished her well and didn't rule out pardoning. However, she was transferred to the most lenient class of prison even though those found guilty of sex crimes are usually barred from those facilities.

https://time.com/7377403/trump-epstein-maxwell-files/

And there's the usual nonsensical and dishonest deflection: "The problem with the anti Trump fanatics is that they obsessively blame every ill in the world on him, and use libel, slander, innuendo, outright lies and made up conspiracy theories to attack him. That does a disservice to everybody, because it makes even legitimate criticism look like a bunch of crazy BS. Screaming the sky is falling like deranged lunatics insures that nobody looks up when this guy actually does fall."

Stick to the facts of the case instead of indulging in nonsensical hyperbole.

Agreed. And it's very possible and more likely that Trump actually participated with the teenagers. It's also quite likely that the same happened in Moscow, which of course was videotaped, and that explains Trump's absolute fealty to King Vlad.

Trump is very, very guilty, it's just a question of to what extent, not whether or not he's guilty.

1 minute ago, spidermike007 said:

Agreed. And it's very possible and more likely that Trump actually participated with the teenagers. It's also quite likely that the same happened in Moscow, which of course was videotaped, and that explains Trump's absolute fealty to King Vlad.

Nice anonymous libel there.

Show us the evidence that Trump engaged in such conduct or, as usual, are you just lying again because of your long term grudge against Trump.

14 minutes ago, Wingate said:

When you're one of the "everybody knew" what Epstein was doing (as Trump claimed when he congratulated the police Chief), you're no hero for keeping it to yourself until Epstein got arrested.

If Trump was one of the "everybodys", how many young girls were abused from the time Trump "found out" until Trump saw Epstein was arrested and tried to virtue signal?

I dont think Trump was a policeman or had arrest power back in 2006 or whenever it was that he blew the whistle.