Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

BREAKING : SCOTUS has ruled on the tariffs

Featured Replies

  • Popular Post
14 hours ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

NOTE : AI Gemini Parody Alert


📱 Truth Social | @realDonaldTrump

The Supreme Court has just REJECTED the American People! A TOTAL DISGRACE! I gave them their jobs, I gave them their lives, and they give me a STAB IN THE BACK because they are WEAK and AFRAID of the Globalist Saboteurs! They say I can’t use Tariffs to stop the foreign GRifters from raping our Country? DISGUSTING! This is a rigged system, a total SCAM, and the "Justices"—except for the few brave ones—are nothing but LEGAL FILTH controlled by the Deep State!

And look at the ASEAN NOW losers—the low-energy, "Expat" TRAITORS who ran away to Thailand because they couldn't cut it in the REAL WORLD! I see you, "beautifulthailand99" and "CallumWK"—posting your pathetic little "Winning" comments while you sit in some sweatbox bar in Pattaya drinking cheap beer because you’re too poor to live in the Great Country I built! You’re over there begging for "Maneerat" to fix your visas for 8,000 Baht because you have NO MONEY and NO COUNTRY! You think it’s funny that Walmart and the Chinese Cheaters get a "refund" while our Borders are wide open? You are the worst kind of people—BOTTOM FEEDERS who root for America to fail from your "Political Soapbox" CESSPOOL! You’re probably the same losers who cry about "Fascism" while you hide behind a keyboard 10,000 miles away!

THE TARIFFS ARE STAYING! I don't care what a "Court" of birdbrains says! We are going to DEFY these people, we are going to DEPORT the illegals, and we are going to CRUSH the ASEAN NOW scum who think they can mock the Greatest Movement in History! You’ll be begging to come back when your "Retirement Visas" get canceled by the very people you’re rooting for! LOUSY!!

MAGA 2026!!! THE WORLD IS WATCHING AND THE RECKONING IS HERE!!!

Thank you for paying attention to this matter!

  • Replies 275
  • Views 5.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Schoggibueb
    Schoggibueb

    No. It blows up the narrative of @riclag & Co of "winning". Fascism is still present under the occupier and administration of the white house.

  • This sort of blows up the left's narrative of fascism, kings, etc.

  • NoDisplayName
    NoDisplayName

    Does this mean all the foreign governments that were paying the tariffs will get refunds?

Posted Images

  • Popular Post
7 minutes ago, boganJoe said:

Unlike the low IQ bumbling fools and losers calling themselves democrats, President Trump rarely bumbles around without contingencies, backups, insightful knowledge and precision step by coordinated step of strategic and timely execution of his policies and initiatives. The tariff program is no exception.

To avail yourselves of the current sent of operational constraints, the rules, laws and the "fine print" that Trump so magnificently navigates within see the references cited and attached below.

In summary:

  • On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Trump exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by imposing sweeping global tariffs, invalidating those duties. In response, Trump announced and signed an executive order that same day imposing a new 10% universal tariff on imports from all countries, effective February 24, using Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act as the legal basis. This provision allows the president to enact temporary tariffs of up to 15% for a maximum of 150 days to address "large and serious" U.S. balance-of-payments deficits, without needing congressional approval during that period.

  • While no prior president has invoked Section 122 in this exact manner, the statute's language appears to grant Trump the authority to do so, effectively replacing the struck-down IEEPA tariffs with minimal disruption to his policy goals. He also indicated plans to pursue additional tariffs via Section 301 investigations into unfair trade practices, which could extend or expand duties beyond the 150-day limit. Legal challenges to these new measures are possible, but as of now, they are in effect.

https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/02/a-breakdown-of-the-courts-tariff-decision/

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/607/24-1287/

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5748682-trump-imposes-global-tariff/

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/20/what-will-happen-to-trump-tariffs-after-supreme-court-verdict

https://www.bhfs.com/insight/supreme-court-restricts-presidential-tariff-authority-under-ieepa/

https://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-outlines-new-plan-tariffs-after-deeply-disappointing/story?id=130338220

Pretty good sarcasm there!

Insightful knowledge and Trump are about as far apart as Earth and the limits of what the Webb telescope can observe.

10 minutes ago, boganJoe said:

Unlike the low IQ bumbling fools and losers calling themselves democrats, President Trump rarely bumbles around without contingencies, backups, insightful knowledge and precision step by coordinated step of strategic and timely execution of his policies and initiatives. The tariff program is no exception.

To avail yourselves of the current sent of operational constraints, the rules, laws and the "fine print" that Trump so magnificently navigates within see the references cited and attached below.

https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/02/a-breakdown-of-the-courts-tariff-decision/

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/607/24-1287/

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5748682-trump-imposes-global-tariff/

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/20/what-will-happen-to-trump-tariffs-after-supreme-court-verdict

https://www.bhfs.com/insight/supreme-court-restricts-presidential-tariff-authority-under-ieepa/

https://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-outlines-new-plan-tariffs-after-deeply-disappointing/story?id=130338220

"Low IQ bumbling fools and losers come in all shapes, sizes and colors and also include some Republicans including you-know-who.

24 minutes ago, boganJoe said:

Unlike the low IQ bumbling fools and losers calling themselves democrats, President Trump rarely bumbles around without contingencies, backups, insightful knowledge and precision step by coordinated step of strategic and timely execution of his policies and initiatives. The tariff program is no exception.

To avail yourselves of the current sent of operational constraints, the rules, laws and the "fine print" that Trump so magnificently navigates within see the references cited and attached below.

In summary:

  • On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Trump exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by imposing sweeping global tariffs, invalidating those duties. In response, Trump announced and signed an executive order that same day imposing a new 10% universal tariff on imports from all countries, effective February 24, using Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act as the legal basis. This provision allows the president to enact temporary tariffs of up to 15% for a maximum of 150 days to address "large and serious" U.S. balance-of-payments deficits, without needing congressional approval during that period.

  • While no prior president has invoked Section 122 in this exact manner, the statute's language appears to grant Trump the authority to do so, effectively replacing the struck-down IEEPA tariffs with minimal disruption to his policy goals. He also indicated plans to pursue additional tariffs via Section 301 investigations into unfair trade practices, which could extend or expand duties beyond the 150-day limit. Legal challenges to these new measures are possible, but as of now, they are in effect.

https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/02/a-breakdown-of-the-courts-tariff-decision/

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/607/24-1287/

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5748682-trump-imposes-global-tariff/

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/20/what-will-happen-to-trump-tariffs-after-supreme-court-verdict

https://www.bhfs.com/insight/supreme-court-restricts-presidential-tariff-authority-under-ieepa/

https://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-outlines-new-plan-tariffs-after-deeply-disappointing/story?id=130338220

I just wonder what he will have to come up with after the 150 days have ended?

He should not worry too much about this,there will be more tantrums coming from the White house.

  • Popular Post
59 minutes ago, Slowhand225 said:

Paying as you go is a wonderful thing, use less, pay less.

Except for the people who have no choice.

52 minutes ago, boganJoe said:

Unlike the low IQ bumbling fools and losers calling themselves democrats, President Trump rarely bumbles around without contingencies, backups, insightful knowledge and precision step by coordinated step of strategic and timely execution of his policies and initiatives. The tariff program is no exception.

To avail yourselves of the current sent of operational constraints, the rules, laws and the "fine print" that Trump so magnificently navigates within see the references cited and attached below.

In summary:

  • On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Trump exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by imposing sweeping global tariffs, invalidating those duties. In response, Trump announced and signed an executive order that same day imposing a new 10% universal tariff on imports from all countries, effective February 24, using Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act as the legal basis. This provision allows the president to enact temporary tariffs of up to 15% for a maximum of 150 days to address "large and serious" U.S. balance-of-payments deficits, without needing congressional approval during that period.

  • While no prior president has invoked Section 122 in this exact manner, the statute's language appears to grant Trump the authority to do so, effectively replacing the struck-down IEEPA tariffs with minimal disruption to his policy goals. He also indicated plans to pursue additional tariffs via Section 301 investigations into unfair trade practices, which could extend or expand duties beyond the 150-day limit. Legal challenges to these new measures are possible, but as of now, they are in effect.

https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/02/a-breakdown-of-the-courts-tariff-decision/

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/607/24-1287/

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5748682-trump-imposes-global-tariff/

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/20/what-will-happen-to-trump-tariffs-after-supreme-court-verdict

https://www.bhfs.com/insight/supreme-court-restricts-presidential-tariff-authority-under-ieepa/

https://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-outlines-new-plan-tariffs-after-deeply-disappointing/story?id=130338220

What it won't allow the stable genius to do is impose whatever tariffs he likes on countries whose leaders offend him personally or that engage in actions that have nothing to do with trade.

6 hours ago, marin said:

Getting so close to treason.

How so lol. This should be good.

4 hours ago, mikebike said:

Russia is struggling 3 years into a "2 week" war with frigging Ukrainian. You think they have any chance against the entire EU 🤔😂😂😂

Cool. Then we don't need to be paying for NATO

48 minutes ago, Wingate said:

Pretty good sarcasm there!

did you like the Trump YMCA shuffle?

  • Popular Post

If Trump had more brains and less ego, he could have gotten his tariffs way back in January 2025, when he had a lot more political capital. He could have gone to Congress and asked them to do what they have the legal authority to do, which is implement tariffs.

Instead, he had to show off that he was some sort of monarch and do what the Constitution says are powers of the Legislative Branch. So he ended up getting b!tch slapped by the Supreme Court and reminded that there are three co-equal branches of government, each with powers granted to them under the Constitution.

Because of his tumbling popularity, the Epstein files, his fascist ICE policy, and the fact Republicans look as if they'll take a whipping in November, that political capital is gone. Trump is almost a lame duck, and when the Repubs lose the House, and maybe the Senate, in November, Trump will be the lamest duck there is. People will be saying nobody has ever seen a duck so lame.

3 minutes ago, boganJoe said:

did you like the Trump YMCA shuffle?

I like the Bill Maher interpretation, that Trump is servicing two men at the same time.

  • Popular Post
6 minutes ago, Yagoda said:
7 hours ago, marin said:

Getting so close to treason.

How so lol. This should be good.

4 minutes ago, Yagoda said:
4 hours ago, mikebike said:

Russia is struggling 3 years into a "2 week" war with frigging Ukrainian. You think they have any chance against the entire EU 🤔😂😂😂

Cool. Then we don't need to be paying for NATO

Interesting that when Trump melts down many of his minions follow right along.

52 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

"Low IQ bumbling fools and losers come in all shapes, sizes and colors and also include some Republicans including you-know-who.

who? bumbling fools are the democrats finest loons, very low IQ kamala, tim walz, AOC and the list goes on, and most all democrats, NOT someone elected twice as POTUS.

3 minutes ago, Wingate said:

I like the Bill Maher interpretation, that Trump is servicing two men at the same time.

post it, share it here.

  • Author
Just now, boganJoe said:

who? bumbling fools are the democrats finest loons, very low IQ kamala, tim walz, AOC and the list goes on, and most all democrats, NOT someone elected twice as POTUS.

Trump was re-elected by racists, the US is full of them.

7 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Cool. Then we don't need to be paying for NATO

No one in NATO trusts you anymore anyway. Do you not follow the news? The EU is investing in their own defence as the USA becomes an international joke... the Board of Peace 😂😄

E

8 minutes ago, boganJoe said:

who? bumbling fools are the democrats finest loons, very low IQ kamala, tim walz, AOC and the list goes on, and most all democrats, NOT someone elected twice as POTUS.

If you say so, although there are many that will disagree with you about you-know-who. Just because he got elected twice doesn't automatically exclude him from list of loonies.

12 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

Trump was re-elected by racists, the US is full of them.

I regret voting for him and I am far from being a racist.

20 minutes ago, Wingate said:

If Trump had more brains and less ego, he could have gotten his tariffs way back in January 2025, when he had a lot more political capital. He could have gone to Congress and asked them to do what they have the legal authority to do, which is implement tariffs.

Instead, he had to show off that he was some sort of monarch and do what the Constitution says are powers of the Legislative Branch. So he ended up getting b!tch slapped by the Supreme Court and reminded that there are three co-equal branches of government, each with powers granted to them under the Constitution.

Because of his tumbling popularity, the Epstein files, his fascist ICE policy, and the fact Republicans look as if they'll take a whipping in November, that political capital is gone. Trump is almost a lame duck, and when the Repubs lose the House, and maybe the Senate, in November, Trump will be the lamest duck there is. People will be saying nobody has ever seen a duck so lame.

I can't to see the expression on his face after the midterm elections. He will no doubt call foul and claim election fraud.

He's right! This unacceptable foreign influence case should be further investigated, and the alleged culprits prosecuted! 😀

Yahoo News
No image preview

House Dem Urges Trump to Immediately Release ‘Evidence of...

Jared Moskowitz called on Donald Trump to put his money where his mouth is over claims the president made about the Supreme Court and "foreign influences."
27 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

What it won't allow the stable genius to do is impose whatever tariffs he likes on countries whose leaders offend him personally or that engage in actions that have nothing to do with trade.

That may be what the law (now?) says but will it make any difference to Trump's tantrum policies?

  • Author
4 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

I regret voting for him and I am far from being a racist.

I didn't say that everyone who voted for him is a racist, but he was re-elected mainly for his policy on immigrants, which is purely racism.

I'm sure many of them now regret voting for him.

  • Author
4 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

I can't to see the expression on his face after the midterm elections. He will no doubt call foul and claim election fraud.

You still believe there will be uninfluenced, or even any, midterm elections?

2 hours ago, mikebike said:

Interesting side note no one has mentioned. Howard Nut... I mean Lutnick's family firm bought up the rights to tariff refunds for 20-30 cents on the dollar last year shortly after "liberation day". Meaning he was betting that SCOTUS would eventually rule this way. Grifters one and all.

Just another illegal move on the part of a member of Trump's gangland criminal cabinet.

1 hour ago, Hawaiian said:

Sounds like an ideal solution except that it hurts low income people. Hawaii, where I live, taxes virtually everything including food, housing and medical services.


How does it hurt them ? They pay no tax until point of sale, they do that now so hows it hurt them ?

4 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

You still believe there will be uninfluenced, or even any, midterm elections?

Look for widespread violence and anarchy if the midterm elections are not held. It's no secret that most elections are influenced one way or another. However, Trump's influence is going downhill. Even some long-time Republicans are deserting him.

2 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

I can't to see the expression on his face after the midterm elections. He will no doubt call foul and claim election fraud.

I suspect Trump is torn this weekend, between petulance and maybe trying to think slightly longer term.

I'm not sure he anticipated this tariff ruling with his stacked SC, so as a means to distract from Epstein, I think he would have attacked Iran this weekend. His petulant nature, after losing the SC decision, might still have him showing his spite by attacking Iran, even though the tariff ruling will keep EPstein on Page 2 at least until Tuesday.

The US now has the largest military force in the Gulf since just before the Iraq invasions, so he's primed to play armchair warrior. Unless the action is extremely limited in scope, the US will lose personnel. The US could even lose a carrier to Iraqi surface-to-surface missiles. Besides being a tragedy, that would not play well at home or in the polls. (No doubt if we attack Iran, Trump will walk past a Isfahan or Qum carpet seller in Beverly Hills and claim that "bravery" should earn him a Congressional Medal of Honor.)

OTOH, Trump may save Iran until Autumn, as he will need an excuse like "national emergency" to call off the midterms, forgetting that we had midterms and a Presidential election during WWII.

  • Author
Just now, Hawaiian said:

Look for widespread violence and anarchy if the midterm elections are not held. It's no secret that most elections are influence. However, Trump's influence is going downhill. Even some long-time Republicans are deserting him.

Maybe influenced was the wrong expression. What I meant is that he will use tactics that would allow having elections cancelled in certain states.

29 minutes ago, Wingate said:

I like the Bill Maher interpretation, that Trump is servicing two men at the same time.


So you have enough experience with that, that you can recognize it in others ?
Interesting talent, not one I'd brag about but ..............

7 minutes ago, Slowhand225 said:


How does it hurt them ? They pay no tax until point of sale, they do that now so hows it hurt them ?

You need to quit talking in circles

8 minutes ago, Slowhand225 said:


How does it hurt them ? They pay no tax until point of sale, they do that now so hows it hurt them ?

You need to quit talking in circles. That seems to be your forte'.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.