This Morning is at the centre of controversy after the show played host to a woman claiming the world's largest breasts at a massive 164XXX.

Chelsea Charms appearance on the show with stars Philip Schofield and Ruth Langsford sparked almost 4,000 comments on the This Morning Facebook page.

Daytime viewers were left horrified as to why an exotic dancer and stripper more suited to a late night post-watershed show was a guest on the pre-lunchtime magazine show - with the possibility of children watching.

Smile, Phillip! Schofield looks slightly unsure about the guest in this picture of the pair together

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1386352/Chelsea-Charms-woman-largest-breasts-world--164XXX--appears-This-Morning.html#ixzz1MCmiDVSn

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1386352/Chelsea-Charms-woman-largest-breasts-world--164XXX--appears-This-Morning.html#ixzz1MCmWkxTB

How does she stand up?

(Probably a big backside as a counterbalance)

Hey - if I sit her on the dashboard of my car I won't need airbags, will I?

Implants of that volume probably utilise aerogel rather than aqeous silicon, a weight saving of around 99%. If she is ever lost at sea, there will be no need for a floatation device.

I must say I'm starting to worry about Boter. On this page alone: Big breast, slutwalk, viagradoms.....

Implants of that volume probably utilise aerogel rather than aqeous silicon, a weight saving of around 99%. If she is ever lost at sea, there will be no need for a floatation device.

I must say I'm starting to worry about Boter. On this page alone: Big breast, slutwalk, viagradoms.....

The newspaper article (yes, I had to read the Daily Male article) said that they were made by a method now illegal, using polypropylene string.

Dunno - how long is a piece of string in this instance?

Boater always keeps abreast of the news to give himself protection from walking tarts..............( jammy dodgers with legs )

They are filled with helium bags to hold up the mass.

It is too bad that people do weird things to their bodies just for a moment in the limelight. I can't imagine trying ot live with those "things". They certainly aren't attractive. I've known lots of women who have had breast reductions just to make life easier.

Grotesque.

One woman, three t*ts, impressive!!

She can't kiss while having sex....it's one or the other.......and no chance of a 69.......unless she meets a very tall hunchback.

She can't kiss while having sex....it's one or the other.......and no chance of a 69.......unless she meets a very tall hunchback.

...you'd be surprised what figure out.

At the beginning of the sixties I used to work in Soho (the real one - in London).

Perfectly legal business, I ran a coffee bar.

However I had a lot of customers who were in the sex trade in one way or another, strippers, dirty bookshop owners, everything you can think of.

And there was a class of customer they all had, who was enamoured of enormous boobs. These guys would buy photos and books of the most hideous-looking females, just because they had size 48DDD boobs - they would find out where such-and-such a girl was stripping, just to watch the one big-titted girl. A complete obsession and the bigger, the more they spent. Never getting in personal contact, just paying good money to watch these massive boobs.

Think of Paul Raymond and Fiona Richmond - Raymond's Revue Bar was packed every night, mainly to watch her. And she was not nearly such an attractive woman as half the girls working the clubs. But she had big boobs.

Too true, Humphry Bear.

There just had to be ANOTHER reason why the guy who took this photo of the CN tower in Toronto used his wide angle lens instead of the telephoto.

Too true, Humphry Bear.

There just had to be ANOTHER reason why the guy who took this photo of the CN tower in Toronto used his wide angle lens instead of the telephoto.

You've used that photo before, Ian.

I follow architectural examples very closely.

Too true, Humphry Bear.

There just had to be ANOTHER reason why the guy who took this photo of the CN tower in Toronto used his wide angle lens instead of the telephoto.

You've used that photo before, Ian.

I follow architectural examples very closely.

Yes, I have, but I use whatever picture I have tha serves the purpose. As a teenager I was like any other horny male, and loved the big boobs. As an adult I came to realize that the whole package is what counts. A plain woman who responds to you is far more attractive than someone with just surface beauty.

This picture comes to mind on the subject of boobs.

Big ones have never done it for me.

True, flat chests are less exciting......but everything in moderation.

It's all in the nipples. Small, big, or himoungous titties not nipples.

Seriously, those must make her back break and how does she sleep? All for the Guiness Book.

There is never a woman on earth who would want tits like that... I hope.

There is never a woman on earth who would want tits like that... I hope.

Photographic evidence shows that there is at least one, but I agree with the sentiment.