Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Warning On Falklands

Featured Replies

I'm going to post the what I deleted last night, as I thought to myself you would think I was deliberately flaming, I'm not, just take a deep breath and think about it.

The modern state of Texas, forged on the anvil of the Alamo, 1836.

The modern state of Germany, founded 1871

The modern state of Italy, founded 1871

British ownership of the Falkland Islands, founded 1833. Our claim to the uninhabited Islands pre-dates Germany, Italy, and the Alamo.

So give back Texas to the Mexicans, return Italy to the Principalities, and disband modern Germany, and we will gift the Falklands to Argentina.

We can't return them, Argentina never owned in them in the first place.

So deal? or no deal? or would you like to selectively pick the bits of history that suit you?

Just sayin' coffee1.gif

Hold on there, Pardner.

Ain't nobody giving Texas back to Mexico. California, on the other hand.......

  • Replies 261
  • Views 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Some nationalities need to learn when to shut up. coffee1.gif

i was bwaiting who will be the loser to come up with the dumbest comment. didn't have to wait long.

av-11672.gif

Some nationalities need to learn when to shut up. coffee1.gif

i was bwaiting who will be the loser to come up with the dumbest comment. didn't have to wait long.

av-11672.gif

its early days yet. Plenty more opportnity for stupidity before the thread gets closed

SC

I still would be very happy for the Argies when they get the Falklands back. They seem to care so very much about it. I think it's much more important to Argentina than to Britain and I'm sure the current residents would be well compensated if the transfer occurs.

I still would be very happy for the Argies when they get the Falklands back. They seem to care so very much about it. I think it's much more important to Argentina than to Britain and I'm sure the current residents would be well compensated if the transfer occurs.

Perhaps they could be resettled onto another bleak island somewhere, while some argeninians could stake claims in their promised land.

SC

I still would be very happy for the Argies when they get the Falklands back. They seem to care so very much about it. I think it's much more important to Argentina than to Britain and I'm sure the current residents would be well compensated if the transfer occurs.

Perhaps they could be resettled onto another bleak island somewhere, while some argeninians could stake claims in their promised land.

SC

There aren't too many islands left. Inaccessible and Desolation are a bit small, and South Georgia really is uninhabitable.

I still would be very happy for the Argies when they get the Falklands back. They seem to care so very much about it. I think it's much more important to Argentina than to Britain and I'm sure the current residents would be well compensated if the transfer occurs.

Perhaps they could be resettled onto another bleak island somewhere, while some argeninians could stake claims in their promised land.

SC

There aren't too many islands left. Inaccessible and Desolation are a bit small, and South Georgia really is uninhabitable.

Maybe they could live in the mountains of Wyoming, or somewhere in the deserts of the Gaza strip, or perhaps somewhere out in the bush...

Maybe they'll all just emigrate to America and Australia when they're displaced by the oil or sheep or whatever it is the Argentinians want to settle the islands for

SC

Give them nice houses in Hawaii. How many will complain? They can start their own little New Falklands Town. Should be a big tourist attraction.

Give them nice houses in Hawaii. How many will complain? They can start their own little New Falklands Town. Should be a big tourist attraction.

Maybe they could be allowed to open casinos and become alcoholics

SC

Give them nice houses in Hawaii. How many will complain? They can start their own little New Falklands Town. Should be a big tourist attraction.

Maybe they could be allowed to open casinos and become alcoholics

SC

Freedom is wunnerful!

If you 'discover' it, I would say Yes.

But I think just about every island and atoll has now been discovered and is either recognised as belong to such-and-suchh a nation or, like the Spatleys, is disputed by differing nations.

No rock, however small, is now unclaimed.

none of these nations have "discovered" the Spratleys and neither have i. can i file my claim and enter the dispute?

If you're fool enough, have money to waste on lawyers, and actually want to live there, I suppose Yes. But even a Klingon needs some kind of justification for his claim!

a single Klingon warbird and a volley of photon torpedoes, fired full spread for demonstration purposes, would be a justification none of the claimants would underestimate tongue.png

I still would be very happy for the Argies when they get the Falklands back. They seem to care so very much about it. I think it's much more important to Argentina than to Britain and I'm sure the current residents would be well compensated if the transfer occurs.

i beg to differ. a number of residents must be already dreaming making big $$$ working on oil rigs 30 days and spending every other 30 days in Phuket, Pattaya or Nakhon Nowhere with their extended families ph34r.png

Where's the bit about why the UK wants the Falklands?

Because they're British, same as the Channel Islands.

Why does the US want to hold on to Hawaii?

SC

Where's the bit about why the UK wants the Falklands?

Because they're British, same as the Channel Islands.

Why does the US want to hold on to Hawaii?

SC

Not exactly the same thing. The obvious challengers to the US for the Hawaiian islands are ... Hawaiians. I think they have a good case. Probably a better case than the Argentinians but less chance of succeeding.

Where's the bit about why the UK wants the Falklands?

Because they're British, same as the Channel Islands.

Why does the US want to hold on to Hawaii?

SC

As I suspected - not a clue!

THe early history of the Falklands is NOT cut and dried. Please get an proper historians perspective...

However recent history is - ask yourself WHERE they are and WHY would the Argentinians so persistently try to push a claim on the place

(I presume you realise that the British had sent a naval force to the Falklands under the about govt. BEFORE thatcher.

Apart from being the main reason for Thatcher's re-election they are also a useful rallying call in Argentinian politics....but those are only minor reasons...THINK what most wars are fought er and you'll start to get an idea what the Falklands are all about.

Where's the bit about why the UK wants the Falklands?

Because they're British, same as the Channel Islands.

Why does the US want to hold on to Hawaii?

SC

As I suspected - not a clue!

THe early history of the Falklands is NOT cut and dried. Please get an proper historians perspective...

However recent history is - ask yourself WHERE they are and WHY would the Argentinians so persistently try to push a claim on the place

(I presume you realise that the British had sent a naval force to the Falklands under the about govt. BEFORE thatcher.

Apart from being the main reason for Thatcher's re-election they are also a useful rallying call in Argentinian politics....but those are only minor reasons...THINK what most wars are fought er and you'll start to get an idea what the Falklands are all about.

Somewhere earlier in this thread there is a potted history of the Falklands. Odd bods popped in for a year or two, but the first people who built houses and stayed were the British.

Why do the Argies want the islands? Oil.

Why do the British want the islands? Because they've been ours since 1833 (that's a guess), and .... oil.

Why did Thatcher fight for the islands? To save face and.... oil.

Where's the bit about why the UK wants the Falklands?

Because they're British, same as the Channel Islands.

Why does the US want to hold on to Hawaii?

SC

As I suspected - not a clue!

THe early history of the Falklands is NOT cut and dried. Please get an proper historians perspective...

However recent history is - ask yourself WHERE they are and WHY would the Argentinians so persistently try to push a claim on the place

(I presume you realise that the British had sent a naval force to the Falklands under the about govt. BEFORE thatcher.

Apart from being the main reason for Thatcher's re-election they are also a useful rallying call in Argentinian politics....but those are only minor reasons...THINK what most wars are fought er and you'll start to get an idea what the Falklands are all about.

Somewhere earlier in this thread there is a potted history of the Falklands. Odd bods popped in for a year or two, but the first people who built houses and stayed were the British.

Why do the Argies want the islands? Oil.

Why do the British want the islands? Because they've been ours since 1833 (that's a guess), and .... oil.

Why did Thatcher fight for the islands? To save face and.... oil.

if only life were has simple as that.........

I'm sorry but if you think building houses justifies "ownership" then you have a long way to go on this issue.

Oil - yes - but that's only the "tip of the iceberg" - UK knows that - US knows that and of course Argentina knows that.

Look at the location of the islands......BTW my family have been connected to the islands since long before Thatcher's war...not that living there gives your a clearer idea of the issues but at least I know where the place was - which is more than you could say for Thatcher.....and the majority of people on this thread by the sound of it.

Where's the bit about why the UK wants the Falklands?

Because they're British, same as the Channel Islands.

Why does the US want to hold on to Hawaii?

SC

Not exactly the same thing. The obvious challengers to the US for the Hawaiian islands are ... Hawaiians. I think they have a good case. Probably a better case than the Argentinians but less chance of succeeding.

Screw the Hawaiians and screw the Argentinians too. God save the Queen!

  • Popular Post

As I suspected - not a clue!

THe early history of the Falklands is NOT cut and dried. Please get an proper historians perspective...

However recent history is - ask yourself WHERE they are and WHY would the Argentinians so persistently try to push a claim on the place

(I presume you realise that the British had sent a naval force to the Falklands under the about govt. BEFORE thatcher.

Apart from being the main reason for Thatcher's re-election they are also a useful rallying call in Argentinian politics....but those are only minor reasons...THINK what most wars are fought er and you'll start to get an idea what the Falklands are all about.

Somewhere earlier in this thread there is a potted history of the Falklands. Odd bods popped in for a year or two, but the first people who built houses and stayed were the British.

Why do the Argies want the islands? Oil.

Why do the British want the islands? Because they've been ours since 1833 (that's a guess), and .... oil.

Why did Thatcher fight for the islands? To save face and.... oil.

if only life were has simple as that.........

I'm sorry but if you think building houses justifies "ownership" then you have a long way to go on this issue.

Oil - yes - but that's only the "tip of the iceberg" - UK knows that - US knows that and of course Argentina knows that.

Look at the location of the islands......BTW my family have been connected to the islands since long before Thatcher's war...not that living there gives your a clearer idea of the issues but at least I know where the place was - which is more than you could say for Thatcher.....and the majority of people on this thread by the sound of it.

Why not share your knowledge of the situation with us? We await your input.

As I suspected - not a clue!

THe early history of the Falklands is NOT cut and dried. Please get an proper historians perspective...

However recent history is - ask yourself WHERE they are and WHY would the Argentinians so persistently try to push a claim on the place

(I presume you realise that the British had sent a naval force to the Falklands under the about govt. BEFORE thatcher.

Apart from being the main reason for Thatcher's re-election they are also a useful rallying call in Argentinian politics....but those are only minor reasons...THINK what most wars are fought er and you'll start to get an idea what the Falklands are all about.

Somewhere earlier in this thread there is a potted history of the Falklands. Odd bods popped in for a year or two, but the first people who built houses and stayed were the British.

Why do the Argies want the islands? Oil.

Why do the British want the islands? Because they've been ours since 1833 (that's a guess), and .... oil.

Why did Thatcher fight for the islands? To save face and.... oil.

- if only life were has simple as that.........

I'm sorry but if you think building houses justifies "ownership" then you have a long way to go on this issue.

Oil - yes - but that's only the "tip of the iceberg" - UK knows that - US knows that and of course Argentina knows that.

Look at the location of the islands......BTW my family have been connected to the islands since long before Thatcher's war...not that living there gives your a clearer idea of the issues but at least I know where the place was - which is more than you could say for Thatcher.....and the majority of people on this thread by the sound of it.

Why not share your knowledge of the situation with us? We await your input.

You may have seen that I advised people to look for themselves

If you want my "knowledge" - you'll have to pay. but I seriously doubt if some of the jingoistic numnuts posting on this topic would understand a single word anyway.

I would hope though that some might go away and educate themselves on the topic.

\posting here would just start a pointless round of gainsaying by those mentioned above

- if only life were has simple as that.........

I'm sorry but if you think building houses justifies "ownership" then you have a long way to go on this issue.

Oil - yes - but that's only the "tip of the iceberg" - UK knows that - US knows that and of course Argentina knows that.

Look at the location of the islands......BTW my family have been connected to the islands since long before Thatcher's war...not that living there gives your a clearer idea of the issues but at least I know where the place was - which is more than you could say for Thatcher.....and the majority of people on this thread by the sound of it.

Why not share your knowledge of the situation with us? We await your input.

You may have seen that I advised people to look for themselves

If you want my "knowledge" - you'll have to pay. but I seriously doubt if some of the jingoistic numnuts posting on this topic would understand a single word anyway.

I would hope though that some might go away and educate themselves on the topic.

\posting here would just start a pointless round of gainsaying by those mentioned above

I expect your knowledge is worth exactly what I would be willing to pay for it...which is nothing.

Thanks for gracing us with your brief presence.

If you want my "knowledge" - you'll have to pay.

Sounds like a real waste of money.

If you want my "knowledge" - you'll have to pay.

Sounds like a real waste of money.

I draw you attention to my previous posts.

If you want my "knowledge" - you'll have to pay.

Sounds like a real waste of money.

I draw you attention to my previous posts.

We're all too busy Googling "Falkland Islands" to read your previous posts.

That's the least we numnuts (sic) can do.

If you want my "knowledge" - you'll have to pay.

Sounds like a real waste of money.

I draw you attention to my previous posts.

We're all too busy Googling "Falkland Islands" to read your previous posts.

That's the least we numnuts (sic) can do.

Perhaps you should concentrate on improving your research techniques and analytical skills? (QED)

  • Popular Post

Perhaps you should concentrate on improving your research techniques and analytical skills? (QED)

Translation:

"Even though I came on this thread claiming I am knowledgeable about the Falkland Islands and calling most of the posters "numnuts" (sic), I refuse to provide this information since I really don't know very much about it at all."

(DNFTT)

Chuck, we are numnuts (I like it!), and must not express an opinion.

Chuck, we are numnuts (I like it!), and must not express an opinion.

I suppose we should be grateful our country is governed by amateurs, and not experts like CowsLips

SC

Perhaps you should concentrate on improving your research techniques and analytical skills? (QED)

Translation:

"Even though I came on this thread claiming I am knowledgeable about the Falkland Islands and calling most of the posters "numnuts" (sic), I refuse to provide this information since I really don't know very much about it at all."

(DNFTT)

Please refer to my original post - as with many of the opinions on this thread they are based on incorrect or illogical assumptions.

I have suggested that others should do more analytical research into the subject. I am not proffering my opinions or knowledge on the subject as it seems to me there is neither enough space or "fertile ground".

PS - if you wish to include yourself in the "numnut" category, that is up to you - I have not specified any individual in particular nor do I intend to.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.