All Thida needs to do is roll over in bed and ask her husband Weng how they were set alight.

Cheers for the mental picture mate.

Yes. Not a very nice thing to do.

Thida.jpg

Bit of a come-hither thing going on with those eyes now i look.

Reminds me of a preying mantis sizing up a bug morsel.

Speaking of bug morsel, K. Jutaporn has been unusually quiet lately.

He went flying off with Thida to Hong Kong last week to see Thaksin.

They return and now we have this effort by Thida to relaunch the arson investigation.... and a relaunch of another Red Shirt Rally .

.

All Thida needs to do is roll over in bed and ask her husband Weng how they were set alight.

Cheers for the mental picture mate.

Yes. Not a very nice thing to do.

Thida.jpg

heres the look that stole Weng's heart............

Ahh now that there's no rice to farm, the Red Shirts are free to hold their idiot rallies again! And Thida, about the arson attacks ,look no further then your own Red Shirts. You're fooling no one.

I wonder if the police will do all in there power to control it?

One policeman per protestor and road blocks to try and keep them out.

Don't forget the coils of Razor wire,and Tear Gas!

But in reality which group of peaceful protestors would you as police chief tear gas?

Looks like lovely Thida is about to make a move on Jatuporn.

It is sad that two years after the Rajaprasong Love-In, that the star of the show, DL, is still no closer to returning than before.

Maybe this year's planned memorial fest will help him?

Yes, because Red Shirt would never burn a building...

Much less banks, city buses, TV stations and up country provincial city halls.

What really annoyed the g/f's family was burning the fire engine

Thida added that she wanted police to bring those responsible for arson and for killing people during the political mayhem to justice.

i can see nothing wrong with that.

For once we agree.

But the chances of even charging Thaksin for his crime in planing and paying for the whole thing is never going to happen. First he would have to be here in Thailand and then there would have to be no mysterious death on his part.

U tube has many pictures and speeches by the red shirt leaders urging their followers to burn Bangkok down. They also should be charged. I am reasonably sure there is some law against inciting dumb goons to burn city's down.

you'd think there was but the courts seem to be saying it's not so. It's almost as if someone was putting pressure on them.

sure?

so why not investigate and nail those responsible.

Another one who would deny ever having seen the Arisman video.

Why, does the Arisman video show red shirts burning down CentralWorld? Why wasn't this video shown in court?

Well nice work Thida! first the Reds have managed to get an aquittal,now she wants to change history and get the Red Shirts completely exonerated,by claiming some other persons or parties did the burning in Bangkok.Next she will be telling us:the Red Shirts never entered Bangkok.

It gets more like a kids way of getting off the hook, e.g. you can't blame us,because you are all liars,we wasn't there!

The people arrested and charged were aquitted due to lack of evidence. If you look beyond that bias chip on your shoulder and read about the case you'd find out why they were aquitted, but you're unlikely to do that I know, your knowledge base and comfort zone is here on this board. I'll leave you to your thoughts..................

bugeyed.jpg

Looks like lovely Thida is about to make a move on Jatuporn.

It is sad that two years after the Rajaprasong Love-In, that the star of the show, DL, is still no closer to returning than before.

Maybe this year's planned memorial fest will help him?

DL, the Dalai Lama?

Ahh now that there's no rice to farm, the Red Shirts are free to hold their idiot rallies again! And Thida, about the arson attacks ,look no further then your own Red Shirts. You're fooling no one.

I wonder if the police will do all in there power to control it?

One policeman per protestor and road blocks to try and keep them out.

Don't forget the coils of Razor wire,and Tear Gas!

But in reality which group of peaceful protestors would you as police chief tear gas?

peacefull protestors.jpg

Wrong framing of the question Two different groups - how do you control them

1) Police and Tear Gas

2) The Military with live ammunition, snipers and "live fire" zones

If you want the real answer consult the UNHRC

DL, the Dalai Lama?

Dear leader. i.e. your icon The convicted bail jumping corrupt felon Thaksin

Ahh now that there's no rice to farm, the Red Shirts are free to hold their idiot rallies again! And Thida, about the arson attacks ,look no further then your own Red Shirts. You're fooling no one.

I wonder if the police will do all in there power to control it?

One policeman per protestor and road blocks to try and keep them out.

Don't forget the coils of Razor wire,and Tear Gas!

But in reality which group of peaceful protestors would you as police chief tear gas?

peacefull protestors.jpg

Actually there is no choice the BIB were so afraid of the one group they allowed them to attempt to burn Thailand down.

Ahh now that there's no rice to farm, the Red Shirts are free to hold their idiot rallies again! And Thida, about the arson attacks ,look no further then your own Red Shirts. You're fooling no one.

I wonder if the police will do all in there power to control it?

One policeman per protestor and road blocks to try and keep them out.

Don't forget the coils of Razor wire,and Tear Gas!

But in reality which group of peaceful protestors would you as police chief tear gas?

peacefull protestors.jpg

Oh by the way could you tell us the source of the thumbnails - was it Pitak Siam or PAD?

2009:

City buses set alight and propelled towards army units. A loaded LPG tanker commandeered and driven amongst Din Dang housing blocks where it is threatened to be set alight.

2010:

Before the rally: "If anyone tries to stop us we'll turn Bangkok into a sea of flame... Bring your own containers, we'll supply the petrol"

During the rally: Continue with the threats of arson. Try and burn down the Channel 3 building

After the rally: Much of Siam Square goes up, along with banks, supermarkets, provincial halls and Central World.

It's clearly all a big misunderstanding. "We reds done nuffink! In fact, we weren't even there. Forget all about it. Look, we'll give you a bit of extra money for your rice, your kids a shiny tablet, eventually, and build a nice new train set that you can sit and watch, because, unless you sell the tablet, when you finally get it, or more rice than you can actually produce from your 5 rai plot, you'll never have enough money to be allowed to ride it. There. You never even seen us, didn't you?"

Thida added that she wanted police to bring those responsible for arson and for killing people during the political mayhem to justice.

i can see nothing wrong with that.

For once we agree.

But the chances of even charging Thaksin for his crime in planing and paying for the whole thing is never going to happen. First he would have to be here in Thailand and then there would have to be no mysterious death on his part.

U tube has many pictures and speeches by the red shirt leaders urging their followers to burn Bangkok down. They also should be charged. I am reasonably sure there is some law against inciting dumb goons to burn city's down.

you'd think there was but the courts seem to be saying it's not so. It's almost as if someone was putting pressure on them.

In PT red shirt democracy please say it ain't so.

sure?

so why not investigate and nail those responsible.

Another one who would deny ever having seen the Arisman video.

Why, does the Arisman video show red shirts burning down CentralWorld? Why wasn't this video shown in court?

Now you are getting ridicules It shows it because they were doing it.

It was not shown in court because it would bring about a conviction. That in turn would put the leaders who urged them on (to be seen on u tube) in the wrong and make them co conspirators.

Well nice work Thida! first the Reds have managed to get an aquittal,now she wants to change history and get the Red Shirts completely exonerated,by claiming some other persons or parties did the burning in Bangkok.Next she will be telling us:the Red Shirts never entered Bangkok.

It gets more like a kids way of getting off the hook, e.g. you can't blame us,because you are all liars,we wasn't there!

The people arrested and charged were aquitted due to lack of evidence. If you look beyond that bias chip on your shoulder and read about the case you'd find out why they were aquitted, but you're unlikely to do that I know, your knowledge base and comfort zone is here on this board. I'll leave you to your thoughts..................

You just put up a post saying there was a video showing them doing it which was not allowed in court.

Now who has a bias chip on their shoulder?

Another one who would deny ever having seen the Arisman video.

Why, does the Arisman video show red shirts burning down CentralWorld? Why wasn't this video shown in court?

Now you are getting ridicules It shows it because they were doing it.

It was not shown in court because it would bring about a conviction. That in turn would put the leaders who urged them on (to be seen on u tube) in the wrong and make them co conspirators.

So you are saying that the "Arisman" tape shows red shirts setting fire to Central World? You accuse me of getting ridiculous?

But in reality which group of peaceful protestors would you as police chief tear gas?

Ahh now that there's no rice to farm, the Red Shirts are free to hold their idiot rallies again! And Thida, about the arson attacks ,look no further then your own Red Shirts. You're fooling no one.

I wonder if the police will do all in there power to control it?

One policeman per protestor and road blocks to try and keep them out.

peacefull protestors.jpg

Wrong framing of the question Two different groups - how do you control them

1) Police and Tear Gas

2) The Military with live ammunition, snipers and "live fire" zones

If you want the real answer consult the UNHRC

Ask a hard one.

the answer is 2 because 1 refused to do any thing about it other than cower in their stations and hope it would go away.

Also you seem to forget it was the red shirts who created the live fire zones. You really didn't think they had all those guns for a marshmallow roast.

On second thought you might of.

Well nice work Thida! first the Reds have managed to get an aquittal,now she wants to change history and get the Red Shirts completely exonerated,by claiming some other persons or parties did the burning in Bangkok.Next she will be telling us:the Red Shirts never entered Bangkok.

It gets more like a kids way of getting off the hook, e.g. you can't blame us,because you are all liars,we wasn't there!

The people arrested and charged were aquitted due to lack of evidence. If you look beyond that bias chip on your shoulder and read about the case you'd find out why they were aquitted, but you're unlikely to do that I know, your knowledge base and comfort zone is here on this board. I'll leave you to your thoughts..................

You just put up a post saying there was a video showing them doing it which was not allowed in court.

Now who has a bias chip on their shoulder?

No, Dolly, you've read it all wrong, try again from the beginning. I was joshing with yoshiwara who basically was saying that the "arisman" tape proved who it was that set fire to Central World.

Another one who would deny ever having seen the Arisman video.

Why, does the Arisman video show red shirts burning down CentralWorld? Why wasn't this video shown in court?

Now you are getting ridicules It shows it because they were doing it.

It was not shown in court because it would bring about a conviction. That in turn would put the leaders who urged them on (to be seen on u tube) in the wrong and make them co conspirators.

So you are saying that the "Arisman" tape shows red shirts setting fire to Central World? You accuse me of getting ridiculous?

Just using your words

"Why, does the Arisman video show red shirts burning down CentralWorld"

But in reality which group of peaceful protestors would you as police chief tear gas?

Ahh now that there's no rice to farm, the Red Shirts are free to hold their idiot rallies again! And Thida, about the arson attacks ,look no further then your own Red Shirts. You're fooling no one.

I wonder if the police will do all in there power to control it?

One policeman per protestor and road blocks to try and keep them out.

peacefull protestors.jpg

Wrong framing of the question Two different groups - how do you control them

1) Police and Tear Gas

2) The Military with live ammunition, snipers and "live fire" zones

If you want the real answer consult the UNHRC

Ask a hard one.

the answer is 2 because 1 refused to do any thing about it other than cower in their stations and hope it would go away.

Also you seem to forget it was the red shirts who created the live fire zones. You really didn't think they had all those guns for a marshmallow roast.

On second thought you might of.

"the red shirts who created the live fire zones".

Now that is one seriously sick joke and proof that you truly have lost the plot. See you.

I was joshing with yoshiwara

From truth twister to tongue twister.

Well nice work Thida! first the Reds have managed to get an aquittal,now she wants to change history and get the Red Shirts completely exonerated,by claiming some other persons or parties did the burning in Bangkok.Next she will be telling us:the Red Shirts never entered Bangkok.

It gets more like a kids way of getting off the hook, e.g. you can't blame us,because you are all liars,we wasn't there!

The people arrested and charged were aquitted due to lack of evidence. If you look beyond that bias chip on your shoulder and read about the case you'd find out why they were aquitted, but you're unlikely to do that I know, your knowledge base and comfort zone is here on this board. I'll leave you to your thoughts..................

You just put up a post saying there was a video showing them doing it which was not allowed in court.

Now who has a bias chip on their shoulder?

No, Dolly, you've read it all wrong, try again from the beginning. I was joshing with yoshiwara who basically was saying that the "arisman" tape proved who it was that set fire to Central World.

O now we are not to take your posts seriously they are jokes.

Mission accomplished

All Thida needs to do is roll over in bed and ask her husband Weng how they were set alight.

Cheers for the mental picture mate.

Yes. Not a very nice thing to do.

Thida.jpg

heres the look that stole Weng's heart............

Thida.jpg

Pity she didn't steal his box of matches too.

But in reality which group of peaceful protestors would you as police chief tear gas?

Ahh now that there's no rice to farm, the Red Shirts are free to hold their idiot rallies again! And Thida, about the arson attacks ,look no further then your own Red Shirts. You're fooling no one.

I wonder if the police will do all in there power to control it?

One policeman per protestor and road blocks to try and keep them out.

Wrong framing of the question Two different groups - how do you control them

1) Police and Tear Gas

2) The Military with live ammunition, snipers and "live fire" zones

If you want the real answer consult the UNHRC

Ask a hard one.

the answer is 2 because 1 refused to do any thing about it other than cower in their stations and hope it would go away.

Also you seem to forget it was the red shirts who created the live fire zones. You really didn't think they had all those guns for a marshmallow roast.

On second thought you might of.

"the red shirts who created the live fire zones".

Now that is one seriously sick joke and proof that you truly have lost the plot. See you.

Truth is painful at times and running is your only choice.

By By

But in reality which group of peaceful protestors would you as police chief tear gas?

Wrong framing of the question Two different groups - how do you control them

1) Police and Tear Gas

2) The Military with live ammunition, snipers and "live fire" zones

If you want the real answer consult the UNHRC

Ask a hard one.

the answer is 2 because 1 refused to do any thing about it other than cower in their stations and hope it would go away.

Also you seem to forget it was the red shirts who created the live fire zones. You really didn't think they had all those guns for a marshmallow roast.

On second thought you might of.

"the red shirts who created the live fire zones".

Now that is one seriously sick joke and proof that you truly have lost the plot. See you.

Truth is painful at times and running is your only choice.

By By

It was actually a dignified shrug of the shoulders, a turn on my heel and walk away from the "truth" ("the red shirts who created the live fire zones".) as perceived and perpetuated by HelloDolly.

If the Red Shirts had not been there with weapons, there would have been no need for live fire zones ...... hence they were created by the Red Shirts.

If the Red Shirts had not been there with weapons, there would have been no need for live fire zones ...... hence they were created by the Red Shirts.

Of course. We all know that.

NIce idea. Why not put the same cops on to this as are responsible for solving the murder that Chalerm's son was accused of? Perhaps for a modest fee the mystery man Puet can also be found to have torched these buildings. Case solved.