Jump to content

Second Pro-PCAD Singer Forced To Cancel Concert This Week


Lite Beer

Recommended Posts

Second Pro-PCAD Singer Forced To Cancel Concert This Week

By Khaosod English.

13934837401393483776l.jpg

BANGKOK: -- Another famous pop singer allied to anti-government protesters is forced to cancel a concert due to pressure from the Redshirts protesters.

Mr. Jirayut Wattanasin, popularly known by his stage name "Jo Nuveau", was slated to give performance at Tawanna 2004 pub-and-restaurant in Nakhon Panom province on 2 March.

However, a group of United Front of Democracy Against Dictatorship (UDD) supporters marched last night to the bar with over 30 vehicles and force the venue to cancel the concert.

Ms. Somsri Sommercon, a local UDD leader, said she is deeply angered by Mr. Jirayut′s support for the People′s Committee for Absolute Democracy With the King As Head of State (PCAD), which aims to oust Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra.

Furthermore, according to Ms. Somsri, Mr. Jirayut has made numerous remarks which insult the Redshirts movements and the poor across the country.

She also threatened to organise a large protest at the bar if its managers refuse to call off the concert on 2 March.

In front of the pub, the Redshirts held up signs denouncing Mr. Jirayut - one of them read "Nakhon Panom people don′t welcome any shop that supports the PCAD" - while their leaders gave speeches criticising the PCAD movements.

The pub′s manager, Mr. Pattanagorn Johjong, later emerged to negotiate with the protesters for around 30 minutes. He told the Redshirts that the management was genuinely unaware of Mr Jirayut′s political affiliation and willing to cancel the concert if the Redshirts insist.

Satisfied by Mr. Pattanagorn′s proposal, the Redshirts peacefully dispersed from the restaurant.

Previously on 24 February, a pro-PCAD singer, Mr. Pongsak "Off" Rattanapong, was also forcedtocall off his scheduled performance at a bar in Chiang Mai province, after a group of Redshirts besieged the pub prior to his arrival.

Source: http://www.khaosod.co.th/en/view_newsonline.php?newsid=TVRNNU16UTRNemMwTUE9PQ==

kse.png
-- Khaosod English 2014-02-27

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

'Somsri Sommercon, a local UDD leader, said she is deeply angered by Mr. Jirayut′s support for the People′s Committee for Absolute Democracy With the King As Head of State (PCAD), which aims to oust Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra.'

Thou shalt not have a view we do not have.

Thou shalt not think.

Thou shalt not exercise your freedom of speech.

Thou shalt not support those we do not.

Thou shalt not mention corruption or rice.

Thou must remember only we are right.

Thou shalt obey.

Thou shalt obey.

Thou shalt obey.

Red Guard Bible [2014 updated]: The New Commandments

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a terrible world it would be if the red shirts actually had power.

No freedom of expression.

Democracy red style, zero tolerance.

Such is the color of red. Plenty of examples around the world.

Sorry to bust your pink bubble but the PDRC were the ones who said it was okay to cancel concerts based on political opinion:

http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/sek-losos-concert-phuket-cancelled-due-protest/

A concert by Sek Loso scheduled to be staged in Phuket Sunday night was abruptly cancelled due to a protest by anti-government protesters.

January 6th, 2014

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

'Somsri Sommercon, a local UDD leader, said she is deeply angered by Mr. Jirayut′s support for the People′s Committee for Absolute Democracy With the King As Head of State (PCAD), which aims to oust Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra.'Thou shalt not have a view we do not have.Thou shalt not think.Thou shalt not exercise your freedom of speech.Thou shalt not support those we do not.Thou shalt not mention corruption or rice.Thou must remember only we are right.Thou shalt obey.Thou shalt obey.Thou shalt obey.Red Guard Bible [2014 updated]: The New Commandments

You forgot Suthep's "thou shall not pass!" the streets of Bangkok.

Oh, wait ...that was Gandalf in Lord of the Rings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actively preventing people from supporting and expressing their political view is inherently anti-democratic.

Nice to see we agree that Suthep's movement, by blocking elections and preventing people from exercising their right to vote and express their political views, is undemocratic.

You basically just copied the opinion of the post above yours after reading it.

Shows you really don't have a mind of your own if you need to steal someone else's comments.

At least Suthep can get up on stage every night sometimes for an hour and speak his own mind, and he has been doing that 7 nights a week for 4 months.

You can't even come onto a forum thread without being unoriginal.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actively preventing people from supporting and expressing their political view is inherently anti-democratic.

Nice to see we agree that Suthep's movement, by blocking elections and preventing people from exercising their right to vote and express their political views, is undemocratic.

You basically just copied the opinion of the post above yours after reading it.

Shows you really don't have a mind of your own if you need to steal someone else's comments.

At least Suthep can get up on stage every night sometimes for an hour and speak his own mind, and he has been doing that 7 nights a week for 4 months.

You can't even come onto a forum thread without being unoriginal.

So, you suggest that if more than 1 person has the same opinion, they are brainwashed and have no opinion for themselves?

What about the people sharing Suthep's ideology, then?

I suggest you stop before you dig an even bigger hole.

By the way, it's pretty much the opinion of every average Thai citizen that people should not be prevented from voting. I suggest you get out of the brainwashed zones and go ask around the country.

Edited by ShannonT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting an owner of a bar to cancel a concert does not fall in the realm of 'freedom of expression' to me. It is the realm of business relationships and requesting the owner to boycott this particular individual is not any different than the PDRC asking its followers to boycott Shin related enterprises. Boycotts are economic tools that are, in my view, a legitimate use of individual or public expression. No violence - just hurt people in their pocketbooks.

Edited by pookiki
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actively preventing people from supporting and expressing their political view is inherently anti-democratic.

Nice to see we agree that Suthep's movement, by blocking elections and preventing people from exercising their right to vote and express their political views, is undemocratic.

Wow - Talk about twisting the truth - Remove a single sentence from the context of the whole paragraph and use that sentence, that has be de- contextualized to imply that we agree!

Is that really the best repost you have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a terrible world it would be if the red shirts actually had power.

No freedom of expression.

Democracy red style, zero tolerance.

They do have the power and sucked the country dry for a good 500 billion from the rice scam alone. And if all go well, a stunning 2.2 trillion baht loan to divide in the coming years! The middle and upper management of the red mob movement have had a couple of good years financially and does not want to give that up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actively preventing people from supporting and expressing their political view is inherently anti-democratic.

Nice to see we agree that Suthep's movement, by blocking elections and preventing people from exercising their right to vote and express their political views, is undemocratic.

Wow - Talk about twisting the truth - Remove a single sentence from the context of the whole paragraph and use that sentence, that has be de- contextualized to imply that we agree!

Is that really the best repost you have?

It doesn't change the context in any way.

You said that preventing people from expressing their political view is undemocratic, did you or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actively preventing people from supporting and expressing their political view is inherently anti-democratic.

Nice to see we agree that Suthep's movement, by blocking elections and preventing people from exercising their right to vote and express their political views, is undemocratic.

And notice how he changes the subject when he is cornered and shown to be hypercritical. This is his usual approach as he has been taken him out of his comfort zone.

Shannon. We are not talking about blocking elections mate. Concentrate now. Concentrate. We are talking about singers and freedom to sing.

We suggested that you where hypercritical in your comment and challenged you on it. Do you have anything to say on that?

Concentrate now. Stay with us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...
""