Send defense ?

Is she not actually required to turn up ?

No surprise here.

Correct. If the Junior staff don't have to show face, why should the boss?

The letter will be very short as she has no defence against a blatant case of Nepotism,

" I was elected so I can do what I want and disregard the laws of Thailand "

or

" My brother told me to do it "

Not the old "My dog ate my homework?"

Send defense ?

Is she not actually required to turn up ?

No she doesn't. There you go short, succinct and to the point. This is a hearing not a criminal proceeding.

Sent from my i-mobile i-STYLE 8.2 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Short, succinct and to the point...but if she truly believed that she was innocent, and objected to being probed on various corruption issues, wouldn't she insist on attending to rebuke such claims...?!

Send defense ?

Is she not actually required to turn up ?

No she doesn't. There you go short, succinct and to the point. This is a hearing not a criminal proceeding.

Sent from my i-mobile i-STYLE 8.2 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Short, succinct and to the point...but if she truly believed that she was innocent, and objected to being probed on various corruption issues, wouldn't she insist on attending to rebuke such claims...?!

It would be intolerably embarrassing for her!!!

Send defense ?

Is she not actually required to turn up ?

Is there some new rule on here that demands that you not read the OP before posting?

It seems the indefensible has finally become indefensible for the most aredent of YL's admirers. In this case, all that is left is scorn and sarcasm for opponents. One used to put up more robust (albeit seriously flawed) posts, but now, with the hard truth obvious to even the most blinkered members, there is not a lot left, is there, except maybe to withdraw with as much dignity as one can muster.

How sad.

What does the woman think this is-the FA cup final and drawing at full time, so extra time please. JOKE. time waster, child tactics.

She really has a very good defense: a militia that is ready to defend the position of her clan with blood, terror, and fire.

Guns against tanks isn't a very good defence!!!!

What tanks are you talking about? Are you writing from Eastern Ukraine?? I was rather thinking about Human Beings, not about tanks. Haven't you heard about all those who have died (including children) or have been injured from the violence of the militia defending her clan?. Not to mention the intimidation, threats, and violent attacks against those investigating the wrongdoing of her government.

The very least that a normal leader in a normal country would have done long time ago is to publicly condemn the violence, condemn the perpetrators, condemn the apologists of violence, civil, war and separatism, illegalize their movement, and break any kind of link with them.

I think the appropriate term to define the Red Shirts dirty actions protecting the government is "State Terrorism"

She really has a very good defense: a militia that is ready to defend the position of her clan with blood, terror, and fire.

Guns against tanks isn't a very good defence!!!!

What tanks are you talking about? Are you writing from Eastern Ukraine?? I was rather thinking about Human Beings, not about tanks. Haven't you heard about all those who have died (including children) or have been injured from the violence of the militia defending her clan?. Not to mention the intimidation, threats, and violent attacks against those investigating the wrongdoing of her government.

The very least that a normal leader in a normal country would have done long time ago is to publicly condemn the violence, condemn the perpetrators, condemn the apologists of violence, civil, war and separatism, illegalize their movement, and break any kind of link with them.

I think the appropriate term to define the Red Shirts dirty actions protecting the government is "State Terrorism"

If these threats from the 'red militia' materialise then you will see what tanks on the streets I am on about!!!

She really has a very good defense: a militia that is ready to defend the position of her clan with blood, terror, and fire.

Guns against tanks isn't a very good defence!!!!

What tanks are you talking about? Are you writing from Eastern Ukraine?? I was rather thinking about Human Beings, not about tanks. Haven't you heard about all those who have died (including children) or have been injured from the violence of the militia defending her clan?. Not to mention the intimidation, threats, and violent attacks against those investigating the wrongdoing of her government.

The very least that a normal leader in a normal country would have done long time ago is to publicly condemn the violence, condemn the perpetrators, condemn the apologists of violence, civil, war and separatism, illegalize their movement, and break any kind of link with them.

I think the appropriate term to define the Red Shirts dirty actions protecting the government is "State Terrorism"

If these threats from the 'red militia' materialise then you will see what tanks on the streets I am on about!!!

Precisely!! If those tanks ever go to the street (I wish they never will) it will be in order to protect the citizens and avoid more victims of the red-shirt terror. In other words: to do the work that the Police does not want to do. YL defends herself with lawyers and has a militia to defend her at any cost, but who is defending the safety of the people in this country?