To think that thing was a country's Prime Minister!!

Dear God!!

Think not. She indeed was the elected Prime Minister compare to current unelected thing.

Who was she elected by?

Her brother actually - albeit through his vassals known as PTP and a few bought political allies.

To think that thing was a country's Prime Minister!!

Dear God!!

Think not. She indeed was the elected Prime Minister compare to current unelected thing.

Who was she elected by?

Less you forget, Thailand was a democratic country and leaders are elected by the electoral system not that long ago. You still remember that period where freedom of expression was tolerated and the 3 fingers salute was allowed?

60 questions up from the 30 the other day?

Would this be the same NACC that was pushing for her impeachment months ago, and professing their case was GTG?

Is it any wonder the AG told them to square the Ts and dot the i's, surely they would have had all the relevant questions that needed to be asked well in advance before now?

Or am I missing something here?

Yes - you are missing something.

The questions posed are in response to Yingluck's statement, which she and her main lawyer, believes answered all the likely questions that might arise. Clearly it didn't and prompted further very explicit questions.

There is no limit to the amount of questions allowed.

Yingluck will of course try anything and everything to avoid being actually questioned and having to provide real answers.

To think that thing was a country's Prime Minister!!

Dear God!!

Think not. She indeed was the elected Prime Minister compare to current unelected thing.

Who was she elected by?

Less you forget, Thailand was a democratic country and leaders are elected by the electoral system not that long ago. You still remember that period where freedom of expression was tolerated and the 3 fingers salute was allowed?

Yes sure, if you say so Eric. A democracy in which a crook can own and run a government whilst a fugitive, facing even more charges. A democracy where the puppet PM and her ministers can openly lie and state they will defy the rule of law when they don't like it. A democracy where the incumbent government can refuse parliamentary debate and refuse to divulge information.

Had the previous regime manipulated the amnesty their owner desired, and changed things to suit themselves, do you really think they would be interested in democracy?

To think that thing was a country's Prime Minister!!

Dear God!!

Think not. She indeed was the elected Prime Minister compare to current unelected thing.

Who was she elected by?

Less you forget, Thailand was a democratic country and leaders are elected by the electoral system not that long ago. You still remember that period where freedom of expression was tolerated and the 3 fingers salute was allowed?

Eric, you are wasting your time. The people, you are trying to have a conversation with, are all hard on the bottle:

To think that thing was a country's Prime Minister!!

Dear God!!

Think not. She indeed was the elected Prime Minister compare to current unelected thing.

Who was she elected by?

Less you forget, Thailand was a democratic country and leaders are elected by the electoral system not that long ago. You still remember that period where freedom of expression was tolerated and the 3 fingers salute was allowed?

Yes sure, if you say so Eric. A democracy in which a crook can own and run a government whilst a fugitive, facing even more charges. A democracy where the puppet PM and her ministers can openly lie and state they will defy the rule of law when they don't like it. A democracy where the incumbent government can refuse parliamentary debate and refuse to divulge information.

Had the previous regime manipulated the amnesty their owner desired, and changed things to suit themselves, do you really think they would be interested in democracy?

JOC, just one more and I will leave this people to have their hard drink.

BB, key words were puppet, lies, rule of law, Parlimentary debate and amnesty. Are you talking about the current junta?

To think that thing was a country's Prime Minister!!

Dear God!!

Think not. She indeed was the elected Prime Minister compare to current unelected thing.

Who was she elected by?

Less you forget, Thailand was a democratic country and leaders are elected by the electoral system not that long ago. You still remember that period where freedom of expression was tolerated and the 3 fingers salute was allowed?

Actually Thailand's electoral system DID NOT elect Yingluck it elected the PHUA THAI political party of which Yingluck was a member. The elected Parliament then elected the PM (in exactly the same way as EVERY Thai Pm since 1997, including Abhisit)

He should be happy with the phrase 'Hired gun'.

Much better than 'Dirty Crony' which is closer to the mark.

Kittirat Na Ranong, who headed the Ministry of Finance from January 2012 to May 2014, is set to testify on behalf of Yingluck during her impeachment hearing before the National Legislative Assembly (NLA), a lawmaking body appointed by the junta after the 22 May 2014 coup.

Oh goody! Kittirat will testify for Yingluck. I can hardly wait for him to explain why he said the payments to the farmers would have to drop to 12,000 baht, then reversed himself, and kept on paying 15,000 baht. Maybe the chairman of the rice board convinced him. what kind of person would ignore their finance minister and encourage the continuation of a policy that was driving the country in to massive debt......oh never mind.

Well, he's not wrong.

When they've asked for Yingluck herself to appear (in person) and answer their questions, her sending yet another "representative" to defend her just doesn't cut it.

She does seem to constantly avoid actually being where she's needed or asked to be, always sending lawyers on her behalf etc to speak for her. One might suspect she's unable to actually answer direct questions without the puppet master putting the words in her mouth.

Reminds of many of her televised faux pas (where she's actually required to think, speak and answer questions, not from a script), such as:

It seams like you write more than you think all the generals friends are not in title to any answers

The general wants to sell the rice internationals which includes following the international laws to not only trading but way of leadership freedom of speech and many other things too

That's why nobody sent her brother to Thailand it's not the international community there don't understand thailand its thailand there don't understand but why you care anyway you not thai are you

^^^^^ what is this? Ever heard of commas and full stops (periods)

Why cant they ask her questions and ask him questions.

At the end of the day, he was finance minister, so should be able to give a bit more specific detail beyind what she knows.

Why cant they ask her questions and ask him questions.

At the end of the day, he was finance minister, so should be able to give a bit more specific detail beyind what she knows.

I think he is on the list for the future anyway!

All this uproar about a few bags of rice and none at all about gunning down innocent civilians and press corps in live fire zones on Bangkok streets...a telling set of priorities indeed.

Lets not argue about a few bags of rice and who killed who, just sweep it under the carpet Thai style and bring out the Som tum and a couple of cold Chang Beer.

Well, he's not wrong.

When they've asked for Yingluck herself to appear (in person) and answer their questions, her sending yet another "representative" to defend her just doesn't cut it.

She does seem to constantly avoid actually being where she's needed or asked to be, always sending lawyers on her behalf etc to speak for her. One might suspect she's unable to actually answer direct questions without the puppet master putting the words in her mouth.

Reminds of many of her televised faux pas (where she's actually required to think, speak and answer questions, not from a script), such as:

Oh the poor little thing. I actually feel for her. She's so <deleted> dumb, she was destined to become a politician.

Well, he's not wrong.

When they've asked for Yingluck herself to appear (in person) and answer their questions, her sending yet another "representative" to defend her just doesn't cut it.

She does seem to constantly avoid actually being where she's needed or asked to be, always sending lawyers on her behalf etc to speak for her. One might suspect she's unable to actually answer direct questions without the puppet master putting the words in her mouth.

Reminds of many of her televised faux pas (where she's actually required to think, speak and answer questions, not from a script), such as:

It seams like you write more than you think all the generals friends are not in title to any answers

The general wants to sell the rice internationals which includes following the international laws to not only trading but way of leadership freedom of speech and many other things too

That's why nobody sent her brother to Thailand it's not the international community there don't understand thailand its thailand there don't understand but why you care anyway you not thai are you

I can only assume that English is not your first language.

The current "Government", you know, the one the Monarchy signed off on and approved, will follow the same strict standards of honesty and transparency as the previous Government, and the international community will continue to do business with Thailand no matter what.

And I care because I live and work here, it's my home. What about you?

"The former minister also insisted that he is qualified to testify on behalf of Yingluck, who is facing impeachment for allegedly failing to stop corruption in her government’s rice-pledging scheme"

The problem is everyone ran the scheme on behalf of yingluck and now the scheme is in the poop because she showed no leadership (yes, yes, she was elected) and so now they are testifying on behalf of her as well.

So this shows they have learnt absolutely nothing and are still shielding and protecting thaksins sister right up to the very end. Not because it is democratically sound, not because they are putting the people, the voters first, but simply because they do not want to be shunned by the shinawatra's. That is as democratic as an elected government that does not practice democracy!

I wonder if someone will serve jail time on behalf of yingluck if it came to it.

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

To think that thing was a country's Prime Minister!!

Dear God!!

Think not. She indeed was the elected Prime Minister compare to current unelected thing.

Who was she elected by?

Less you forget, Thailand was a democratic country and leaders are elected by the electoral system not that long ago. You still remember that period where freedom of expression was tolerated and the 3 fingers salute was allowed?"

"Less you forget, Thailand was a democratic country and leaders are elected by the electoral system not that long ago"

The winner - Joke of the day award!!

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

The term " hired bs artist " comes to mind. alt=whistling.gif>

Yes or 'hired liar'.

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

To think that thing was a country's Prime Minister!!

Dear God!!

Think not. She indeed was the elected Prime Minister compare to current unelected thing.

Who was she elected by?

Less you forget, Thailand was a democratic country and leaders are elected by the electoral system not that long ago. You still remember that period where freedom of expression was tolerated and the 3 fingers salute was allowed?"

"Less you forget, Thailand was a democratic country and leaders are elected by the electoral system not that long ago"

The winner - Joke of the day award!!

Democracy is a joke to you. I see you compromised your own moral standard. Live with that for your rest of your life.

Why cant they ask her questions and ask him questions.

At the end of the day, he was finance minister, so should be able to give a bit more specific detail beyind what she knows.

so should be able to give a bit more specific detail beyond what she knows.

"beyond what she knows."

My dog would be more knowledgeable!!

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

To think that thing was a country's Prime Minister!!

Dear God!!

Think not. She indeed was the elected Prime Minister compare to current unelected thing.

Who was she elected by?

Less you forget, Thailand was a democratic country and leaders are elected by the electoral system not that long ago. You still remember that period where freedom of expression was tolerated and the 3 fingers salute was allowed?"

"Less you forget, Thailand was a democratic country and leaders are elected by the electoral system not that long ago"

The winner - Joke of the day award!!

Democracy is a joke to you. I see you compromised your own moral standard. Live with that for your rest of your life.

Thailand hasn't been a true democracy, ever!

Here's a good question .. what is democracy? It's slightly different in every country! Is Singapore Democratic? Is Cambodia Democratic?

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

In a way I can see his point, but what does that make the NLA? Full of military officers who really are Hired guns, if the cap fits I guess?

So a guy who freely admits to lying when he thinks its convenient wants to answer questions for another proven liar. and then gets upset when someone uses an appropriate metaphor in a descriptive way.

Aw diddums, is he all upset then, poor sensitive soul.

Or put it another, he shat in his own nest, now he has to sleep in it. Som num nar.

All this uproar about a few bags of rice and none at all about gunning down innocent civilians and press corps in live fire zones on Bangkok streets...a telling set of priorities indeed.

Shameful isn't. Bags of rice are valued more than lives according to the NACC priorities. The 2010 killings will probably not see the light of day with the current NACC commitee.

But why would the NACC investigate the 2010 riots and deaths, what did those have to do with corruption, surely it was the DSI under Khun Tarit, who brought charges against the then-PM/DPM ?

It might indeed be interesting, to find out who absolved the RTA of any wrong-doing, at that time. But that is another topic, and belongs in another thread. This one is about Yingluck's apparent inability, to show-up in-person and answer questions, about things she was directly in-charge-of and responsible for.

<"If [Yingluck] sends hired guns to answer for her, how will that be credible?" Pornpetch said>.....says the General's hired gun

To think that thing was a country's Prime Minister!!

Dear God!!

Think not. She indeed was the elected Prime Minister compare to current unelected thing.

Who was she elected by?

The electorate

To think that thing was a country's Prime Minister!!

Dear God!!

Think not. She indeed was the elected Prime Minister compare to current unelected thing.

Who was she elected by?

The electorate

Wrong!! Try again!

From wiki : The Prime Minister is appointed by a vote in the Thai House of Representatives by a simple majority, and is then sworn-in by theKing of Thailand. The House's selection is usually based on the fact that either the prime minister is the leader of the largest political party in the lower house or the leader of the largest coalition of parties.

Also note Yingluck was NOT the leader of Phua Thai at any time during or after the election. She was the number 1 on the party list vote. But as you can see anybody who is an elected MP can be voted as PM.

yeh, they weren't hired,they did it for free out of loyalty

All this uproar about a few bags of rice and none at all about gunning down innocent civilians and press corps in live fire zones on Bangkok streets...a telling set of priorities indeed.

Shameful isn't. Bags of rice are valued more than lives according to the NACC priorities. The 2010 killings will probably not see the light of day with the current NACC commitee.

But why would the NACC investigate the 2010 riots and deaths, what did those have to do with corruption, surely it was the DSI under Khun Tarit, who brought charges against the then-PM/DPM ?

It might indeed be interesting, to find out who absolved the RTA of any wrong-doing, at that time. But that is another topic, and belongs in another thread. This one is about Yingluck's apparent inability, to show-up in-person and answer questions, about things she was directly in-charge-of and responsible for.

Think you have very shallow understanding of the cases under NACC purview. Try checking malfeasance charge brought against CRES in the 2010 killings. By the way, the killings have nothing todo with the RTA.

So, apparently, she won't be there to answer questions by herself, would she have had the ability to I seriously doubt anyway, but this is really, again, and one more time, spitting in the face of the Thai State's authorities!

Who do the present members of this clan of immigrated shady Akku Chinese profiteurs think they are! Hope it has at least been made sure she will not go out of Thailand before the decision falls about her impeachment, ...although it's still the sales period in Paris and London! And till the NACC charges against her have come in front of a Court as a matter of fact.

And who's going to speak on her behalf? Mister white, and other, lies? I would like it a lot to be close to him, looking him straight in the eyes, when he is sworn in... Telling the truth, him? Has he ever? Does he even know what it means?

Oh my, what a despicable bunch!