Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

World News

Fresh news brought to you daily from around the world. Hot news, breaking stories as they happen.
The European car industry has urged the European Union to exempt the UK from planned "made in Europe" rules, warning that excluding British manufacturers would disrupt deeply integrated supply chains and weaken the bloc's competitiveness.

Get today's headlines by email

The European Automobile Manufacturers Association (Acea) called on the European Commission to grant the UK, Turkey and Morocco "justified, targeted exemptions" from the proposed rules. Under the plans, only vehicles and components produced within the EU would qualify for subsidies and public procurement contracts.
European carmakers seek UK exemption
The measures form part of the EU's proposed Industrial Accelerator Act (IAA), which is designed to strengthen European industry against growing competition from heavily subsidised Chinese manufacturers.
Although aimed at reducing dependence on Chinese imports, the proposals could become one of the most significant economic consequences of Brexit for Britain's automotive sector because they currently apply only to EU member states.
Brexit impact and industry concerns
Acea said the European automotive industry continues to operate an integrated supply chain with the UK despite Brexit. It argued that vehicles, batteries and components produced in Britain should be treated the same as those made within the EU and have equal access to policy support.
The group's intervention comes as Britain seeks changes to the proposals during talks with Brussels. Europe Minister Nick Thomas-Symonds met EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič on Wednesday, with the Industrial Accelerator Act among the issues under discussion.
Mike Hawes, chief executive of the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT), welcomed Acea's position, saying it reflected the close links between the UK and European automotive industries. He said he hoped EU regulators would take those shared interests into account when finalising the legislation.
Speaking at a London conference on Tuesday, Hawes warned that the proposals could effectively exclude UK-built vehicles from much of the European market. He argued that such an outcome would harm both sides because many UK factories are owned by European manufacturers and the UK and EU remain each other's largest export markets for cars and automotive parts.
Integrated manufacturing network
Acea's membership includes BMW, Volkswagen and Stellantis, which own the Mini, Bentley and Vauxhall manufacturing operations in the UK. Jaguar Land Rover, Ford, Toyota and Nissan are also members with significant production facilities in Britain.
According to reports, Nissan has privately warned that it could be forced to close its Sunderland factory if the rules are implemented without changes. More than half of UK vehicle exports are destined for EU markets.
Several Acea members also operate manufacturing plants in Turkey and Morocco, prompting the organisation to argue that excluding those facilities would leave existing European investments stranded and reduce the industry's competitiveness.
China competition shapes policy
The Industrial Accelerator Act is intended to help protect European manufacturing from an influx of lower-cost Chinese vehicles and components.
Earlier this week, the EU and China agreed to hold three months of diplomatic talks aimed at preventing a wider trade dispute.
Last month, several European trade groups warned that domestic industries risked being undermined by what they described as "China shock 2.0". Concerns have intensified after Volkswagen proposed cutting up to 100,000 jobs across Europe. The EU's trade deficit with China has reached around €1 billion a day and is forecast to approach €400 billion in China's favour by the end of the year.
While Acea is strongly influenced by German manufacturers, the Industrial Accelerator Act is largely driven by France, meaning any significant amendments would require the support of French President Emmanuel Macron. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has also called for stronger action to address China's growing industrial advantage, citing the country's currency policy as a contributor to its trade surplus.

Join the discussion?


10 July 2026
webfact
webfact
President Donald Trump is now arguing that Iran has effectively been stripped of its nuclear capability, a position that contrasts with the rationale his administration gave for launching the war earlier this year.

Get today's headlines by email

When the conflict began in February, Trump said Iran posed an imminent nuclear threat. However, critics noted that he had spent months beforehand insisting that U.S. and Israeli strikes in June 2025 had already "obliterated" Iran's nuclear programme.
Trump shifts message on Iran's nuclear threat
Just weeks before the war started, he said those attacks had left Iran without even a "potential capability" to build nuclear weapons.
Now, as the conflict enters its fifth month, Trump is once again describing Iran's nuclear programme as effectively eliminated.
Trump declares war a success
Speaking at a NATO summit in Turkey on Wednesday, Trump rejected suggestions that the war had reached a strategic dead end.
"I was there for one reason: that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. I call it, we denuclearize Iran," he said. "And that's happened; they will never have a nuclear weapon."
Trump argued that Iran's nuclear materials are now buried so deeply beneath mountains that they are effectively inaccessible. He also said the United States can monitor the sites and ensure they remain unusable.
"There's no way they have a nuclear weapon," he said.
At another event, Trump was asked how the United States intended to secure Iran's nuclear materials. He suggested that their location effectively placed them under U.S. control.
"We've already got the nuclear material, because it's so far underground," Trump said. "Nobody's going to be able to get it except us."
"They can't get it," he added, calling the outcome "a tremendous success."
Questions over the war's objectives
Trump's latest comments have fuelled questions about the administration's original justification for the conflict.
Throughout the war, administration officials repeatedly described securing or eliminating Iran's nuclear materials as a key objective. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent referred to obtaining the materials as a "red line" only weeks ago.
Trump has increasingly suggested that physically recovering those materials may no longer be necessary because Iran cannot access them and the sites can be monitored remotely.
His latest remarks also add to what critics describe as shifting explanations for the war. Over recent months, the administration has cited multiple objectives, including preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and, at times, promoting regime change. Trump has also claimed that the killing of senior Iranian leaders amounted to achieving regime change, despite Iran's government remaining in power.
Critics point to inconsistencies
The president's latest position has prompted further questions about why the war continued if Iran's nuclear capability had already been neutralised.
The largest attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities occurred in June 2025, when Trump first declared the programme had been "obliterated." Major combat operations in the current conflict ended with a ceasefire announced on April 7.
If Iran's nuclear materials were already inaccessible, critics ask why the administration continued pursuing a nuclear agreement and maintained that securing those materials remained essential.
Some analysts argue Trump's latest comments suggest he is preparing to reduce U.S. involvement while portraying the campaign as a success, despite key objectives remaining unmet and negotiations with Tehran showing little sign of progress.
The conflict has imposed significant costs, including the deaths of 13 U.S. service members, disruption to the global economy and heightened concern over Iran's demonstrated ability to affect shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Critics argue those consequences may ultimately prove among the war's most enduring outcomes.

Join the discussion?


10 July 2026
webfact
webfact
Andy Burnham is on course to become Labour leader and the UK's next prime minister after securing the backing of 322 Labour MPs in the first round of leadership nominations.

Get today's headlines by email

Burnham, the only declared candidate since nominations opened on Thursday, is just one nomination short of the 323 needed to make it mathematically impossible for another contender to enter the race. Several MPs who were unable to vote on the opening day have indicated they will support him when they return to Parliament.
MP Support Puts Leadership Within Reach
If no rival emerges, as widely expected, Burnham is set to be confirmed as Labour leader next week before taking office as prime minister on 20 July.
The development marks a rapid political ascent for the former Greater Manchester mayor, who only recently returned to Westminster after winning the Makerfield by-election.
Burnham Outlines Vision for Labour
Responding to the wave of support, Burnham said he was "deeply grateful" to Labour MPs who had nominated him, adding that the backing reflected support from across the party.
He said the nominations showed a "shared belief that Britain needs a new approach to politics" and described his agenda as a "circuit breaker" that would shift power away from Westminster, reshape the economy to benefit ordinary people and promote growth across the country.
Later on Thursday, Burnham briefly turned to politics while presenting the Legend Award to Manchester indie band James at the Silver Clef music awards at London's Royal Albert Hall.
Although he said he would avoid discussing politics during the event, he joked about Reform UK leader Nigel Farage's decision to trigger a by-election in Clacton, where Count Binface is standing after Labour and the other major parties chose not to contest the seat.
"Count Binface, you are carrying the hopes of the nation. Don't let us down," Burnham said.
Leadership Race Appears All but Decided
Burnham's return to Parliament, combined with Labour's heavy losses in May's local elections, intensified pressure on Sir Keir Starmer to step aside. Sir Keir resigned as Labour leader on the day Burnham was sworn in as an MP, saying he had concluded he was no longer the best person to lead Labour into the next general election.
Candidates have until Wednesday to secure nominations from at least 81 Labour MPs to qualify for the leadership contest. Once Burnham reaches 323 MP nominations, no other candidate will be able to reach that threshold.
He must also receive nominations from at least three of Labour's 31 affiliated trade unions or socialist societies, a requirement expected to be completed without difficulty.
If he remains unopposed, Burnham will become Labour leader and prime minister without a vote among party members or affiliated trade union supporters.
Attention Turns to Policy Agenda
Support for Burnham gathered momentum after former defence minister Al Carns ruled out entering the contest on Wednesday, effectively clearing the path for an uncontested leadership race.
Even so, some Labour figures have called on Burnham to provide more detail about the policies he would pursue in government, particularly as he spent the past eight years outside Westminster after leaving Parliament in 2017.
His limited contact with many newer Labour MPs has increased interest in an official parliamentary hustings scheduled for Monday, where he is expected to answer questions about his plans.
Meanwhile, Burnham has begun "access talks" with senior civil servants, led by Cabinet Secretary Antonia Romeo, to discuss policy proposals ahead of a potential transition into government.
Speaking as nominations opened, Sir Keir endorsed his longtime colleague, saying he had worked closely with Burnham after first entering Parliament and believed he would make "a good prime minister."

Join the discussion?


10 July 2026

webfact
webfact
Podcaster Joe Rogan has questioned President Donald Trump's decision to resume military strikes on Iran, saying the president "might’ve f---ed it up" by becoming involved in the conflict.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking on Wednesday's episode of The Joe Rogan Experience, Rogan argued that many conservatives never wanted a war with Iran and said the military action appeared to contradict one of Trump's key campaign promises.
He continued: "They’re the only people that seem to be thinking it’s a good idea in this country. Most people are horrified by the idea because Trump was elected. One of the pillars that he stood for apparently was that he doesn’t want any more wars."
Conservative Criticism Intensifies
Rogan's remarks echo criticism from several prominent conservative commentators, including Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly and Matt Walsh.
The group has argued that Trump entered the conflict to advance Israeli interests without fully considering the consequences for Americans, who have faced fluctuating fuel and energy prices since the fighting began.
Growing Opposition on the Right
British politician Rupert Lowe, who appeared as Rogan's guest on the podcast, said Iran remained a regional threat but questioned whether military action served U.S. interests.
"There’s only a reason to go to war if it’s going to benefit you," Lowe said. Although he described Iran as "a sort of malevolent state" that spreads harmful ideology, he said it was difficult to identify a clear benefit for the United States.
Lowe also pointed to Iran's backing of Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas as evidence that Tehran continues to pose a security challenge.
Fighting Continues
The comments came as efforts to secure a diplomatic breakthrough appeared to falter.
While Trump's team had been working to negotiate an agreement, fighting between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon threatened hopes for a broader peace deal. Israel has maintained control of a security zone along its border with Lebanon, saying the buffer is needed to prevent Hezbollah operations.
Iran has said regional peace was secured under the ceasefire agreement and urged Trump to adhere to the terms outlined in the memorandum of understanding.
However, after Iran attacked three ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz on Tuesday and clashes between U.S. and Iranian forces continued on Wednesday, Trump declared that the ceasefire agreement was "over."
Next Moves Awaited
International leaders are now watching closely for Washington's next military decisions as they assess whether the conflict with Iran will escalate further or move back toward diplomacy following the latest exchanges of strikes.

Join the discussion?


10 July 2026
webfact
webfact
Nigel Farage's decision to resign as the member of parliament for Clacton and force a by-election has drawn sharp criticism, with Britain's main political parties refusing to contest the vote and leaving him facing a satirical challenger instead.

Get today's headlines by email

Farage, leader of Reform UK, stepped down on Tuesday while facing allegations that he failed to declare millions of pounds' worth of gifts from wealthy donors. He has denied any wrongdoing and is under investigation by Parliament's standards watchdog.
Announcing his resignation, Farage said he wanted voters in Clacton, in southeast England, to decide his political future rather than what he described as an "establishment" campaign against him.
"I've decided the people of Clacton should be the judges of my actions," he said, adding that he intended to continue the "political revolution" led by Reform UK.
Major Parties Boycott Contest
Farage's strategy quickly met resistance from Britain's three main political parties. Labour, the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats all announced they would boycott the by-election, arguing that the contest was an unnecessary political stunt.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer described the move as a "desperate stunt," while a spokesperson for Andy Burnham, widely viewed as a potential future prime minister, called it a "gimmick" intended to divert attention from questions surrounding Farage's financial backers.
Rachel Reeves, the finance minister who formally accepted Farage's resignation from Parliament, also criticized the move. Writing on X, she said the people of Clacton deserved better and remarked that if Farage wanted to spend the summer "arguing with a bin," she would not stop him.
Count Binface Emerges as Main Challenger
With the major parties opting out, the most recognizable candidate to enter the race is Count Binface, a satirical character created by comedian and writer Jon Harvey.
Known for wearing a metallic bin on his head, Count Binface has regularly contested British elections as part of the country's long tradition of novelty candidates challenging high-profile politicians. His campaign often combines political satire with deliberately humorous policy proposals.
Following Farage's resignation, Count Binface declared "Game on, Nige" in a post on X.
The comedian later told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that he wondered whether politicians were avoiding the contest because they feared him rather than Farage. Asked why voters should support him, he replied simply: "I'm not Nigel Farage."
Supporters Defend Farage's Decision
Farage's allies argued that the boycott showed Britain's established parties were unwilling to challenge the Reform UK leader directly.
Reform UK's home affairs spokesman, Zia Yusuf, accused the other parties of avoiding the contest despite years of attacking Farage politically.
"The establishment is on the ropes," Yusuf wrote on X.
Although Count Binface is not expected to win the seat, some political commentators have suggested he could attract a notable protest vote as dissatisfaction with the by-election and the surrounding controversy continues to dominate attention.


Join the discussion?


10 July 2026
webfact
webfact
Russian President Vladimir Putin is unlikely to pursue peace talks with Ukraine in the near future and is instead expected to intensify the war, according to three sources close to the Kremlin who spoke to Reuters.

Get today's headlines by email

The sources said recent Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian oil refineries, ports and fuel infrastructure have reinforced Putin's determination to continue the conflict rather than negotiate. Two of the sources, who requested anonymity, said an escalation in military operations is likely in the coming months. One person who regularly meets with the Russian leader described the chances of escalation as "high."
Kremlin Sources See Little Prospect of Peace
The assessment contrasts with comments made this week by U.S. President Donald Trump, who said Putin wanted the war to end and suggested a resolution was "closer than people realize." Trump held separate phone calls with Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last week before meeting Zelenskyy during the NATO summit, where the two leaders discussed possible steps toward peace. The White House did not respond to Reuters' request for comment.
Putin Focused on Donbas Objectives
According to one source familiar with Putin's thinking, the Russian president remains committed to capturing the remainder of Ukraine's eastern Donbas region. The source said Putin recently rejected advice from some advisers who proposed accepting a ceasefire along the current front lines, insisting instead on achieving his military objectives.
Another source said Putin believes Russian forces will eventually secure the remaining Ukrainian-held areas of Donbas.
The Kremlin maintained its public position that Russia remains open to a peaceful settlement while continuing military operations. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Moscow had sufficient capability to continue what it calls its "special military operation."
A senior Ukrainian official, responding on behalf of Zelenskyy's office, said Ukrainian intelligence indicates Russia is preparing for additional military action rather than negotiations, including possible new operations inside Ukraine or even against another European country.
Growing Concerns Over Wider Escalation
Some Western military analysts believe Russia would need a politically unpopular mobilisation of additional fighting-age men to fully capture Donbas, a step Putin has so far avoided.
Russian military commentators have increasingly discussed the possibility of expanding the conflict, including strikes against European targets such as NATO bases in the Baltic states. Such attacks could risk direct confrontation with the U.S.-led alliance.
Jack Watling of the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) said Russia might instead seek limited attacks designed to create divisions within NATO over how to respond. He added that rising tensions with the alliance could also provide domestic justification for wider military conscription.
War Continues to Take Heavy Toll
Repeated Ukrainian strikes on Russian energy infrastructure have caused fuel shortages, increasing the war's impact on the Russian public. Although Putin's approval rating remains high, polling has shown it recently reached its lowest level since the full-scale invasion began in 2022.
The source who regularly meets Putin said Ukraine's recent battlefield successes have made the Russian leader more determined to respond forcefully. Russia has launched major drone and missile attacks on Ukraine in recent days, including strikes on Kyiv that killed dozens of civilians. Moscow says it targeted military facilities.
Speaking to senior military officers last week, Putin said Ukrainian attacks on Russian infrastructure justified creating a broader "security zone" by capturing additional territory along the border beyond Donbas.
Former Russian defence ministry official Andrei Ilnitsky recently wrote that a future escalation could include attacks on major industrial sites in Ukraine and, later, strikes against NATO bases and European facilities supporting Ukraine's defence industry. Asked about those remarks, Kremlin spokesman Peskov said Russia must strengthen its security in response to what he described as Europe's militarisation.
Grinding Offensive in Eastern Ukraine
Russia's advance across the roughly 1,200-kilometre front line has slowed as Ukrainian drone warfare has reduced Moscow's numerical advantage. Fighting has intensified around Kostiantynivka, a key defensive city in Ukraine's Donetsk region.
On July 3, Putin claimed Russian forces had captured Kostiantynivka, a statement Ukraine denied. During a subsequent phone call with Trump, Putin reportedly expressed confidence that Russia would eventually seize the remaining Ukrainian-held part of the Donetsk region.
According to the source who regularly meets Putin, the Russian president views control of Donbas as a matter of principle and believes he needs a significant military victory.

Join the discussion?


10 July 2026
webfact
webfact
President Donald Trump mistakenly referred to the "Islamic Republic of Japan" while describing an alleged missile attack on a U.S. aircraft carrier during remarks to reporters alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on July 8 at the NATO summit in Ankara, Turkey.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking about the USS Abraham Lincoln, Trump said: "We have an aircraft carrier which is one of the most beautiful in the world, it's one of the biggest, the (USS) Abraham Lincoln. And a few months ago, we had, I told this story yesterday, we had 111 missiles shot by the Islamic Republic of Japan."
He went on to claim the missiles were fired at the aircraft carrier over the course of an hour and that every one of them was intercepted.
USS Abraham Lincoln and Iran
The USS Abraham Lincoln has been involved in heightened tensions with Iran in recent months.
In February, the U.S. military said it shot down a drone that approached the aircraft carrier aggressively while it was operating in the Arabian Sea, about 500 miles off Iran's southern coast.
The following month, Iran claimed it had struck the USS Abraham Lincoln with a ballistic missile. U.S. Central Command rejected the claim, stating that the carrier was not hit and that the missiles "didn't even come close." The military said the vessel continued launching aircraft in support of operations aimed at countering threats from Iran.
Longstanding US-Japan Alliance
Trump's reference appeared to confuse Iran with Japan.
The United States and Japan have maintained a close military alliance for nearly 75 years. The two countries signed a security treaty in 1952, several years after the end of World War II, and continue to cooperate under a mutual defense agreement.
Around 60,000 U.S. military personnel are currently stationed in Japan as part of the alliance.


Join the discussion?


9 July 2026
webfact
webfact
Welsh singer Bonnie Tyler, whose powerful vocals helped make Total Eclipse of the Heart one of the defining hits of the 1980s, has died at the age of 75.

Get today's headlines by email

A statement published on her official website said Tyler died unexpectedly on Wednesday night in a hospital in Portugal after being treated for an illness.
Death Confirmed by Family
Born Gaynor Hopkins in south Wales, Tyler rose to international fame with a string of chart successes during the 1970s and 1980s. Her signature hit, Total Eclipse of the Heart, became a worldwide bestseller and surpassed one billion streams on Spotify earlier this year.
Career Defined by Global Hits
Despite its enduring popularity, Tyler previously said she earned very little from the song because it was written by someone else.
Her stage name was chosen after she browsed a newspaper, selecting first and last names that appealed to her before launching her recording career.
Health Struggles
Tyler had been seriously ill in recent months. In May, she underwent emergency intestinal surgery in Portugal and was placed in an induced coma. Her spokesperson said last month that she had emerged from the coma but remained in intensive care and was still critically unwell.
Tributes Pour In
Tributes have begun pouring in following news of her death. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer described Tyler as one of Britain's greatest recording artists.
A Downing Street spokesperson said the prime minister was saddened by the loss of "an iconic figure" whose music, including Total Eclipse of the Heart and Holding Out for a Hero, continues to resonate with audiences, fill dance floors and remain karaoke favourites.
"The prime minister's thoughts are very much with her friends and family," the spokesperson added.


Join the discussion?


9 July 2026
webfact
webfact
The UK's highest appeal judges have begun hearing a case that could determine whether Trinidad and Tobago's colonial-era law criminalising consensual same-sex intimacy should remain in force.

Get today's headlines by email

The appeal centres on whether Trinidad and Tobago's Court of Appeal had the legal authority to overturn a 2018 High Court ruling that declared the country's anti-gay law unconstitutional.
The so-called "buggery law", first introduced in 1925 and incorporated into Trinidad and Tobago's 1986 Sexual Offences Act, criminalises anal sex between consenting men and carries a prison sentence of up to five years.
Challenge to Colonial-Era Law
In 2017, LGBTQ+ rights activist Jason Jones challenged the legislation, arguing that it violated his constitutional rights to privacy and equality. A High Court agreed in 2018, striking down the law as unconstitutional.
However, the country's Court of Appeal reversed that decision in 2025 after intervention by the attorney general, restoring the legislation. Jones has now appealed to the London-based Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC), which serves as the final court of appeal for several Commonwealth countries, British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies.
A ruling is expected within three to six months.
Wider Constitutional Questions
The case is being closely monitored across the Caribbean because its outcome could extend beyond LGBTQ+ rights.
Trinidad and Tobago's government is contesting Jones's appeal, arguing that the case could affect the interpretation of constitutional "savings clauses". These provisions preserved many laws inherited from British colonial rule after countries gained independence.
Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar said the Privy Council's decision could provide guidance on whether other colonial-era laws protected by savings clauses should remain in force.
Darrell Allahar, a minister in the Office of the Prime Minister and one of the government's lawyers, said the proceedings were important because they concerned the broader constitutional role of savings clauses, which were designed to preserve existing laws following independence rather than allow widespread legal changes based on new constitutional rights.
Activist Criticises Government
Jones, 61, said the matter should never have reached the Privy Council, arguing that the government or parliament could have repealed the legislation years ago.
He accused the state of spending millions of dollars in public funds defending laws that, he said, criminalise and stigmatise LGBTQ+ people. Jones expressed confidence that the Privy Council would rule in his favour, arguing that the legislation is incompatible with modern human rights protections.
Regional Significance
Several Caribbean countries have recently repealed or struck down similar colonial-era laws. The Bahamas decriminalised homosexuality in 1991, while courts have more recently invalidated comparable legislation in Barbados, Dominica, St Lucia, and Antigua and Barbuda. The UK also repealed such laws in several British Overseas Territories in 2001.
However, consensual same-sex intimacy remains criminalised in Guyana, Grenada, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, and St Vincent and the Grenadines.
Former Irish prime minister Leo Varadkar said the remaining countries in the Americas that still criminalise homosexuality all share a history as former British colonies. Writing in a recent paper for Harvard University, he argued that this reflected the continued existence of colonial-era laws that have already been repealed in the United Kingdom, where rights including privacy and personal autonomy are protected under domestic law.



Join the discussion?


9 July 2026
webfact
webfact
President Donald Trump's proposal to build a 250-foot (76-meter) triumphal arch in Washington, D.C., is set for another review on Thursday as the federal agency responsible for approving construction on federal land considers the project.

Get today's headlines by email

The National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) will discuss the proposal during its meeting, with the arch among the items on its agenda.
Agency staff have recommended that commissioners grant preliminary approval for the site and building plans. However, they also advise requiring design changes before the project can receive final approval.
Planning Commission to Consider Revised Design
According to a 185-page staff report, the proposed design should be revised to comply with the federal Height of Buildings Act, which limits building heights in downtown Washington to protect the city's skyline.
The report recommends that the commission ask the applicant to revise the design and return for final approval. It says the required changes would involve redistributing the height of the main structure, the habitable roof section and the three gilded statues planned for the top of the arch.
Height Rules and Design Changes
Despite those revisions, the overall structure, including the public observation deck and statues, would still reach Trump's proposed height of 250 feet, the report said.
Staff also recommended that commissioners seek additional information on vehicle traffic around the site, the proposed granite exterior and other aspects of the project before the Interior Department, which oversees the National Park Service, submits the proposal for final approval.
Trump plans to build the monument on a traffic circle at the Virginia end of Memorial Bridge, opposite the District of Columbia.
Opposition and Legal Challenge
The proposal has already received approval from the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, which signed off on the design in May. The NCPC began its review in June.
Critics argue the arch would dominate Washington's skyline and disrupt the historic sightline between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery, a view designed to symbolize national reunification after the Civil War.
However, opposition has had little impact on the two federal commissions reviewing the project. Both include members closely aligned with Trump, who appointed senior White House aide Will Scharf to chair the planning commission.
A group of veterans and a historian have filed a federal lawsuit seeking to block construction, arguing the project would damage the historic vista.
Funding Questions Remain
The proposed arch would stand more than twice the height of the 99-foot (30-meter) Lincoln Memorial and nearly half the height of the 555-foot (169-meter) Washington Monument.
Trump previously said the project could be financed using unused funds from hundreds of millions of dollars he said had been raised from corporate and private donors for a new $400 million White House ballroom.
However, public funds are now expected to contribute to both the ballroom and the arch project. The White House has not released an estimated cost for the monument.



Join the discussion?


9 July 2026
webfact
webfact
A federal judge in New York has ordered President Donald Trump to pay the $5 million judgment awarded to writer E. Jean Carroll after a jury found him liable for sexually abusing and defaming her.

Get today's headlines by email

The order was issued on Wednesday while Trump attended the NATO summit in Ankara. Judge Lewis Kaplan directed that the $5 million judgment, along with nearly $800,000 in accrued interest, be paid to Carroll.
Appeals Exhausted
In his ruling, Kaplan said Trump had delayed the case for years despite repeated court defeats.
Jury Verdict and Supreme Court Decision
A New York jury in 2023 found Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll in a dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman in the mid-1990s and for defaming her in 2022 after he denied her allegations. The jury awarded Carroll $5 million in damages.
Last month, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Trump's appeal of that verdict without any recorded dissents, leaving the judgment in place.
Trump's lawyers filed a notice on Wednesday stating they intend to appeal Kaplan's latest order.
Appeals Court Rejects Delay Request
Trump's legal team also sought an administrative stay from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in an effort to delay payment. However, the appeals court rejected the request in a one-page order on Wednesday, allowing the funds to be released to Carroll.
The Second Circuit had previously rejected Trump's attempts to overturn the verdict before the Supreme Court declined to review the case.
Three years ago, Trump deposited approximately $5.55 million into the federal Court Registry Investment System, where the funds were held while his appeal proceeded.
Kaplan has now ordered the court clerk to transfer the money to an account belonging to Carroll's lawyers. Court records do not yet indicate whether the transfer has been completed.
Separate $83 Million Judgment Still Under Appeal
Following the Supreme Court's decision, Carroll's attorneys asked the court to release the funds, arguing that after years of litigation there was no reason for further delay, despite indications that Trump might seek reconsideration from the Supreme Court.
"[A]fter four years of litigation across every level of the federal court system, it is time for this case to end," Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, wrote in a court filing.
Trump responded to the Supreme Court's decision in a post on his social media platform, saying he would continue challenging the case.
"I will continue the fight against this Weaponization and Lawfare Case against me, including the ridiculous claim of Defamation, with all of my power and strength," he wrote.
A separate jury has also ordered Trump to pay Carroll an additional $83 million in damages in a related defamation case. That judgment remains under appeal.

Join the discussion?


9 July 2026
webfact
webfact
President Donald Trump signaled a significant shift in U.S.-Ukraine relations on Wednesday after meeting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on the sidelines of the NATO summit in Turkey, announcing new defense cooperation as Kyiv seeks to strengthen its position in the war with Russia.

Get today's headlines by email

Trump said the United States would purchase Ukrainian-made drones and approved plans for Ukraine to co-produce Patriot missile interceptors under a U.S. license. The move, if implemented, could bolster Ukraine's long-term air defense capabilities against continued Russian missile attacks.
New Support Announced at NATO Summit
The announcement marks a notable change in Trump's approach to Ukraine. Throughout the Biden administration, he frequently criticized U.S. military aid to Kyiv and publicly urged Zelensky to consider territorial concessions as part of a negotiated settlement with Russia.
Speaking to reporters alongside Zelensky, Trump said relations between the two leaders had improved considerably since their widely publicized Oval Office confrontation in February 2025.
"We've actually developed a good relationship," Trump said. "From the Oval Office to now, I think we've developed a very good relationship."
Relations Improve After Earlier Tensions
Asked whether the United States would transfer additional Patriot interceptors directly to Ukraine, Trump said U.S. stockpiles had been reduced following military operations against Iran.
Instead, he said Washington would authorize Ukraine to manufacture the interceptor missiles under license.
"We're going to give a license to you to make Patriots," Trump told Zelensky, adding that he still needed to notify the manufacturer but expected the arrangement to proceed.
Lockheed Martin, which produces Patriot interceptors, already faces a substantial backlog of international orders, with production priorities determined by the Pentagon. It remains unclear how quickly Ukraine could establish domestic production facilities.
Ukraine Seeks Stronger Defenses
For several years, Zelensky has urged Western partners to allow Ukraine to co-produce Patriot systems, which play a critical role in defending against Russian ballistic missile attacks.
Russia has intensified missile and drone strikes on Ukraine following successful Ukrainian operations targeting military facilities and energy infrastructure inside Russian territory.
Trump appeared to endorse Ukraine's strategy of carrying out strikes beyond its borders, describing it as an escalation that could ultimately help bring the conflict to an end.
"It's an escalation, but it's also an escalation that could help lead to an end," he said.
Support Welcomed by Ukraine and U.S. Lawmakers
The announcements were welcomed by Ukrainian officials and some U.S. lawmakers attending the NATO summit.
Luke Coffey, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, said many had expected Ukraine to receive limited attention because of divisions within the alliance, but noted that several concrete decisions were announced that could influence the battlefield.
Ukraine's ambassador to the United States, Olga Stefanishyna, said expanding cooperation on Patriot missile capabilities reflected a shared commitment to protecting Ukrainian civilians and infrastructure. She added that Ukraine had demonstrated its ability to develop advanced defense technologies and that closer industrial cooperation would strengthen broader transatlantic security.
The proposals also received bipartisan backing in Washington. Senator Jeanne Shaheen urged Trump to finalize plans to purchase Ukrainian drones.
Shaheen joined a bipartisan congressional delegation at the NATO summit that also included Senators Dick Durbin, Mike Rounds, Lindsey Graham, Chris Coons, and Representative Mike Turner. After meeting Zelensky, the group said Russian President Vladimir Putin faced growing domestic pressure from attacks on energy infrastructure, international sanctions and the economic strain of the war.
Trump, who last spoke with Putin by telephone on July 4, said he still believed the Russian leader wanted to negotiate an end to the conflict and expected to speak with him again.
"We have a lot of pressure on President Putin," Trump said. "I don't think he likes what's going on. There's a lot of pressure on President Putin to get it done."


Join the discussion?


9 July 2026
webfact
webfact
President Donald Trump said he will return to the United States aboard the older Air Force One after attending the NATO summit in Turkey, while the newly acquired aircraft donated by Qatar will travel separately through Europe.

Get today's headlines by email
New Aircraft to Visit Military Bases
Speaking at a news conference in Ankara on Wednesday, Trump dismissed questions about whether the decision was linked to security concerns surrounding the new aircraft. He instead said the plane would visit military bases so U.S. service members could tour it.
Trump also repeated that he believes he is Iran's primary assassination target.
He briefly joked that he would rather be “No. 1 on TikTok” before adding that he was “No. 1 on the list for killing.”
Trump Explains Travel Plans
When asked why he was not flying home on the new aircraft, Trump said it would stop at military bases in Europe.
“And we’ll be going home by normal methods,” he said. “But we have it going to Europe to a couple of bases... so the soldiers can see it because it’s truly magnificent.”
Earlier on Wednesday, Trump announced on Truth Social that the aircraft would be flown to Royal Air Force Mildenhall in the United Kingdom, where military personnel would have an opportunity to tour it.
He wrote that the visit was intended “to honor our brave men and women of the Military,” adding that they should be the first to see the new addition to the Air Force fleet.
Trump said he would instead fly aboard the previous Air Force One from Turkey to Mildenhall “for old time's sake” before continuing his journey home.
Iran Comments Repeated
During his remarks, Trump again referred to threats from Iran, saying he believed he remained the country's top target.
“They had leaders; they're gone, and they had another set of leaders; they're gone,” he said. “Now they have another set of leaders, they may be gone, who knows, and you know what, I may be gone too, because I'm their No. 1 target.”
Interim Aircraft Until Boeing Delivery
Trump unveiled the retrofitted Qatari aircraft last month. The plane is expected to serve as an interim presidential aircraft until two delayed Boeing replacements enter service. Those aircraft were originally expected in 2024 but are now scheduled for delivery in 2028.
The U.S. Air Force has said it spent less than $400 million upgrading the aircraft's security systems.
Last week, the Associated Press reported that the aircraft appears to lack some of the missile detection and countermeasure systems installed on the current Air Force One fleet. One aviation expert told the news agency the plane appeared better suited for domestic travel than international missions.
The aircraft completed a domestic trip to North Dakota last week before carrying Trump to Turkey.


Join the discussion?


9 July 2026
webfact
webfact
A U.S. appeals court has rejected President Donald Trump's request to halt a lower court order requiring his name to be removed from the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, after judges found no evidence that the decision would cause irreparable harm.

Get today's headlines by email

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued an unsigned order on Wednesday denying the request from Trump and fellow members of the center's board. The court noted that Trump's name had already been removed from the building's facade.
The judges said the board had "failed to show how they will be irreparably injured absent a stay," rejecting its argument that removing Trump's name could damage fundraising efforts and contribute to the center's financial decline.
The panel, which included Trump appointee Gregory Katsas, also said the board had not provided any specific facts or evidence to support its claims about potential financial harm.
Lower Court Decision
The ruling leaves in place a May decision by U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper, who found that the Trump-controlled board acted unlawfully when it voted in December to rename the venue the "Trump-Kennedy Center."
Judge Cooper also invalidated the board's decision to close the performing arts center for renovations beginning this month.
Reaction and Next Steps
Following the appeals court's decision, Joyce Beatty welcomed the ruling, saying it reaffirmed that the administration's efforts to rename the Kennedy Center were unlawful and urged the administration to accept the outcome.
Judge Cooper has instructed the Kennedy Center's leadership to provide an update on any programming or renovation plans that emerge from a board meeting expected to take place in mid-July.


Join the discussion?


9 July 2026

webfact
webfact
US President Donald Trump has declared that the ceasefire agreement with Iran is effectively over, warning of further American military action after renewed exchanges of fire between the two countries.

Get today's headlines by email

Speaking at a NATO summit in Turkey on Wednesday, Trump said the US had struck Iranian targets overnight and suggested additional attacks could follow.
"We hit them very hard last night," he told reporters. "We'll probably hit them hard again tonight."
US President Signals Further Military Action as Tensions Rise
The comments came after the heaviest fighting since Washington and Tehran signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) on 17 June, aimed at halting hostilities and creating a framework for further negotiations.
The agreement included a 60-day ceasefire, commitments to protect commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, continued diplomatic talks, and a temporary easing of US sanctions on Iranian oil exports.
Trump Dismisses Future Talks
Trump accused Iran of violating the agreement, claiming its leaders had acted dishonestly throughout the negotiations.
Speaking at the summit, he described Iran's leadership as "scum" and "cuckoo", saying he no longer wished to negotiate with Tehran.
"I think it's over," Trump said. "We make a deal. They go outside, talk to the press, and say, 'We never even talked about it.' There's something wrong with them."
Earlier in the day, he said US negotiators could continue discussions "if they want", but dismissed further diplomacy as "a waste of time". Later, however, he added that he did not expect the conflict to develop into a prolonged war and believed any future fighting would end quickly.
Iran Promises Response
Iranian officials strongly criticised Trump's remarks and warned against further US military action.
Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi wrote on X that Iran would respond through action rather than rhetoric.
"We do not answer vulgarity with vulgarity, but with action: fearlessly and with great valour," he said.
Ali Akbar Velayati, a senior adviser to Iran's supreme leader, warned that any new American strikes would receive an "immediate response".
Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said Trump's comments reflected the failure of years of sanctions, threats and military pressure to force Iran into submission.
Parliamentary Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf accused Washington of violating the June agreement through renewed strikes and by restoring sanctions on Iranian oil exports.
"The era of bullying and extortion is over. It leads nowhere. We don't fold," he said.
Military Escalation Continues
US Central Command said it carried out "powerful" strikes on Tuesday after attacks on three commercial tankers in the Strait of Hormuz.
Iranian state media reported that eight members of the country's armed forces were killed in strikes on Bandar Abbas and Bushehr.
In response, Iran said it launched attacks on US military sites in Bahrain and Kuwait on Wednesday.
The US also reinstated sanctions relief that had temporarily been suspended under the June agreement.
Meanwhile, Central Command said more than 20 US Navy warships remain deployed across the Middle East as tensions continue.
Oil prices rose following Trump's comments, although they remain below the peaks reached when the Strait of Hormuz was fully closed during the earlier stages of the conflict.
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte described the latest US strikes as "absolutely necessary", saying Iran had violated the ceasefire.
The latest escalation has cast further doubt on the future of negotiations. Talks had already been paused during funeral ceremonies for Iran's late Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed during the opening phase of the US-Israeli campaign against Iran.
Asked whether diplomacy would resume, Trump said he was unconcerned.
"I don't care," he said, adding that while negotiators including Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner could continue discussions if they wished, he believed doing so would be "just a waste of time."


Join the discussion?


9 July 2026

webfact
webfact
A German palliative care doctor has been sentenced to life imprisonment after being convicted of murdering 15 of his patients over nearly three years.

Get today's headlines by email

A court in Berlin found the 41-year-old doctor, identified only as Johannes M. under German privacy laws, guilty of killing 12 women and three men between September 2021 and July 2024.
Victims Killed During Home Visits
The victims ranged in age from 25 to 94. Although they were all seriously ill, the court heard that none were believed to be close to death at the time they were killed.
Prosecutors said the doctor administered a fatal combination of medications to patients during home visits without their knowledge or consent.
Fires Allegedly Used to Conceal Crimes
The court also heard that the doctor allegedly set fires on several occasions in an attempt to destroy evidence and conceal the killings.
According to prosecutors, shortly before his arrest in July 2024, he killed two patients on the same day. A 75-year-old man died at his home in central Berlin, followed a few hours later by a 76-year-old woman in a neighbouring district.
Prosecutors said the doctor attempted to set fire to the woman's home but was unsuccessful.
Confession During Trial
For much of the year-long trial, the doctor remained silent. However, last month he admitted to killing 12 of his severely ill patients.
He told the court that he had persuaded himself he was acting in their best interests by ending what he described as their suffering and infirmity.
The doctor apologised for the pain he had caused and said he intended to cooperate more fully in future legal proceedings.
Dozens More Cases Under Investigation
Authorities believe the 15 confirmed murders may represent only part of the doctor's alleged crimes.
Prosecutors are investigating 76 additional cases involving former patients. German media have reported that, if further charges are proven and result in convictions, the case could become one of the largest serial murder cases in Germany's history.
During the trial, relatives of several victims described their shock and grief.
The mother of the youngest victim, a 25-year-old woman who died in 2021, told the court her daughter had never expressed a wish to die.
The son of a 72-year-old woman who died in 2024 said his mother had been planning a trip to the Baltic Sea with her sister and wanted to continue living.
The court ruled that the doctor's guilt was particularly severe, making early release highly unlikely. In addition to the life sentence, judges ordered preventive detention after the prison term if necessary and imposed a lifetime ban on practising medicine.

Join the discussion?


8 July 2026
webfact
webfact
The UK government has granted a conditional posthumous pardon to Ruth Ellis, the last woman to be executed in Britain, more than 70 years after she was hanged for the murder of her lover.

Get today's headlines by email

Justice Secretary David Lammy announced the decision, saying the pardon recognises a "profound injustice" in what he described as an exceptional case.
Pardon Recognises Injustice
Ellis was executed in 1955 after being convicted of murdering her lover, David Blakely. She was the last woman to be hanged in the UK before capital punishment was later abolished.
Announcing the decision, Lammy said the conditional pardon does not declare Ellis innocent of the crime.
"While the pardon does not claim she was innocent, it replaces the death penalty with a sentence of life imprisonment to recognise a profound injustice in this exceptional case," he said.
The conditional pardon acknowledges that, under modern legal standards, Ellis would not have faced the death penalty.
Family Welcomes Decision
Ellis, who was from Rhyl in north Wales, has long been viewed by campaigners and historians as a victim of domestic abuse.
Her family welcomed the government's decision, describing it as long-overdue recognition of the circumstances surrounding her case.
In a statement, Ellis' granddaughter, Laura Enston, said: "Justice has finally been done."
She added, however, that the pardon "does not restore the lives that were broken."
Announcement Made in Parliament
The announcement came at the conclusion of Deputy Prime Minister's Questions in the House of Commons, where discussion had focused largely on early prisoner release schemes.
Ellis' case has remained one of the most widely debated in British legal history, with supporters arguing for decades that her execution failed to take account of the abuse she suffered before the killing.

Join the discussion?


8 July 2026
webfact
webfact
A village on the shores of Italy's Lake Como has introduced fines of up to €200 (£170) for visitors who walk around shirtless or wearing swimwear, as local authorities seek to tackle the impact of growing tourism.

Get today's headlines by email

The new regulations in Varenna, a popular fishing village, are intended to preserve the area's character and improve the quality of life for its approximately 650 permanent residents, who have increasingly felt the effects of rising visitor numbers.
New Rules Introduced to Curb Tourist Behaviour
Under the rules, tourists are prohibited from walking through the village with bare chests or wearing swimsuits outside designated lakeside beaches or while on boat trips. Anyone who breaks the dress code faces fines ranging from €50 to €200.
Limits on Tour Groups
The measures also place restrictions on organised tour groups, limiting them to a maximum of 25 people. Groups are expected to avoid blocking the village's narrow cobbled streets, while tour guides are no longer permitted to use loudspeakers.
Varenna's mayor, Mauro Manzoni, said the village remained proud to welcome hundreds of thousands of visitors each year but stressed that tourism should not come at the expense of local residents.
He said protecting the quality of life for those who live in the village year-round was a priority alongside maintaining Varenna's appeal as a tourist destination.
Residents Welcome the Changes
The rules, which came into force several days ago, have been broadly welcomed by local residents and business owners, particularly the restrictions on inappropriate clothing.
One shop owner told Italian broadcaster Mediaset's TGCom24 that beachwear was acceptable by the lake but said visitors should dress appropriately when entering shops, restaurants, churches or public squares.
Another local business owner described the regulations as overdue, adding that effective enforcement would be essential for the measures to succeed.
Part of a Wider Trend Across Italy
Varenna joins a growing number of Italian destinations that have introduced rules to manage the effects of overtourism and encourage respectful behaviour from visitors.
In 2022, the mayor of Sorrento introduced fines for people walking around the town in swimwear or bare-chested, describing the practice as inappropriate and damaging to the town's image.
The following year, the coastal resort of Portofino created temporary "no-waiting zones" in popular locations to discourage visitors from lingering for photographs, including selfies, in an effort to ease congestion.

Join the discussion?

8 July 2026
webfact
webfact
An asylum seeker brought to the UK under the government's "one in, one out" migration scheme has said he believes it is unfair that his legal entry came at the cost of another person being returned to France.


Get today's headlines by email

The man is among those admitted through the policy, which allows one asylum seeker to enter the UK legally in exchange for another who arrived by small boat being deported to France. Speaking anonymously to protect his identity, he said he was grateful to be in Britain but questioned the fairness of the arrangement.
First-Hand Account of Legal Entry
"I am very happy to be here, but it's not fair that another asylum seeker who may have a very similar case to mine but arrived in a small boat has been sent back to France so I can come here legally," he said.
He added that he did not support a system in which some asylum seekers are returned to France to make way for others to enter legally.
Life in the UK While Awaiting a Decision
The government introduced the scheme in July last year. Since then, more than 900 people have been allowed to travel to the UK to apply for asylum, while a similar number of migrants who arrived irregularly have been transferred to France.
The asylum seeker said travelling to Britain by plane from Paris was far safer and quicker than attempting the dangerous Channel crossing in a small boat. However, he described life in the UK as uncertain while waiting for his asylum application to be processed.
He said he was still awaiting his main asylum interview and had little to do during the waiting period.
According to the man, he applied for a university scholarship but was rejected because of his asylum status. Although he has been volunteering, he criticised restrictions that prevent asylum seekers from working or studying while their claims are being considered.
He said the lack of opportunities left many people inactive as they waited for decisions on their cases.
Journey Through the Scheme
The asylum seeker explained that he applied online before travelling to Paris, where officials collected biometric information and passports.
Applicants were then taken to a hotel and informed later the same day whether they had received temporary visas to travel to the UK. Those approved were transferred to the airport and flown to Britain.
After arriving in the UK, he said the group was taken to a Home Office building for interviews. He recalled being escorted from an underground parking area into the building and said officials handled the process professionally.
He described Home Office staff as friendly and said they managed the procedure in a diplomatic manner.
The man also said he was staying in a hotel with other people admitted through the scheme and that all those he had encountered were single men.
Charity Criticises Policy
The charity Safe Passage, which supports asylum-seeking families in France seeking legal routes to the UK, criticised the programme. It argued that the policy does not provide a genuine pathway to protection for refugees.

Join the discussion?

8 July 2026

webfact
webfact
President Donald Trump renewed his call for the United States to control Greenland during the NATO summit in Turkey on Tuesday, saying the Arctic territory should be under U.S. control rather than Denmark's.


Get today's headlines by email

Speaking to reporters alongside Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Trump said Greenland "should be controlled by the United States, not by Denmark", reviving a position that has strained relations between Washington and Copenhagen, both founding members of NATO.
Greenland Remarks Renew Tensions
Trump has repeatedly argued that the United States should acquire or control Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, citing its strategic importance.
Denmark Rejects Proposal
Hours later in Ankara, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen firmly rejected the suggestion, saying NATO allies should respect Denmark's sovereignty and recognise that Greenland was not for sale.
She said it was well known that the United States wanted to take control of Greenland, but stressed that such a move would not happen. Frederiksen also said there were no plans for discussions at the summit on Greenland, the Arctic or the High North.


File photo

Greenland's Foreign Minister Mute Egede echoed Denmark's position, saying the island's future should be decided by its own people.
In a Facebook post, Egede said Greenland's future had always been determined by its population and that this would continue, while adding that the territory should maintain close cooperation with its allies.
Trump Cites Security Concerns
Trump argued that the disagreement over Greenland had affected U.S. relations within NATO.
He said Denmark was not doing enough to support Greenland despite its strategic location, claiming the island was surrounded by Chinese and Russian vessels. Trump also pointed to U.S. spending on European security, particularly in response to Russia, as part of his criticism.
The United States has long viewed Greenland as strategically important because of its location in the Arctic and its role in regional defence.
Diplomatic Talks Continue
Despite the public disagreement, the issue has shifted onto a diplomatic track in recent months.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in June that discussions with Denmark and Greenland were continuing on a monthly basis.

Join the discussion?

8 July 2026
webfact
webfact
Pakistani authorities are searching for a cargo aircraft that disappeared off the coast of Karachi with five crew members on board.

Get today's headlines by email

The Boeing 737 lost contact with air traffic controllers at 21:21 local time (16:21 GMT) on Tuesday after rapidly descending, according to Pakistan's airport authority. The aircraft had been flying from Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates to Karachi.
Officials said the crew had reported a problem with the aircraft's navigation system shortly before contact was lost.
Airline Confirms Crew Details
The aircraft was operated by K2 Airways, a private cargo carrier based in Karachi that was established in 2018.
In a statement issued on Wednesday, the airline identified the five crew members aboard the flight and said it was fully cooperating with the Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority and other government agencies involved in the response.
"We continue to pray, earnestly, for the safety of our colleagues," the airline said.
Search Teams Deployed
Preliminary flight data from flight-tracking service Flightradar24 indicated the aircraft experienced significant changes in altitude before entering a steep descent.
Pakistan's airport authority said the search operation involves multiple agencies, including the navy and air force, as efforts continue to locate the missing aircraft.
Pakistan's Recent Aviation History
The disappearance is the latest serious aviation incident involving Pakistan.
The country's last major aviation accident occurred in 2020, when a Pakistan International Airlines passenger jet crashed while approaching Karachi airport. Of the 99 people on board, only two survived.

Join the discussion?

8 July 2026

webfact
webfact
Police are continuing a manhunt for a suspect believed to have killed a mother and her two children before leaving the UK. Officers from Bedfordshire Police forced entry to a home on Carnoustie Drive in Great Denham, near Bedford, on Monday after receiving reports that the family had not been seen for several days.


Get today's headlines by email

Assistant Chief Constable John Murphy said investigators had identified a suspect who was known to all three victims and believed the individual had since left the country.
Murphy described the case as "a deeply distressing incident" in which a mother and her two children were believed to have been murdered.
Police identify suspect believed to have left UK
Floral tributes have been placed outside the property, with mourners gathering to pay their respects.
One woman, while laying flowers at the scene, said: "We're really sorry to lose her. She was such a gracious mother."
The driveway of the house remains cordoned off as officers continue their investigation.
Residents described their disbelief at the incident, saying violent crime was rare in the quiet village.
Community in shock
Jess Roland said she was stunned when her husband told her about the deaths.
"I actually almost wanted to fact check it to see if it was true because it just doesn't seem like something that would happen here – but obviously it could happen to anybody," she said.
Her husband, Tim Roland, said the incident was "just incredibly shocking and just really sad".
Appeal for information
Another resident, Brian Cheyne, said the deaths of the two children made the case especially distressing.
"It's absolutely shocking, especially the two young children," he said, adding that the discovery several days after the family was last seen made the incident "absolutely horrific".
Laura Watson-Smith described Great Denham as a quiet and friendly village where the news had left residents deeply shaken.
"Everyone's very shocked and it's incredibly sad and scary to hear that something like that has happened in the village," she said.
Police said there was nothing to indicate any wider threat to the public but confirmed that additional patrols would be carried out in the area to reassure residents.
Investigators have appealed for anyone with information about the deaths, or who noticed suspicious activity in Great Denham on Friday or Saturday, to contact Bedfordshire Police.

Join the discussion?

8 July 2026

webfact
webfact
Iran says it has launched attacks on American military sites in Bahrain and Kuwait in retaliation for US strikes on dozens of Iranian military targets.

Get today's headlines by email

The announcement came after the United States said it had carried out large-scale attacks on Iranian positions late on Tuesday.
US strikes dozens of targets
The US Central Command said its forces struck more than 80 targets across Iran, including more than 60 small boats belonging to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
According to Iranian state media, areas including Bandar Abbas and Sirik were hit during the operation. Some people were reported to have been injured by shrapnel.
Escalating regional tensions
The latest exchange follows attacks earlier this week on three oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has not directly claimed responsibility for those incidents.
The retaliation marks a further escalation in tensions between Tehran and Washington, raising concerns about the potential for a wider regional conflict.
Dispute over ceasefire
Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte said the US military action was "absolutely necessary", accusing Iran of "basically violating the ceasefire".
Iran's parliamentary speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, rejected that claim, saying it was the United States that had breached the truce.



Join the discussion?

8 July 2026
webfact
webfact
A US federal judge has rejected Elon Musk’s attempt to overturn a jury verdict that found he defrauded Twitter investors during his 2022 acquisition of the social media company, while ruling that he was not liable for one of the disputed tweets.

Get today's headlines by email

Judge Upholds Jury's Decision
US District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco on Monday denied Musk’s request to dismiss the jury’s March verdict, rejected his bid to decertify the investor class, and granted the plaintiffs’ request for prejudgment interest.
Lawyers representing Musk did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Tweets at the Centre of the Case
A jury found on 20 March that Musk sought to depress Twitter’s share price in an effort to renegotiate or withdraw from his $44 billion takeover of the company in 2022.
The case centred on tweets posted by Musk on 13 and 17 May 2022, in which he questioned whether Twitter had significantly more fake and spam accounts, commonly known as bots, than the company had disclosed.
One Tweet Upheld, One Dismissed
Breyer said there was "substantial evidence of falsity" in Musk’s 13 May tweet, finding that it caused Twitter’s share price to fall sharply and supported the jury’s verdict.
However, the judge ruled that Musk was not liable for the 17 May tweet because there was no meaningful market reaction following that post.
Following the March verdict, a lawyer representing the investors estimated that potential damages could amount to about $2.5 billion.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 8 July 2026
webfact
webfact
Donald Trump cast a long shadow over the Nato summit in Ankara, where alliance leaders are attempting to project unity while accelerating efforts to strengthen Europe's defences.

Get today's headlines by email

Turkey gave the US president a high-profile welcome, with a ceremonial reception led by President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The two leaders arrived together after Erdogan greeted Trump at the airport, while a military band played the US national anthem and Turkish fighter jets staged a flypast.
Although the summit is focused on Nato's security priorities, Trump quickly drew attention with remarks that threatened to distract from the alliance's agenda.
Trump dominates summit opening
Shortly after arriving, he repeated his view that the United States should take control of Greenland, the autonomous Danish territory that forms part of the Kingdom of Denmark, a Nato member. Trump acknowledged that his previous comments on the issue had strained relations within the alliance. Denmark has previously warned that any attempt by the US to seize Greenland by force would effectively end Nato.
Disagreements over Iran
Trump also revisited disagreements over the US military campaign against Iran earlier this year, expressing frustration that Nato allies did not join the conflict, which Washington launched without consulting the alliance.
He criticised UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer despite Britain's decision to allow US forces to use British airbases for strikes on Iranian missile sites.
Speaking about Starmer, Trump said: "He said no we'll help after the war is over. I said I don't want that kind of help. We didn't need any help at all. In a way I was testing people, I was testing to see whether or not they'd be there because I've long said that we help them but I'm not sure that they'd be there for us."
The British delegation has sought to highlight defence cooperation with European partners during the summit. However, Starmer has arrived in Ankara facing criticism that the UK's Defence Investment Plan falls well short of the funding levels outlined in last year's Strategic Defence Review.
Europe focuses on defence
Away from the political tensions, Nato members have concentrated on expanding Europe's military capabilities and strengthening defence industrial cooperation.
The alliance announced major contracts for a new fleet of Airbus transport aircraft, while Sweden's GlobeEye aircraft will replace Nato's ageing AWACS airborne early warning fleet. Delegates have also discussed joint missile development programmes.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky urged allies to speed up the development of European air defence systems, warning that Russia's continued missile attacks on Ukraine highlight the need for stronger protection.
In recent days, Russian ballistic missile strikes have hit residential areas in Kyiv, killing dozens of civilians, while Ukrainian air defence units have reported critical shortages of interceptor missiles.
"Europe needs its own effective anti-ballistic system and missiles," Zelensky said.
"And this work is already under way and I urge you and all of our partners to give it the attention it deserves. And this cannot wait until 2030 or beyond, Europe needs affordable mass-produced anti-ballistic systems as soon as possible."
Preparing for future threats
Nato leaders say they want the war in Ukraine to end, but many also fear that any ceasefire could allow Russia to rebuild its military rapidly.
With the United States steadily reducing its defence commitments in Europe, alliance members are accelerating plans to strengthen their own capabilities, particularly in air defence, amid concerns that Russia could be capable of threatening Nato territory within four years.



Join the discussion?

Already a member?


Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 8 July 2026
webfact
webfact

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.