Of course that is correct. My point is,(maybe you missed it the first time), that at say 9.45 in the morning I am shopping for a dinner party. I cannot buy a bottle or two of wine, but I can buy 10 litres of it.
Why bother? The article's tone and framing—particularly its dismissal of Ukrainian nationhood, reliance on selective historical anecdotes, and portrayal of Ukraine as a vulnerable entity surrounded by predatory neighbors—mirror common tropes in Russian propaganda aimed at delegitimizing Ukraine's sovereignty. It also leverages historical grievances and geopolitical tensions to sow doubt about Ukraine's territorial integrity, aligning with narratives that support Russian influence or territorial revisionism.
While not entirely fabricated, the article is heavily biased, omitting countervailing evidence of Ukrainian history and identity while advancing a narrative that serves Russian geopolitical interests. It is not a neutral historical account but rather a slanted interpretation with propagandistic intent.
To all intents a complete waste of anyone's time reading, why would you waste your time on such slanted drivel?
Bot winning parties had a clear definition of existing cannabis legalization, and who are you to speak for Thai majority?
Based on my limited sphere, nobody wanted legalization of cannabis, still doesnt mean Im right, but lately polls, shows the cannabis tourism and how it ended up to be, not wanted.
Nida poll
60% support reclassing cannabis as classified drug
https://www.nationthailand.com/news/general/40038141
Recommended Posts