Jump to content

Trump, without evidence, blames China for hacking Clinton emails


Recommended Posts

Posted

Trump, without evidence, blames China for hacking Clinton emails

 

2018-08-29T050232Z_1_LYNXNPEE7S08F_RTROPTP_4_PEOPLE-HILLARY-CLINTON.JPG

FILE PHOTO: Hillary Clinton, Former U.S. Secretary of State listens to Journalist Tina Brown during the Women In The World Summit in New York City, U.S., April 13, 2018. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz/File Photo

 

(Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Twitter early on Wednesday China hacked the emails of 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton but did not offer any evidence or further information.

 

"Hillary Clinton's Emails, many of which are Classified Information, got hacked by China. Next move better be by the FBI & DOJ or, after all of their other missteps (Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Ohr, FISA, Dirty Dossier etc.), their credibility will be forever gone!" he tweeted a little after midnight on Wednesday.

 

Trump said in an earlier tweet on Tuesday night: "China hacked Hillary Clinton's private Email Server. Are they sure it wasn't Russia (just kidding!)? What are the odds that the FBI and DOJ are right on top of this? Actually, a very big story. Much classified information!"

 

Speaking in Beijing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said such accusations were nothing new.

"This isn't the first time we've heard similar kinds of allegations," Hua told a daily news briefing.

 

"China is a staunch defender of cybersecurity. We firmly oppose and crack down on any forms of internet attacks and the stealing of secrets," she added, without specifically mentioning Trump or Clinton in her answer.

 

U.S. intelligence officials have said Russia orchestrated the hacking of Democratic officials to meddle with the 2016 presidential election.

 

A U.S. federal grand jury indicted 12 Russian intelligence officers in July on charges of hacking the computer networks of Clinton and the Democratic Party.

 

Special Counsel Robert Mueller is investigating Russia's role in the 2016 election and whether the campaign of Republican candidate Trump colluded with Moscow. Russia denies meddling in the elections, while Trump has denied any collusion.

 

Trump said in April 2017 China may have hacked the emails of Democratic officials to meddle with the 2016 presidential election. He also did not provide any evidence backing his allegation at that time.

 

China has repeatedly denied any accusations of involvement in overseas hacking attacks.

 

China and the United States, whose ties are often fraught, are also currently in the midst of an increasingly bitter trade war.

 

(Reporting by Brendan O'Brien in Milwaukee; Additional reporting by Michael Martina in Beijing; Editing by Paul Tait and Michael Perry)

 
reuters_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-08-29
Posted
18 minutes ago, Becker said:

(Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Twitter early on Wednesday China hacked the emails of 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton but did not offer any evidence or further information.

 

And why should he. Real information and evidence is of no interest to the base man-child supporter.

 

A better question would be "how could he?"  Any such evidence would probably come from US intelligence and be classified.

 

I'll go one step further and say the NSA hacked them, too.  Because they hack everything.  Just like some other nation states...

 

  • Haha 1
Posted

2 successful businessmen.

2 Twitter addicts.

2 very clever people who are actually stupid.

Musk'nTrump.

Sounds like a new burger franchise.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Are we getting a we bit desperate Donald just spinning and spewing bs I want to surf the blue wave that drowns that clown

  • Thanks 1
Posted

 That's rich!The guy has  the number one clearance for classified intel  in the US. I would tend to believe him ,than the Career Professional FBI sources, who ever they are!

"Despite a lack of evidence that Clinton’s server had been breached, the Justice Department report acknowledged that there was no way of knowing “100%” whether the servers had been accessed by hackers who expertly covered their tracks.

Still, a forensic specialist with the FBI who was quoted in the report said he was “fairly confident that there wasn’t an intrusion.”

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/29/fbi-refutes-report-promoted-by-trump-that-china-obtained-hillary-clintons-emails.html

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Srikcir said:
16 hours ago, impulse said:

Any such evidence would probably come from US intelligence and be classified.

See zaphod reborn's Post #18 - FBI who has access to classified intelligence found no evidence.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fbi-no-evidence-clinton-server-hacked-despite-trump-183226677--politics.html

 

You figure the NSA shares the results of all their unconstitutional activities with fellow agencies that have powers (and a legal obligation) of arrest when they know about unconstitutional activities?

 

Edited by impulse
Posted
2 minutes ago, Grouse said:

What do they call those things that vets use to put down sick donkeys?

sick elephants

  • Haha 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

You figure the NSA shares the results of all their unconstitutional activities with fellow agencies that have powers (and a legal obligation) of arrest when they know about unconstitutional activities?

 

“The moment we want to believe something, we suddenly see all the arguments for it, and become blind to the arguments against it.” ~ George Bernard Shaw

  • Like 2
Posted

Congratulations to BoonMee. 10 haha's on Page 1, surpassing 9 sads on Page 1 on another thread about the thatched one earlier this week. Birds of a feather, Trump shoeshiners certainly do stick together ?.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...