Jump to content

Brexit deadlocked again: British parliament fails to find an alternative


webfact

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, sandyf said:

People welcomed into the UK and lived there for over 30 years not allowed to vote.

A hypocritical referendum.

Thousands of UK citizens not allowed to vote due to shortcomings in government systems.

An incompetent referendum

A life changing decision based on one vote out of 10s of millions.

An ill-conceived referendum.

Proven illegal activity by the leave campaign.

A fraudulent referendum.

 

"Democratic" - probably the most inappropriate adjective that could be used.

Thanks for your rant Sandy.

 

People welcomed into the UK and lived there for over 30 years not allowed to vote. How many exactly? Also many who have been there a few years and were allowed to vote.

 

A hypocritical referendum. Can you show us your evidence for this?

 

Thousands of UK citizens not allowed to vote due to shortcomings in government systems. I would say many thousands so that would have made the vote leave with an even bigger majority, is that what your saying?

 

An incompetent referendum. Can you show us your evidence for this and not delivering the result the referendum itself?

 

A life changing decision based on one vote out of 10s of millions. How many shall we have the best of 5. Wasn't there only one vote going into the ECE?

 

An ill-conceived referendum. Your evidence for this?

 

Proven illegal activity by the leave campaign.

A fraudulent referendum. Go on then tell us how and why?

 

"Democratic" - probably the most inappropriate adjective that could be used. What is your version of democracy. 2 votes if you have a degree? Please enlighten us?

 

:coffee1:

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bt99..shall I ask darksidedog if he would consider holding our financial stake once we properly word our bet?

Right..lets put down the exact wording re the bet.
Single bet only as thai politics should in all honestly be avoided by expats imo.
Once we have phrased the wording of the wager..perhaps the Moderator DARKSIDEDOG could pm you and I his thai bank details then both of us lodge 1,000 baht into his account. ?????
What do you say???


Sent from my SM-G7102 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app



Sent from my SM-G7102 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dick dasterdly said:

Because it's the typically manipulated 'truth' - which has become all to common nowadays....

 

A shame, as I'd previously liked stephen fry.  I've no doubt that he knows very well that this video manipulates the 'facts'*, but he posted it anyway ☹️.

 

* e.g. Implying that the majority now want to remain according to opinion polls - which is why the first part of this video was supportive of opinion polls and desperately trying to explain why they previously were wrong.....  Not to mention, a fair number of opinion polls indicate that leave would win if there was another referendum at the moment - which is one of the reasons why MPs aren't keen on the idea....

QED

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Laughing Gravy said:

Thanks for your rant Sandy.

 

People welcomed into the UK and lived there for over 30 years not allowed to vote. How many exactly? Also many who have been there a few years and were allowed to vote.

 

A hypocritical referendum. Can you show us your evidence for this?

 

Thousands of UK citizens not allowed to vote due to shortcomings in government systems. I would say many thousands so that would have made the vote leave with an even bigger majority, is that what your saying?

 

An incompetent referendum. Can you show us your evidence for this and not delivering the result the referendum itself?

 

A life changing decision based on one vote out of 10s of millions. How many shall we have the best of 5. Wasn't there only one vote going into the ECE?

 

An ill-conceived referendum. Your evidence for this?

 

Proven illegal activity by the leave campaign.

A fraudulent referendum. Go on then tell us how and why?

 

"Democratic" - probably the most inappropriate adjective that could be used. What is your version of democracy. 2 votes if you have a degree? Please enlighten us?

 

:coffee1:

 

Shouting the odds doesn't make things right.

There has only ever been 3 national referendums and they have all been fundamentally flawed. It was by good luck rather than judgement that the other two did not have a contentious result. The politicians screwed up and now they are suffering the consequences of their actions, and it is not over by a long way.

Political reform could well be the brexit bonus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wilcopops said:

It seems nOw Brexiteers are blaming the Queen.

Yet further evidence that they understand neither the constitution nor democracy.

God forbid where's the lese-majeste law when you need it! It is alleged that the venerable Archbishop of Canterbury persuaded May to talk with Corbyn. She being a church-going daughter of a vicar.  If God is on our side who can be against us?

 

Image result for god brexit

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sandyf said:

A hypocritical referendum. Can you show us your evidence for this?

The cliche'd response of those with no argument?

"burden of proof fallacy"

 when someone claims that others don’t have a burden of proof with regards to their own arguments, or when someone attempts to shift their own burden of proof to someone else.

Edited by wilcopops
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More religious sh&t..if you honestly believe that..well..as religion or rather lack of common manners and decency to other people has been responsible for more deaths than anything else..what can I say.
Just hope that your god be it he/she is oh so happy with all deaths caused by religious beliefs. Will he/she also be happy that his/her top kiddies live in the lap of luxury whilst many struggle to put food on the table?????
Just saying

God forbid where's the lese-majeste law when you need it! It is alleged that the venerable Archbishop of Canterbury persuaded May to talk with Corbyn. She being a church-going daughter of a vicar.  If God is on our side who can be against us?
 
Church-Brexit-prayer.jpg&key=d06087cef0fd94bd30f872f1eec741220d86244a1338112e514bcc80a92cd454


Sent from my SM-G7102 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another prominent leaver has gone the full Oborne.....

 

Without question, the most concerning part of Brexit discourse over the past few years has been how the most stubborn of Leave campaigners have doubled down on erroneous positions, adopting ever more extreme views as the jaws of reality bite down on our attempts to leave the EU.

Faced with genuine complexity and immovable obstacles, those who maintained that Brexit would be easy are becoming increasingly desperate and erratic in their prescriptions for how things might be saved. Problems that were once dismissed as trivialities or as Project Fear are now rapping sharply at the door. First among these is probably the prospect of a no-deal Brexit.

 

The Brexit ideologues would sooner barbecue their grandmothers than acknowledge any misjudgment of the biggest issue in post-war British politics. Admittedly, changing one’s mind can be difficult – especially for public figures. But the constant mining for excuses, however irrational and absurd, is intellectually unhealthy. The fact that is has become so normal, is a worrying sign for British democracy.  

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/brexit-no-deal-queen-monarchy-ukip-andrew-lilico-republican-a8862931.html

Edited by beautifulthailand99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, wilcopops said:

The cliche'd response of those with no argument?

"burden of proof fallacy"

 when someone claims that others don’t have a burden of proof with regards to their own arguments, or when someone attempts to shift their own burden of proof to someone else.

So I will take that as a no then.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, wilcopops said:

Again another response that only reinforces the perception of paucity of intellect in the Brexit camp.

Brexit is nearly dead in the water. A campaign which stated with no defined parameters nor common aim is doomed to eat itself, and it appears to be true to form.

How can Brexit actually happen with such a fractious group of squabbling disciples and factions?

The country is not divided 50/50 leave remain, it is 50% Remain and the rest is just raggle-taggle disparate groups of Xenophobes racists, the gullible and those obsessed with some idyllic view of "the past". There is no common Brexit plan, no unified movement

There is no leave majority at all; just that half of the country want 17 million different things, many of which aren't even Brexit...if they bothered to think about it

So now we are faced with another 6 months of watching the UK sink slowly into economic, political and diplomatic oblivion as parliament (our sovereign authority) gradually wrenches back control like a parent trying to get petulant toddler to let go of a dangerous toy.

 

 

 

 

If you make a bold claim it more than justifiable to provide some sort of evidence to support your claim. I was not asking for a list of journals just some evidence. If it was a believe or opinion then the poster (sandy) just had to say.

 

So all the nonsense you have written to try and justify nothing is irrelevant to what i was asking.

 

So another 6 months as you put it the UK sink slowly into economic, political and diplomatic oblivion as parliament (our sovereign authority) gradually wrenches back control like a parent trying to get petulant toddler to let go of a dangerous toy.

 

You do like to make some sweeping statements. Oblivion great adjective. So does that mean we wont have a parliament? So the economy would be what exactly. We have been hearing that for 3 years and nothing. It would with your definition or are you been melodramatic with your words... again

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably would be..but then both backstabbing parties would then have to go cap in hand to..the ..BREXIT PARTY..DUP AND UKIP AND BEG FOR ASSISTANCE TO FORM A GOVT.???????[emoji6]

What if you end up with a hung parliament? according to some political observers that is a possibility.


Sent from my SM-G7102 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Laughing Gravy said:

If you make a bold claim it more than justifiable to provide some sort of evidence to support your claim. I was not asking for a list of journals just some evidence. If it was a believe or opinion then the poster (sandy) just had to say.

 

So all the nonsense you have written to try and justify nothing is irrelevant to what i was asking.

 

So another 6 months as you put it the UK sink slowly into economic, political and diplomatic oblivion as parliament (our sovereign authority) gradually wrenches back control like a parent trying to get petulant toddler to let go of a dangerous toy.

 

You do like to make some sweeping statements. Oblivion great adjective. So does that mean we wont have a parliament? So the economy would be what exactly. We have been hearing that for 3 years and nothing. It would with your definition or are you been melodramatic with your words... again

Your lack of comprehension is breathtaking

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Laughing Gravy said:

If you make a bold claim it more than justifiable to provide some sort of evidence to support your claim. I was not asking for a list of journals just some evidence. If it was a believe or opinion then the poster (sandy) just had to say.

 

So all the nonsense you have written to try and justify nothing is irrelevant to what i was asking.

 

So another 6 months as you put it the UK sink slowly into economic, political and diplomatic oblivion as parliament (our sovereign authority) gradually wrenches back control like a parent trying to get petulant toddler to let go of a dangerous toy.

 

You do like to make some sweeping statements. Oblivion great adjective. So does that mean we wont have a parliament? So the economy would be what exactly. We have been hearing that for 3 years and nothing. It would with your definition or are you been melodramatic with your words... again

 

Correct! The burden of proof lies with someone making a claim not on anyone else to disprove. 

If you claim a teapot is orbiting the Sun between the Earth and Mars you need to provide evidence. Not to do so questions the veracity of the claim and the age of the claimant.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Laughing Gravy said:

If you make a bold claim it more than justifiable to provide some sort of evidence to support your claim. I was not asking for a list of journals just some evidence. If it was a believe or opinion then the poster (sandy) just had to say.

Evidence, as far as the brexiteer is concerned, is nothing more than fake news. They firmly believe that everybody that should have had the right to vote had the right to vote, and that Vote Leave have done nothing wrong.

 

Whatever happened to 'beyond reasonable doubt'?, politicians that supported the referendum breached their own guidelines on human justice.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...