Jump to content

Health insurance mandatory for long-stay foreigners in Thailand


Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

There's no mention at all in the OP articles on the issues of exclusions, just the required coverage amounts...

 

So if you had a 400,000 / 40,000 baht policy -- BUT, it excluded various things -- how's the MFA and Immigration etc. going to deal with that kind of situation?  I don't think we have any clue...  Might they just keep it simple and only check for the required coverage amounts, and ignore exclusions. I have no idea!

 

Brilliant! Get a 57b./mth health insurance policy which excludes illness. Everything else covered.

 

I am not being sarcastic. TallGuy's onto something. Enough exclusions and the cost could come down to near zero. Is the IM going to read the fine print?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, jesimps said:

Those with pre-existing conditions? No chance, or no payment if you claim.

SO.....there the gov. go get anyway a bill who could possible not be paid …...missing their target unless they force insurances to come up with a clean insurance … but that is also   maybe why they put a low limit of 400 000 baht & 40 000 outpatient .for themselves

Axa expat at 450€ has that condition is that your home country is a "nanny state" , as they have repatriation option included , and so can dump you home on national health care costs..! Fine for me , only that outpatient option is bothering me , else I was complete o.k. with the new rules, as no age or pre conditions excluded, and no pre examination .

A good one that some here already have and no problems with them had.

Edited by david555
Posted

Can someone please explain to me the concerns of having to pay outpatient cover when it's only 40k to be covered. Does it make a disproportionate difference to the premium?

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Sheryl said:

 

Actually if you look at the premiums, they are not. And 400k limit is useless IMO.

 

For same price you can get much better level of cover - but NOT for OPD cover. It is this unnecessary  requirement for 40,000 baht of OPD coverage that makes this so difficult.

 

Sheryl, thanks for clarifying about the premium amounts... As for the coverage, that's why I specifically mentioned your general advice about 3-5 million baht being what people SHOULD get for health insurance purposes...

 

But if someone is ONLY looking to meet the new MFA/Immigration rule, then that's a different calculation...  So I guess the question becomes, can older people get a regular health insurance policy with higher coverage limits that covers BOTH inpatient and outpatient for better premium rates than the special Long Term Stay program limited coverage policies?

 

Getting a better policy doesn't do the person any good if it lacks the outpatient component and thus doesn't meet the new rule, and thus makes them ineligible to obtain / renew their retirement O-A visa and extension....

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, david555 said:

He stated anyway :

new requirement for all foreigners staying in the country on one-year Non-Immigrant O-A “visas”, or “permits-to-stay”.

 

That last line is clear enough …. 

Clear, maybe (for you), but it's not what is written in the article and OP. To "renew a O-A visa" is returning your country to get a new one.

Posted
1 minute ago, david555 said:

Fine for me , only that outpatient option is bothering me

Same here. And many others too I would guess. Should be an opening for an insurance company to come up with a reasonable OPD-only coverage.

Tack that on to your existing inpatient cover and you're good to go.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, PatOngo said:

It does not mention people with red hair either! It clearly states LONG STAY up to 1 year.

Ok

it is mandatory to all, 

live with it ????????

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Saltire said:

Can someone please explain to me the concerns of having to pay outpatient cover when it's only 40k to be covered. Does it make a disproportionate difference to the premium?

 

At the moment it does but I imagine it will become an affordable option in the future given these changes

  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 hours ago, BestB said:

my full health insurance cover has a payout of 50 or so million with premium of 55000 baht.

That sounds a very good deal, is it a policy from your home country or from a Thai insurer and roughly what age bracket is that for?

 

Thanks.

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Pattaya46 said:

Clear, maybe (for you), but it's not what is written in the article and OP. To "renew a O-A visa" is returning your country to get a new one.

A ret.Ext. is a permit to stay ...or not ? We shall now when it appears in the doc. needed for extension , if not you are right .

Besides the discussion should not be for how much you need to be safe …, It must go about what to do to become in their lines to get no problem for your ret. ext. and their are cheap possibillitys as i mentioned already 

That other discussions about how much you need to be safe for all what can happen is only feeding the insurance company's and their agents pockets...

Edited by david555
  • Confused 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, Brickbat said:

No vagueness about this , as many claim. It’s pay up or ship out. Bye Bye farangs. This is the end of the road for Thailand as a cheap retirement destination. 

And I don’t blame them. It’s clear as hell. Cheap farangs don’t pay their hospital bills. So stop complaining! 

Why would Thailand want to be "cheap retirement destination"?

Too many tourists and others can't or won't pay hospital bills. The honest ones get punished.

 

  • Like 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, Saltire said:

Can someone please explain to me the concerns of having to pay outpatient cover when it's only 40k to be covered. Does it make a disproportionate difference to the premium?

 

Extra marketing targeting by the hospitals ….more income possibillity's

  • Like 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, randy723 said:

does BKK bank have medical insurance for retiree?

Yes, depending on your age. According to their site they will insure up to 59 years of age, and continue up to 69 for those who have policies before they turned 60.
https://www.bangkokbank.com/en/Personal/My-Family-and-Me/Bancassurance/Life-Insurance/Health-1st

However, there are rip-off, er, I mean the "tailored specifically for this new rule" policies available from other outlets as per this link:
https://longstay.tgia.org/
that offer less coverage for more money (and will insure to higher ages as well).

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Sonhia said:

Hospital treatment should be free. Consider how much revenue the government generate from foreigners and consider the value for money foreginers get in return...

You live in a dreamworld.

Posted
1 minute ago, vinniekintana said:

I would hope they'd also offer the option of a higher bank deposit but no obligation to buy insurance.

I suspect this will be the case. I can't imagine IMOs parsing multipage policies written in English.

 

In fact, here's 100b. that says that, in fact, an X hundred thousand b. "healthcare deposit" in a separate ac. will be what they want.

Posted
9 hours ago, webfact said:

 if they wish to use health insurance that they bought overseas, they must ensure that the coverage amount is no less than what is required by the rule.

I have an HMO plan that has a component called 'Away From Home'. When I was here in February I got sick, went to the hospital, paid cash, submitted my bill when I got back home and my insurance reimbursed me 100%. I still pay my premium in the US no matter how long I stay here so don't let anybody 'double dip you'. There are some HMOs in the US that will reimburse you. Check with your member services. My suggestion is look into something similar and stay out of this hornets nest. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Sonhia said:

 

Hospital treatment should be free. Consider how much revenue the government generate from foreigners and consider the value for money foreginers get in return...

Can you imagine the influx of people flooding here for treatment?

  • Like 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, Bang Bang said:

Brilliant! Get a 57b./mth health insurance policy which excludes illness. Everything else covered.

 

I am not being sarcastic. TallGuy's onto something. Enough exclusions and the cost could come down to near zero. Is the IM going to read the fine print?

 

You don't get to "exclude" things by choice (types of illnesses) in order to lower your premiums.

 

The insurers mandate exclusions based on things in your recent medical history that they're not going to cover.  And when they issue those exclusions from a policy, that doesn't change the required premium at all.

 

The only things the policyholder can adjust are -- what insurer he uses, what the coverage amounts are, whether the coverage is inpatient only or also outpatient, and what amount of deductible amount the policyholder has to pay before the insurance kicks in.

 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Saltire said:

Can someone please explain to me the concerns of having to pay outpatient cover when it's only 40k to be covered. Does it make a disproportionate difference to the premium?

 

 

2 minutes ago, david555 said:

Extra marketing targeting by the hospitals ….more income possibillity's


Take my policy for example. When I was on "Plan 4" I could make 30 visits per year with a maximum cost of 1,500 baht/visit any time I had a headache or minor "owwie" that need a bandaid.

That policy cost me 27,000/year (including the Inpatient coverage of course).

 

Meanwhile, the "Plan 2" of the same policy gets rid of those 30 visits per year, keeps the same Inpatient coverage and costs 21,000 per year. So if you are like me and rarely go to the hospital for anything, and then prefer to just pay cash, Plan 2 makes more sense.

However, if you like to go to the hospital 2-3 times a month for whatever reason(s), then you may want to opt for the higher OPD coverage as it would be cheaper than paying for all those visits yourself.

 

Also, knowing that long stay expats will now have to have higher OPD limits, there's nothing stopping the hospitals from simply raising their rates for OPD services. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...