Jump to content

U.S. appeals court blocks release of unredacted Mueller report pending appeal


webfact

Recommended Posts

U.S. appeals court blocks release of unredacted Mueller report pending appeal

 

2019-10-30T003738Z_1_LYNXMPEF9T00R_RTROPTP_4_USA-TRUMP-RUSSIA-REPORT.JPG

FILE PHOTO: Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller departs from the U.S. Capitol following his testimonies before the House of Representatives, on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S. July 24, 2019. REUTERS/Tom Brenner/File Photo

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday issued a stay that blocks the release to a congressional committee of an unredacted copy of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report detailing Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. election.

 

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell on Friday ordered President Donald Trump's administration to hand over by Wednesday a copy of the Mueller report that included material that had been blacked out.

 

The Justice Department requested the stay by the Court of Appeals in Washington while it appeals Howell's ruling.

 

The department is trying to block Democrats from accessing the full Mueller report on the grounds that doing so would require the disclosure of secret grand jury materials and potentially harm ongoing investigations.

 

The U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee issued a subpoena seeking the full report as part of Democrats' effort to build a case for removing Trump from office through impeachment.

 

Mueller submitted his report to U.S. Attorney General William Barr in March after completing a 22-month investigation that detailed Russia's campaign of hacking and propaganda to boost Trump's candidacy in the 2016 election as well as extensive contacts between Trump's campaign and Moscow.

 

Barr, a Trump appointee who Democrats have accused of trying to protect the president politically, released the 448-page report in April with some parts redacted.

 

The House impeachment inquiry centres not on the findings of the Mueller report but on Trump's request that Ukraine investigate a domestic political rival, former Vice President Joe Biden. House Democrats have described that as an improper solicitation of foreign interference in a U.S. election.

 

In her ruling on Friday, Howell also said the House need not pass a resolution formally initiating its impeachment inquiry, undercutting an argument that Trump's fellow Republicans have made in attacking the probe.

 

Democrats began the inquiry without putting such a resolution to a vote, but on Tuesday they unveiled legislation laying out procedures for the probe that could be voted on a early as this week.

 

(Reporting by Eric Beech; Editing by Sonya Hepinstall)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-10-30
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Sorry, no.  Disinformation is coming from the Trump side.aybe some from the liberals, but there people care about it, the Trump camp doesn't care about truth anymore.

A lot of disinformation also funded from groups/entities outside the US.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Thomas J said:

Never proven that Russia had any "meaningful" impact on the election nor if it swayed any votes to Trump or Clinton.  <snip>

Doesn't matter, the meddling was there, that is the issue.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NoBrainer said:

But eventually the fight of Good VS Evil will have a winner, and Good will generally prevail.

So Trump will be a goner then! 

 

If what you say is "true" then the dumb, lying, cheating, misogynistic, adulterous excuse for a human being, called Trump, certainly won't prevail! Good news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, canuckamuck said:

It is amazing that you can think that one side is being truthful and the other is entirely untruthful. What sort of world do you live in?  You don't think politicians on the left ever lie, or the mainstream media doesn't manipulate the news?

Until you gain some skepticism, you are just going to be a pawn.

 

Nice try at conflating empty generalities with this particular issue. 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...
""