Jump to content

U.S. Democrats expected to unveil two articles of impeachment against Trump


Recommended Posts

Posted

Well wouldent it be nice to hear from the principals involved?oh that’s right trump won’t let them testify wonder why???(not)and imo they only went with 2 to keep it simple for simple minds to grasp and those 2 cover plenty!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 12/10/2019 at 2:17 PM, Boon Mee said:

This impeachment scam is virtually clinching Trump's relection. The Democrats have not shown one iota of a crime. Kangaroo Court or what? 555 

 

MAGA 

Impeachment isn’t a criminal trial-look it up-you should know that by now I would think ????  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
18 hours ago, riclag said:

"Two House articles of impeachment fail to meet constitutional standards"

The radical dems went from qpq to bribery and now landed on  obstruction of congress and abuse of power! 

The constitution calls for impeachment, for treason ,  bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors!

 

There is no mention of these vague made up accusations in the constitution !They have no bi partisan support ,no wording that support their 2 articles in the constitution for impeachment of a POTUS who is accused of abuses power and obstructs congress!

 

What will the GOP Senate do when presented with a unconstitutional act by the radical house dems!

 

 https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/473849-two-house-articles-of-impeachment-fail-to-meet-constitutional-standards

 

 

Excellent article by Dershowitz.  The articles of impeachment are unconstitutional and therefore void. A nothing burger.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Kelsall said:

Excellent article by Dershowitz.  The articles of impeachment are unconstitutional and therefore void. A nothing burger.

Dershowitz. His other just as innocent , famous client was OJ Simpson. ????

Posted
6 hours ago, Jingthing said:

With 45 fans it's not about knowing facts or learning facts, it's all about repeating total lies and distortions enough time to their Fox News -- white house - Putin propaganda generated misinformation bubble. This situation has become dangerous. The lies repeating so many times become the REALITY of the cult of personality members.

Putin is the new Hitler with you Libs. As soon as I see it I disregard anything the person says.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, chokrai said:

Putin is the new Hitler with you Libs. As soon as I see it I disregard anything the person says.

No. He is Putin. That's bad enough. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
21 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

 

Pelosi's statement regarding USMCA was widely covered and televised. 

Yes, and I don't recall "Nancy and some anonymous dude" taking credit for the USMCA.  She took credit for changes to the USMCA that made it acceptable to the House.

  • Haha 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Jingthing said:

With 45 fans it's not about knowing facts or learning facts, it's all about repeating total lies and distortions enough time to their Fox News -- white house - Putin propaganda generated misinformation bubble. This situation has become dangerous. The lies repeating so many times become the REALITY of the cult of personality members.

with the TV leftist cabal it is not about the realities of an improved economy and the obvious lack of a viable candidate or message, it is about getting rid of the Legally elected POTUS to feed the irrational emotional zealots. there is NOTHING to substantiate the blather about russian influence of any kind, but keep up the propogandas to feed another vacuous narrative with nothing to back it up.

 

you stooges will be howling at the sky at the reelection without an ounce of common sense.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Dershowitz is a subject unto himself!

Basically if he's right and I don't believe he's right, the founders intended that we have an elected dictatorship type president. 

 

https://newrepublic.com/article/148080/happened-alan-dershowitz

 

Shame on him for using a sober unemotional, objective, common sense approach to the constitution!

 

what a load of blather Jing you have tried to infer

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

with the TV leftist cabal it is not about the realities of an improved economy and the obvious lack of a viable candidate or message, it is about getting rid of the Legally elected POTUS to feed the irrational emotional zealots. there is NOTHING to substantiate the blather about russian influence of any kind, but keep up the propogandas to feed another vacuous narrative with nothing to back it up.

 

you stooges will be howling at the sky at the reelection without an ounce of common sense.

You're conflating the impeachment with election campaign issues. They are not the same thing. No doubt the impeachment with likely end result lack of conviction by the senate will have consequences electorally. But we don't know what those will be exactly regardless of the premature bluster of the 45 cult of personality brigade.

  • Haha 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

Shame on him for using a sober unemotional, objective, common sense approach to the constitution!

 

what a load of blather Jing you have tried to infer

If you had read the very balanced article which I'm guessing you haven't you will see support for my POV in there. But easier to just hurl insults. Weak.

Posted
1 hour ago, elmrfudd said:

with the TV leftist cabal it is not about the realities of an improved economy and the obvious lack of a viable candidate or message, it is about getting rid of the Legally elected POTUS to feed the irrational emotional zealots. there is NOTHING to substantiate the blather about russian influence of any kind, but keep up the propogandas to feed another vacuous narrative with nothing to back it up.

 

you stooges will be howling at the sky at the reelection without an ounce of common sense.

"there is NOTHING to substantiate the blather about russian influence of any kind"

 

You are either a Russian troll or you practice willful ignorance to the extreme.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




  • Topics

  • Popular Contributors

  • Latest posts...

    1. 17,651

      Australian-rules-football-afl-chatting-tipping-and-news

    2. 40

      President Zelensky sees the light?

    3. 0

      What Could Trump’s “Gold Card” Mean for Thai Nationals?

    4. 45

      US, Japan Issue Security Alerts After Thailand's Uyghur Deportation

    5. 32

      Buffett vs Trump

    6. 17,651

      Australian-rules-football-afl-chatting-tipping-and-news

  • Popular in The Pub

×
×
  • Create New...