2 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

45 has shown signs of significant mental deterioration himself. 

I believe the only reason he hasn't yet been Article 25'd is, you know, Pence. Damn clever insurance policy I have to say.

4 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

You mean unsubstantiated claims of corruption as opposed to proven claims of using your own charity for political and personal gain?

The hypocrisy of Trump fans is something else to behold. Your man had to settle this for $2million 

and disband his own charity yet you have the audacity to keep harping on about a many times exhonerated Biden as if the conspricay (and that's exactly what it is) was true. 

And let's not get started on Trump University. Or porn stars.  

I notice the Cult 45 never have any rebuttal when these facts are brought up. More the Deny, Deflect, I did it so what retoric.

4 minutes ago, lannarebirth said:

6 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

45 has shown signs of significant mental deterioration himself. 

I believe the only reason he hasn't yet been Article 25'd is, you know, Pence. Damn clever insurance policy I have to say.

Funny thing is Trump's people have been wanting him to jettison Pence and bring on Nikki Haley.  That would be a shrewd move.  If Biden wins the nomination, Trump may do just that. 

1 hour ago, WalkingOrders said:

I think, Comrade, that if Bernie him self whispered in your ear that he was a communist, you would still be holding your breath.

Just one more of "your" opinions and no lack of those I see.

3 hours ago, Misty said:

The national polls definitely say either could beat Trump.  But friends and family in the swing states I hail from seem to prefer Biden, then Trump, but aren't interested in Bernie.  If the electoral college comes into play again, Biden may be the better choice to beat Trump.  Biden would likely carry the downticket with these voters too. Not sure about Bernie's ability to flip the Senate.

More importantly is the swing States polls that also show Biden will defeat trump.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/general_election/

6 minutes ago, Berkshire said:

Funny thing is Trump's people have been wanting him to jettison Pence and bring on Nikki Haley.  That would be a shrewd move.  If Biden wins the nomination, Trump may do just that. 

Yes, that would be a scary move for democrats. I've heard analysis that if 45 can get only 12 percent of the black vote, he'll be impossible to beat. If anyone doesn't understand the importance of the black vote, that number should be a wake up call. However, by dumping Pence, wouldn't that be seen as a betrayal to 45's white evangelical base? 

10 minutes ago, Berkshire said:

Funny thing is Trump's people have been wanting him to jettison Pence and bring on Nikki Haley.  That would be a shrewd move.  If Biden wins the nomination, Trump may do just that. 

Yes that would be very clever, I agree. But I am not too worried as his history of people choices speaks for itself. 

12 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

You mean unsubstantiated claims of corruption as opposed to proven claims of using your own charity for political and personal gain?

The hypocrisy of Trump fans is something else to behold. Your man had to settle this for $2million 

and disband his own charity yet you have the audacity to keep harping on about a many times exhonerated Biden as if the conspricay (and that's exactly what it is) was true. 

And let's not get started on Trump University. Or porn stars.  

Sad but true.  The extent of denial among Trump supporters is simply off-the-charts.  There is a list a mile long of credible accusations against Trump--both before and during his Presidency--which includes massive corruption, lying, obstruction of justice, abuse of power, extortion, money laundering, tax evasion, adultery, sexual assault, mishandling of classified material, etc.  Yet, Trump supporters just pooh pooh it all away.  But if any sort of unproven conspiracy theory against his opponents show up on Twitter, they latch onto it like a life preserver in a hurricane.  Amazing, these people.   

38 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

I very much doubt that. Biden doesn't really need a Midwesterner as he's already got very strong rust belt / white working class cred with his "Scranton" schtick. Even though I think he will pick a woman as VP if nominated I think it will probably be a woman of color (Stacey Abrams and Kamala Harris come to mind). 

If wants to pick the canidate who is the mose intelligent and not worry about an electorial choice. I support Yang for VP

Wonder what plum posts Buttigieg and Klobuchar were promised for their co-operation.

 

 

This just in      Joe is running for the senate so be sure and vote for him on super Thursday

9 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Yes, that would be a scary move for democrats. I've heard analysis that if 45 can get only 12 percent of the black vote, he'll be impossible to beat. If anyone doesn't understand the importance of the black vote, that number should be a wake up call. However, by dumping Pence, wouldn't that be seen as a betrayal to 45's white evangelical base? 

I think Trump has got the evangelical base in his pocket.  It's not that they love or respect Trump, but they're getting everything they want in terms of conservative judges and religious rights in general.  They'll put up with anything...and in the case of Trump, that's an awful lot.  

2 minutes ago, JHolmesJr said:

Wonder what plum posts Buttigieg and Klobuchar were promised for their co-operation.

 

 

Cooperation, how? For dropping out of a race they had no money to continue fighting and couldn't win anyway? Or for endorsing the candidate whose policies were the most similar to their own?

 

Just now, lannarebirth said:

5 minutes ago, JHolmesJr said:

Wonder what plum posts Buttigieg and Klobuchar were promised for their co-operation.

 

 

Cooperation, how? For dropping out of a race they had no money to continue fighting and couldn't win anyway? Or for endorsing the candidate whose policies were the most similar to their own?

This was suggested by Trump at a rally....with no evidence of course.  Trump can say just about anything and his blind followers will believe it. 

14 minutes ago, JHolmesJr said:

Wonder what plum posts Buttigieg and Klobuchar were promised for their co-operation.

 

 

Perhaps ambassador to the eu. ????

21 minutes ago, JHolmesJr said:

Wonder what plum posts Buttigieg and Klobuchar were promised for their co-operation.

 

 

To live in a country without 45 as president.

 

Amy already has a great job. 

 

Pete does need one now. 

57 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

So our choice is between senile or more trump fatigue. Bet I know the decision outcome of Americans better than you do.

Did I hear the word bet? Shall we talk privately Companero?

19 minutes ago, Berkshire said:

 

 There is a list a mile long of credible accusations against Trump--both before and during his Presidency--which includes massive corruption, lying, obstruction of justice, abuse of power, extortion, money laundering, tax evasion, adultery, sexual assault, mishandling of classified material, etc.  Yet, Trump supporters just pooh pooh it all away. 

 

What an amazing list of sins, some of them criminal.

 

Since, as Pelosi and her minions never tire of telling us, no one is "above the law", why has not this malefactor not been charged with any offence in the courts?  

 

It may be worth pointing out that 2 years of Mueller's investigations brought not the slightest whiff of wrongdoing, the kind that can be prosecuted in a court of law.  (And we can be 100% sure that if anything HAD been there, the legal knives would have long ago been flashing in the dark slime pits of Washington.)

 

As for adultery, let he who is without sin cast the first stone, and not come on ThaiVisa and play "holier than thou".

 

Besides, there is always Melania to deal with that particular problem (if you are concerned).

 

 

 

28 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

If wants to pick the canidate who is the mose intelligent and not worry about an electorial choice. I support Yang for VP

I don't think Yang is a VP type. It's  loyalty yes man job. Biden won't get behind his guaranteed income idea. 

56 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

You mean unsubstantiated claims of corruption as opposed to proven claims of using your own charity for political and personal gain?

The hypocrisy of Trump fans is something else to behold. Your man had to settle this for $2million and disband his own charity yet you have the audacity to keep harping on about a many times exhonerated Biden as if the conspiracy (and that's exactly what it is) was true. 

And let's not get started on Trump University. Or porn stars.  

Yeah, read the whole story, not that big  deal. I am not a Trump fan, I am a Trump voter. The package most resembling paleoconservative gets my vote. That would not be any democrat or Trotskyite. I also do not favor Joe Biden, because he got money kicked back through his son, who's only job on Burisma was to provide bank account numbers! 

4 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

I don't think Yang is a VP type. It's  loyalty yes man job. Biden won't get behind his guaranteed income idea. 

 

It's ok.....Old Joe won't be able to understand the "guaranteed income idea" anyway, so Yang can just carry on pushing the idea till he (Yang) is ready to run for pres again. 

21 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

To live in a country without 45 as president.

 

Amy already has a great job. 

 

Pete does need one now. 

 

Pete will be ok....his husband will take care of him.

1 hour ago, Berkshire said:

Funny thing is Trump's people have been wanting him to jettison Pence and bring on Nikki Haley.  That would be a shrewd move.  If Biden wins the nomination, Trump may do just that. 

Based upon what evidence?

10 minutes ago, blazes said:

 

Pete will be ok....his husband will take care of him.

I notice you still live with the belief one must take care of a spouse. Perhaps you should move into this century.

9 minutes ago, WalkingOrders said:

1 hour ago, Berkshire said:

Funny thing is Trump's people have been wanting him to jettison Pence and bring on Nikki Haley.  That would be a shrewd move.  If Biden wins the nomination, Trump may do just that. 

Based upon what evidence?

Oh I don't know.  Why don't you just Google "Trump Pence Nikki Haley" and see for yourself. 

1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

Yes, that would be a scary move for democrats. I've heard analysis that if 45 can get only 12 percent of the black vote, he'll be impossible to beat. If anyone doesn't understand the importance of the black vote, that number should be a wake up call. However, by dumping Pence, wouldn't that be seen as a betrayal to 45's white evangelical base? 

Pence isn't going anywhere

23 minutes ago, Sujo said:

I notice you still live with the belief one must take care of a spouse. Perhaps you should move into this century.

 

Your little squib would normally be beneath contempt, but I don't mind rousing myself to confute your weird assessment of 21st century mores. 

 

If I look around at my friends and neighbours and at my own marriage, I would allow that most of us subscribe to the view that marriage is a matter of shared concerns. 

 

However, it would be a shallow and mean-spirited person who thought he or she had no moral responsibility to his or her spouse in the event of sudden hard times.

2 hours ago, johnnybangkok said:

You mean unsubstantiated claims of corruption as opposed to proven claims of using your own charity for political and personal gain?

The hypocrisy of Trump fans is something else to behold. Your man had to settle this for $2million and disband his own charity yet you have the audacity to keep harping on about a many times exhonerated Biden as if the conspiracy (and that's exactly what it is) was true. 

And let's not get started on Trump University. Or porn stars.  

Or HRC's bogus charity...

1 hour ago, Berkshire said:

Oh I don't know.  Why don't you just Google "Trump Pence Nikki Haley" and see for yourself. 

OK, I just did. Fake news.

2 hours ago, Berkshire said:

Sad but true.  The extent of denial among Trump supporters is simply off-the-charts.  There is a list a mile long of credible accusations against Trump--both before and during his Presidency--which includes massive corruption, lying, obstruction of justice, abuse of power, extortion, money laundering, tax evasion, adultery, sexual assault, mishandling of classified material, etc.  Yet, Trump supporters just pooh pooh it all away.  But if any sort of unproven conspiracy theory against his opponents show up on Twitter, they latch onto it like a life preserver in a hurricane.  Amazing, these people.   

No corruption at all, no lying, no obstruction of justice, no abuse of power, no extortion, no money laundering, no tax evasion, no adultery as President, and before that not my business, no sexual assault, no mishandling of classified info. Some were charges claimed in impeachment NOT GUILTY. You are simply making baseless accusations.