Jump to content

After fatal UK crash, U.S. removes criminal immunity for its diplomat families


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, evadgib said:

Those signs have been there since WW2.

Yet they still have had to agree to improve road signage on this, hmm...

Edited by Bluespunk
  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Malawi said:

Does this mean that the yanks will send the killer back to face justice?

Nope, hence the following line:

 

11 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

should these tragic circumstances ever arise again,” Raab said.

 

Posted
11 hours ago, northsouthdevide said:

 

The one and only reason that the lady hasn't had to answer the British justice system is that she's seen as elite. 

 I thought her husband the spy would let out secrets if she (his wife) had to pay for killing that boy.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Bluespunk said:

Yet they still have had to agree to improve road signage on this, hmm...

Americans must have difficult with English (and, international road signage).

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, skytrooper70 said:

Americans must have difficult with English (and, international road signage).

They drive on the right in US military bases whereas HMF stationed worldwide drive as per local conditions and have to have a local licence to compliment their DVLA one. The baiter to whom you replied knew nothing of that.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
57 minutes ago, skytrooper70 said:

No one should be allowed to drive, in another country, until they demonstrate they know the rules of the road. 

Unfortunately, these tragedies happen fairly regularly in the UK. In many parts there are multi-lingual road signs reminding drivers to drive on the left. If there was insufficient signage around the area where the accident happened then good that that is improved. 

Posted
13 hours ago, tifino said:

be a pity if this was not made retrospective

If I am not mistaken US law forbids an "ex post facto" law.  Sad in this case but it exists in order to prevent the government from passing a law to prosecute people for  doing things that were legal at the time they did them.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, evadgib said:

They drive on the right in US military bases whereas HMF stationed worldwide drive as per local conditions and have to have a local licence to compliment their DVLA one. The baiter to whom you replied knew nothing of that.

Wrong as usual, though I fail to see what british forces stationed overseas has to do with my post. 
 

Edited by Bluespunk
Posted
4 hours ago, Dice Man said:

Who did HRH Prince Andrew kill and what arrest warrants are outstanding on him?

The American authorities are saying that he's offering zero co-operation.

Posted
5 hours ago, Dice Man said:

Who did HRH Prince Andrew kill and what arrest warrants are outstanding on him?


We don’t know yet because Andrew has not provided a statement or agreed to an interview either in UK or US. As you know, Andrew is not very good at giving interviews on his own, without his lawyer present.

 

It could well be, based on claims by some of the women, that he had sex with under age girls in US which would be statutory rape.

 

The link between Harry Dunn and Prince Andrew seems to have been rumbling on in the background for some time. The US was, initially, very uncooperative about the Harry Dunn case, yet now they seem to be more helpful. That is a big surprise. Why would that be? One possibility is that Harry Dunn (or at least subsequent similar cases) and Andrew are seen as related and, if considered together, can be resolved at government level
 

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7936463/Virginia-Roberts-says-Prince-Andrew-not-law-attorney-statement-cooperation.html

Posted
8 hours ago, kingdong said:

those sort of shenanigans aren,t as blatant in the west.

blatant maybe not but just as frequent. Just because an act is not overt doesn't indicate it doesn't occur. In Canada a lot of the corruption is negotiated as 'favors' political and otherwise, and although cash may not of been passed physically at the time it all amounts to the same in the long run. You would have to be completely naive to believe otherwise..

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...