Jump to content

U.S. Justice Alito says pandemic has led to 'unimaginable' curbs on liberty


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, edwinchester said:

Freedom is the right to unnecessarily risk other people's lives according to this idiot.

Exactly ,the idiot even protects the rights for  10 of thousands to gather in groups to protest during a pandemic! A equal opportunity nut job ,say what!

Edited by riclag
txt
  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)

Interesting... seems Alito didn't travel to the group's conference to deliver his remarks in person.... Wonder why? Perhaps something to do with the CV pandemic???

 

Quote

he said during his address over a video link for the conservative organization's annual conference

 

Perhaps for the same reason his own U.S. Supreme Court earlier this spring, for the first time in history, held oral arguments in cases via conference call instead of in person... "In keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19."

 

Quote

Supreme Court for first time to hold arguments via teleconference next month

...

“In keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19, the justices and counsel will all participate remotely,” the statement said. “The court anticipates providing a live audio feed of these arguments to news media. Details will be shared as they become available.”

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-for-first-time-to-hold-arguments-via-teleconference-next-month/2020/04/13/f7e325d0-7d8d-11ea-a3ee-13e1ae0a3571_story.html

 

Quote

Virus Pushes a Staid Supreme Court Into Revolutionary Changes

The court is set to depart from history twice on Monday: The justices will hear arguments by conference call, and the public will be able to listen in.
...
But on Monday, the court will break with history twice: hearing the first of 10 cases that will be argued in a telephone conference call, and letting the public listen in. It is a momentous step for a cautious and secretive institution and yet another way in which the coronavirus pandemic has forced American society to adjust to a new reality.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/03/us/politics/supreme-court-coronavirus.html

 

But but but, what about Alito's freedom?  I guess he thinks it's OK -- not just OK but a constitutional right!!! -- for the religious extremists to merrily infect each other and those around them, and then suffer the consequences... But Supreme Court justices, ahhhh, apparently not so much...

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, riclag said:

"This guidance is not intended to infringe on rights protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution or any other federal law, including the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA). The federal government may not prescribe standards for interactions of faith communities in houses of worship, and in accordance with the First Amendment, no faith community should be asked to adopt any mitigation strategies that are more stringent than the mitigation strategies asked of similarly situated entities or activities".

 

"In addition, we note that while many types of gatherings are important for civic and economic well-being, religious worship has particularly profound significance to communities and individuals, including as a right protected by the First Amendment".

 

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/faith-based.html

 

The Justice is speaking  toward  freedoms ,such as First Amendment rights inherit from the Constitution ! Surely this can apply to all gatherings where people exercise their civic rights to speak and to gather! 

 

Freedom  is not realized until you loose it!

 "Coronavirus is taking away people’s freedom bit by bit. First, it was not going to school, then no friends, and then being stuck at home. This isn’t really freedom. Freedom is being able to do what you want and being able to do things that make you happy".

https://forward.com/culture/444993/you-dont-know-what-freedom-is-until-its-gone/

 

 

 

Now address the bit about what constitutes a marriage.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Now address the bit about what constitutes a marriage.

I'm in love with my big bike, we want to get married. Is that a problem??

  • Sad 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

The U.S. Supreme Court went down this road earlier this spring, and came away with a 5-4 sensible decision, with Alito and his ilk dissenting. But that was with RBG on the bench. Today, with Trump's right-wing extremist packed court, who knows. Maybe Alito would be writing the new majority opinion in the reverse:

 

Quote

Supreme Court, in 5-4 Decision, Rejects Church’s Challenge to Shutdown Order

A California church argued that restrictions on public gatherings treated houses of worship worse than many businesses.

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday turned away a request from a church in California to block enforcement of state restrictions on attendance at religious services.

The vote was 5 to 4, with Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. joining the court’s four-member liberal wing to form a majority.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/30/us/supreme-court-churches-coronavirus.html

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
  • Sad 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

I'm in love with my big bike, we want to get married. Is that a problem??

 

Only if you forget to let the exhaust cool down.

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...