Jump to content

Trump lawyer Giuliani claims voter 'fraud' in long-shot Pennsylvania challenge


Recommended Posts

Posted
58 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

 

There were probably other reasons why people didnt mail in their votes 

 

"One expert on elections and voter turnout, Michael McDonald of the University of Florida, pointed out that an even greater number of Democrats who voted by mail in the primary didn't vote at all in the general."

I am sure there are. When I think back to times I did not vote it was times I got off late from work or was too damn tired to go. After we got mail in voting in my state, I never misses a vote. I do think Trump shot himself in the foot by pushing his followers to wait for election day. S**t happens!

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, stevenl said:

So you're upset about Trump being called '45', after he insulted all and every opponent.

 

  Not upset, just seems a bit immature to me .

*President Biden* , there, said it 

  • Confused 1
Posted
Just now, stevenl said:

You have to admit that compared to what Trump called his opponents, calling him '45' is very civilised.

 

  I am talking about myself and how I will refer to Biden , I am not talking about how Trump refers to other people 

  • Confused 2
Posted
8 hours ago, CrunchWrapSupreme said:

Were they allowed in the room? Yes. Could they see the ballots being counted? Yes. The only complaint is distance. How close do they want them? They cannot be breathing down the workers' necks. The cases are being dismissed.

 

Close enough to be able to see and verify the ballots.

If they cannot see the content of the ballots what are they observing? 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Ireland32 said:

He’s asking $20, 000 a day to retain him ,Rudy is  the Town Drunk in NY 

He should know Trump's reputation of not paying his workers. Moreover the legal battles wouldn't work according to the last standing Trump's lawyer Marc Scaring. 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, PattayaJames said:

 

And on its way to the federal Supreme Court. 

Would you accept a coin toss bet where you observed the coin being tossed but were unable to verify how it landed? 

Would you put olive oil on toast?

 

PS. Link to source on this being appealed to the USSC?

Edited by Phoenix Rising
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...