Popular Post rooster59 Posted November 29, 2020 Popular Post Posted November 29, 2020 Foreigners stranded in Thailand due to COVID-19 can now stay until at least 29 Jan 2021 The Thai Immigration Bureau has announced that foreigners who are still stranded in Thailand due to the COVID-19 situation can remain in the country until at least 29 January 2021. Anyone who had applied for a temporary visa extension due to COVID-19 were permitted to stay in Thailand until 30 November. But according to an order released earlier this week (unofficial translation below), foreigners who apply for and are granted a new extension for a fee of 1900 baht. The extension would be valid for 60 days from the day a person's current permit to stay ends or from the date of application. This means that those affected could potentially stay in Thailand until the end of March if they applied for a new 60 day extension on or near January 29th. The order, signed by Immigration Commissioner Somphong Chingduang, reads: Due to the continuity of the Coronavirus 2019 or COVID-19 outbreak in countries around the world, affecting the departure from the Kingdom and the stay in the Kingdom among foreigners, it is considered to extend the duration of stay as per the letter until 29 January 2021. The order will be a welcome relief for people that are in Thailand and need to or want to stay longer. Anyone whose temporary extension was due to expire on 30 November are advised to visit their local immigration office on Monday for a further extension. Thanks to Thai Visa Centre for the information. -- © Copyright Thai Visa News 2020-11-29 - Whatever you're going through, the Samaritans are here for you - Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking COVID-19 updates 1 3 1
RotBenz8888 Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 Not any surprise. Would've been madness to kick them out, for many reasons.
Popular Post Peterw42 Posted November 29, 2020 Popular Post Posted November 29, 2020 4 minutes ago, RotBenz8888 said: Not any surprise. Would've been madness to kick them out, for many reasons. What about those that are not genuinely stranded, just electing to stay.. 2 1
Popular Post ezzra Posted November 29, 2020 Popular Post Posted November 29, 2020 3 minutes ago, Peterw42 said: What about those that are not genuinely stranded, just electing to stay.. Probably will work for all kind of visas as long as you want to stay, if questions ask, you'r stranded, no need for further explanations... 3
Popular Post tinca tinca Posted November 29, 2020 Popular Post Posted November 29, 2020 7 minutes ago, Peterw42 said: What about those that are not genuinely stranded, just electing to stay.. does it really matter to you?? 19 5 1
2530Ubon Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 1 minute ago, ezzra said: Probably will work for all kind of visas as long as you want to stay, if questions ask, you'r stranded, no need for further explanations... Yes, there are reports in the visa section that show people on retirement / visiting family / thai wife extensions who switched over to this 60 day extension. What is criminal though, is that Ubon IO seems to be the only one charging 3,900 per extension. All of the other offices are reporting the usual 1,900 baht fee. I wonder why they are doing this. 2 1
EricTh Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 23 minutes ago, Peterw42 said: What about those that are not genuinely stranded, just electing to stay.. In fact, I did meet one of these not genuinely stranded at immigration recently, she wrote 'it is not safe to go back' on her application form to extend her tourist visa. But she told me she is teaching English online on a tourist visa in Thailand, go figure. This is the real purpose, earning money while living on low cost of living. 2
Popular Post darrendsd Posted November 29, 2020 Popular Post Posted November 29, 2020 25 minutes ago, Peterw42 said: What about those that are not genuinely stranded, just electing to stay.. I'm fine thanks ???? 1 9
Popular Post BangkokReady Posted November 29, 2020 Popular Post Posted November 29, 2020 25 minutes ago, tinca tinca said: does it really matter to you?? Apparently, for some foreigners it's the most rage inducing, unfair, criminal, immoral prospect they have encountered for some time! 2 1 5
metisdead Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 A reported troll post and the replies have been removed.
Popular Post Oldie Posted November 29, 2020 Popular Post Posted November 29, 2020 1 hour ago, Peterw42 said: What about those that are not genuinely stranded, just electing to stay.. It is a funny thing. Tourists are stranded here and at the same time tourist from such countries can enter Thailand. 7
soisanuk Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 1 hour ago, rooster59 said: This means that those affected could potentially stay in Thailand until the end of March if they applied for a new 60 day extension on or near January 29th. According to the translation, the extension can be up to 60 days, but not past January 29, 2021. Quote Due to the continuity of the Coronavirus 2019 or COVID-19 outbreak in countries around the world, affecting the departure from the Kingdom and the stay in the Kingdom among foreigners, it is considered to extend the duration of stay as per the letter until 29 January 2021. (Emphasis added)
BigFun Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 1 hour ago, RotBenz8888 said: Not any surprise. Would've been madness to kick them out, for many reasons. You mean as they did on 26th Sept, and then changed their minds, but too late. 1 1
offset Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 I think most tourist can go home I do not think a home country can refuse entry, but most do not want to do quarantine 1
Popular Post BigFun Posted November 29, 2020 Popular Post Posted November 29, 2020 1 hour ago, Peterw42 said: What about those that are not genuinely stranded, just electing to stay.. Well, i guess they will be contributing their small part to a heavily affected economy. Are you an Immigration volunteer like those tourist police guys? ???? 6
BigFun Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 3 minutes ago, offset said: I think most tourist can go home I do not think a home country can refuse entry, but most do not want to do quarantine If they can afford not to, aren't working within Thailand, why should they?
Popular Post loong Posted November 29, 2020 Popular Post Posted November 29, 2020 1 hour ago, Peterw42 said: What about those that are not genuinely stranded, just electing to stay.. The article refers to 'stranded foreigners'. The order does not. So it is not a necessity to be 'stranded'. 3
jackdd Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 1 hour ago, Peterw42 said: What about those that are not genuinely stranded, just electing to stay.. I don't see anything in immigration's letter that it is only for stranded people, this is only in Thaivisa's thread title. 2
scorecard Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 13 minutes ago, offset said: I think most tourist can go home I do not think a home country can refuse entry, but most do not want to do quarantine But there are some foreigners who can't go home (except for repat. flights) because there are no commercial flights right now. Plus repat. flights to most countries are quite/very expensive, maybe not enough funds.
Peterw42 Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 15 minutes ago, jackdd said: I don't see anything in immigration's letter that it is only for stranded people, this is only in Thaivisa's topic title. 2nd paragraph The order basically says "due to coronavirus affecting the departure from the kingdom" That is stranded
jackdd Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 6 minutes ago, Peterw42 said: The order says "due to coronavirus affecting the departure from the kingdom" That is stranded That is one interpretation of it. Somebody who is stranded is obviously affected, that's correct. But there are other groups of people who are affected as well, but who aren't stranded. Maybe I'm just afraid to fly back home due to the pandemic going on there, then it's also affecting my departure from the kingdom, even though I'm not actually stranded. If immigration would only want people to got this extension who are actually stranded they would demand proof that somebody is actually stranded. That they don't demand such proof shows that it's not limited to stranded people.
Peterw42 Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 I dont have any problem with people choosing to stay, claiming they are stranded etc when they are not. If you can stay, knock yourself out. ' BUT" eventually it may lead to the shutdown of extensions for genuinely stranded tourists. If the Thai government realises that they are providing extensions for people who can get home, or new tourist arrivals are starting to claim stranded status, I can see a situation where they will shut it down. Most immigration measures come about as a response to the system being abused, bogus income letters, agents lending funds, 27 back to back tourist visa's etc etc. Again, I dont care less how people are staying in Thailand, but dont be surprised if it gets shut down because to many non- stranded tourists are staying. 1 1
AlfHuy Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 1 hour ago, 2530Ubon said: Yes, there are reports in the visa section that show people on retirement / visiting family / thai wife extensions who switched over to this 60 day extension. What is criminal though, is that Ubon IO seems to be the only one charging 3,900 per extension. All of the other offices are reporting the usual 1,900 baht fee. I wonder why they are doing this. They probably are not "Buddhists" but "Christians". They need some extra cash to buy Christmas presents which they will hand over to lonely farangs, walking around Udon. 1
Peterw42 Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 3 minutes ago, jackdd said: That is one interpretation of it. Somebody who is stranded is obviously affected, that's correct. But there are other groups of people who are affected as well, but who aren't stranded. Maybe I'm just afraid to fly back home due to the pandemic going on there, then it's also affecting my departure from the kingdom, even though I'm not actually stranded. If immigration would only want people to got this extension who are actually stranded they would demand proof that somebody is actually stranded. That they don't demand such proof shows that it's not limited to stranded people. Wasnt that the whole idea of getting a letter from embassy ? This next round of extensions they haven't actually clarified what will be required to stay.
FritsSikkink Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 1 hour ago, RotBenz8888 said: Not any surprise. Would've been madness to kick them out, for many reasons. Why if you want to go home, you can. 1
Peterw42 Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 58 minutes ago, loong said: The article refers to 'stranded foreigners'. The order does not. So it is not a necessity to be 'stranded'. The order says in paragraph 3, "corona virus affecting departure from the kingdom"
Peterw42 Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 I have a friend, arrives next week on a TR visa, quarantine, insurance etc. His plan is, after the TR expires , is to say he is stranded and stay indefinitely. I dont have a problem with this plan, I do worry that when immigration starts to notice 500 arrivals and only 400 departures, 100 stranded extension. They will start to question the extensions
topt Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 6 minutes ago, Peterw42 said: His plan is, after the TR expires , is to say he is stranded and stay indefinitely. one rather hopes that the current situation will not last "indefinitely"......
kwonitoy Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 Version:Dec, 2020 If you cannot view this E-NEWS, please click here. Taiwan Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) launched the "Fall-winter COVID-19 Prevention Program" Starting from 1 December, 2020 (local time at the place of departure), travelers arriving at airports in Taiwan or transit passengers at airports in Taiwan, regardless of nationality (Taiwanese nationals or foreign nationals) or travel purpose (studies, work, diplomatic or official business, or others), are all required to present a certificate of a negative COVID-19 RT-PCR test result issued within three days (working days) of boarding before they are allowed to board their flight to Taiwan. Please click here for more information. I got the above from EVA last week, makes travelling through Taiwan all the more difficult now.
Oldie Posted November 29, 2020 Posted November 29, 2020 28 minutes ago, Peterw42 said: I have a friend, arrives next week on a TR visa, quarantine, insurance etc. His plan is, after the TR expires , is to say he is stranded and stay indefinitely. I dont have a problem with this plan, I do worry that when immigration starts to notice 500 arrivals and only 400 departures, 100 stranded extension. They will start to question the extensions I have the feeling that in the meantime every foreigner in the country is important. I am just waiting that they say "Please don't fly back because we need your spendings here". 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now