Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

In the beginning of the pandemic there were some observations published in the news that smokers were slightly protected against Covid-19 - actually little surprising - but I never saw any follow up stories.

 

I tried to find some sources, and it seems like it's been a misunderstanding...

A number of recent studies have found low percentages of smokers among COVID-19 patients, causing scientists to conclude that smokers may be protected against SARS-CoV-2 infection. National and international media were interested in this story and we soon began receiving questions about this topic in general practice. In this article, we shed light on the process that resulted in the misinterpretation of observational research by scientists and the media. We also point out the methodological flaws of various studies on which hasty conclusions were based. Finally, we address the role of primary healthcare providers in mitigating the consequences of erroneous claims about a protective effect of smoking.

Source: Nature "Are smokers protected against SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19)? The origins of the myth".

 

  • Like 1
Posted

They need proven effective vaccines now not waiting a year from now  in the hope thatnthis plant vaccine will work. How many million cases by then and deaths if not enough real vaccines are  aquired now.

  • Like 1
Posted

The Covid-19 virus is now likely to be around for a very long time. Any new vaccine is welcome and a plant based one (if it works) is likely to be cheaper and quicker to produce than the laboratory modified DNA etc ones . Let us wait and see..

Posted

What kind of b ****it more are we gonna get . You can make all kinds of stupid phrases but chemistry is chemistry . Where ever it comes from is a load of <deleted> . In the end you are making a vaccine which in my textbook , MRNA , inactivated virus , live virus , ...you make or have some kind of proteins in some sort of combo . Proteins are the building blocks of RNA/DNA and since you want to use something which your body can recognize as incoming virus , you need something which replicates it in a less harmful way then the original virus . Were ever the chemicals come from does not matter since you are making something else with it , a process called SYNTHESIS .

You can make water from H2 and O2 , but you can also make water from petroleum or from cheese . In the end the result is the same H2O . Where ever it comes from is pure advertising bull .... .

BTW , if they can make a vaccine , it is always good , but saying ooohhh it's plant based is just like i said before .

Posted
20 hours ago, Jonathan Fairfield said:

The team aims to introduce the vaccine for use by Thai people in Q3 2022,

.

Geez, more whining to come on this forum now.

Posted
21 hours ago, Jonathan Fairfield said:

If successful, the vaccine is expected to become available in Q3 next year.

Sadly it looks like there will still be plenty of unvaccinated adults in Thailand for this to be tried out on.... I might well still be one of them. 

Posted
19 hours ago, Thailand said:

Perhaps use the Cannabis plantand have the Happy Vaccine?

HappiVax - Get Covid but you'll never know the difference. And sales of snack foods will generate billions.

Posted
23 hours ago, Jonathan Fairfield said:

The antigen will be grown and harvested in tobacco leaves,

In the absence of vaccines, smoke your way clear of Covid. How Thai.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...