Jump to content

Is new COVID-19 variant a cause of concern for Thailand?


webfact

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, pizzachang said:

Didn't everyone know that a "new variant" would be "announced? I'm really surprised at the disconnect between "WHO's Fears" and reality. Haven't all the{Thai} "emergency field hospitals" closed?. Didn't I hear multiple scientists and doctors state publicly, the same information that is common to virus 'behavior?  "They become less dangerous and more transmissible." I also heard on multiple media that "most people seem to have little or no symptoms....if ANY". The entire "virus emergency" seems more like an experiment in some kind of 'global control' of travel, public gatherings, and compliance - but I've been told that is "conspiracy theory".  There are some basic facts that may be useful for allaying "fears".  They are: death rates, recovery rates, comparisons to other lung disease and immunity after natural infection/recovery...hardly a conspiracy.

It is a conspiracy theory.  Basic facts won't be known for several weeks.  Which is what the WHO and every credible media outlet is reporting.  So far, they're just saying it's a variant of concern.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, placnx said:

There is simply not enough production capacity. To not booster US & EU populations would be derelict. It's really unfortunate that the US and others did not assess available capacity a year ago. Then when Biden took office there could have been a plan in place to create more capacity, encourage other countries to do the same. 

A major part of the production issue was that Pfizer, JJ, Moderna & BioNTech were reluctant to relinquish control of their patented knowledge and technology in spite of pressing calls by health advocacy organisations to allow production for poorer countries. Contrast with Sputnik V which was to their credit a model of pandemic diplomacy by broadly licensing their vaccine to 34 drug companies outside their borders like in India and Brazil. In this pandemic diplomacy war, the west especially USA is still losing to China who has came out yesterday and promised a billion doses to Africa. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, CartagenaWarlock said:

Advocating where? How many rallies you have attended to demand opening? How many letters you have written to authorities and published in news papers? How many  articles you have published advocating for an opening? 

You're right, didn't do it the official way. Still, shared my ideas on various forums and social media, hoping to make others understand how crucial it was for the country to open in order to avoid a complete economic meltdown. At the end, the general opinion matters for the authorities to make decisions ( or so it should).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

A major part of the production issue was that Pfizer, JJ, Moderna & BioNTech were reluctant to relinquish control of their patented knowledge and technology in spite of pressing calls by health advocacy organisations to allow production for poorer countries. Contrast with Sputnik V which was to their credit a model of pandemic diplomacy by broadly licensing their vaccine to 34 drug companies outside their borders like in India and Brazil. In this pandemic diplomacy war, the west especially USA is still losing to China who has came out yesterday and promised a billion doses to Africa. 

Let's hope their donations aren't Sinovac....

 

The problem in SA isn't getting the jabs.  It's getting them in arms.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mavideol said:

wonder the reason for WHO skipping the other Greek letters before Omicron  (Lambda Mu  Nu and XI) maybe afraid of ?????

Would you complain if they called it the Smith variant if that was a Greek letter? In case you are confused Xi is a common Chinese surname and is the reason that the name was skipped.

Edited by ozimoron
  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, terryofcrete said:

The world is restricting travel and making it more difficult to travel. .Thailand will now do the opposite. Ease entry from US , and for Brits, with their massive daily covid figures .. 

i can't criticise them because I don't know the answers to this conundrum. Let them in ? Keep them out ? Damned if they do and damned if they don't .

Ive just returned from a month's holiday in Phuket and Pattaya . Glad to get home to be honest . Nothing like "normal" and I have cancelled my next trip planned for January ... 

GREAT POST

I’m going back too Phuket  mid Jan for Two months …..

All booked and travel red tape sorted just need too pass the required COVID Tests…..

Have not been back since 2017 before COVID & a Career change….

Still .would not be going if I did not have family & responsibilities that need tending too in Thailand ..

I Have been away far too long already…

No telling what I am getting myself into….

D/T the worldwide COVID Situation no control of this trip..

hope all goes well for all of us….

Does not seem like a fun trip like it used too be that’s for sure…..

It may be my last trip to Thailand as well….

Only time will tell……

Cheers

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, johnarth said:

well there no vaccine in our area, so thinking of waiting for the new one to come out but then how long will it take to get here? no doubt the sinovac will be scraped now

If a new one is needed, and that's not known yet, they are estimating 100 days for a new jab. mRNA technology has changed the game on how quickly they can do this.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Jeffr2 said:

I guess you also believed the Chinese docs who said their vaccine was very effective against the virus?  Too funny....I'll wait for a report from the WHO or CDC.

 

P.S. South Africa has a very young population.  Nothing like what's in other countries.  Impossible to compare.

The CDC...OK, but the WHO, are you serious, that really is too funny?? Do some research on them and their vested interests!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

The CDC...OK, but the WHO, are you serious, that really is too funny?? Do some research on them and their vested interests!

The WHO, dont get fooled again they say, or wait was it this WHO

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHhrZgojY1Q

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

The CDC...OK, but the WHO, are you serious, that really is too funny?? Do some research on them and their vested interests!

I have. Whatever there is won't impact their scientific assessment of this new variant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

A major part of the production issue was that Pfizer, JJ, Moderna & BioNTech were reluctant to relinquish control of their patented knowledge and technology in spite of pressing calls by health advocacy organisations to allow production for poorer countries. Contrast with Sputnik V which was to their credit a model of pandemic diplomacy by broadly licensing their vaccine to 34 drug companies outside their borders like in India and Brazil. In this pandemic diplomacy war, the west especially USA is still losing to China who has came out yesterday and promised a billion doses to Africa. 

The issue back then was compulsory licensing and turnover of know how to make mRNA vaccines in numerous countries, at least in the talking points of some very vocal activists, particularly in India and South Africa. On the other hand, the US government has sufficient ways and means to order the creation of production facilities in the US on an expedited basis, which could be operated by Pfizer and Moderna. This vaccine product would be less likely to encounter hesitancy issues due to questions of quality than production cited in countries ill-suited to make even recombinant vaccines.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, johnarth said:

well there no vaccine in our area, so thinking of waiting for the new one to come out but then how long will it take to get here? no doubt the sinovac will be scraped now

100 days minimum  for development, longer for clinical testing of safety and efficacy.

 

Do not wait for this.  Try to get AZ or Pfizer or Moderna now. It is highly likely these will provide at least some protection against severe disease from the new variant and they certainly do for the exisitng variants in Thbailand.

 

Hard to believe there is nowhere near you with vaccine. Where do you live?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

6 hours ago, pizzachang said:

Didn't everyone know that a "new variant" would be "announced? I'm really surprised at the disconnect between "WHO's Fears" and reality. Haven't all the{Thai} "emergency field hospitals" closed?. Didn't I hear multiple scientists and doctors state publicly, the same information that is common to virus 'behavior?  "They become less dangerous and more transmissible." I also heard on multiple media that "most people seem to have little or no symptoms....if ANY". The entire "virus emergency" seems more like an experiment in some kind of 'global control' of travel, public gatherings, and compliance - but I've been told that is "conspiracy theory".  There are some basic facts that may be useful for allaying "fears".  They are: death rates, recovery rates, comparisons to other lung disease and immunity after natural infection/recovery...hardly a conspiracy.

Didn't I hear multiple scientists and doctors state publicly, the same information that is common to virus 'behavior?  "They become less dangerous and more transmissible."

 

I didn't know this, do you have some references?

That is good news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

Or is it because its the name of the Chinese President?? The WHO would not want to upset their friends!!

There is no mystery about this and nothing being hidden.

 

Who openly stated Xi was not used because it is a common last name in China, including that of the current leader.

 

It is standard to omit names that sound like other common worlds or names.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, cdemundo said:

 

Didn't I hear multiple scientists and doctors state publicly, the same information that is common to virus 'behavior?  "They become less dangerous and more transmissible."

 

I didn't know this, do you have some references?

That is good news.

checked a bit...

Apparently, this is not quite true.

 

https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-011488089270

 

[But in fact, there have been cases of viruses that mutated to become more deadly.

“That claim as a whole is just nonsense,” said Troy Day, a professor of mathematics and biology at Queen’s University in Canada, who has studied the ways infectious diseases, including coronavirus, can evolve.

Some examples of viruses that became more deadly over time includethose that developed drug resistant variants, and animal viruses such as bird flu, which were harmless to humans initially but then mutated to become capable of killing people, according to Dr. Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar at Johns Hopkins University’s Center for Health Security.

“Flu viruses have developed resistance to certain antivirals that make them more difficult to treat, and therefore make them more deadly,” Adalja said, also noting the same has happened with HIV and certain Hepatitis C strains.

...

“Becoming more transmissible and less lethal are absolutely what’s best for the pathogen,” said Day. “But the problem is that it’s not always possible, and in many instances is never possible, to be more transmissible and also less lethal.”]

 

So in theory the optimum for the virus to proliferate is to let the host live and become more transmissible. But the selection process acts on the variations in the population, and the the variation is a result of random mutation so the optimum variants may not (may never) occur.

 

 

]

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mutations can occur randomly (in which case they can be anything, having any or - most commonly - no effect on how transmissable or deadly a virus is) - and through natural selection or a combination of both.

 

Mutations that occur due to natural selection will always be ones that favor increased viral replication. Viral replication in turn depends on how easily a virus can be transmitted and how long it can live in a host. Quickly killing a host is not in a virus' interests so typically, over time within a population, a virus will become less lethal. But this can take quite a while to occur (years or even generations). Also, being less lethal can mean either not causing serious disease OR having a long time lag between infection and severe disease/death. This was the secret behind the HIV virus's success: while being extremely lethal in the absence of treatment, it took 5-10 years to get to that point, and during much of that time the person did not even feel ill. So the fact that it eventually killed was not a deterrent to viral spread.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

In this pandemic diplomacy war, the west especially USA is still losing to China who has came out yesterday and promised a billion doses to Africa. 

For free, or does it come will strings attached, like they have to give over their major shipping port or airport if they default?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, glassdude007 said:

may be my last trip to Thailand as well….

Only time will tell……

Cheers

If you have responsibilities to attend too that is a a solid reason to travel back there. I wish you well . Already saying that the Omicron variant is milder just more contagious. ... Good luck to you sir.    

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, terryofcrete said:

If you have responsibilities to attend too that is a a solid reason to travel back there. I wish you well . Already saying that the Omicron variant is milder just more contagious. ... Good luck to you sir.    

No credible scientist has said that. None.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...