Jump to content

Beautiful teacher: Rules need to change to allow Thai stunners in uniform to be allowed to compete in beauty pageants


Recommended Posts

Posted
15 minutes ago, NeoDinosaw said:

My eye-sight is better that yours    - I assume thst hyou are not blind

Trifocal wearer, with 20/300 vision, did I miss something

Posted
7 hours ago, fusion58 said:

“Stunner?” Hoping this is supposed to be satire. ????

after you spend 6 months on a desert island they all would be "stunners"   555

Posted

She'll be very good at "lip service" me thinks. She would have nailed the "questions" category of Miss Universe contest where they have to talk BS about how they'd solve world hunger etc.

 

 

 

What did you think I meant by "lip service" you dirty farang!!!

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, transam said:

If one has it, there's nothing wrong with earning a few quid from it....????

As long as you can accept the opportunity cost, I guess. ????‍♂️

Edited by BangkokReady
Posted
4 hours ago, Levi Patterson said:

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I think she’s lovely. And intelligent on top of that. 

There is a very old established opinion held by many mysoginistic men (and some women) that intelligent and capable women cannot be beautiful, they have to look nunty. Rules such which prevent female teachers from participating promote that out of date opinion, by not allowing intelligent women to participate and show their beauty to the world.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, BritManToo said:

We aren't entering beauty pageants, so our looks are irrelevant to our opinions. 

 

As for her looks...... 

I wouldn't barfine her. 

Moreover, we're not the ones claiming to be "stunners."

Posted
4 minutes ago, fusion58 said:

Moreover, we're not the ones claiming to be "stunners."

Wait you mean you saw me and I am not a Stunner to you, now I am just stunned, I mean stunned in the shock and awe way.  She on the other hand is just a normal looking Thai woman.

Posted
7 hours ago, BritManToo said:

We aren't entering beauty pageants, so our looks are irrelevant to our opinions. 

 

As for her looks...... 

I wouldn't barfine her. 

But you do barfine girls then?

Hardly a quality needed to judge beauty.

  • Confused 1
Posted

Reckon the point of the article was aimed more at the duality of Thailand when saying it is OK in one social circle but not in another.
Don't think it is fair to start discussing how beautiful she is or isn't, the point is she should be allowed to compete in a beauty pageant like most other fist world countries would allow occupations from any walk of life.

For a country to reverse all it's principles on drugs (legalising marijuana) and also reverse all it's principles on gambling opening 6 casinos to recover some money after covid shows more about duality of man than anything else.
Why is a school teacher taking part in a beauty pageant even a problem?

  • Like 1
Posted
12 hours ago, fusion58 said:

“Stunner?” Hoping this is supposed to be satire. ????

Seems like they all have a moustache?

Posted
6 hours ago, AndyFoxy said:

Yeah. Looks like a top bloke. Good for a few pints and a chat.

you have an ugly heart. shame on you. kthxbye.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
14 hours ago, KannikaP said:

In UK, and other countries now, we would not be allowed to use the word 'stunner' as it can be deemed sexist. We can hardly use the word 'girl' or 'woman' !

Agreed - its getting bloody ridiculous.  We are supposed to accept the gender that a person indentifies as rather than what they actually are.  Then there's the famous pop-singer Sam Smith who says he's non-binary and objects to being labelled as either male or female - saying he, sorry it, doesn't 'identify' as either.

 

Even the LGBT+ Pride flag has now been updated to reflect yet another 'group' - 'intersex' people - that's a new one on me.

 

World's gone mad but I'll eat my hat if the girl in the photos is anything other than female.

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

It's all a matter of perspective.  Many would say beauty contests in generally are prehistoric and have no place in a modern and progressive society.

Beauty constests are mainly a commercial enterprise driven by sponsors. The girls do not exactly wake up one morning and improvise. There's teams behind them, there's lucrative contracts at stake, in some cases the chance to settle for life.

There are hundreds of beauty contests from Miss Universe to Miss Pad Thai, and what we men think or like doesn't count an iota in the process but it's fun to read all the comments.

 

Posted
4 hours ago, arithai12 said:

Beauty constests are mainly a commercial enterprise driven by sponsors. The girls do not exactly wake up one morning and improvise. There's teams behind them, there's lucrative contracts at stake, in some cases the chance to settle for life.

Doesn't really have much effect on what I said.

 

4 hours ago, arithai12 said:

There are hundreds of beauty contests from Miss Universe to Miss Pad Thai, and what we men think or like doesn't count an iota in the process but it's fun to read all the comments.

Your opinion is that opinions don't matter? Perhaps, but that's just your opinion. ????

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Nsp64 said:

But you do barfine girls then?

Hardly a quality needed to judge beauty.

As a guy that barfines women I probably get more opportunity to judge 'full length' female beauty than those that don't. As for 'sexy teachers', this is the one for me ..........

gun teacher.jpg

Edited by BritManToo
  • Haha 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...