BREAKING NEWS ! Boris Johnson to resign as Prime Minister

[RayC]

I would have hoped that having had the Premiership unceremoniously ripped away from him by his own MPs, Johnson would, at least, now be able to act in a relatively normal manner now that he is free from the stress of trying to save his job. 

 

Sadly, based on today's PM Questions, his sacking seems to have pushed him over the edge. He called Starmer "Captain Crash-a-roony Snooze Fest". Nope, me neither.

[baboon]

2 hours ago, RayC said:

I would have hoped that having had the Premiership unceremoniously ripped away from him by his own MPs, Johnson would, at least, now be able to act in a relatively normal manner now that he is free from the stress of trying to save his job. 

 

Sadly, based on today's PM Questions, his sacking seems to have pushed him over the edge. He called Starmer "Captain Crash-a-roony Snooze Fest". Nope, me neither.

He has appointed a new cabinet. He intends on going nowhere, 'Caretaker' or not.

[Loiner]

39 minutes ago, baboon said:

He has appointed a new cabinet. He intends on going nowhere, 'Caretaker' or not.

Great, he’s fooled you all again. 

[NanLaew]

On 7/12/2022 at 9:55 AM, transam said:

On 7/11/2022 at 5:49 PM, GroveHillWanderer said:

You do understand that Starmer didn't commit an infraction, don't you?

 

That's what it means when the police say that after conducting an investigation that was described as "thorough, detailed and proportionate" they "concluded that there is no case to answer...."

 

This is of course, in complete contrast to the actions of Boris and his minions at Number 10 where after a similarly thorough investigation a total of 126 fixed penalty notices were issued. 

 

Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner cleared by Police

Expand  

I reckon that if the panel that fined Boris investigated beer Kier, there would probably have been a far different outcome....

But they didn't. The UK is still blessed with not having a national police force.

[NanLaew]

On 7/12/2022 at 10:00 AM, Chomper Higgot said:

How so, do they have a time machine that enables them to retroactively change the law and regulations applicable at the time the photos were taken?

 

The Police have unequivocally stated: 

 

‘No case to answer’.

How simple to understand does it need to be in order to get through?

 

Note that the Met also claimed 'No case to answer' on their first sampling of the scant and largely anecdotal evidence of team Boris playing fast and loose with their own rules.

 

Then along came that flood of photographs...

[NanLaew]

On 7/12/2022 at 1:29 PM, transam said:

You've got some front, a crank MP, your lot have had Dianne for decades and done nothing about it and still there.

Your Corby, your leader for years, chums with Iran, IRA, yet done nothing about it..

................????

Sheesh... that's at least five times you mentioned Dianne on this thread alone.

 

Have you got the hots for  her or what? Should 'Corby' be worried?

 

(Do you want her number?)

[NanLaew]

On 7/12/2022 at 5:03 PM, 3NUMBAS said:

On 7/12/2022 at 4:54 PM, transam said:

Very funny, but daft......????

https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1637975/Boris-Johnson-latest-Conservative-leadership-election-Tory-Prime-Minister-selection-vn

This probably explains it. From the cited news article.

 

"...From Cheshire, Sky News Australia's Katerina Vittozzi has reported: "Although Boris Johnson's cabinet deserted him, he still has huge grassroots support. ..."

 

Sad times when Boris doesn't even have the backing of the daily Express's own dim hacks.

 

On 7/12/2022 at 5:05 PM, 3NUMBAS said:

https://cdn.jwplayer.com/previews/1wcRrmqg

 

boris supporters

Despite the embedded video, posting the same source twice doesn't lend it any more credibility.

 

Dont forget, Skynews.com.au's own hot pick for premiership downundah just had his ass handed to him.

 

 

[NanLaew]

23 hours ago, transam said:

Labour failed again, vote of no confidence thrown out.......????

British democracy trampled on again.

 

Labour would have lost the no confidence motion anyway. They knew that already. Nobody in their right mind would think it had a snowball's chance in hell. It's all about the ignominy of having one called for in the first place.

 

So, with nothing to fear, why did the Grand Sulk himself rule against it?

 

"... But a government spokesman hit back, accusing Labour of “playing politics” by tabling a motion of no confidence in the government and the prime minister when Boris Johnson had already resigned.

“As the prime minister has already resigned and a leadership process is under way we do not feel this is a valuable use of parliamentary time,” the spokesman said. ..."

 

https://www.itv.com/news/2022-07-12/grant-shapps-pulls-out-of-tory-leadership-race-and-backs-rishi-sunak

 

Look at that flagrant misrepresentation of the facts of what Johnson has just done. He resigned as leader of the Conservatives ONLY. He's still PM and planned on hanging on till October until his cronies suddenly had a dose of realism, hastily rewrote the rules (as they do) so they can toss out this waste of skin by September.

[transam]

54 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

Sheesh... that's at least five times you mentioned Dianne on this thread alone.

 

Have you got the hots for  her or what? Should 'Corby' be worried?

 

(Do you want her number?)

I've already got her number, a fruitcake......????

[Kwasaki]

2 minutes ago, transam said:

I've already got her number, a fruitcake......????

Theres 4 women left and 2 men hope a woman gets to be Prime Minister which will be better I reckon for Conservative's to stay in power at the next election.

[transam]

1 minute ago, Kwasaki said:

Theres 4 women left and 2 men hope a woman gets to be Prime Minister which will be better I reckon for Conservative's to stay in power at the next election.

Yep, Liz or Penny are good.....

[NanLaew]

3 minutes ago, transam said:

I've already got her number, a fruitcake......????

On that we are agreed. But sometimes she makes a very, very good point.

 

"It was only in March that all of these Tories were cheering tax hikes in the Spring Statement. Now they are desperate to cut them to save their skins at the next election. "

 

https://twitter.com/HackneyAbbott/status/1547147058754293760

 

Queue the "What's Starmers/Labour plan?"

[NanLaew]

5 minutes ago, transam said:

7 minutes ago, Kwasaki said:

Theres 4 women left and 2 men hope a woman gets to be Prime Minister which will be better I reckon for Conservative's to stay in power at the next election.

Yep, Liz or Penny are good.....

Kemi. Less drivel, more substance.

[Kwasaki]

4 minutes ago, transam said:

Yep, Liz or Penny are good.....

I'm not into politics I just reckon because of all the media witch hunt was about Bojo and other men a woman not involved in any of it would be like a fresh start.

[Kwasaki]

5 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

Kemi. Less drivel, more substance.

Was she involved at all much with the partygate stuff if so the media will start vilifing her from the start. 

[Chomper Higgot]

1 hour ago, NanLaew said:

Note that the Met also claimed 'No case to answer' on their first sampling of the scant and largely anecdotal evidence of team Boris playing fast and loose with their own rules.

 

Then along came that flood of photographs...

Correct, but Johnson had already made misleading statements to Parliament, ensuring this was no long simply a matter of breaking the isolation laws/regulations.

 

Photographs showing Starmer’s activities that at the time the photos were taken were not breaking any laws or regulations.

 

 

No matter how unequivocally  precise and simple the police conclusion of their second investigation is, it still can’t get through to some.

 

‘No case to answer’.

 

 

Edited July 14, 2022 by Chomper Higgot

[Chomper Higgot]

49 minutes ago, Kwasaki said:

Theres 4 women left and 2 men hope a woman gets to be Prime Minister which will be better I reckon for Conservative's to stay in power at the next election.

 

43 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

On that we are agreed. But sometimes she makes a very, very good point.

 

"It was only in March that all of these Tories were cheering tax hikes in the Spring Statement. Now they are desperate to cut them to save their skins at the next election. "

 

https://twitter.com/HackneyAbbott/status/1547147058754293760

 

Queue the "What's Starmers/Labour plan?"

To win the PM post the candidates must attract the vote of the rank and file members of the Conservative Party, who are predominantly old, white, reactionary and relatively affluent.

 

They are not in any sense representative of the voting population as a whole.

 

Tge next election will be won on policies that address the concerns of ordinary ‘floating’ voters.

 

I’m not hearing anything from any candidate that addresses the Taft of problems the UK population is facing.

 

Edited July 14, 2022 by Chomper Higgot

[SatEng]

5 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

To win the OM post the candidates must attract the vote of the rank and file members of the Conservative Party, who are predominantly old, white, reactionary and relatively affluent.

 

They are in any sense representative of the voting population as a whole.

 

Tge next election will be won on policies that address the concerns of ordinary ‘floating’ voters.

 

I’m not hearing anything from any candidate that addresses the Taft of problems the UK population is facing.

 

While you may be right about the make up of the conservative party members, it is surprising that Penny Mordaunt - a centrist - is leading with the membership vote

[baboon]

10 hours ago, Loiner said:

Great, he’s fooled you all again. 

How can you fool somebody who knows what you are up to?

[Chomper Higgot]

15 minutes ago, SatEng said:

While you may be right about the make up of the conservative party members, it is surprising that Penny Mordaunt - a centrist - is leading with the membership vote

I suspect it’s her messaging on ‘old style Conservative values’.

 

She’ll need support, the Tory Party are deeply divided, at best this next PM is going patch over the gaping cracks.

[transam]

41 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

To win the PM post the candidates must attract the vote of the rank and file members of the Conservative Party, who are predominantly old, white, reactionary and relatively affluent.

 

They are not in any sense representative of the voting population as a whole.

 

Tge next election will be won on policies that address the concerns of ordinary ‘floating’ voters.

 

I’m not hearing anything from any candidate that addresses the Taft of problems the UK population is facing.

 

Well yes, the last general election showed what the populace thought of the socialists, are you saying your socialists don't have ageing, white reactionary and relatively affluent voters..

Well, you could be right, who wants to be a socialist in the 21st century.....????

[baboon]

3 minutes ago, transam said:

Well yes, the last general election showed what the populace thought of the socialists, are you saying your socialists don't have ageing, white reactionary and relatively affluent voters..

Well, you could be right, who wants to be a socialist in the 21st century.....????

That's quite rich. A poster stuck in a 1980s time warp telling us all about the 21st century...

[transam]

4 minutes ago, baboon said:

That's quite rich. A poster stuck in a 1980s time warp telling us all about the 21st century...

Good afternoon Bab's......Pray tell me why I am stuck in the 1980's.....?  ????

[baboon]

3 minutes ago, transam said:

Good afternoon Bab's......Pray tell me why I am stuck in the 1980's.....?  ????

The language you employ is straight from The Sun in the 1980s.

[Rimmer]

Pointless off topic bickering posts and replies have been removed

[Chomper Higgot]

1 hour ago, transam said:

Well yes, the last general election showed what the populace thought of the socialists, are you saying your socialists don't have ageing, white reactionary and relatively affluent voters..

Well, you could be right, who wants to be a socialist in the 21st century.....????

I’ve got some shocking news for you.

 

This isn’t the last election.

[Kwasaki]

The leading contenders at the moment is Suenat and Penny.

[3NUMBAS]

Daily Mail out to stop ‘traitor’ Sunak as Tory rivals vie for press backing

Analysis: newspapers still hold great power, and pro-Johnson Mail has set out its ‘anyone but Rishi’ stall

• Politics live: latest updateshttps://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/13/daily-mail-out-to-stop-rishi-sunak-as-tory-rivals-vie-for-press-backing

 

 

 

• boris was  brought down by a coup from you know who

[3NUMBAS]

nadine dorris says bo  was done for by others

a coup was done

scumbags

[3NUMBAS]

As a result, Tory leadership candidates put high value on winning the official support of these titles. In part this is due to the hope that readers of the Telegraph, Times, Mail, Sun and Express may be in the pool of roughly 100,000 Tory members who will select the next prime minister.

 

 

from the above link to daily mail