Jump to content

Trump under investigation for potential violations of Espionage Act


Scott

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

You seem reticent to post any supporting evidence for this claim.

Would it be because the person in question also believes that bushfires are caused by Jewish lasers?

Actually it was a rant that included the Rothschilds but didn't specifically single out Jews. That said, she did link to a video that said Zionist Supremacists are promoting mass migration of nonwhites into primariy white countries in order to promote miscegenation.  Also she supported QAnon, Muslims don't belong in govt, 9/11 was an inside job, shooting at sandy hook, parkland, and Las Vegas were staged, and of course top level Democratic politicians should be executed.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/marjorie-taylor-greene-qanon-wildfires-space-laser-rothschild-execute.html

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

Better do some research, I can not give you specific cases as they are not for public purview unless a Public Records act is filed.  You can believe what you want, but I myself as a supervising manager authorized many O.R. Releases to family or friends depending on the situation and always after a Blood/Urine/Breath sample was obtained and as long as the individual was cooperative.  If not then they went straight to jail.

In this day and age where DAs decide what laws they will enforce or not I don't doubt you, ThailandRyan.  That America is descending into chaos is not an argument I would take the opposing side on.   Still, it would be interesting to know where O.R. Releases are taking place in the country.  My assumption, and I could be wrong, is that it's in major urban areas.  I give you credit here.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Desperation now setting in. Lets get rid of the Espionage Act, wouldn't that be handy, the very act Trump is being investigated for, Paul Rand today on twitter

 

"The espionage act was abused from the beginning to jail dissenters of WWI. It is long past time to repeal this egregious affront to the 1st Amendment. Repeal the Espionage Act – The Future of Freedom Foundation"

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

In this day and age where DAs decide what laws they will enforce or not I don't doubt you, ThailandRyan.  That America is descending into chaos is not an argument I would take the opposing side on.   Still, it would be interesting to know where O.R. Releases are taking place in the country.  My assumption, and I could be wrong, is that it's in major urban areas.  I give you credit here.

Selective enforcement of the law is not something new:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_enforcement

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

I appreciate you are too deep sniffing the vapors of the Fever Swamps to even begin to understand the recklessness of 45. So brain addled is your thinking that you call 'doing your job' corruption.

 

45 had ZERO right to the docs he kept.

His counsel/he LIED in a signed affadavit in June claiming they had returned everything. That is intent to deceive and can form the basis for charging him with "conspiracy to commit espionage".

 

It would have been a gross dereliction of duty for the AG NOT to get a warrant and seize the docs 45 lied about. There is more to come.

 

The US is a democracy that operates by the rule of law. You and the Drooling Goobers of 45's cult seem to hate everything upon which the US is based. You are traitors to US ideals. You are fascists who despise democracy and prefer autocracy.

 

You lose. US wins.

I'll give you kudos for your passionate beliefs.

"45 had ZERO right to the docs he kept."

You have no way of knowing that with the certainty you express.  That much is obvious to anyone who is looking at this objectively.

"His counsel/he LIED in a signed affadavit in June claiming they had returned everything. That is intent to deceive and can form the basis for charging him with "conspiracy to commit espionage".

Again, you have zero personal knowledge of all of the details regarding whatever Trump transferred back or any of the disputes and talks between Trump and government agencies in the whole.

What you do have so far is a one-sided story put out by a media who has clearly shown they are propagandists.  And the narrative fits like a glove on your Trumpian bias.

The U.S. is not a democracy.  It's a Republic.  That you get this elemental fact wrong suggests you may be wrong about much else.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, mikeymike100 said:

 

I see, so like many others on this Forum , you seem to have your mind made up, that he is guilty, of what?

So you don't believe in Due Process?

 

I do believe in due process. I also believe the system is rigged. And that the chances of an ex prez being charged and jailed are very low. I hope I am wrong. His guilt was never in doubt. That is just who he is, and how he rolls. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Selective enforcement of the law is not something new:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_enforcement

On a case by case basis, yes.  But not across the board.  That's when a DA takes it upon himself or herself to thumb his or her nose at the legislature which passed the laws the DA is sworn to uphold but then refuses to enforce.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...