Jump to content

Retirement Visa Easiest Option


Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, steve187 said:

not the best method or the cheapest, you need a non imm visa to be able to apply for a yearly extension 'retirement' either from UK, or within Thailand as part of a conversion process from visa exempt or tourist visa entry.

keep away from agents they are costly and on the whole do something iffy, not quite legal just plain iffy.

Go to the agent

Best option

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, scubascuba3 said:

Another thread today someone just got a non imm O based on retirement online, he just proved he had something like £30k in the bank (probably 800k equivalent was the important amount)

Once again Australia is different. 

You can get 90 days non 0 over 50 age.

No need to be married etc.

(SYDNEY IS DIFFERENT FROM CANBERRA).

 

Its time to standardise the requirements at all thai embassies. 

 

https://canberra.thaiembassy.org/non-immigrant-visa-category-o-for-retirement-valid-for-90-days/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dallen52 said:

Its time to standardise the requirements at all thai embassies

Exactly! I hate when you apply with documents that have worked somewhere else--and for years, and the requirements have changed. More hoop jumping required.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't have a Thai bank account and want to arrive and relax and also have some extra time to get a tm30 organized if need be, do the Non O online at home - 8-9 questions, health insurance for 90 days, proof that you live in the area you are applying, home bank statement 800k baht equivalent , should have your emailed 90 day Non O  E-Visa in 24-48 hours.......

Edited by CANSIAM
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rmac442 said:

There seems to be a push to show helath insurance when applying for a retirement visa ... NZ guy I know refused visa because no  health insurance  (HI) !!!

What are the rules currently regarding HI ??

The OP asked about two options.

First to enter with tourist visa (or visa exempt) and obtain non O retirement in Thailand

VS

Obtain the non O retirement in UK.

The first option requires no insurance.

The second option requires insurance with 90 day cover. 

Edited by DrJack54
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CANSIAM said:

If you don't have a Thai bank account and want to arrive and relax and also have some extra time to get a tm30 organized if need be, do the Non O online at home - 8-9 questions, health insurance for 90 days, proof that you live in the area you are applying, home bank statement 800k baht equivalent , should have your emailed 90 day Non O  E-Visa in 24-48 hours.......

What a lot of unnecessary hassle.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Peterw42 said:

No agents are "government verified". Yes they work with immigration and can get around the rules, because they are paying to get around the rules, but they are not official government agents

They are not regulated either, anyone can set up as an agent, there are no rules they have to abide by. They can take your money and disappear.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rmac442 said:

There seems to be a push to show helath insurance when applying for a retirement visa ... NZ guy I know refused visa because no  health insurance  (HI) !!!

What are the rules currently regarding HI ??

As far as I know OA visa requires HI, O visa not.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, dallen52 said:

Several of the agents are basically government verified and work in with immigration. 

What you get stamped in the passport is legitimate. 

You just don't stand in line like other do.

15k baht upwards.

I know several people who use reputable agents.

not where you get the term 'government verified' from, more likely they know someone who knows someone in a position to help, what about the financial requirement that are bypassed, yes some agents  are completely legal, if they only help with collating the required documents, and maybe stand in line for you at the required office, but others are sailing close to the wind, the same as agents for driving licences, the rules are the rules and in some cases those rules are completely bypassed, there are posts on here where it is posted that IO are allowed some discretion regarding the financials, but why does it 99.9% of the time only happen when an agent is involved.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, proton said:

They are not regulated either, anyone can set up as an agent, there are no rules they have to abide by. They can take your money and disappear.

Thing is you go with a reputable agent that's been going for years, it's not difficult, hardly worth them running off with 12,500 or 25,000 baht

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, CFC said:

If I want to apply for my first retirement visa. Would it be easier to get a tourist visa and apply in Thailand or apply in the UK at the Thai Embassy in London. (I am a UK citizen)

Enter Thailand on a tourist visa.
Make sure you have the required funds in a Thai bank or monthly income required in place and go for a conversion to Retirement visa prior to the expiry of the tourist visa.

Get all the documents needed and go yourself.. visa cost 1,900 baht

no need for an expensive dodgy visa via an agent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Rmac442 said:

There seems to be a push to show helath insurance when applying for a retirement visa ... NZ guy I know refused visa because no  health insurance  (HI) !!!

What are the rules currently regarding HI ??

thats an O-A visa issued by embassy>
Not same as a O visa  ( 90 days) an then extended in country

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DrJack54 said:

The OP asked about two options.

First to enter with tourist visa (or visa exempt) and obtain non O retirement in Thailand

VS

Obtain the non O retirement in UK.

The first option requires no insurance.

The second option requires insurance with 90 day cover. 

Is the health insurance just a standard policy or do they require you to have cover for X amount.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...