Jump to content

Ukraine war: World must act now to stop Russia nuclear threat - Zelensky


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.jpeg

Zelensky warns Russians are being prepared for nuclear warfare

 

By Hugo Bachega and John Simpson
BBC News, Kyiv


Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky says Russian officials have begun to "prepare their society" for the possible use of nuclear weapons, but added he does not believe Russia is ready to use them.

 

In an interview with the BBC, President Zelensky denied having urged strikes on Russia, claiming that an earlier remark had been mistranslated.

 

"You must use preventive kicks," he said, referring to sanctions, "not attacks".

 

In recent weeks, the Ukrainian army has recaptured large swathes of territory in a successful counter-offensive that has forced Russian troops to abandon long-held positions. In what Kyiv describes as Moscow's response to its defeats, President Vladimir Putin has incorporated four partially occupied regions of Ukraine.

 

Full story: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63173443

 

BBC.jpg

-- © Copyright BBC 2022-10-08
  • Haha 2
Posted
55 minutes ago, Sydebolle said:

Did anyone tell Zelensky that Biden will fight this war to the last Ukrainean? 

Its ok, Russia's doing a mighty good job of supplying Ukraine with all it needs:

 

Ukraine's New Offensive Is Fueled by Captured Russian Weapons

 

“The Russians no longer have a firepower advantage. We smashed up all their artillery units before launching the offensive, and then we started to move ahead so fast that they didn’t even have time to fuel up and load their tanks,” said the officer. “They just fled and left everything behind.”

Combined with weapons taken during Russia’s retreat from Kyiv and other parts of northern Ukraine in April, these recent gains have turned Moscow into by far the largest supplier of heavy weapons for Ukraine, well ahead of the U.S. or other allies in sheer numbers, according to open-source intelligence analysts. Western-provided weapons, though, are usually more advanced and precise.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/ukraine-s-new-offensive-is-fueled-by-captured-russian-weapons/ar-AA12CIDc

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

A troll post from an unproved source has been removed, also a reply

 

Also removed a further troll post and reply

Posted
5 hours ago, billd766 said:

And how many hundreds of thousands of lives did they save?

 

In addition it was a world war and 77 years ago.

 

During that war the Germans were also attempting to make an atom bomb. Do you think that they would not have used it?

I'm not convinced that the US had to use nukes to beat Japan but that is literally an academic question now.

 

The current situation is completely different.

 

Two nuclear powers involved.

 

MAD has worked up till now but the dynamics have changed.

 

One side Putin openly willing to consider using tactical nukes if sovereign Russia is threatened and Putin now has FIVE annexed regions that he has illegally claimed as Russia. Ukraine has not respected Putin's scams.

 

It would be silly at this point to not take Putin's threats seriously and if he acts escalation to full nuclear war is very possible.

  • Like 2
Posted
14 hours ago, Jingthing said:

I'm not convinced that the US had to use nukes to beat Japan but that is literally an academic question now.

 

The current situation is completely different.

 

Two nuclear powers involved.

 

MAD has worked up till now but the dynamics have changed.

 

One side Putin openly willing to consider using tactical nukes if sovereign Russia is threatened and Putin now has FIVE annexed regions that he has illegally claimed as Russia. Ukraine has not respected Putin's scams.

 

It would be silly at this point to not take Putin's threats seriously and if he acts escalation to full nuclear war is very possible.

At the end of World War II Japan's suicidal defense of the island's it had captured left the US considering three options for ending the war:

 

1.  Invade Japan, losing hundreds of thousands of US troops and killing millions of Japanese troops and civilians.

 

2.  Blockade Japan and starve it into submission.  All evidence indicated that Japan would not submit until millions of its citizens had starved and a generation of survivors would be left mentally and physically damaged by malnutrition.

 

3.  Use the atomic bomb, kill over a hundred thousand civilians, and end to war.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, heybruce said:

At the end of World War II Japan's suicidal defense of the island's it had captured left the US considering three options for ending the war:

 

1.  Invade Japan, losing hundreds of thousands of US troops and killing millions of Japanese troops and civilians.

 

2.  Blockade Japan and starve it into submission.  All evidence indicated that Japan would not submit until millions of its citizens had starved and a generation of survivors would be left mentally and physically damaged by malnutrition.

 

3.  Use the atomic bomb, kill over a hundred thousand civilians, and end to war.

That is what Americans the victors are taught in school but there is more to it.

 

https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/How-the-Soviets-helped-Allies-defeat-Japan-3177012.php

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

It doesn't look like he can give up now.  The embarrassment of it would be too much.  I think he will cross the line and create a world war.  Russia will be turned into dust and a new government will be put it place.

Edited by markclover
Posted
3 hours ago, Jingthing said:

That is what Americans the victors are taught in school but there is more to it.

 

https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/How-the-Soviets-helped-Allies-defeat-Japan-3177012.php

Obviously my three option summary simplified the situation; many volumes could be written about details and hypothetical alternate histories.  And it is true that after the war in Europe ended Stalin was intent on capturing as much of Japanese held Korea, Manchuria, China and any other vulnerable lands as possible.

 

This would have certainly happened with either a US invasion or blockading of Japan.  I don't think this would have led to a better outcome for Japan or the world.  Forcing Japan into a rapid surrender prevented much of this, but the Soviet Union still seized Manchuria and Russia still holds it.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, markclover said:

It doesn't look like he can give up now.  The embarrassment of it would be too much.  I think he will cross the line and create a world war.  Russia will be turned into dust and a new government will be put it place.

It seems that way but hopefully his Russian insider peers will stop him before it's late.

An alternative would be if he can create some kind of fiction of some kind of victory. That's more of a battlefield issue. 

Posted
24 minutes ago, JetsetBkk said:

Yes - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minsk_agreements   &  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolution_of_Dignity

 

re. the Minsk Accords: When Boris Johnson went to Ukraine in April, he told Zelensky not to negotiate for peace with Russia.

All Russia wanted was for Ukraine not to join NATO.

 

And now, here we are.

 

Thanks Boris.

 

Except that the prospect for negotiations was never a serious one. Since the start of the war, Ukrainians have known this:

 

Declaring its readiness for negotiations, Russia is trying to buy time to prepare for the continuation of its aggressive policy towards Ukraine - Mykhailo Podolyak

Stating the alleged desire to resume peace talks, Russia is trying to divert the attention of Ukraine and the world community in order to buy time to prepare for the continuation of the aggressive policy. Mykhailo Podolyak, Advisor to the Head of the President's Office, emphasized this in an interview with Wirtualna Polska.

https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/zayavlyayuchi-pro-gotovnist-do-peremovin-rosiya-namagayetsya-77161

Posted
5 hours ago, JetsetBkk said:

Yes - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minsk_agreements   &  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolution_of_Dignity

 

re. the Minsk Accords: When Boris Johnson went to Ukraine in April, he told Zelensky not to negotiate for peace with Russia.

All Russia wanted was for Ukraine not to join NATO.

 

And now, here we are.

 

Thanks Boris.

 

What utter misinformation you spew, this was never about NATO and certainly not about Boris:

 

As war began, Putin rejected a Ukraine peace deal recommended by aide

But, despite earlier backing the negotiations, Putin made it clear when presented with Kozak's deal that the concessions negotiated by his aide did not go far enough and that he had expanded his objectives to include annexing swathes of Ukrainian territory, the sources said. The upshot: the deal was dropped.

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/exclusive-war-began-putin-rejected-ukraine-peace-deal-recommended-by-his-aide-2022-09-14/

 

President Zelensky: 'Ukraine won't join NATO to stop the war with Russia'

In order to find peace with Russia, president Zelensky is willing to reject NATO

https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2022/03/23/623a883fca47418c4d8b45f6.html

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...