Jump to content

Chuwit: They buy elections but can't give the people true happiness - firebrand former MP enters World Cup rights debate


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, TheFishman1 said:

Yeah I think the Prime Minister should pay for it

I think a TV network should pay and sell advertising????

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Purdey said:

It's just a game and won't lead to a better quality of life, especially as the poor gamblers will lose a lot of money. 

Especially when they do not take Iran to beat England by 4 goals!

  • Like 1
Posted

So 1.6 billion baht or 43 million USD so 10% of 70 million can watch soccer?  So like 6$ per viewer or 200 baht or 1/4 days wage per viewer.     I'm glad im not a sports fan 

  • Like 1
Posted

So how much did Chuwit donate or pledge for the happiness of the people?

 

And how about the people who don't care about football but want a free (soapy) massage? I am ready to receive donations.

  • Love It 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Elkski said:

So like 6$ per viewer or 200 baht or 1/4 days wage per viewer.     I'm glad im not a sports fan 

800.Baht days wage is for whom? Anyway, there is someone who could easily bring up that money and please his people. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Elkski said:

So like 6$ per viewer or 200 baht or 1/4 days wage per viewer. 

Maybe ask some Thai people how much money they bet on football.

Hint: A lot! Much more than 200B.

Posted
2 hours ago, Trevor Collins said:

I reside in the UK, so when I make arrangements to travel to Thailand I book my flight and car parking well in advance, to get the best possible price. Likewise, the Thai government should have bought the broadcast rights to the FIFA World Cup well in advance and not leave it to the last minute.

If they don't understand this, then maybe they should employ an outside expert to help. 

They appear to have not known the WC was on until about a week ago. No planning for it, came as a complete surprise.

Posted

I don't think Chuwit would've been squeaky clean when he nominated for elections before. Did he pay his constituents cash for votes or give them free vouchers for a soapy with an extended happy ending.

Posted
4 hours ago, nchuckle said:

Gamblers will stop gambling because WC is not on the telly ? 
Strange logic there…

We'll find a way to watch it.

 

No problem. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Purdey said:

It's just a game and won't lead to a better quality of life, especially as the poor gamblers will lose a lot of money. 

"It's just a game..........."? Nonsense! :-  

“Football is not a matter of life and death... it's much more important than that.”
 Bill Shankly

Just joking - I agree with you about these overpaid prima donnas kicking a ball about for vast sums of money!  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...