Jump to content

Thai man dead, had "genitals ripped apart" in Pit Bull attack - owner says he's had enough of his pets


Recommended Posts

Posted

What is with this whole "finding another home for dangerous animals instead of putting them down"? Surely this is a joke? Offering someone a trio of animals that mauled someone to death? 

 

Here's what these pups need: .38 special

images (13).jpeg

  • Like 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, HandsomeTallFarang said:

Here's what these pups need: .38 special

But in Thailand there is a law to protect animals from cruel owners. 

Quote

The Act forbids animal cruelty to be perpetrated towards these animals (section 20).

 

Posted

i bet this guy wouldn't even blink if someone approached him and said I have 2 young kids but I want them.... he'd hand them over without a care in the world or a single worry about what could and mostly like would happen. I just don't get this mentality in Thailand... people seem to have zero conscience here about their actions.

Posted
14 minutes ago, IvorBiggun2 said:

But that doesn't answer my question. Why are Pit Bulls so popular around the world if they're considered a danger to humans?

I wasn't answering your question. I care for dogs in semi retirement to augment my income, and was in a dog park today with a couple of small dogs where there was a really sweet natured pit bull/staffy cross whose owners have trained her to do 'party tricks' but also been very concerned to adequately socialise the animal. I am always a little concerned with dogs in my care around pit bulls and staffies, but this dog gave no indication of aggression towards people or animals.

 

When I was teaching some years back in a socio-economically depressed area, many of my students had pit bulls at home which were used in pig hunting. Sometimes when I see a pit bull with a heavily muscled owner I figure the owner wants a dog that mirrors his own personality. In Australia, the majority of pit bull owners are responsible people. To be honest, I am not sure why the breed is so popular. Hopefully it's not because people want a pet want a pet that complements their personality or to be used as a guard dog. I just don't think they are appropriate in country's that allow dangerous animals to live once they have killed or maimed, even if the owner is a nice bloke willing to pay for victims' funerals.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Photoguy21 said:

This breed of dog should be banned in Thailand. I assume all three of the dogs are going to be put to sleep. Unfortunately you cant do the same with the owner.

Not a forgone conclusion in Thailand. However what iswould be if you killed the dog heavy fine or prison.

  • Like 1
Posted

"They haven’t killed anyone else before" 

"Anyway,I’ll pay the funeral expenses "

"Jeepers,I’ve gone the extra mile with all that - why are you all still having a go at me? It’s so unfair…." ????‍♂️ 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Photoguy21 said:

This breed of dog should be banned in Thailand. I assume all three of the dogs are going to be put to sleep. Unfortunately you cant do the same with the owner.

"put to sleep"?  I don't think so.  Most veterinarians will not euthanize a dog or any other animal.  I believe that there are government (Tessaban) workers who might catch a dangerous dog, but they won't kill them.  So who is left?  The police?  Unless there is something in it for them, they will usually do nothing.  

 

Dogs are protected in Thailand by both law and custom.  Killing a dog is a crime and the killer could face both fines and prison time.  Perhaps someone with more knowledge can correct me, but I have never heard of a legal mechanism in Thailand to deal with a killer dog.

 

Having said that, after the news has died down, the dogs will probably have some sort of 'accident' and quietly die.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Callmeishmael said:

"put to sleep"?  I don't think so.  Most veterinarians will not euthanize a dog or any other animal.  I believe that there are government (Tessaban) workers who might catch a dangerous dog, but they won't kill them.  So who is left?  The police?  Unless there is something in it for them, they will usually do nothing.  

 

Dogs are protected in Thailand by both law and custom.  Killing a dog is a crime and the killer could face both fines and prison time.  Perhaps someone with more knowledge can correct me, but I have never heard of a legal mechanism in Thailand to deal with a killer dog.

 

Having said that, after the news has died down, the dogs will probably have some sort of 'accident' and quietly die.

I would do it. These animals are too dangerous to people. Kiling aperson to me is a bigger crime but no one seems to bother about that.

Posted
6 hours ago, jvs said:

Two year old pitbulls,3 of them like a loaded gun waiting to be used.

Terrible but there will be more stories like this every week or so.

Also a story about an 8 week old puppy that "attacked' some one.

Clueless people and the mai pen rai attitude.

No reason to look for the why any further.

They have never killed anyone before,what a comment!

The laws need to be changed and in a hurry!

Dog bites? bullet in the head.

Yes i can also not understand why the village people did not shoot them,

the fact is there are many guns around.

You can not talk reason with brain washed people,sad.

 

 

And bullet in the head for drunks who batter people for no reason? They can't control themselves. Same, right? Your comment lacks all good sense. Shame that others have approved it really. How about instead fining AND jailing the owner and sending the dogs for rehabilitation. But I can see you're brainwashed. And you're happy for illegal guns to be around if they can be used for your vigilantism. Yes, sad.

  • Like 1
Posted

hope is not the same one they were looking for a new home... they kind look alike

 

New home wanted for vicious Pit Bull who attacked three in household - come and collect....

 

image.jpeg

 

 

Posted
58 minutes ago, IvorBiggun2 said:

But in Thailand there is a law to protect animals from cruel owners. 

 

Does that apply to Elephants & captive Tigers too?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, webfact said:

He had looked after the three male Pit Bulls for two years and they were usually mild mannered. 

So sometimes they were not mild mannered............and there were three of them.

I believe the police should of taken them into custody for their own protection and await the Court's permission to have them put to sleep.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Harveyboy said:

not killed anyone before Whoopee..so he's fed up with them now ..just giving them away as if nothing happened ..3 bullets 3 dogs job done 

4 bullets, 3 dogs, 1 man, job done.

Posted
48 minutes ago, Speedhump said:

And bullet in the head for drunks who batter people for no reason? They can't control themselves. Same, right? Your comment lacks all good sense. Shame that others have approved it really. How about instead fining AND jailing the owner and sending the dogs for rehabilitation. But I can see you're brainwashed. And you're happy for illegal guns to be around if they can be used for your vigilantism. Yes, sad.

If you can not see the difference between people killing each other and dogs killing people then i feel sorry for you.

We are not in Kansas ,we are in Thailand.

How am i brainwashed?

Where would you send a dog in Thailand for rehabilitation?

Why don't you take in these 3 sweet little dogs?

The owner is willing to give them away and you would do such a good thing.

Oh,yes, do not forget to make your will if you do.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, IvorBiggun2 said:

You don't know much about Buddhists do you?

Nothing to do with it.  

 

They have no problem killing millions of pigs, chickens and cows every year with hammers to the head.  No problem catching and keeping wild birds in tiny cages in the full sun, no problem fishing, shooting birds of prey, killing rats and mice, no problem curtting down forests and ancient trees for 'development', not a problem burning the forests on the mountains and trapping endangered deer and wild pigs. No problem torturing elephants to 'break' them and keep them in chains for tourists entertainment etc. 

 

It's not their religion that stops them putting dangerous dogs or suffering dogs to sleep.....

 

 

Edited by jak2002003
Posted
2 hours ago, ThaiFelix said:

 

Something else that stands out in this case is that the victim was 'different", he had "some minor mental health issues".  Dogs notice things like this and it makes them uneasy.  I had a workmate who had a limp and the soi dogs gave him hell going to work everyday but ignored the rest of us.  We have 2 mentally challenged guys in our village and you can always tell when they are out and about because all the dogs go berzerk barking.  Im not excusing the dogs but its just another reason why powerful dogs should not be allowed to roam free.

Yes very true,this is the part of the dogs acting that is used to get a dog to bite.

It works really well and it is referred to as "waking up the dog"

Only used in dogsports in general.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, IvorBiggun2 said:

But that doesn't answer my question. Why are Pit Bulls so popular around the world if they're considered a danger to humans?

Try looking here to find those wonderful friendly people loving Pit bulls.

 

https://highlandcanine.com/50-most-popular-dog-breeds-in-the-world-2022/

 

or here

 

https://www.akc.org/expert-advice/dog-breeds/most-popular-dog-breeds-of-2021/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...