Jump to content

Donald Trump Jr.’s Interview With Kyle Rittenhouse Goes South In A Hurry


Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

They were just local prosecutors doing their normal taxpayer funded jobs.

But this pair of fascist bozos had to bring Jew hating into it 

Well, to be literal, he claimed that his prosecutors were funded by George Soros. Not sure someone like him is even knowledgeable enough to know that Soros is Jewish. And it's crazy enough without invoking anti-Semitism. I'm not denying that anti-Semitism accounts for a sizeble number of people who subscribe to Soros hatred, but not all. After all, there are loons who hate Soros but adore Mark Levin.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

You are extremely naive to suggest the super maga poster boy Rittenhouse and vile Trump son Don Jr. aren't well aware of one of the most widely used and notorious codes of that fascist movement -- demonizing Soros. I do realize Rittenhouse is quite dumb, but he's not that stupid either. He has been actively coached. Also, dude, look at the context, he wasn't talking about currency trading he was talking about funding progressive causes.

 

The Troubling Truth About The Obsession With George Soros (forbes.com)

 

The internet has once again exploded with a surge of social media posts about George Soros, with far-right activists and QAnon conspiracy theorists posting wildly imaginative claims related to the billionaire philanthropist. But behind the spectacle of paranoid outrage, there is a troubling and undeniable truth about the constant attacks on George Soros:

Anti-Semitism.

You can construe as much as you like. But there's no hard evidence to support your contention. On the other hand, there's plenty of evidence to support the fact that Rittenhouse's thought processes are seriously defective.

And you did not at all address the fact that there are plenty of right wingers out there who are fans of Jewish demagogues like Mark Levin or of Jewish lowlifes like Steven Miller.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, placeholder said:

You can construe as much as you like. But there's no hard evidence to support your contention. On the other hand, there's plenty of evidence to support the fact that Rittenhouse's thought processes are seriously defective.

And you did not at all address the fact that there are plenty of right wingers out there who are fans of Jewish demagogues like Mark Levin or of Jewish lowlifes like Steven Miller.

This isn't a court of law. It's a forum.

Don Jr. played along. Surely you know that he knows the maga code words. 

Rittenhouse was obviously coached by some maga zealots and whether he understands what he's doing or not, he is still doing it. 

This is about code words from the right wing.

Naming some right wing Jews is irrelevant. It's like trying to prove the maga party isn't white nationalist by naming some black Trumpists.

It's sickening to me that you seriously felt I am somehow obligated on a narrow topic like this to mention all kinds of Jews. The topic here is right wing white nationalist code which is international now.

 

Edited by Jingthing
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, placeholder said:

You're the one who made the simplistic claim that  Rittenhouse ' comment was anti-semitic

His comment was stupid and repugnant enough without bringing anti-Semitism into it.

Note that the antisemitic nature of attacks on Soros is mentioned in the yahoo article we're talking about. Charging me with inventing that aspect is just wrong.

 

In this case, we're talking only about the use of the Soros code word coming from the white nationalist right wing specifically. 

 

The code words "Soros" and "Globalists" coming from white nationalist Super Magas in the US, Orban supporters in Hungary (they are allies) and other international right wing white nationalists, are most definitely antisemitic code words.

Whether you call that simplistic or not, that is a fact.

You can find thousands of links to document that if this is a new concept to you.

If you're suggesting that Rittenhouse specifically is so mentally unfit that he should be given a pass, well, on that I will concede that could be possible. But Don Jr. definitely not. 

Edited by Jingthing
  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

He still went there with a deliberate intention to foment trouble with black protesters. Unfortunately for him (and them) it was white protesters who challenged him.

...and your evidence for this is.....

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, ozimoron said:

Vigilantism is actually illegal.

Funny then, how Rittenhouse was not charged with it. Why is that, do you think?  

 

Next thing, you will call Neighborhood Watch and the like illegal...

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Can you provide a link for that ?

The "Black" protestors bit ?

Rittenhouse has cosied up to white supremacist groups since his trial.

 

Kyle Rittenhouse, out on bail, flashed white power signs at a bar, prosecutors say

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/kyle-rittenhouse-out-bail-flashed-white-power-signs-bar-prosecutors-n1254250

 

The other case centred around a white 18-year-old named Kyle Rittenhouse. Rittenhouse shot three people during an anti-racism protest.

 

In case you missed the details of this highly polarizing case: Rittenhouse shot and killed two men and injured a third during a protest in Kenosha, Wis., in 2020. The protests were in response to the police shooting of a Black man, Jacob Blake.

 

https://theconversation.com/the-acquittal-of-kyle-rittenhouse-raises-questions-about-white-privilege-172365

 

When white people find Black protesters scary, and white vigilantes heroic, where does that leave the legal concept of ‘reasonable belief’?

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/nov/19/kyle-rittenhouse-conviction-america-white-privilege

 

November 2021, in the United States, Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted of all charges after shooting and killing Joseph Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber and wounding Gaige Grosskreutz, while they were protesting against impunity in the killing of Black people.

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2021/12/13/a-homecoming-for-mr-rittenhouse

 

Rittenhouse was photographed in a bar before the trial with apparent members of the far-right Proud Boys.

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/feds-seek-to-limit-telehealth-prescriptions-for-some-drugs/

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
Just now, ozimoron said:

Rittenhouse has cosied up to white supremacist groups since his trial.

 

Kyle Rittenhouse, out on bail, flashed white power signs at a bar, prosecutors say

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/kyle-rittenhouse-out-bail-flashed-white-power-signs-bar-prosecutors-n1254250

 

The other case centred around a white 18-year-old named Kyle Rittenhouse. Rittenhouse shot three people during an anti-racism protest.

 

In case you missed the details of this highly polarizing case: Rittenhouse shot and killed two men and injured a third during a protest in Kenosha, Wis., in 2020. The protests were in response to the police shooting of a Black man, Jacob Blake.

 

https://theconversation.com/the-acquittal-of-kyle-rittenhouse-raises-questions-about-white-privilege-172365

 

When white people find Black protesters scary, and white vigilantes heroic, where does that leave the legal concept of ‘reasonable belief’?

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/nov/19/kyle-rittenhouse-conviction-america-white-privilege

 

November 2021, in the United States, Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted of all charges after shooting and killing Joseph Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber and wounding Gaige Grosskreutz, while they were protesting against impunity in the killing of Black people.

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2021/12/13/a-homecoming-for-mr-rittenhouse

 

Rittenhouse was photographed in a bar before the trial with apparent members of the far-right Proud Boys.

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/feds-seek-to-limit-telehealth-prescriptions-for-some-drugs/

Which one of those links backs up your claim that Kyle went to the area on the night of the killings  to "foment trouble with BLACK protestors " ?

   

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...