Thai Police Say Canadian Man who Claimed he was Robbed and Attacked in Patong Lied and Started a Fight with a Group of Thai Men
By
webfact
in Phuket News
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
353
So Long And Thanks For All The Fish - Ukraine bombs Russian Nuclear Bombers
Seems you’ve served up a word salad of logical errors: post hoc, circular reasoning, cherry-picking, suppressed evidence, ad hominem, motive fallacy, false dilemma, appeal to certainty, and contextomy — all tossed together and served like it makes a coherent case. Assertions aren’t arguments. Repeating “very obviously” doesn’t make something true. That’s appeal to certainty — a shortcut for when evidence is missing. Sequence isn’t causation. Johnson visited. Talks ended. That’s post hoc — assuming A caused B just because B came after A. It’s a timestamp, not a chain of cause and effect. Assumptions aren’t proof. You start with “Zelensky must be lying,” then use that assumption to reject anything he says. That’s circular reasoning — the argument eats itself. Selective quoting isn’t analysis. You cherry-pick one line from Arakhamia, but ignore the part where he said Ukraine didn’t trust Russia and saw their offer as vague. That’s not oversight — that’s suppressed evidence. Ignoring Bucha isn’t strategy — it’s evasion. You skip over mass graves, civilian executions, and a collapse in trust like they’re background noise. That’s contextomy — removing what breaks your narrative. Speculating on motives isn’t a rebuttal. Claiming “Zelensky just wants to look good” is textbook ad hominem and motive fallacy — attacking the man because the facts don’t help you. False dilemmas don’t strengthen weak arguments. Saying Ukraine had “no choice” but to fight is a false dichotomy — as if public outrage, national will, and agency all vanished overnight. If you’re going to claim someone “ended peace talks,” you need to show how — not just when. You’re not making a case. You’re defending a belief — stitched together from selective fragments, imagined motives, and logic errors. Until then, you’re not proving a thing — you’re just trying to put lipstick on a pig. -
353
So Long And Thanks For All The Fish - Ukraine bombs Russian Nuclear Bombers
Except for no ships, no island, no harbor, and no pearls. But most important, Putin is already deeply engaged in a horrific war of territorial aggression of his own making. So It more resembles a Hiroshima of drones. End stage finding out. -
353
So Long And Thanks For All The Fish - Ukraine bombs Russian Nuclear Bombers
Except for no ships, no island, no harbor, and no pearls. But most important, Putin is already deeply engaged of a horrific war of territorial aggression of his own making. So It more resembles a Hiroshima of drones. End stage finding out. -
2
More Trump Socialism
I am a far-left-wing liberal and consider myself a socialist. Trump, IMO, is definitely not a socialist. He's an ultra-right-wing capitalist. -
1
Another earthquake, but only a little one, just after 2pm
Much less movement than the one a few weeks back. I thought the cat had jumped on my chair but she was still asleep on the sofa. Now we wait for the next shake 555. -
12
Paris football riots? What's the deal?
I think it's one of the side effects of unvetted wide open immigration.aka "diversity"
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now