Jump to content

NACC decide to prosecute: They are going after famous forensic scientist KY Pornthip over useless bomb and drug equipment


webfact

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

She should have been dealt with long ago. Her forensics reputation was in tatters a decade ago when she was the center of media attention. Describing the bomb detectors as a "mistake" isn't sufficient. She has responsibility in the debacle.

I still remember her rationale on giving the green light for the purchase of the GT detectors. Very scientific ????

 

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GT200

 

She said: "I do not feel embarrassed if the bomb detector is proven ineffective. Personally, I have never handled the device myself. But my people have used it and it is accurate every time. Long long time ago, people believed that the Earth is flat and anyone who said otherwise faced execution. Things which are not visible does not necessarily mean they do not exist. The devices are there and no one has the right to ban their use. I will continue to use it."

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, worgeordie said:

Not enough evidence ,they must be joking ,why going after her , much bigger fish involved

 

regards worgeordie

Isn't this the corruption scandal that got big joke in trouble.  Now we know why they pulled him she was protected by a soon to be ex pm and an organization we can not mention.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if these are the same units, but in Iraq they (the Iraqi recipients of US $) had these contraptions which were basically shoe boxes with coat hangers sticking out. And we had to wait at the check points. Check point are among the most dangerous places to be. They were bought at something like a couple hundred K each. A big scam. Around 2008. UK made I think. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, AlQaholic said:

Now why would a national forensic scientist even come close to involvement in the military purchasing empty boxes with bogus metal probes sticking out of them?

She was, at the time, a very high profile government scientist. Quite possibly enlisted to support the purchase of the equipment by foolishly agreeing that it was a good idea.

 

It will be interested to see if she actually profited from the purchase.

 

Too clear up the scandal requires a fall guy. Once the fall has been "taken" then it is closed. Having her as the "fall guy" also "pays back" someone who has at times proved to be a bit of a thorn in various sides. Bit of a bonus?

 

Mind you, I am surprised in a way that they are resurrecting the investigation so far down the line - all the Benzes will be parked at the back of the second hand car lots by now, and there are far more pressing problems, greater threats to society and bigger fish to fry - Chinese girls buying school uniforms and having their names embroidered on them for example!

Edited by herfiehandbag
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GT200

 

Even after the efficacy of the device was debunked by Thai and foreign scientists, Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha, then army chief, declared, "I affirm that the device is still effective."[33] The  Post commented that, "The GT200 case was a unique scandal because the devices...seemed to fool only the people closely connected to their sale and purchase."[34]

Edited by metisdead
After pasting a reply format the text you have pasted. An easy way to do this is to click the "Paste as plain text instead" option at the bottom of the reply box.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...