Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png.ca115b020ec69ba08857c310f516b40a.png

 

Tucker Carlson is preparing to unleash allies to attack Fox News in an effort to bully the network into letting him work for — or start — a right-wing rival, sources close to him tell Axios.

 

Bryan Freedman, the high-powered Hollywood lawyer Carlson retained for the contract dispute, told Axios: "The idea that anyone is going to silence Tucker and prevent him from speaking to his audience is beyond preposterous."


Why it matters: Tucker vs. Fox could reshape the conservative news world. Fox, which has seen its ratings plunge in Carlson's slot since he was let go 13 days ago, wants to sideline him by paying him $20 million a year not to work.

 

READ MORE

https://www.axios.com/2023/05/07/fox-news-tucker-carlson

 

image.png.fbfb86a7f1c98c50fbbe2ee924ad0692.png

  • Haha 2
Posted

A lot of commentators are claiming that Carlson doesn't have a chance of success without Fox's backing because of what happened in the past. But streaming and alternate networks mean the situation is very different now from what it was just a few years ago. It just depends on how long Carlson's contract has to run or if he can sue his way out of it.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, bendejo said:

In the time since TC got dumped Megyn Kelly's name has been popping up in the media feeds, coming off just as wacko as in her Fox days.  Maybe she's conspiring to re-join Fox? 

Fox and TC in a feces-slinging match?  Bring it on!

 

 

Megyn Kelly made the fatal mistake of criticizing Trump publicly and gaining employment from the enemy. Carlson is a lot smarter than that.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

America loves a 'persecuted victim' so for my money, Tucker will win this conflict. But $20 a year to sit back and do nothing....that would really tempt me.,

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
3 hours ago, onthedarkside said:

"The idea that anyone is going to silence Tucker and prevent him from speaking to his audience is beyond preposterous."

Really.  He can speak on Facebook or Instagram anytime he likes.  He can get a job at another news platform likely.  

  • Confused 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Freedman is a smart, talented, and vicious lawyer.  He will get what Tucker wants done. Hell, even Don Lemon has retained Freedman for the same reason.  


Might take a while, but you will see The Tucker back in media in some form.  Fox is feeling the wrath now of jilted viewers who are going elsewhere, and it isn&t going to improve any time soon.

 

Related news, I was shocked at listening to the ratings for The Daily Show. In the last season with Jon Stewart in 2015, they averaged 1.3 million views. These days with Trevor Noah, they are down to less than 400,000 and doing even worse in the key demographic group.  I guess talent DOES matter!

So your' still thinking is he will rise again?

Even though he has the record of firings so far!

PBS Fired

CNN Fired

MSNBC Fired

Fox News Fired

Doubtful 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

sad

Not if you were paying his inflated salary. He was getting $16 million a year to tank the ratings of a once very funny show.  Good work if you can get it!

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

So your' still thinking is he will rise again?

Even though he has the record of firings so far!

PBS Fired

CNN Fired

MSNBC Fired

Fox News Fired

Doubtful 

For sure.  Seems like he would be better serve to work independently. But he has nearly 7 million Twitter followers and was pulling in north of 3 million viewers a night on Fox.  Obviously there is a market for his brand of commentary.  Just a matter of time.  

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Not if you were paying his inflated salary. He was getting $16 million a year to tank the ratings of a once very funny show.  Good work if you can get it!

Yeah and also his gig at Hosting the 2023 Grammys too was an over payment as well! LOL

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

For sure.  Seems like he would be better serve to work independently. But he has nearly 7 million Twitter followers and was pulling in north of 3 million viewers a night on Fox.  Obviously there is a market for his brand of commentary.  Just a matter of time.  

One per cent of the population is not what I had ever considered as immpressive but you can think it, so it will be true. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

For sure.  Seems like he would be better serve to work independently. But he has nearly 7 million Twitter followers and was pulling in north of 3 million viewers a night on Fox.  Obviously there is a market for his brand of commentary.  Just a matter of time.  

His followers are not going anywhere is the truth. But thats actually their problem and not anybody elses

Some of us are ecstatic his career is over in MSM

Edited by earlinclaifornia
  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

One per cent of the population is not what I had ever considered as immpressive but you can think it, so it will be true. 

Actually, it IS impressive if you know anything about tv ratings and audience share.  Comparable shows in the same time slot were drawing less than half of Tucker's numbers.  You may not like what he says, I get that. But he does have undeniable drawing power. THAT is why so many people here disparage him and pay attention- they are afraid of his reach in the media and hope to silence him. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, Eric Loh said:

O’Reilly drew in more viewerships at his own peak and was the number one cable show for a long while and he is practically forgotten. Twitter podcast is losing its edge and advertising revenues. It’s hard to sustain interest of listeners. If that is Tucker’s plan, it is a losing proposition. No looking good for Tucker. Fox was his golden goose and he f it up. 

Bill O was older when he was dropped. He was also embroiled in a very easy to understand scandal (sexual harrassment).  A lot of his viewers rightly were disgusted by his behavior and could see the reason he needed to go. Not so here. Fox is really dropping the ball by the drip drip drip of innuendo and leaks without coming out and saying exactly their reason for cancelling Tucker.  Bill's time was also long before the power of podcasts, independent media, etc.  

  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 5

      Renew Thai DL on METV (Now that Embassy no longer gives POR)

    2. 0

      U.S. Senators Introduce Legislation to Counter UN Actions Against Israel

    3. 0

      Essex Police Under Scrutiny for Domestic Abuse Failures Amid Investigation of Allison Pears

    4. 0

      Accusations of Hypocrisy as Private Jet use Doubles Travelling to Cop29

    5. 0

      Council Tax Bills to Increase by Over £100 in April Amid Cap Freeze

    6. 0

      Elon Musk Embraces New Role as the ‘George Soros of the Right’ Alongside Trump

    7. 0

      Arrest of Suspected Serial Killer in France Sparks Outrage Over Immigration Policies

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...