7 minutes ago, candide said:

Which mistake have they made in this case? Any evidence of it? Or is it just your imagination?

That is just your imagination , you imagined that I said that .

I didn't say that the FBI made any mistakes, you just imagined that I said that 

1 minute ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

That is just your imagination , you imagined that I said that .

I didn't say that the FBI made any mistakes, you just imagined that I said that 

Then why did you feel the need to evoke it?

30 minutes ago, candide said:

The content of the documents is irrelevant to some of the potential charges, in particular the obstruction of justice charge.

 

 

So who took the documents and where did they move them to ?

   The content of the documents is also relevant  , where they the USA nuclear codes or were they the White house window cleaning bills ? 

18 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

So who took the documents and where did they move them to ?

   The content of the documents is also relevant  , where they the USA nuclear codes or were they the White house window cleaning bills ? 

Well, if you want to satisfy your curiosity about each and every aspect of this case, I'm afraid you need to spend time with our friend Google.

 

Of course, the content of the documents may be an added bonus. However, they wouldn't need it for an obstruction of justice charge. The obstruction-related statute carries the strongest sentence of a fine and a maximum 20 years in jail for each offense. 

 

 

2 minutes ago, candide said:

Well, if you want to satisfy your curiosity about each and every aspect of this case, I'm afraid you need to spend time with our friend Google.

 

Of course, the content of the documents may be an added bonus. However, they wouldn't need it for an obstruction of justice charge. The obstruction-related statute carries the strongest sentence of a fine and a maximum 20 years in jail for each offense. 

 

 

I am asking you to clarify your claims , if you make a claim, then you are required to provide evidence of those claims

   So, where were the boxes found ?

I have asked you three times now  

16 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

I am asking you to clarify your claims , if you make a claim, then you are required to provide evidence of those claims

   So, where were the boxes found ?

I have asked you three times now  

I 'm not going to spend my time searching the Internet for you.

They found extra documents, that's fact. If you want details, search for them!

Sounds like the continual witch hunt. 

If you believe this nonsense, fool you. 

13 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Sounds like the continual witch hunt. 

If you believe this nonsense, fool you. 

Maybe just abandon the national records archives? Future presidents don't need those documents anyways.

Comment on moderation removed. 

45 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Sounds like the continual witch hunt. 

If you believe this nonsense, fool you. 

Well it's already been proven that there were documents from the WH, in Mar-a-lago, so I don't know where you're coming from with your comment about a "continual witchhunt", because it is a fact, and hopefully trump will be punished accordingly.

 

Of course the trumpies and Maga-nuts will continue with their comments about a "witchhunt" and "nonsense" even if trump is found guilty, or even better, jailed.

11 minutes ago, xylophone said:

Well it's already been proven that there were documents from the WH, in Mar-a-lago

Is that illegal?

12 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Is that illegal?

Yes.  It is a violation of the Presidential Records Act.  Trump was informed of this and still refused to return documents that didn't belong to him. 

 

You really need a better news source if you were unaware of this.

10 minutes ago, heybruce said:

Yes.  It is a violation of the Presidential Records Act.  Trump was informed of this and still refused to return documents that didn't belong to him. 

 

You really need a better news source if you were unaware of this.

Disingenuous trolling is becoming a problem around here. It's entirely the reason I have reduced my presence in recent weeks.

2 hours ago, Neeranam said:

Is that illegal?

Are you that uninformed or are you just trolling?

29 minutes ago, candide said:

Are you that uninformed or are you just trolling?

I rarely follow the news.

26 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

I rarely follow the news.

Rarely use Google too, I guess.

On 5/27/2023 at 11:22 AM, riclag said:

Two of Donald Trump’s employees moved boxes of papers the day before FBI agents and a prosecutor visited the former president’s Florida home to retrieve classified documents in response to a subpoena — timing that investigators have come to view as suspicious and an indication of possible obstruction, according to people familiar with the matter.
 

How and who reports these “suspicious”and “possible” obstruction allegations to the news organizations ?

What are there motives!

Sad state of affairs my countries 3 letter agencies have created imop

 

 

You are smart enough to know ALL FBI Directors are Republicans. 

Democratic presidents appoint Republicans to run the FBI. For nearly 100 years! 

1 hour ago, Neeranam said:

I rarely follow the news.

Your post makes me believe this is a factual admittance indeed. 

2 hours ago, Neeranam said:

I rarely follow the news.

Then on what did you base your "continual witch hunt" post?

6 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Your post makes me believe this is a factual admittance indeed. 

Not sure what you mean by, 'admittance', unless you think not following the US political news is something wrong. 

Spoiler alert:  Legally there is a huge difference between inadvertently possessing classified and returning it immediately once it is identified and knowingly possessing classified and refusing to return it.

Posts moving the OP off topic have been removed. Do not attempt to hijack the OP to include others.

 

The OP is:

 

Trump workers moved Mar-a-Lago boxes a day before Justice Dept. came for documents

On 5/28/2023 at 1:05 PM, Mac Mickmanus said:

So who took the documents and where did they move them to ?

   The content of the documents is also relevant  , where they the USA nuclear codes or were they the White house window cleaning bills ? 

Good point! Anybody guess!

1 hour ago, riclag said:

Good point! Anybody guess!

Guesses and speculation are all you have and are worth nothing against the fact, and it is a fact, that Trump illegally took documents from the White House to his home at Mar a Lago.

 

Another fact is that those documents were NOT kept in a secure location.

2 hours ago, billd766 said:

Guesses and speculation are all you have and are worth nothing against the fact, and it is a fact, that Trump illegally took documents from the White House to his home at Mar a Lago.

 

Another fact is that those documents were NOT kept in a secure location.

Why hasn't Trump ben arrested and charged ?

15 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

Why hasn't Trump ben arrested and charged ?

When all else fails, complain that the investigation is going on too long.