Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, scorecard said:

And the large number of low income folks want and are entitled to a much improved quality of life and a big reduction in int income gap.

 

Like in many countries before now the greedy industrialsists will have to learn to adjust. 

no they'll be fired....and some industry will be moved to Laos, Myanmar, Cambodia....

Government mandated salaries above the value of the work leads to unemployment. If there is full employment the salaries increase on themself...for many years in China they increased 10% every year. Of course government would need to reduce cheap labor from Myanmar and Cambodia so there is a shortage in Thailand.

If you want that the poor people can buy more than reduce the taxes that hit the poor people most. And stop the mismanagement for the electric (but here government has done something for the poor.....in a stupid way but they did something).

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, h90 said:

no they'll be fired....and some industry will be moved to Laos, Myanmar, Cambodia....

Government mandated salaries above the value of the work leads to unemployment. If there is full employment the salaries increase on themself...for many years in China they increased 10% every year. Of course government would need to reduce cheap labor from Myanmar and Cambodia so there is a shortage in Thailand.

If you want that the poor people can buy more than reduce the taxes that hit the poor people most. And stop the mismanagement for the electric (but here government has done something for the poor.....in a stupid way but they did something).

Low cost wages is only one part of the situation.

High quality, high productiity, low absenteeism, also in the mix.

 

In the past several examples of manufacturers moving to Thailand for low wage cost, but soon departed because of low quality, low productiity, high  absenteeism.

 

Got to get the whole picture / all elements right. It can be done and it brings benefits to all. 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
On 7/1/2023 at 6:48 AM, herfiehandbag said:

What is required to move and pass a constitutional amendment?

 

I understand that Chapter 15, Section 256 (3), of the 2017 Constitution requires that a majority of the combined two chambers of parliament, the House and the Senate, as well as no fewer than one-third of senators, or 84 of the 250 senators. The Senate vote is guaranteed, that would give them just under a year to create the majority.

It seems there is another condition:

"The third reading also requires a majority vote of the parliament. However, that majority must also include one-third of the Senate, and 20 percent of MPs from all political parties which do not hold positions as cabinet members, Speaker of House of Representatives, or Deputy Speaker of House of Representatives."

https://prachataienglish.com/node/9086

 

I am not sure how to interpret this other condition, as it is translated in English from the original version. Is it 20% of all MPs, or is it 20% of MPs in each party?

 

Edited by candide
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, candide said:

It seems there is another condition:

"The third reading also requires a majority vote of the parliament. However, that majority must also include one-third of the Senate, and 20 percent of MPs from all political parties which do not hold positions as cabinet members, Speaker of House of Representatives, or Deputy Speaker of House of Representatives."

https://prachataienglish.com/node/9086

 

I am not sure how to interpret this other condition, as it is translated in English from the original version. Is it 20% of all MPs, or is it 20% of MPs in each party?

 

deleted

Edited by cleopatra2
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, candide said:

It seems there is another condition:

"The third reading also requires a majority vote of the parliament. However, that majority must also include one-third of the Senate, and 20 percent of MPs from all political parties which do not hold positions as cabinet members, Speaker of House of Representatives, or Deputy Speaker of House of Representatives."

https://prachataienglish.com/node/9086

 

I am not sure how to interpret this other condition, as it is translated in English from the original version. Is it 20% of all MPs, or is it 20% of MPs in each party?

 

20% of MPs in each party can not be. There are parties with only one seat in parliament. That would mean a total veto if that one MP is not present.

 

The 20% is probably a minimum requirement and refers to those present in order to have a quorum at all.

Edited by tomacht8
  • Like 1
Posted

A further photo of Prawit taking a nap today:

Netizens are laughing again at Phalang Pracharath Party leader Gen Prawit Wongsuwan, who's former junta leader & still caretaker Deputy PM, falling asleep at parliament again on Tues way before bedtime. Just siesta

Image

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 7/1/2023 at 3:06 AM, h90 said:

Is Prawit only the best the opposition can find?

Pita on one side and Prawit on the other side?

Only Abhisit is missing to make the failure complete

 

If that is the political landscape than we are doomed and wish for the return of Thaksin.....at least he wasn't stupid

I'm not sure he's that bright. He made it pretty obvious that he was in charge when his sister was PM, rather than keeping a low profile. He must have known that wasn't in line with Thai law and was an obvious excuse for the military. They took over and were similarly lacking in covering up their real intentions. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, kimamey said:

I'm not sure he's that bright. He made it pretty obvious that he was in charge when his sister was PM, rather than keeping a low profile. He must have known that wasn't in line with Thai law and was an obvious excuse for the military. They took over and were similarly lacking in covering up their real intentions. 

"He made it pretty obvious that he was in charge when his sister was PM" True, he even said that she was his clone.

 

Who believes he is coming back next month with no other intent than playing with his grandchildren?

 

And who believes he won't be jailed on arrival? If you do then please share how this would work. 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, scorecard said:

"He made it pretty obvious that he was in charge when his sister was PM" True, he even said that she was his clone.

 

Who believes he is coming back next month with no other intent than playing with his grandchildren?

 

And who believes he won't be jailed on arrival? If you do then please share how this would work. 

He announced he would be back this month, on his birthday, July 26 or around there.

Jim posted confidently many times that Tony would be a free man in Thailand on that day but Jim's gone quiet lately. 

That could be because he's away in Paris, cleaning the gravestone of the great man on the anniversary of his death yesterday. 

How Tony could come home a free man? 

A pardon from the top perhaps, with an amnesty passed in Parliament by PT, Bhumjaithai, plus some other MPs persuaded with some pieces of silver.

The trouble is PT haven't got the coveted House Speaker's post to set Parliamentary business and the watch collector can't  seem to stay awake long enough to be  PM.

 

 

Posted
On 7/1/2023 at 10:53 PM, scorecard said:

And the large number of low income folks want and are entitled to a much improved quality of life and a big reduction in int income gap.

 

Like in many countries before now the greedy industrialsists will have to learn to adjust. 

The class disparity exist today as it never has.....especially throughout the "democratic" and "developed" West, where the deeply fixated ruling oligarchs have always had their way. 

Appears to me that too many are slumbering to understand what is and what isn't - seeing cultural comparatives as competition. 

  • Confused 1
Posted
On 7/4/2023 at 12:13 PM, scorecard said:

"He made it pretty obvious that he was in charge when his sister was PM" True, he even said that she was his clone.

 

Who believes he is coming back next month with no other intent than playing with his grandchildren?

 

And who believes he won't be jailed on arrival? If you do then please share how this would work. 

There's certainly a chance he's behind everything that PT does now.

  • Like 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, kimamey said:

There's certainly a chance he's behind everything that PT does now.

They're playing for his return....

Posted

Applying the logic (though it's rather hard) that only from having hit 'ROCK BOTTOM' can a real upward ascent towards some kind of lasting, positive development occur in a society, then I wonder if the senators & all the MPs should not just forget about the PM vote altogether and put the sleepy toad in the PM's seat, without any delay. 

 

Makes sense: get the toad in there, experience the inevitable consequences, then things genuinely turn towards the light. Hopefully in my lifetime. Right now: total eclipse.

Posted

There's no hope for this nation of great natural wealth and promise, stripped by generations of cabals pretending to be honorable warriors. 

 

Whenever I see this decrepit excuse for a soldier, sat there, fat dumb and happy, I want to bring up my dinner.

 

All over him. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted (edited)
On 7/4/2023 at 6:41 PM, zzaa09 said:

The class disparity exist today as it never has.....especially throughout the "democratic" and "developed" West, where the deeply fixated ruling oligarchs have always had their way. 

Appears to me that too many are slumbering to understand what is and what isn't - seeing cultural comparatives as competition. 

"... seeing cultural comparatives as competition. "

 

What does that mean.

 

Seems to me that rampant manic capitalism, strongly encouraged in many countries is a main driver of the rich get richer and the poor get poorer situation* and which increases 'the gap', which is part of why I believe in a mixed system:

 

- Selected socialist policies: health care, education etc.

 

- Controlled capitalism. One e.g. China clamped down on Jack Ma and his massively wealthy companies because they were getting too rich. China wants to see much more spread of the wealth.

*Globalization was touted as 'the great leveler.'  In reality it made the gap bigger. 

Edited by scorecard

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...