Jump to content

EC sends Pita shareholding case to Charter Court


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, BenStark said:

Let me correct you, the second will affect the whole country if they rule to disband MF

hmmmm maybe not so sure will wait and see

Edited by Otter3737
  • Like 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, ikke1959 said:

so is facebook, line, instagram, tik tok, theTV, the smartphone. and so on.. abolish all as all is media....even a pressmeeting is media

 

What you have quoted are by definiton Media

Posted
1 hour ago, Purdey said:

Yes, I see your point but I think they can do so only if it were against the law. For instance, the question was raised whether Pita's books were media. This would make Stephen King/Tomayanti journalists so i don't believe it can be used. 

 

Having said that, what else could they find? 

Facebook posts! Social media - that's publishing media, no? There's no end to this utter tomfoolery. Wasting the court's time, but I guess they have nothing better to do. I can't understand the legal procedure here. Surely Pita's lawyers should have had an opportunity to petition the court for "No case to answer" or some such before it was kicked upstairs? Something radically wrong with the legal process.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
51 minutes ago, Otter3737 said:

By definiton Books are literature  which in turn are media  and by the leter of the law is not allowed  the law does not care about Stephen King/Tomayanti

Hey, wait a minute. Owning shares in a media company and publishing a book are 2 very different things. Anyone who has ever had an article published in a newspaper, and there must be hundreds of politicians who have, would be at risk of accusations otherwise. Or giving an interview on TV.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, bradiston said:

Facebook posts! Social media - that's publishing media, no? There's no end to this utter tomfoolery. Wasting the court's time, but I guess they have nothing better to do. I can't understand the legal procedure here. Surely Pita's lawyers should have had an opportunity to petition the court for "No case to answer" or some such before it was kicked upstairs? Something radically wrong with the legal process.

Methinks, the biggest misconception is view this as an issue centered around governmental politics, and to perhaps believe that democracy is regarded as supreme- it certainly isn't in the real corridors of power, and for that matter the average Somchai isn't so bothered either.  On the latter, yes, Thais would rather like democracy but not if upholding it requires effort.  MF will have to get more than a few hundred waving placards - a million or two more like. Snow will fall, as the Thais say. 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, bradiston said:

Hey, wait a minute. Owning shares in a media company and publishing a book are 2 very different things. Anyone who has ever had an article published in a newspaper, and there must be hundreds of politicians who have, would be at risk of accusations otherwise. Or giving an interview on TV.

you are correct  welome to Thailand

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Toolong said:

If it is against aseannow policy to allow posts that appear to encourage acts of civil disobedience that may include acts of violence that result in physical harm to parties involved or not involved in such acts, then I suppose it's more than likely moderators my disallow my comments and perhaps rightly so, but it's impossible for me to resist sincerely declaring that I think, sadly, that the only option for all those Thais justifiably outraged at the establishment's barefaced disregard of proper principles.....is an unprecedentedly large uprising against it. United in the single imperative of doing what is right,

including they who wear red, yellow, orange or any darned colour, but all Thais of reason who may have become more enlightened by the whole ugly mess. 

And boy, is it ugly. Ugly, wrong, unacceptable. ????

 

I agree but does not need to be violence      a General strke

Posted
4 minutes ago, bradiston said:

Yes, and it is the second which really takes my breath away. This was filed by "activist lawyer" Theerayut Suwannakaysorn, accusing the MFP of attempting to overthrow the democratic system, based on the MFP's declared aim of attempting to amend Section 112 of the criminal code.

 

Only in the Thai version of democracy could this happen for reasons we are not allowed to mention. But there we have it. Without amending 112 it seems there will never be an end to this, nor a way forward for democracy in Thailand.

 I think the outcome is the possibility of a crippled and unstable civilian government dictated to by a band of unelected elites. Under the 2017 Constitution, Thailand’s political future does not look promising, and years away from democricy.

Posted
25 minutes ago, Otter3737 said:

I agree but does not need to be violence      a General strke

In an ideal situation, yes, Otter, and if such a thing did happen, with a successful outcome, then I should know what true contentment is. 

 

But you are right, in a way, I don't dispute that. Just a little naive, perhaps (????).

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
9 hours ago, ikke1959 said:

The stupidity is unlimited in Thailand....The EC think they are smart by waiting till the day before the PM election to decide... But they don't have a clue about the reactions...As I said earlier this week tomorrow 13th July PM elections but the 14th of July France National Holiday... Thailand will follow soon

100% sadly.... I predict all out war.

Posted

Pita complains of unfair treatment by the Election Commission

 

CFF2F7DC-30A1-4AB2-9F18-F56A955D5072.png

 

Move Forward party leader Pita Limjaroenrat claimed today (Wednesday) that he has been unfairly treated by the Election Commission (EC), with its decision to submit the iTV share case to the Constitutional Court for consideration, without giving him a chance to defend himself.

 

Full story: https://aseannow.com/topic/1300487-pita-complains-of-unfair-treatment-by-the-election-commission/

 

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Otter3737 said:

I agree but does not need to be violence      a General strke

Which will only hurt the general public, lack of food, water, transportation, utilities, etc. 

 

It will not hurt the powerful in the slightest, in fact, the public may actually want them back to get the necessities again!

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, hughrection said:

Correct, the new rule set up by Prayut's crowd allows a non-MP to be prime minister. If they pull Pit's MP status, he can still be put forward as the new PM. ????

But ... but ... but ... he already said he has quit politics.  

Posted
1 hour ago, Otter3737 said:

I agree but does not need to be violence      a General strke

I don't agree, there is an overwhelming need for change and change cannot happen when the politicians, senators, judiciary, police and military are all completely corrupt

 

The only thing that will change them is blood on the streets and a complete root and branch change then string the horrible robbing bastards up so the next lot think twice

 

Violence should always be a last resort but I reckon there is absolutely no other option, they have shown they have zero respect for democracy or the will of the people...  

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Toolong said:

If it is against aseannow policy to allow posts that appear to encourage acts of civil disobedience that may include acts of violence that result in physical harm to parties involved or not involved in such acts, then I suppose it's more than likely moderators my disallow my comments and perhaps rightly so, but it's impossible for me to resist sincerely declaring that I think, sadly, that the only option for all those Thais justifiably outraged at the establishment's barefaced disregard of proper principles.....is an unprecedentedly large uprising against it. United in the single imperative of doing what is right,

including they who wear red, yellow, orange or any darned colour, but all Thais of reason who may have become more enlightened by the whole ugly mess. 

And boy, is it ugly. Ugly, wrong, unacceptable. ????

 

Nobody on here will be manning the barricades. Anyone tempted to should desist; photo recognition seems to work here.

Posted
2 hours ago, bradiston said:

Pita's lawyers should have had an opportunity to petition the court for "No case to answer"

Absolutely. In fact I wonder why his lawyers have not given him better legal advice from the beginning, such as return the shares or give them to the relative his father had instructed him to give them in the will. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Veiled comments about the Monarchy have been removed.   Continue and face a suspension and a possible ban.  

 

  • Like 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, champers said:

Nobody on here will be manning the barricades. Anyone tempted to should desist; photo recognition seems to work here.

wait till the holidays at the end of he month.. With Thanatorn they started, this time there is already a lot of unrest in the whole country... and tomorrow we all know what will happen and it will not be acepted

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...