ozimoron Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 17 minutes ago, nauseus said: I will. And I will only let Bill know anyway. How? By DM I presume. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Woof999 Posted August 13, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 13, 2023 On 8/12/2023 at 9:29 AM, nauseus said: And evidence is slowly emerging. Great. Nothing more to talk about until the evidence is presented then. Please, no more talk from the GOP about the existence of evidence that never materialises. We had enough of that from Rudy, Sidney and the Pillow nutter. 8 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post ozimoron Posted August 13, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 13, 2023 Jolly, who recently said voters are rejecting Republican extremism in record numbers, appeared on American Voices with Alicia Menendez where he was asked about the political ramifications of Republicans demanding a special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden, only to call the appointment of one a "sham." "They will run the messaging through November even if David Weiss never actually brings charges. Republican messaging is locked in on this." https://www.rawstory.com/gop-hunter-biden-messaging/ 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billd766 Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 1 hour ago, nauseus said: OK. I'll let you know. Thank you. I still won't be holding my breath though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post nauseus Posted August 13, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 13, 2023 1 minute ago, billd766 said: Thank you. I still won't be holding my breath though. Yep, prolly better not. They do say that requested evidence has been regularly held up by the holders of it. 1 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozimoron Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 1 minute ago, nauseus said: Yep, prolly better not. They do say that requested evidence has been regularly held up by the holders of it. It's precisely because they keep saying that we have now got a special counsel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nauseus Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 41 minutes ago, Woof999 said: Great. Nothing more to talk about until the evidence is presented then. Please, no more talk from the GOP about the existence of evidence that never materialises. We had enough of that from Rudy, Sidney and the Pillow nutter. For now, yes. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nauseus Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 3 minutes ago, ozimoron said: It's precisely because they keep saying that we have now got a special counsel. Must be true then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nauseus Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 50 minutes ago, ozimoron said: How? By DM I presume. DHL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozimoron Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 7 minutes ago, nauseus said: DHL. QED. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
placeholder Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 3 hours ago, nauseus said: That is not an answer. Just saying no isn't enough. If you don't provide a rationale why it's not, then I'm not obliged to explain further. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
placeholder Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 3 hours ago, nauseus said: Nothing has 'fizzled'. Link to Hannity please. If I supply the link to Hannity will you concede their case has fizzled? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nauseus Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 1 hour ago, placeholder said: Just saying no isn't enough. If you don't provide a rationale why it's not, then I'm not obliged to explain further. Sounds good. I can't stand any more of that. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nauseus Posted August 13, 2023 Share Posted August 13, 2023 1 hour ago, placeholder said: If I supply the link to Hannity will you concede their case has fizzled? Are you related to Weiss? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post placeholder Posted August 13, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 13, 2023 37 minutes ago, nauseus said: Are you related to Weiss? Thanks for making it clear that it's pointless to supply you with information. 1 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nauseus Posted August 14, 2023 Share Posted August 14, 2023 18 hours ago, ozimoron said: It's precisely because they keep saying that we have now got a special counsel. I doubt that has FA to do with it. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post nauseus Posted August 14, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 14, 2023 14 hours ago, placeholder said: Thanks for making it clear that it's pointless to supply you with information. It just rang of another dodgy deal is all. 1 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danderman123 Posted August 14, 2023 Share Posted August 14, 2023 if a Special Counsel were assigned to investigate me (or anyone else), given enough time, they will find something to charge. So, Hunter Biden will probably go down for something. And I certainly won't vote for him for president. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenl Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 Lol, republicans themselves, including the ones shouting hardest now, asked for Weiss to be appointed special counsel. https://www.hydesmith.senate.gov/30-gop-senators-call-special-counsel-investigation-hunter-biden 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post nauseus Posted August 16, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 16, 2023 3 hours ago, stevenl said: Lol, republicans themselves, including the ones shouting hardest now, asked for Weiss to be appointed special counsel. https://www.hydesmith.senate.gov/30-gop-senators-call-special-counsel-investigation-hunter-biden Yes, a year ago, in the hope that there would be some action - before it was plain that Weiss had no intention of doing his job - it seems the opposite if anything. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted August 16, 2023 Share Posted August 16, 2023 1 hour ago, nauseus said: Yes, a year ago, in the hope that there would be some action - before it was plain that Weiss had no intention of doing his job - it seems the opposite if anything. Some action on what? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nauseus Posted August 17, 2023 Share Posted August 17, 2023 13 hours ago, candide said: Some action on what? Anything! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozimoron Posted August 17, 2023 Share Posted August 17, 2023 On 8/14/2023 at 7:38 AM, nauseus said: I doubt that has FA to do with it. I gave a reason. Care to put up yours? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nauseus Posted August 17, 2023 Share Posted August 17, 2023 (edited) 37 minutes ago, ozimoron said: I gave a reason. Care to put up yours? Yes. I don't see Garland caring what the GOP says. Now Weiss has been 'promoted' to SC then I see that as increasing the chances that nothing will happen and that the clock runs out. Edited August 17, 2023 by nauseus 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted August 17, 2023 Share Posted August 17, 2023 It looks like they are never happy! ???? Republicans Are Mad They Got The Hunter Biden Special Counsel They Asked For https://news.yahoo.com/republicans-mad-got-hunter-biden-222225202.html 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nauseus Posted August 17, 2023 Share Posted August 17, 2023 26 minutes ago, candide said: It looks like they are never happy! ???? Republicans Are Mad They Got The Hunter Biden Special Counsel They Asked For https://news.yahoo.com/republicans-mad-got-hunter-biden-222225202.html Now, eleven months on since that request, the same group can see that it is obvious that Weiss was working to protect Hunter Biden. They suspect Weiss because he was the one who negotiated the ridiculous immunity plea deal, that was rejected by a judge recently. So, as far as the GOP is concerned, as a US Attorney, and after four years on this case, Weiss is not special at all and should not be SC. Now Blackburn et al are saying just that, as per the Yahoo story: Attorney General Merrick Garland “knows Weiss will protect Hunter,” Blackburn scoffed in a social media post on Saturday. “If Weiss negotiated the sweetheart deal that couldn’t get approved, how can he be trusted as a Special Counsel?” McCarthy said in his post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heybruce Posted August 17, 2023 Share Posted August 17, 2023 1 hour ago, nauseus said: Now, eleven months on since that request, the same group can see that it is obvious that Weiss was working to protect Hunter Biden. They suspect Weiss because he was the one who negotiated the ridiculous immunity plea deal, that was rejected by a judge recently. So, as far as the GOP is concerned, as a US Attorney, and after four years on this case, Weiss is not special at all and should not be SC. Now Blackburn et al are saying just that, as per the Yahoo story: Attorney General Merrick Garland “knows Weiss will protect Hunter,” Blackburn scoffed in a social media post on Saturday. “If Weiss negotiated the sweetheart deal that couldn’t get approved, how can he be trusted as a Special Counsel?” McCarthy said in his post. Looks like Republicans have already made up their minds that Hunter is guilty and are frustrated by their inability to find evidence of a major crime. Worse still, they can't connect President Biden to anything illegal. Rather than accept that there is nothing there, they choose to believe in a deep state conspiracy. I'm not surprised. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bkk Brian Posted August 17, 2023 Share Posted August 17, 2023 1 hour ago, nauseus said: Now, eleven months on since that request, the same group can see that it is obvious that Weiss was working to protect Hunter Biden. They suspect Weiss because he was the one who negotiated the ridiculous immunity plea deal, that was rejected by a judge recently. So, as far as the GOP is concerned, as a US Attorney, and after four years on this case, Weiss is not special at all and should not be SC. Now Blackburn et al are saying just that, as per the Yahoo story: Attorney General Merrick Garland “knows Weiss will protect Hunter,” Blackburn scoffed in a social media post on Saturday. “If Weiss negotiated the sweetheart deal that couldn’t get approved, how can he be trusted as a Special Counsel?” McCarthy said in his post. Yet Wiess and Hunter Biden’s attorneys also clashed over whether the agreement would protect the president’s son from additional charges in the future. At one point, Weiss said the investigation into Hunter Biden was ongoing, but he would not share details on the inquiry. It was not just the judge but also a dispute with the prosecutors and Hunters attorneys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nauseus Posted August 17, 2023 Share Posted August 17, 2023 1 hour ago, heybruce said: Looks like Republicans have already made up their minds that Hunter is guilty and are frustrated by their inability to find evidence of a major crime. Worse still, they can't connect President Biden to anything illegal. Rather than accept that there is nothing there, they choose to believe in a deep state conspiracy. I'm not surprised. I really don't think the Republicans would make the claims they are making if no evidence has been found. Comer says their hearings have been frustrated by the slow pace, obstruction and stonewalling of the DOJ and FBI. Any connection to President Biden may or not emerge once the oversight committee is given all of what it has requested - of course the way things have gone so far, if all that information ever gets to Comer, that would be a huge surprise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozimoron Posted August 17, 2023 Share Posted August 17, 2023 19 minutes ago, nauseus said: I really don't think the Republicans would make the claims they are making if no evidence has been found. Comer says their hearings have been frustrated by the slow pace, obstruction and stonewalling of the GOJ and FBI. Any connection to President Biden may or not emerge once the oversight committee is given all og what it has requested - of course the way things have gone so far, if all that information ever gets to Comer, that would be a huge surprise. Why don't you? Which republicans are on this oversight committee who aren't famous for telling lies. Space lasers! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now